[Sosfbay-discuss] Permanent Absentee ballots.

[Andrea Dorey]

I think technological members should sign up with email addresses in  
order to save the environment and mailing costs for the GP.  What do  
others think about this?
Andrea
On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:05 AM, cls at truffula.sj.ca.us wrote:

>
>> From: WB4D23 at aol.com
>> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:08:56 EST
>> To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
>> X-Mailer: [AOL] 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5044
>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Permanent Absentee ballots.
>
>> In a message dated 12/8/2007 1:06:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>> tnharter at aceweb.com writes:
>
>>> I'm  thinking we should think about doing a mailing to the  
>>> membership in
>>> January. If we can make an endorsement at the January meeting and  
>>> put
>>> out a mailing by the middle of the month, maybe we can influence  
>>> how  our
>>> County votes. What do you guys think?
>
>> At last Thursday's general membership meeting, there was a   
>> consensus to do
>> phone banking for GOTV.  I don't think we would  get  consensus as  
>> to the
>> presidential candidates, so no GPSCC endorsement is probably  the  
>> better courts.
>> Warner
>
> Discussion Thursday night was phonebanking for sure, but we don't have
> the cash for a newsletter type mailing.  Jim S wanted to do a  
> postcard.
> I don't think they have much impact, but it's been a long time since
> we've done one.
>
>
> Cameron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
>