[Sosfbay-discuss] Old Iran Resolution

[Gerry Gras]

I heard that some at last night's meeting preferred the
old resolution (re a possible attack on Iran).  I did not
use it because some aspects were obsolete.

But here it is for reference.

I won't be able to work any more on this before Monday.
Dana and I are going to LA, leaving in a few hours and
returning late Sunday.

Gerry


	=	=	=	=	=	=


RESOLUTION

WHEREAS,
   Iran poses no imminent nuclear threat as it could take Iran
   eight years to manufacture a nuclear device (1), or in
   extreme worst-case scenario, three years (2), and the
   International Atomic Energy Agency has found no proof that
   Iran diverted nuclear material to a weapons program (3),
   and a senior United Nations (U.N.) diplomat in Iran said
   regarding Western spy services' tips about secret Iranian
   weapons, "Pretty much all the intelligence that's come to
   us has proved to be wrong" (3); and

WHEREAS,
   up to five United States (U.S.) generals and admirals are
   willing to resign rather than approve what they see as a
   reckless attack on Iran (4), and an attack on Iran could
   backfire (5), and Senators Boxer and Feinstein have both
   called for diplomacy in accordance with international law
   rather than preemptive war (6); and

WHEREAS,
   the U.S. has ratified the U.N. Charter which states that no
   nation shall use force or threat of force against the
   territorial integrity or political independence of any
   nation (Article 2.4) and that, only if attacked, a nation
   may respond only once before informing the UN and bringing
   the conflict before the U.N. Security Council (Article 51);
   and

WHEREAS,
   Article I Section 8 of the United States Constitution
   provides that only the Congress has the authority to
   declare war; and

WHEREAS,
   inflammatory rhetoric may discourage diplomacy, it does not
   necessarily constitute a security threat.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
   that the Green Party of Santa Clara County recommend to the
   four Representatives of Santa Clara County (Anna Eshoo,
   Mike Honda, Zoe Lofgren, and Jerry McNerney) that they support
   H.R. 770 (7) "To prohibit the use of funds to carry out any
   covert action for the purpose of causing regime change in Iran
   or to carry out any military action against Iran in the absence
   of an imminent threat, in accordance with international law and
   constitutional and statutory requirements for congressional
   authorization," and request that Senators Barbara Boxer and
   Dianne Feinstein cosponsor Senator Jim Webb's bill (S. 759)
   prohibiting funds for military operations in Iran without
   the consent of Congress (8), and that they recommend an
   appropriations amendment or rider to restrict funds, such as:
  [1] No funds from any source shall be used for any military
      action against Iran, Syria, or any new target, and
  [2] Any executive violation shall be construed as a high
      crime and misdemeanor.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
   that the Green Party of Santa Clara County supports the
   International Atomic Energy Agency's efforts to verify Iran's
   nuclear activities, encourages Iran to cooperate fully with
   those efforts, and applauds the action of the United Nations
   General Assembly in condemning Holocaust denial.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
   that the Green Party of Santa Clara County send
   copies of this signed Resolution promptly to U.S. Senators
   Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Jim Webb, Bernard Sanders,
   Robert Byrd, Chair Senate Foreign Relations Committee
   Joseph Biden, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid;
   U.S. Representative Barbara Lee, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
   and Chair House Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Lantos.


(1) reprinted from NY Times in SF Chronicle on 1/27/07
     "Iran going ahead with nuclear program, UN official says
     - ElBaradei urges all sides to ratchet down tensions"
       by Mark Landler and David Sanger
     www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/27/MNG9DNQ6KP1.DTL
(2) Federation of American Scientists,
     www.fas.org/cgi-bin/ucountdown.pl;
     11th clause of Senator Bernard Sanders' Concurrent
     Resolution 13:
     http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.CON.RES.13:
(3) "UN Calls US Data on Iran's Nuclear Aims Unreliable"
       by Bob Drogin and Kim Murphy LA Times 2/25/07
 
www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-usiran25feb25,0,4451045.story?coll=la-home-headlines
(4) "US Generals `Will Quit' If Bush Orders Iran Attack"
       by Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter Sunday Times Online 2/25/07
     www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece
(5) "Attack on Iran would backfire, warns report" 3/5/07
     www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,329734502-111322,00.html
(6) "Confronting Iran: Will we learn from our mistakes and
     apply tough diplomacy-or rely once again on the failed
     doctrine of preemption?"
       by Dianne Feinstein, LA Times 4/15/06
     http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/59/19119
     On 2/26/07 Sen. Boxer wrote to a Berkeleyan that she
     believes the U.S. and the international community must
     continue to pursue diplomatic options and that she will
     continue to push for a diplomatic solution re Iran.
(7)
     http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00770:
(8) Press release on Senator Webb's website:
     http://webb.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=270138