From andid at cagreens.org Tue Jul 1 07:35:45 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:35:45 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Tesla Announces their Model S Sedan! Message-ID: <9EBDC6D2-345D-4820-933E-FF5C50A64CCA@cagreens.org> It will be built in SF Bay Area! Coming in two years! We should thank CA's Treasurer Bill Lockyer for brokering the deal with Tesla and keeping the company here. (Governor Terminator doesn't require any thanks in light of his part in vetoing clean air standards and publicizing Hummers.) See story below: > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/30/ > BATH11GGP2.DTL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Tue Jul 1 10:27:34 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Taiwan Green Party activist starts Fairtrade shop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <656467.55274.qm@web54305.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Hsu Wen-yen wanted to have a Fairtrade Labelling Organization (FLO) International-certified shop in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and started to contact the FLO International head office in 2006, only to find that the road before him was "long and winding." After many twists and turns, he obtained an FLO business license Dec. 7, 2007, issued by the FLO head office after it found that Hsu is a member of Taiwan's Green Party with a strong commitment to environmental protection and wildlife conservation efforts... The rest of the article may be found at http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/%20business/2008/06/30/163248/First%2Dcertified.htm Note: The Taiwan Green Party should not be confused with the Pan Green Alliance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Tue Jul 1 11:12:05 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:12:05 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] proposed agenda for 7/2/2008 Message-ID: <486A7375.1050600@sbcglobal.net> Green Party of Santa Clara County Proposed Agenda for Wednesday July 2-nd 2008 Selection of Facilitator, Notetaker(hardest job), Timekeeper, Vibes Watcher 5 min Introductions, Announcements, Finalizing Agenda 15 min Tabling Schedule for July 4-th weekend Fundraising ?Mailing Party ? [tentative] Treasurer's report: Reports from County Council Picnic (Caroline) VTA (Merriam) Friday night movie (?) Populate working groups ( Drew) Carol Brouillet campaign: Peter Myers campaign: Proposal: Agenda and meeting modifications Reports: Locals (activities) Recruiting (E.Brown slate delegates) Impeachment report Total time: TBD From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 1 19:55:24 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] FW: Re: impeach bush letter -- an answer to your charges - Impeachment 101 Message-ID: <2183.38.99.84.36.1214967324.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [Outreach-cmte] [Fwd: Re: impeach bush letter -- an answer to your charges] - Impeachment 101 From: "Alan Kobrin" Date: Sat, June 28, 2008 11:30 To: "OutReach" Cc: "Rebecca Tobias" "Scott McLarty" "Brent McMillan" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- It may well be a waste of time, but I decided to answer this comment sent by one reactionary reader. In any case it was good practice to summarize the impeachment arguments. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: impeach bush letter -- an answer to your charges Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:21:08 -0400 From: Alan Kobrin Reply-To: alank at spotgrafix.com To: sfic at southfloridaimpeachmentcoalition.org Mr. Dziadik, In reference to my letter about impeachment and censorship published in the Jan. 28, 2008 Miami Herald, you admonished me "not [to] waste newspaper space with such dribble." I think the word you wanted is drivel. Aside from the personal insult which is not so important, there is a very major principle you seem to be missing. I wish I knew how to make you SEE, so please indulge me, and follow this through. It will be worth your time. 1- America IS its Constitution. Without it, we have nothing special to offer this planet. It is what set this "land of the free" apart historically, why we call ourselves the "great experiment in democracy (laws made by the people)". It is what spelled out the basis for a democratic society, that which George Bush claims to be sending people to kill and die for on the other side of the world. 2- Built into that Constitution is a self-defense mechanism, the process of impeachment (basically a congressional accusation, which could lead to a trial). It was written there in order to prevent and deal with possible abuses of power or breaches of the Constitution. 3- The President, the Congress, and the Armed Forces ALL make an Oath to that Constitution, not to the president, not to a political party, not to a flag, but to the Constitution, to defend it against "all enemies, foreign and domestic." 4- If, when an abuse seems apparent, as is the case of the George Bush administration (whether you agree with that notion or not), impeachment is called for to look into the case to see whether such abuse has really gone on. Conservative elements used impeachment against Bill Clinton for absolutely frivolous reasons, in order not only to harass and hinder him and attempt to remove a political opponent from office, but also to get the public to "see" impeachment as a mere political partisan tool (instead of the safeguard of our Constitution that it is)--so it would not likely ever be used against them in the future. Indeed, it seems they succeeded in sullying the use of Impeachment itself. 5- If, in cases of seeming great abuse, impeachment is not called upon (as required by our Constitution), then: a. our Constitution becomes "defenseless", and loses its means of protection from abuse b. our Congress, by not invoking impeachment, violates its Oath of Office to defend that Constitution, and becomes complicit in possible wrong-doing c. The Constitution might never be protected again, and thus, effectively America, as we know it, will have DIED, never to be resurrected again as it was...and all our officials will have breached their Oaths to defend it. The backbone of America will be broken. So, those who say impeachment is wrong, or that there is not enough time, are effectively allowing America to commit suicide, never to to have that dream again. They will have done more damage to the US (and the world) than any Al Queda or other foreign-based enemy ever could do. It wouldn't matter any more what happens with America's wars abroad. Our security (the constitutional basis for our society) will have been severely breached, and the war at home will be LOST, our freedoms lost. Spying, torture, no habeus corpus, preemptive wars, illegal unlimited detention, infiltration of civic groups, censorship, accusing political opposition of being "terrorists," etc....does this sound like the USA you and I know? Sounds kinda like the ol' Soviet Union, doesn't it? I don't know about you, but I don't want a dictatorship implanted here. I want an ever-more-perfected democracy. George Bush has been quoted as calling the Constitution, "that goddamned piece of paper." THAT UTTERANCE, alone, is a violation of the inaugural Oath of Office he took, and the document he swore to defend; it makes him unfit to continue in that office, and should land him in the street. There is no higher political or moral duty at this time for REAL patriots to do their duty as it is required by law, by our Constitution, to impeach. There simply ARE NO higher priorities than to save America's Laws and Life. So, NO, sir, to pretend there are more important things to do in Congress during Bush's last six months, is to willingly stick one's head in the sand while America dies an ignoble death. Do you want that on your conscience? Is THAT the legacy you wish to give your children? Or might you rather have them be proud to be part of a nation that knew how to REALLY defend itself from abuse--and not just with bombs and bullets--but rather, with the Supreme Law of the Land, the US Constitution. Before you jump to conclusions and make emotional charges against those who care deeply about the future of our nation, I suggest you actually READ the 35 charges by Kucinich (no matter what physical height or looks he might have) and be able to deny all 35 of them. In any case, America has the right, the need, the Constitutional obligation, to look into such allegations for their merit. Any single one of them, if proven true, is grounds for impeachment as written in our Constitution, which, the last time I looked, still reigns as the supreme law in our land. Yours, with due respect, Alan Kobrin PS- The only connection between the impeachment charges and effort to get hearings (currently supported by a number of Democratic congresspeople, including Florida's Wexler) and the Green Party, is that our Party looked at the evidence (and there is an astonishing amount), and has been calling for impeachment of Bush & Cheney since 2003. We are glad that finally others in our nation have seen the seriousness of what has happened to the land we love, and are beginning to demand that Law be followed and our Constitution be secured so that We, the People, can be truly secure. If our Party is "not taken seriously" it is to a great degree because those in the two major parties (whom you apparently DO take seriously), in clearly anti-democratic actions and to the detriment of open public debate on the issues, prevent our group and other parties from access to public debates and the media. statesmc at bellsouth.net wrote: > Dear Sir, > > After reading you editorial in the Miami Herald I realize why > your party is not taken seriously. There was a reason why no one was > on the floor in Congress and why neither the press nor the public > cared about the little troll like person called Kucinich wasted his > time and taxpayers money by bringing up charges of impeachment. > Whether you support OUR PRESIDENT or not, and obviously you do not, > President Bush will be leaving office in 6 months. Your idea to waste > Congress's and the Senate's time on impeachment when there is so many > more important issues to deal with and the fact impeachment would take > more time then the President has in office, is just assinine. It is > time for this country to heal and come together to solve our problems > of today, not waste it's time or energy on ripping it apart on a dead > issue. Please, if your going to write letters to the editor, do not > waste newspaper space with such dribble. > > Sincerely, > > Bob Dziadik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Impeach-press-Soviet.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 15391 bytes Desc: not available URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 1 21:12:36 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 21:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] proposed agenda for 7/2/2008 In-Reply-To: <486A7375.1050600@sbcglobal.net> References: <486A7375.1050600@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <2230.38.99.84.36.1214971956.squirrel@www.greens.org> My whole suggestion was to have the talk near the beginning. Therefore I request we move Carol's talk to just after the treasurer's report and move the tabling and fundraising to after that. Put some sugar right up front -- don't bury it after what should be working group and committee work. Green is Care! Drew On Tue, July 1, 2008 11:12, Jim Doyle wrote: > Green Party of Santa Clara County > Proposed Agenda for Wednesday July 2-nd 2008 > > Selection of Facilitator, Notetaker(hardest job), Timekeeper, Vibes > Watcher 5 min > Introductions, Announcements, Finalizing Agenda 15 min > > Tabling Schedule for July 4-th weekend > > Fundraising ?Mailing Party ? [tentative] > > Treasurer's report: > > Reports from County Council > Picnic (Caroline) > VTA (Merriam) > Friday night movie (?) > Populate working groups ( Drew) > > Carol Brouillet campaign: > > Peter Myers campaign: > > Proposal: Agenda and meeting modifications > > Reports: > Locals (activities) > Recruiting (E.Brown slate delegates) > Impeachment report > > Total time: TBD > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From tnharter at aceweb.com Tue Jul 1 23:37:43 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:37:43 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] proposed agenda for 7/2/2008 In-Reply-To: <2230.38.99.84.36.1214971956.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <486A7375.1050600@sbcglobal.net> <2230.38.99.84.36.1214971956.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <486B2237.2030403@aceweb.com> Don't we need to confirm that we have indeed moved our meeting to the 1st Wednesday? Drew Johnson wrote: > My whole suggestion was to have the talk near the beginning. Therefore I > request we move Carol's talk to just after the treasurer's report and move > the tabling and fundraising to after that. Put some sugar right up front > -- don't bury it after what should be working group and committee work. > > > Green is Care! > > Drew > > On Tue, July 1, 2008 11:12, Jim Doyle wrote: >> Green Party of Santa Clara County >> Proposed Agenda for Wednesday July 2-nd 2008 >> >> Selection of Facilitator, Notetaker(hardest job), Timekeeper, Vibes >> Watcher 5 min >> Introductions, Announcements, Finalizing Agenda 15 min >> >> Tabling Schedule for July 4-th weekend >> >> Fundraising ?Mailing Party ? [tentative] >> >> Treasurer's report: >> >> Reports from County Council >> Picnic (Caroline) >> VTA (Merriam) >> Friday night movie (?) >> Populate working groups ( Drew) >> >> Carol Brouillet campaign: >> >> Peter Myers campaign: >> >> Proposal: Agenda and meeting modifications >> >> Reports: >> Locals (activities) >> Recruiting (E.Brown slate delegates) >> Impeachment report >> >> Total time: TBD >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Latest change: Added Friday's SF Critical Mass pictures and commentary. From mkmusic at greens.org Wed Jul 2 03:15:30 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:15:30 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Impeachment demonstration Thursday, 7/3 at Zoe Lofgren's office Message-ID: <486B5542.4040209@greens.org> Hi All, This week only we will be at Representative Zoe Lofgren's office on Thursday 7/3 from 3p-6p. Friday is the Fourth of July and her office is not open. This is our 34th consecutive week. After SVIC's meeting with Zoe this week we really need to be her conscience. Come out and hold IMPEACHMENT signs proudly. No matter what Zoe's decision is on impeachment hearings we will continue to show her "We The People" demand Bush and Cheney's accountability through IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS!!! Please join us this Thursday, 7/3 in front of Lofgren's office from 3:00pm - 6:00pm. We want a large presence demanding she "*DO HER JOB*." Zoe's office is at 635 N. 1st St., San Jose. (Between Taylor & Jackson St. across from the IHOP restaurant/Light Rail stop is corner of Jackson St on 1st St.) We want to be loud and proud for Impeachment hearings for Cheney and Bush. SEE YOU THERE. Thanks, Merriam Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition mkmusic03 at aol.com 408-482-6032 (Cell) svimpeach.org From snug.bug at hotmail.com Wed Jul 2 13:17:57 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:17:57 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Christopher Hitchens gets Waterboarded: "Believe Me, it's Torture" Message-ID: Believe Me, It?s Torture What more can be added to the debate over U.S. interrogation methods, and whether waterboarding is torture? Try firsthand experience. The author undergoes the controversial drowning technique, at the hands of men who once trained American soldiers to resist?not inflict?it. by Christopher Hitchens August 2008 Here is the most chilling way I can find of stating the matter. Until recently, ?waterboarding? was something that Americans did to other Americans. It was inflicted, and endured, by those members of the Special Forces who underwent the advanced form of training known as sere (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape). In these harsh exercises, brave men and women were introduced to the sorts of barbarism that they might expect to meet at the hands of a lawless foe who disregarded the Geneva Conventions. But it was something that Americans were being trained to resist, not to inflict. Exploring this narrow but deep distinction, on a gorgeous day last May I found myself deep in the hill country of western North Carolina, preparing to be surprised by a team of extremely hardened veterans who had confronted their country?s enemies in highly arduous terrain all over the world. They knew about everything from unarmed combat to enhanced interrogation and, in exchange for anonymity, were going to show me as nearly as possible what real waterboarding might be like. It goes without saying that I knew I could stop the process at any time, and that when it was all over I would be released into happy daylight rather than returned to a darkened cell. But it?s been well said that cowards die many times before their deaths, and it was difficult for me to completely forget the clause in the contract of indemnification that I had signed. This document (written by one who knew) stated revealingly: ?Water boarding? is a potentially dangerous activity in which the participant can receive serious and permanent (physical, emotional and psychological) injuries and even death, including injuries and death due to the respiratory and neurological systems of the body. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808 Windows Live Hotmail is giving away Zunes. Enter for your chance to win. Enter Now! _________________________________________________________________ Do more with your photos with Windows Live Photo Gallery. http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_photos_022008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 2 21:42:01 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Picnic, Sat Aug 9th, Sunnyvale Murphy Park Message-ID: <51286.66.159.228.19.1215060121.squirrel@greens.org> Join us for our Regional summer picnic The Annual San Mateo/Santa Clara Green Party Potluck Picnic will be held this year on August 9th at Murphy Park, 250 N. Sunnyvale Avenue, in Sunnyvale. Our table is right next to the horseshoe area. Bring something to share and your horseshoes! 11A to 4P. All are welcome. WHEN: Saturday, 9th Aug 11A - 4P WHERE: Murphy Park, 250 Sunnyvale Ave, Sunnyvale MAP: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=san+jose+4th+of+july&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl MASS TRANSIT OPTIONS: 2 blocks from Caltrain Sunnyvale Station 55 VTA bus line runs to park, 54, 53, 32 runs to Caltrain station (2 blocks away). Note: Light Rail is within cycling distance BIKE AND AUTO: Near following East-West Roads: Near El Camino, California Avenue, Between Maude, Evelyn Near Central Expressway Near following North-South Roads: Close to Mathilda and Fair Oaks exits off 101 highway. Near Wolfe From gerrygras at earthlink.net Wed Jul 2 21:47:13 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:47:13 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Betancourt Freed Message-ID: <486C59D1.3080703@earthlink.net> http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/02/10062/ Gerry From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 2 21:56:23 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Meeting Notes for GPSC General Meeting 7/02/08 Message-ID: <56916.66.159.228.19.1215060983.squirrel@greens.org> Green Party of Santa Clara County Meeting Notes Wednesday July 2-nd 2008 GPSC General Meeting Minutes 7-02-08 Fundraising ?Mailing Party ? was done before and during meeting. Start of formal meeting: 8p Present: Tian Harter, Drew Johnson, Carol Brouillet, Andrea Dorey, Caroline Yacoub, Paul Coe, Debbie Campbell, Peter Meyers, Jim Doyle, Warner Bloomberg, Fred Dupperault, Facilitator: Tian Harter vibes: Peter Meyers Time keeper: Peter Meyers Selection of Facilitator, Notetaker(hardest job), Timekeeper, Vibes Watcher 5 min Introductions, Announcements, Finalizing Agenda 15 min Tabling Schedule for July 4-th weekend Carol Brouillet for Congress talk: Tian asked her to run for congress, LoWV threw her out of a debate because she wanted to raise substantive issues. Jan 2002, first march for 9/11 Truth Hyperactivist, media activist, Deception, Conception, Perception dollars. Trying to establish balance between activism and rest of life. Truth Movement is broad ? truth is healing. Change direction of country and world. ?Real ID?, North American Union. Peter Myers for Congress talk: Has lived many places but grew up in Los Gatos, Campbell, Boston U Journalism and International Relations, 9-11 in first two weeks of college. Instinctively saw war buildup as dumb idea. Very influenced by Howard Zinn ? saw him speak several times. Peace Corps in Moldova, taught computer on 1997. Met many former Soviet military veterans. Roadtrip through south east to New Orleans. Misplaced government priorities, even in ?Bush country? ?red states? people were sick of the war. 2006 Dems claimed they were going to defund the war and then caved. When he saw Dems B.S. Peter started thinking about running for congress. Honda not a bad guy but doesn't seem to get big picture ? stop war. Ripple out new ideas, influence people, research issues and get clarity on issues. Organizing house parties in July. Treasurer's report: approx. $960 in bank, + $100 fundraising from Jim Doyle, (+ $86 in kind contribution from Carol), + $86 from Peter's campaign around $450 Outstanding: - $140 - $215 to Tian for mailing materials 4th of July 3 day America Festival tabling arrangements (Tian): Reports from County Council: Picnic (Caroline): Saturday August 9th; Murphy Park, Sunnyvale, California and Sunnyvale Ave. Caltrain 2 blocks away, 55 bus goes right by, 32 nearby. 11-4; Caroline to reserve at 9AM; wants additional folks for will need canopy for shade; horseshoes, BBQ, lawn, lawn bowling, croquet Gas Station protests, encouraging use of VTA/Caltrain (Merriam): Friday night movie (Merriam): Populate working groups ( Drew): Reports: Locals ? activities (Drew): Recruiting E.Brown slate delegates (Drew); Want help Impeachment report (Merriam, Fred) Meeting that happened w/ Lofgren (Merriam); Mountain View (); Proposal: Agenda and meeting modifications (Drew -- didn't really get to this item) close 9:50 From andid at cagreens.org Wed Jul 2 23:23:41 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:23:41 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Meeting Notes for GPSC General Meeting 7/02/08 In-Reply-To: <56916.66.159.228.19.1215060983.squirrel@greens.org> References: <56916.66.159.228.19.1215060983.squirrel@greens.org> Message-ID: Awesome, Drew! Great work. Andrea On Jul 2, 2008, at 9:56 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > Green Party of Santa Clara County > Meeting Notes Wednesday July 2-nd 2008 > > GPSC General Meeting Minutes 7-02-08 > > Fundraising ?Mailing Party ? was done before and during meeting. > > Start of formal meeting: 8p > > Present: Tian Harter, Drew Johnson, Carol Brouillet, Andrea Dorey, > Caroline Yacoub, Paul Coe, Debbie Campbell, Peter Meyers, Jim Doyle, > Warner Bloomberg, Fred Dupperault, > > Facilitator: Tian Harter > vibes: Peter Meyers > Time keeper: Peter Meyers > > Selection of Facilitator, Notetaker(hardest job), Timekeeper, Vibes > Watcher 5 min > Introductions, Announcements, Finalizing Agenda 15 min > > Tabling Schedule for July 4-th weekend > > Carol Brouillet for Congress talk: > Tian asked her to run for congress, LoWV threw her out of a debate > because > she wanted to raise substantive issues. Jan 2002, first march for 9/11 > Truth > Hyperactivist, media activist, Deception, Conception, Perception > dollars. > Trying to establish balance between activism and rest of life. Truth > Movement is broad ? truth is healing. Change direction of country and > world. ?Real ID?, North American Union. > > Peter Myers for Congress talk: > Has lived many places but grew up in Los Gatos, Campbell, Boston U > Journalism and International Relations, 9-11 in first two weeks of > college. Instinctively saw war buildup as dumb idea. Very > influenced by > Howard Zinn ? saw him speak several times. Peace Corps in Moldova, > taught > computer on 1997. Met many former Soviet military veterans. Roadtrip > through south east to New Orleans. Misplaced government > priorities, even > in ?Bush country? ?red states? people were sick of the war. 2006 Dems > claimed they were going to defund the war and then caved. When he saw > Dems B.S. Peter started thinking about running for congress. Honda > not a > bad guy but doesn't seem to get big picture ? stop war. Ripple out > new > ideas, influence people, research issues and get clarity on issues. > Organizing house parties in July. > > Treasurer's report: > approx. $960 in bank, > + $100 fundraising from Jim Doyle, > (+ $86 in kind contribution from Carol), > + $86 from Peter's campaign around $450 > Outstanding: > - $140 > - $215 to Tian for mailing materials > > 4th of July 3 day America Festival tabling arrangements (Tian): > > Reports from County Council: > Picnic (Caroline): Saturday August 9th; Murphy Park, Sunnyvale, > California and Sunnyvale Ave. Caltrain 2 blocks away, 55 bus goes > right > by, 32 nearby. 11-4; Caroline to reserve at 9AM; wants additional > folks > for will need canopy for shade; > horseshoes, BBQ, lawn, lawn bowling, croquet > > Gas Station protests, encouraging use of VTA/Caltrain (Merriam): > Friday night movie (Merriam): > Populate working groups ( Drew): > > Reports: > Locals ? activities (Drew): > Recruiting E.Brown slate delegates (Drew); Want help > Impeachment report (Merriam, Fred) > Meeting that happened w/ Lofgren (Merriam); > Mountain View (); > > Proposal: Agenda and meeting modifications (Drew -- didn't really > get to > this item) > > close 9:50 > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From andid at cagreens.org Thu Jul 3 12:16:50 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:16:50 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Minutes from General Meeting in June... Message-ID: <33FF6CEF-D190-4522-96B4-4794915214CC@cagreens.org> I guess I should have sent these out online; I handed out hardcopies at the meeting last night. Those of you who weren't there missed a heck of great meeting! (See Drew's minutes for July 2nd already online.) Hope you can come next time to see what a great job the "newbies" on the SCC County Council are doing and how this is affecting even our SCC General Meeting. Lots of great energy and fun stuff happening! Join us for the next meeting on August 6th at the San Jose Peace Center and the Regional Picnic on August 9th at Murphy Park! Andrea --------------------------------------- Minutes ? Green Party Santa Clara County, San Jose Peace Center, June 5th Meeting in session: 7:44 pm Selection of functionaries: Facilitator, Tian; Notetaker, Andrea; Timekeeper, Drew ; Vibes Keeper, Fred Others present: Gerry, Dana, Jim D, Jody, Warner, Cameron, Jim S, Merriam Introductions and announcements...[the following is reconstructed from a lost document] Warner announced memorial for Dave Wald on July 13; Fred asked for 3 items to be added to agenda. Consensus: yes, if time to do them. Items were: Growing Green with positive visibility; how to boost Pres candidate; how UN can contribute to global sustainability. Fundraising: need $2000 by September 1st for newsletter mailing?Drew reported. Warner estimated that $300 was made from the yard sale at his house. Suggested events: pancake breakfast (Drew), another yard sale, a monthly backyard party (Dana), etc. Jim S mentioned San Mateo?s sustainer donations?maybe adopt that here? Jim D report?Elaine Brown delegates (need 3); Drew volunteered to follow up. Treasurer?s Report: bank access, $902; $83; $225; $1,044. (Jim D & protem Cameron) The hat was passed to collect the usual donations and to collect expected gifts from the new SCCcc members present. SCCcc members present were introduced: top 7 elected were: Carol Brouillet, Dana St. George, Caroline Yacoub, Tian Harter, Wes Rolley, Andrea Dorey, Jim Doyle. Noted: of 4663 registered Greens, 916 (20%) voted; 55% by mail, 45% at polls. SCCcc candidates who used the LWV website were: Dana, Caroline, Tian, Wes, suggesting that it is an effective tool for candidates. The successful & fun Election Night party, reported by Tian; SMateo members also there. National Meeting & Nominating Convention, July 10-13, Chicago: reporters, Warner/Jim S There are still matters of controversy; reg fee is $225 with scholarships available. Planning to go: Cameron, Warner, Jim S, Drew, and possibly Peter Myers. Warner: were Carol & Peter on the ballot due to ROV? Jim S: if so, law was broken; 1992 lawsuit to allow GP to do it our way. Jim D: yes. Jim S will draft complaint letter if needed. No objections to this. Events: Juneteenth volunteers include: Cameron, Jim S, Drew, Dana, Tian, Andrea, Valerie, etc., with several to march in the Gay Pride parade on Sunday. We need literature to give out. Tian will contact the McKinney campaign to download their material. Cameron still has GP stuff, and will set up for the first day. Peter?s & Carol?s materials will be there too. Drew said canopy is broken again. July 4th needs volunteers to sign up. Literature needed for all upcoming events. Supplies: we need button stuff, new shirt design, updated GP issues. Discussion ensued about how much could be acquired in Chicago mtg/ convention. Delegates are empowered to view and buy some materials. $100? $50 each? Consensus was $100. Email list uses: Warner/Jim S. We need to review the proper use of these, especially multi-posting. Warner: new council needs to decide the names that will be retained on meeting list: old members? advisors? etc. Local activities: supporting campaigns. Reported by Drew. McKinney, Carol, Peter. Impeachment report, Merriam: So Bay Labor Council sending impeachment resolution; DFA will send letter to Lofgren?they?ve spent 29 weeks in front of her office. Fred: Mtn View City Council is to issue impeachment resolution on June 24th; Fred?s article appeared in Mtn View Voice urging that it is not too late to impeach. Merriam reported on SClara Board of Sups; also, Torrico and Cabellaro received impeachment proposal. A state proposition to Federal floor of Congress. Some Dems are following Pelosi: ?Impeachment is not on the table.? Fred outlined his 3 proposals: (1) Growing GP?more press releases, can we help other progressive groups, no time for forums for many people, how to attract attention, have a potluck? Warner: we need a specific proposal. Merriam: meet weekly, not monthly? Fred: (2) how to boost Pres candidate?how to give McKinney more press, blogs? Drew: use Green nexus site. Warner: need to contact Pres candidate/two local candidates?schedule now, get committee, get candidates on board with dates. Drew: Kent Mesplay campaign challenged other to a debate... Fred: (3) How UN can contribute?start a Green World Congress of Green parties worldwide; send a resolution? Drew volunteered to join Fred. Merriam: gas station project?give out literature at stations while people are still enraged at cost of tank of gas; press releases to let people know which stations and to recruit volunteers to help. Tian: next meeting on first Wednesday. Warner expressed concern about abrupt decision. Tian will conduct email poll. Meeting adjourned at 10:10 pm Meeting notes by ALD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tnharter at aceweb.com Thu Jul 3 13:27:03 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:27:03 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Critical Mass in San Francisco Message-ID: <486D3617.80301@aceweb.com> The last Friday of the month, starting at 6 PM there has been a Critical Mass ride in San Francisco since the early 1990s. Ever since the police and Mayor stopped trying to stamp it out it has started at Justin Herman Plaza. I went last month, and took a batch of pictures you can see at: http://tian.greens.org/SanFrancisco/CriticalMass/June08/index.html The event has evolved a lot since I first took pictures at it, as has my photography style: http://tian.greens.org/CriticalMassPictures.html Back then it didn't have a police escort, for one thing. In other news, tomorrow is Independence Day. Happy 4th of July! -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Latest change: Added Friday's SF Critical Mass pictures and commentary. From andi at wrytor.com Thu Jul 3 13:38:43 2008 From: andi at wrytor.com (Andrea Dorey) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:38:43 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] America Festival - July 4th NOTE the Schedule in SJ Merc... Message-ID: SJ Merc, Eye section, lists the times at the July 4th event as: Friday, noon to 10:30 pm Saturday, 3 to 10:30 pm Sunday, noon to 9 pm Free admission Discovery Meadow, Woz Way and San Carlos From andid at cagreens.org Thu Jul 3 13:44:13 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:44:13 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Fwd: America Festival - July 4th NOTE the Schedule in SJ Merc... References: Message-ID: Sorry, wrong email address earlier...here's the one I should have used for this notice. Andi Begin forwarded message: > From: Andrea Dorey > Date: July 3, 2008 1:38:43 PM PDT > To: Green South Bay Discussion > Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] America Festival - July 4th NOTE the > Schedule in SJ Merc... > > SJ Merc, Eye section, lists the times at the July 4th event as: > > Friday, noon to 10:30 pm > Saturday, 3 to 10:30 pm > Sunday, noon to 9 pm > > Free admission > Discovery Meadow, Woz Way and San Carlos > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fredd at freeshell.org Thu Jul 3 15:47:42 2008 From: fredd at freeshell.org (Fred Duperrault) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:47:42 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [PEACE] Attack on Iran] Message-ID: <486D570E.1020205@freeshell.org> Something well worth the time to read: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PEACE] Attack on Iran Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:20:22 -0400 From: Hank Stone To: Hank Stone This strikes me as an unusually level-headed look at the war our government is threatening against Iran... -------------------- Sent by James Christner christ14482 at yahoo.com http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/15607 *The Coming Attack on Iran: * *A Perfect Storm of Madness* * * *By Bernard Weiner* *Co-Editor, The Crisis Papers* * * *July 1, 2008* * * The question is not whether Iran will be attacked, but by whom and whether the bombing will commence within the next several months or shortly after the November election. The U.S. for many months has made bellicose noises about thwarting Iran's nuclear ambitions with force -- complete with a virtual repeat of its pre-war propaganda campaign prior to "shock&awe" against Iraq. Israel is reported to have just carried out a military exercise practicing for an attack on Iran. Iran is letting it be known how destructive and unconventional its retaliation would be if it is bombed. What is going on? Though one can decry it, at least one can understand why Israel, just a short missile flight from Iran, might want to take "pre-emptive" action against that country were it to possess nuclear-weapons capabilities. But what's driving the neocons in the White House to push so insistently for an attack on Iran? It seems clear that Cheney and Bush want Iran's nascent civilian nuclear program taken out now before it could become operational in a military sense five or ten years down the road. If this is true, why would the Administration have wanted to attack Iraq? For decades, you may remember, Iraq was the buffer between an ambitious, strengthening Iran and the West's strategic interests in the Middle East, and for that reason the U.S. under Reagan helped Saddam in his war against his country's Iranian neighbor. But with Iraq sinking into military/economic irrelevance after what Cheney and Bush have done to ruin that country, Iran not surprisingly is filling the political and military vacuum in that Islamic region of the Greater Middle East. The neocons argue that if Iran is not stopped now, America will lose all hopes of future influence and control in the oil-rich region. Iran would become one of the most powerful, and likely anti-U.S., players in the Greater Middle East, with all the military, economic and oil-based implications that such hegemonic power brings with it. In short, say the neocons, it's vital to stop Iran in its tracks now while the stopping is still possible. Once Iran has operational nuclear-tipped missiles -- which could be a mere ten years down the line, or less -- the entire equation would change. THE HAWKS PREPARE The neocons believe that if Iran is attacked by the U.S. and/or Israel, it could retaliate with missiles and asymmetrical warfare, but, given the firepower of U.S. and Israeli forces, its long-range military strength would be severely diminished for at least a decade or two, with little ability to successfully exercise its political authority in the region. Syria, another possible competitor for top-dog influence in the region, might try to fill the bill or, more likely, might well back off, seeing what its enemies did to both Iraq and Iran. In short, from the neo-con hawk perspective, now is the perfect time to launch a "pre-emptive" air-attack on Iran. This is the case even though CheneyBush cannot produce any conclusive evidence that Iran is working on military uses of nuclear energy; that may be in their long-range plan but, by and large, the U.S. is basing its antagonism on speculation and future fears. In short, there does not appear to be any kind of imminent Iranian threat to the U.S. or to other countries in the region. (Absent an imminent threat, an attack on a sovereign nation is regarded as illegal under international law, perhaps even a war crime.) The Republicans also note that along with the quagmire in Iraq, a war with Iran would ensure that the new American President would find himself hogtied in Iran and to a diplomatic/military/economic policy in the Greater Middle East from which it would be difficult to disentangle. Also, both presidential candidates are firm supporters of Israel and have indicated they'd be open to taking military action against Iran to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons, the difference being that McCain is more amenable to going forthrightly into a shootin' match, while Obama is willing to try diplomacy first without taking a possible attack off the table. In short, given the complexities of what's at stake in the region, and how Bush&Co. is trying to lead the new Administration into highly dangerous waters, the new President might fail badly, making it easier for a Republican victory in the 2010 Congressional elections and the 2112 presidential contest. A GAME OF HIGH-STAKES "CHICKEN"? So, there's that possible take on what is going on with regard to Iran. But what if it's all a high-stakes, all-in game of "chicken" being played out? Each side blustering, threatening an attack, but done with great restraint -- a lot of chest-beating, saber-rattling, insulting, etc., but no battles, just maneuvering to break the will of the other guy? Iran would want America to back off and let it go its own way in its own neighborhood, and the U.S. would want Iran to drop its plans for weapons-grade uranium enrichment. Look at the situation this way: The American military, and National Guard/Reserves, are not in any mood to accept another major war, as U.S. forces around the world already are stretched way too thin and are, because of the way the troops are abused, having problems meeting their recruitment quotas. Likewise, the Pentagon chiefs are not especially crazy about initiating another war, especially against Iran, given the lack of firm evidence to support such an attack. Defense Secretary Gates keeps pumping for diplomacy with Iran and plays down any saber-rattling; Admiral William Fallon -- before he was forced to resign -- was head of Central Command and was vehemently and publicly trying to block Cheney's near-compulsion for attacking Iran. In short, an attack on Iran would be almost totally a White House project with Cheney's hands all over it and is sure to engender even more retirements and then truth-telling from the resentful, angry military brass and perhaps an instantaneous upsurge of demands for impeachment of Cheney and Bush in the House. ILLUSION OF POSITIVE "LEGACY" And yet, even given that negative situation, I think Cheney and Bush are still salivating at the prospects of attacking Iran as a last spastic use of the power they've amassed for themselves. In addition, perhaps Cheney and Bush just might go for it in a final desperate attempt to establish their "legacy": They believe that eventually all Americans, and others, will realize that during their tenure they courageously and correctly began the process of bringing democracy and free-market capitalism to the "backward" Islamic countries in the Greater Middle East, even if at the point of a gun. But what if the U.S. rulers miscalculate once again, a la Iraq -- some leading neocons blithely assume that the young, anti-mullah population of Iran will rise up following an attack and overthrow their religious rulers -- and the U.S. gets sucked into a no-win quagmire all over the Middle East? What then? Maybe CheneyBush don't give a rat's petunia; in the long run, as the solipsistic Bush has said about his "legacy," he'll be dead. To gain their war, CheneyBush (along with Israel) are threatening and trying to provoke Iran into making a bad blunder in response that could be interpreted as a "hostile" act, requiring a retaliatory strike. According to Seymour Hersh, a former high-placed intelligence officer said that a secret meeting took place in Cheney's office where "the subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington." At best, in Bush&Co. calculations, an air attack using "surgical" bombing runs and laser-guided missile attacks would quickly take out Iran's military/nuclear facilities, perhaps in a day or two, with little civilian "collateral" damage. At worst, regardless of whether it's Israel or the U.S. initiating the attack, the result could lead to uncontrollable chaos and destruction -- and an oil-supply system badly wrecked, with all that implies for the economies of the U.S. and Europe -- and the clash of cultures that so many extremists, on both sides, seem almost to desire. (The U.N.'s chief nuclear official, Mohammed El Baradei, said an attack on Iran would turn the region in a "ball of fire.") And the new President would be stuck with the catastrophe. HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO WAR? So how close are we to war against Iran? Former CIA official Ray McGovern reports that upon emerging from a 90-minute White House meeting with President George W. Bush on June 4, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the two leaders were of one mind: /"'We reached agreement on the need to take care of the Iranian threat. I left with a lot less question marks [than] I had entered with regarding the means, the timetable restrictions, and American resoluteness to deal with the problem. George Bush understands the severity of the Iranian threat and the need to vanquish it, and intends to act on that matter before the end of his term in the White House."/ McGovern also quotes a member of Olmert's delegation saying that the two countries had agreed to cooperate in case of an attack by Iran, and that "the meetings focused on 'operational matters' pertaining to the Iranian threat." My best guess right now is that CheneyBush, as always divorced from the real world, will go for an attack probably later this summer, or, if not then, between the November election and the inauguration of a new President in January. Whether CheneyBush will do so with the U.S. playing the central role is unknown at this time. My guess is that the U.S. will be helpful to Israel in getting them to do the deed. (Remember that Israel bombed Saddam Hussein's nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.) Already, a huge number of America's military brass, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, have recently had mostly secret consultations with their Israeli counterparts. Neo-con Bill Kristol even suggests that if Bush thinks Obama is poised to win the presidency, he'll launch the attack either just prior to or right after the November election. In other words, better vote for McCain if you want to stop a widening war in the Greater Middle East. Political extortion of the first order. BUILDING OF A "PERFECT STORM" I would be happy to be proven wrong in all my speculations and to learn that what's happening in the Persian Gulf area is merely (!) a dangerous game of "chicken." If the latter, then someone with rational sense will veer away from the confrontation before it's too late and the region is plunged into full and total economic and military conflagration, with the spillover effect of a potential worldwide economic Depression and wars of choice throughout the region. In short, mixed in with an already-proceeding environmental collapse brought on by human-accelerated global warming, it's clear, as Hemingway might say, that there's a cataclysmic shitstorm coming. A perfect storm with untold, horrific consequences. Finally, with Iran in the crosshairs, you would think that both Congress and the mainstream media would feel obliged to start paying some major investigative attention to the likelihood of such an attack, so that we won't wind up once again falling into war without a proper and lengthy debate about the wisdom of such a move. But once again, as was the case with the runup to the war against Iraq, Congress, this time controlled by the Democrats, remains inert and the corporate media remain mostly silent or act as cheerleaders for CheneyBush policy. Prior to the "shock&awe" bombing of Iraq, those opposed to the coming attack put ten million dissenters into the streets around the globe. In contrast, today's so-called "antiwar movement" in the U.S. and elsewhere seems dormant in the face of the coming conflagration, with a lot of energy now siphoned off to the presidential campaign. DO-NOTHING CONGRESS AND "MOVEMENT" In sum, everything points to the likelihood of the coming attack with precious little countervailing power coming from the corporate media, anti-war forces, and the supposed "opposition" party, the Democrats, or the party's standard-bearer in the November election, Barack Obama. The U.S. economy already is teetering on the brink of a long-term recession, or worse, with ordinary citizens forced to work multiple jobs just to keep their families economically intact, with little extra time for political activism. According to former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter: /"[Not only is Congress failing] to put any obstacles in the way of this policy but in fact Congress is actively facilitating this policy by refusing to enact legislation that would require the president to get the consent of Congress before going into Iran. The fact that Congress has opted out from tying the president's hands reinforces, at least in the Bush administration's mind, that Congress is legitimizing the potential of action. / / / /"So when you put all of this together you start to see that there is not only a real risk of war but that those who would like to do it see that there aren't any obstacles being put in the way of their accomplishing this, which makes the likelihood of military action even greater. Everyday that goes by without Congressional action is another day that reinforces that there will be a military strike against Iran."/ Is the situation reversible before Israel and/or CheneyBush initiate the bombing runs and Tomahawk-missile attacks on Iran? Reversal may be possible if the opposition mobilizes intensely in the next few months, but, at the moment, that does not appear likely. America's dogs of war are about to be unleashed in the Greater Middle East yet again, with everyone else, the world, seemingly immobilized and ready to be treated as mere "collateral damage." It's the numbness of too much trauma. Madness, madness. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tnharter at aceweb.com Thu Jul 3 18:07:57 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:07:57 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] America Festival - July 4th NOTE the Schedule inSJ Merc... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <486D77ED.7050308@aceweb.com> What follows is the schedule as I know it. If you aren't already signed up for something, please consider taking a shift of your choice away from Tian Andrea Dorey wrote: > SJ Merc, Eye section, lists the times at the July 4th event as: > > Friday, noon to 10:30 pm Noon to 2 PM Caroline and ???? 2 PM on Peter and Tian. BTW: If someone else wants to take a shift here we would love it. > Saturday, 3 to 10:30 pm 3 PM to 6 or 7: Drew and Fred 7 on: Tim and Tian > Sunday, noon to 9 pm Noon to 4: Eric Meece and whomever I gave the other band to last night. 4 PM on: Tian and whomever shows up until Cameron takes stuff home. > > Free admission > Discovery Meadow, Woz Way and San Carlos > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Latest change: Added Friday's SF Critical Mass pictures and commentary. From andid at cagreens.org Thu Jul 3 19:19:00 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:19:00 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] America Festival - July 4th NOTE the Schedule inSJ Merc... In-Reply-To: <486D77ED.7050308@aceweb.com> References: <486D77ED.7050308@aceweb.com> Message-ID: On Jul 3, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Tian Harter wrote: > What follows is the schedule as I know it. If you aren't already > signed > up for something, please consider taking a shift of your choice away > from Tian > > Andrea Dorey wrote: >> SJ Merc, Eye section, lists the times at the July 4th event as: >> >> Friday, noon to 10:30 pm > > Noon to 2 PM Caroline and ???? > > 2 PM on Peter and Tian. > > BTW: If someone else wants to take a shift here we would love it. > >> Saturday, 3 to 10:30 pm > > 3 PM to 6 or 7: Drew and Fred Tian, I signed up for the 3-6 or 7 pm shift 2 days ago; do you NOT need me??? Andrea > > 7 on: Tim and Tian > >> Sunday, noon to 9 pm > > Noon to 4: Eric Meece and whomever I gave the other band to last > night. > > 4 PM on: Tian and whomever shows up until Cameron takes stuff home. > >> >> Free admission >> Discovery Meadow, Woz Way and San Carlos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > > -- > Tian > http://tian.greens.org > Latest change: Added Friday's SF Critical Mass pictures and > commentary. > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tnharter at aceweb.com Fri Jul 4 00:52:28 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:52:28 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] America Festival - July 4th NOTE the ScheduleinSJ Merc... In-Reply-To: <486D77ED.7050308@aceweb.com> References: <486D77ED.7050308@aceweb.com> Message-ID: <486DD6BC.1050606@aceweb.com> Please notice updates below. Help will still be appreciated on Sunday. Tian Harter wrote: > What follows is the schedule as I know it. If you aren't already signed > up for something, please consider taking a shift of your choice away > from Tian > > Andrea Dorey wrote: >> SJ Merc, Eye section, lists the times at the July 4th event as: >> >> Friday, noon to 10:30 pm > > Noon to 2 PM Caroline and ???? > 2 PM to 5 PM Dana and Gerry 5 PM to closing Peter and Tian. > > BTW: If someone else wants to take a shift here we would love it. > >> Saturday, 3 to 10:30 pm > 3 PM to 6 or 7: Drew and/or Fred and/or Andrea > > 7 on: Tim and Tian > >> Sunday, noon to 9 pm > > Noon to 4: Eric Meece and whomever I gave the other band to last night. > > 4 PM on: Tian and whomever shows up until Cameron takes stuff home. > >> Free admission >> Discovery Meadow, Woz Way and San Carlos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Latest change: Added Friday's SF Critical Mass pictures and commentary. From fredd at freeshell.org Fri Jul 4 13:08:05 2008 From: fredd at freeshell.org (Fred Duperrault) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:08:05 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [VFP_101] Celebration of the Life of David Wald : Indybay] Message-ID: <486E8325.5010202@freeshell.org> FYI. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VFP_101] Celebration of the Life of David Wald : Indybay Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:52:23 -0700 From: bernard To: Paul George , VFP -- San Jose Another event to put up on our calendars http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/06/02/18504034.php __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar Web address: groups.yahoo.com/group/VFP_101/ MARKETPLACE You rock! Blockbuster wants to give you a complimentary trial of Blockbuster Total Access. Yahoo! Groups Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Visit Your Group Yahoo! News Fashion News What's the word on fashion and style? Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. Check out the Y! Groups blog Stay up to speed on all things Groups! . __,_._,___ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Sun Jul 6 16:40:16 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 16:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] FW: So write something, dammit (Re: About Ingrid) Message-ID: <1890.38.99.84.36.1215387616.squirrel@www.greens.org> This is from the GP-US Press Secretary, Scott McLarty: Press/Media Contacts: Scott McLarty scottmclarty at yahoo.com 202-518-5624 Starlene Rankin starlene at greens.org 916-995-3805 Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 18:39:06 +0000 From: Scott McLarty Subject: [usgp-dx] So write something, dammit (Re: About Ingrid) To: > John Rensenbrink wrote: > In another post Jenefer Ellingston asks why, in all the lavish > publicity, no mention that Ingrid is a member of the Green Party. > This is the treatment we've been getting since day one. There's no > excuse for it. There seems to be a settled notion in the press that > anything about the Greens, especially good things, need to be edited > out. Hi folks John is correct. How often, when Nobel Peace Prize laureate Wangari Maathai is mentioned in the major media, have you read that she's a leader of the Kenyan Green Party? Occasions like this one are perfect opportunities for Greens to write letters to the editor, as well as op-ed submissions, articles, etc. We can mention that Ms. Betancourt's rescue is especially significant right now because it occurs on the eve of the US Green Party's national convention in Chicago and Ms. Betancourt is a Green Party leader in Colombia. See Wednesday's press release for more information & links: http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=76 If all the active members of the this discussion list wrote one letter to the editor of a newspaper for every five messages they posted here, just think of the publicity for the Green Party that would result. If we don't communicate with the public on our own behalf, no one is going to do it for us. Scott From andid at cagreens.org Mon Jul 7 09:16:52 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:16:52 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] KPFA 94.1 FM will broadcast LIVE GP Convention! (EOM) Message-ID: <7F1E6C6C-8826-4D7C-A29D-611D722E2C3E@cagreens.org> From gerrygras at earthlink.net Mon Jul 7 10:44:27 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:44:27 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] "Surviving the Fourth of July" Message-ID: <487255FB.2040506@earthlink.net> "Surviving the Fourth of July" by Chris Hedges http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/07/10164/ with lots of literary references. Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Mon Jul 7 10:52:58 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:52:58 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] "Learning From Past Disasters, Preventing Future Ones" Message-ID: <487257FA.7000601@earthlink.net> "Learning From Past Disasters, Preventing Future Ones" "Foreword to Flirting With Disaster: Why Accidents Are Rarely Accidental" by Daniel Ellsberg http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/07/10181/ Gerry From WB4D23 at aol.com Mon Jul 7 17:28:52 2008 From: WB4D23 at aol.com (WB4D23 at aol.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 20:28:52 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Dave Wald Memorial Service Sunday July 13th Message-ID: The life of Dave Wald will be celebrated this Sunday, July 13th, starting at 2 p.m., at the IBEW 332 Hall, 2125 Canoas Garden Road, San Jose, CA. Doors open at 1:30 p.m. For more info see www.sanjosepeace.org. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Mon Jul 7 18:03:52 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] FW: GP ADVISORY New update: Green Nat'l Convention (Chicago, July 10-13) schedule, other info] Message-ID: <1702.38.99.84.36.1215479032.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [G-C-F] Fwd: GP ADVISORY New update: Green Nat'l Convention (Chicago, July 10-13) schedule, other info From: "Hank Chapot" Date: Mon, July 7, 2008 15:35 To: "gpca forum" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "Green News DC" > Date: July 7, 2008 10:12:39 AM PDT > To: dcsgpnews2 at yahoo.com > Subject: GP ADVISORY New update: Green Nat'l Convention (Chicago, > July 10-13) schedule, other info > > GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES > http://www.gp.org > > For Immediate Release: > Monday, July 7, 2008 > > Contacts: > Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, cell 202-904-7614, > mclarty at greens.org > Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene at gp.org > Ruth Weill, National Convention Coordinator, 414-350-2107, ruthweill at gmail.com > Patrick Kelly, Illinois Green Party Media Coordinator, 773-203-9631, > media at ilgp.org > > > Updated information on the Green Party's 2008 National Nominating > Convention in Chicago, July 10-13 > > ? Schedule of news conferences and other media events, media > credentialing, bios of featured speakers, other essential details > > Key links: > ? 2008 Green National Convention: Live Green, Vote Green > http://www.greenparty2008.org > ? Media credentialing http://www.gp.org/forms/media > ? Video of Green presidential candidates > http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/presidential-videos.php > ? Links to Green Presidential Candidates' web sites > http://www.gp.org/committees/pcsc/index.shtml > ? Green candidate database for 2008 and other campaign information: > http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml > ? Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml > ? Green Party Speakers Bureau http://www.gp.org/speakers > ? Green Party ballot access page http://www.gp.org/2008-elections > > > WASHINGTON, DC -- The Green Party of the United States has released an > updated schedule for the party's national nominating convention, at > which the Green presidential ticket will be chosen by Green delegates. > > The convention, titled "Live Green, Vote Green," will take place July > 10-13 in Chicago (http://www.greenparty2008.org). The schedule of > news conferences and other media events and a list of guest speakers > are appended below. The nomination will take place on Saturday, July > 12 at the Chicago Symphony Center. > > Jesse Johnson, Cynthia McKinney, Kent Mesplay, and Kat Swift are the > four contenders for the Green presidential nomination. Information on > the apportionment of the party's 836 state and caucus delegates is > being compiled at "2008 Green Party Presidential Nomination Delegate > Count" (http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/Delegate-Vote-Count.php). > > Organizers of the Green National Convention are encouraging > journalists who intend to cover the event to register at the Media > Credentialing web page: http://www.gp.org/forms/media (onsite > registration is also possible, but pre-convention registration is > encouraged) > > The Green Party encourages live blogging from the convention. The > Chicago Symphony Center, convention site, will provide Internet access > for registered media. > > For video clips of Green presidential candidates: > http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/presidential-videos.php > > For further information, including details on lodging at the Palmer > House Hilton: http://www.greenparty2008.org > > ? Links to Green Presidential Candidates' web sites: > http://www.gp.org/committees/pcsc/index.shtml > Jesse Johnson http://www.jesse08.org > Cynthia McKinney http://www.runcynthiarun.org > Kent Mesplay http://www.mesplay.org > Kat Swift http://www.voteswift.org > > ? More on Green candidates running for various offices in 2008: > http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml > http://www.gp.org/elections/candidates/index.php > > > MEDIA EVENTS > Schedule for the Chicago Convention, July 10-13 (subject to change) > > > THURSDAY, JULY 10 > Location: Palmer House Hilton, 17 East Monroe Street > Media Room & Media Check-in: Clark 9, 7th floor > The Media Registration table hours: Noon - 5 pm > Press Conference Room: Clark 5, 7th floor > > ? 4 pm: Introductory news conference > Featuring Steering Committee members, Honorary Co-chairs, Illinois > Green leaders, some Illinois candidates > > ? 6 pm: Welcome reception featuring international Greens > > > FRIDAY, JULY 11 > Location: Palmer House Hilton, 17 East Monroe Street > Media Room & Media Check-in: Clark 9, 7th floor > The Media Registration table hours: 8 am - 8 pm > Press Conference Room: Clark 5, 7th floor > > ? 9 am: News conference featuring Green candidates for Congress > > ? 11 am: News conference featuring candidates for other public offices > > ? Possible afternoon press conferences (to be announced) and press > availability for Green presidential and other candidates > > ? 7-9 pm: Presidential Candidates' Forum > Moderator: Rich Whitney, 2006 candidate for Governor of Illinois > > > SATURDAY, JULY 12 > Location: Chicago Symphony Center, 220 S Michigan Avenue > Media Check-In: Mezzanine > The Media Registration table hours: 8 am - 5 pm (flexible) > Press Conference Room: Grainger Ballroom, Mezzanine Level > > ? 9 am: Press briefing and news conference with Green presidential > candidates; on-stage program begins > > ? 9:30 am: Keynote speaker Cliff Thornton > > ? 9:45 am: Adoption of the 2008 Green Party Platform > > ? 10:45 am: Keynote speakers Kathy Kelly, Malik Rahim > > ? 11:15 am: Speeches by the four Presidential Candidates > > ? 12 noon: Lunch > > ? 1 pm: Keynote speakers Omar L?pez, Dr. Jill Stein > > ? 1:30 pm: Voting, state roll call > > (Times for events after this are tentative, depending on how long it > takes to complete the nomination process) > > ? 2:30 pm: Vice Presidential acceptance speech (nominee will be > introduced by Pat LaMarche, 2004 Green nominee for Vice President) > > ? 3 pm: Presidential acceptance speech (nominee will be introduced by > David Cobb, 2004 Green nominee for President), followed by photo op > for all Green candidates and the nominees > > ? 4 pm: Press conference featuring Green nominees for President and > Vice President > > > FEATURED SPEAKERS > > ? Malik Rahim, former Black Panther and Green Party candidate, > co-founder of Common Ground Collective/Relief, an organization that > provides short-term relief to victims of hurricane disasters in the > gulf region. Visit http://www.commongroundrelief.org > > ? Kathy Kelly, co-founder of Voices in the Wilderness, an organization > that worked to end sanctions in Iraq beginning in 1996. Visit > http://www.vcnv.org > > ? Omar L?pez, teacher and Green candidate for the US House in > Illinois' 4th District, principal convenor and leader of the historic > mega-marches of March 10 and May 1, 2006, in defense of the rights of > undocumented immigrant workers and constitutional rights under attack > by the Sensenbrenner House Bill 4437. Mr. L?pez has co-founded > numerous labor, tenant, immigrants' rights, and bilingual education > organizations, and is director of C.A.L.O.R., which provides services > to Latinos affected by HIV/AIDS and other diseases. Visit > http://www.omarlopez2008.org > > ? Dr. Jill Stein, physician and founder of the Massachusetts Coalition > for Healthy Communities. Dr. Stein ran for Secretary of the > Commonwealth in 2006 with the Massachusetts Green-Rainbow Party, > garnering 351,495 votes (18%). Visit http://www.masschc.org > > ? Cliff Thornton, Jr., a long-time social justice and drug policy > reform activist and Green candidate for Governor of Connecticut in > 2006. Mr. Thornton is co-founder of Efficacy, which works for the > reform of drug laws and criminal justice policies. Visit > http://www.efficacy-online.org > > > MORE INFORMATION > > Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org > 202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN > Fax 202-319-7193 > ? 2008 Green National Convention: Live Green, Vote Green > http://www.greenparty2008.org > ? Media credentialing http://www.gp.org/forms/media > ? Video of Green presidential candidates > http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/presidential-videos.php > ? Links to Green Presidential Candidates' web sites > http://www.gp.org/committees/pcsc/index.shtml > ? Green candidate database for 2008 and other campaign information: > http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml > ? Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml > ? Green Party Speakers Bureau http://www.gp.org/speakers > ? Green Party ballot access page http://www.gp.org/2008-elections > > > ~ END ~ Hank Chapot - Oakland CA hchapot at igc.org 510.654.5311 http://hchapot.blogspot.com/ Cogito Ergo Green _______________________________________________ cal-forum mailing list cal-forum at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/cal-forum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andid at cagreens.org Mon Jul 7 21:13:48 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:13:48 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] GP Donation Letters Mailed at Lundy PO... Message-ID: They were mailed today at 5:30 PM, well ahead of the 8 PM deadline for overnight delivery. While not guaranteed, most of the 500 will be received by recipients in tomorrow's mail. Andi From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 8 04:11:38 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 04:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Elizabeth Holtzman: Impeach Bush Now Message-ID: <63625.76.126.222.234.1215515498.squirrel@www.greens.org> http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080721/holtzman Impeach Bush Now By Elizabeth Holtzman, The Nation, http://thenation.org According to a top aide, John McCain recently endorsed George W. Bush's right to wiretap American citizens without court approval, despite the clear requirements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Clearly, McCain has learned nothing from the past seven-plus years of Bush/Cheney assaults on the Constitution. _______ According to a top aide, John McCain recently endorsed George W. Bush's right to wiretap American citizens without court approval, despite the clear requirements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Clearly, McCain has learned nothing from the past seven-plus years of Bush/Cheney assaults on the Constitution. More troubling is that he doesn't seem very worried that his position will generate serious criticism. And apparently it has not. The lack of public outcry points to the likelihood that too many Americans are either confused about a President's prerogatives or have been persuaded by the years of Bush's constitutional abuses that a chief executive has the right to violate the law or subvert the Constitution in other ways. McCain's position and the response to it demonstrate how much the Bush Administration has damaged public understanding of the system of checks and balances that lies at the heart of our democracy. The framers believed that unchecked power, including unchecked executive power, was the greatest threat to our liberties, but too many citizens today perceive that danger as unreal. That is why Congress should initiate impeachment proceedings now. Impeachment is one of the few ways Congress can draw limits around presidential power and educate the country about those limits. And without the people's support for those limits, they will be breached again and again by future Presidents. The proposed revisions of FISA that recently passed the House give added urgency to the impeachment argument. Some Democrats have announced support for the bill because they believe it will restrain this and future Presidents. The bill provides that FISA is the exclusive means by which a President may authorize wiretapping. But the original FISA bill had a similar provision, and it did not stop Bush from repeatedly claiming that as commander in chief he has the authority to ignore FISA. Impeachment is the only way to force a President who steadfastly refuses to obey the law to do so. And it sends an indelible message to future Presidents as well. We know that the impeachment process, done properly, without partisan rancor and with fairness to the President, can have a hugely positive effect on public understanding of the Constitution and strengthen the democratic underpinnings of the society. This is what happened during the impeachment process against Richard Nixon. We learned that impeachment is not just a grand inquest or inquisitorial process; it is also a great teach-in--a unique opportunity for an extended and serious national discussion of checks and balances, the limits on presidential power and how to preserve our liberties. Take illegal wiretapping by a President. One of the grounds for impeachment in the House Judiciary Committee's resolution was Nixon's illegal wiretapping of journalists and White House staffers. After that resolution passed with bipartisan support, and after Nixon resigned rather than face certain impeachment and removal from office by the whole Congress, an understanding that national security wiretaps had to be carried out in accordance with the law and the Constitution continued for a quarter-century, until Bush's sledgehammer shattered it. In theory, a Supreme Court case might re-establish checks on the presidency, as the cases regarding the Guant?namo detainees have begun to do. But challenges to some of the most serious abuses of presidential power--wiretapping in violation of FISA, the mistreatment or torture of detainees, signing statements, by which the President claimed he was not bound to obey the bills he signed into law--might never be heard by the Court. An impeachment inquiry would resolve those challenges. It would also permit Congress to delve into other matters, including the President's role in outing Valerie Plame and the US Attorneys scandal, that involve possible serious abuses of power that may not otherwise be fully investigated. Bush stalls Congressional inquiries with extreme claims of executive privilege, but there is no executive privilege in an impeachment inquiry, a precedent created during the Nixon impeachment process. And without impeachment, it is hard to envision any other way of holding President Bush accountable for the deceptions, exaggerations and misstatements that drove the United States into the tragic war on Iraq. While some may argue that impeachment would divide the country, create sympathy for Bush and thus lose the presidential election for the Democrats, that need not be the case. The Nixon impeachment not only resulted in a rout of the Republicans in November; it brought Americans together as they rediscovered a shared basic value, namely, that more important than any individual or party was the rule of law itself. That process educated Congress and the country. It can again. Finally, it is not essential to finish the entire process of impeachment in the House and trial in the Senate in the few remaining months of this Congress. In the words of the Talmud: you are not required to finish the task, but neither are you free to desist from it. There will not be another opportunity to hold this President accountable in this way; and if we do not act, the signal to future generations is that impeachment, a weapon intended to defend the rule of law, has grown rusty and unusable on our watch. From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 8 05:16:41 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 05:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Free Speech Radio News covers GP-US Convention Message-ID: <60679.76.126.222.234.1215519401.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [GPCA-MediaComm] Live Green - Vote Green From: "Craig Peterson" Date: Wed, July 2, 2008 21:45 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free Speech Radio News covered the upcoming National Green Party Convention on today's broadcast. If you go to http://www.fsrn.org/content/election-unspun-july-2-green-party-convention/2716 you can listen or download the file. ***** Green Party Gearing for Green Convention Next week is the Green Party's National Convention. In Chicago, Illinois, Greens will choose their Presidential Candidate. After primaries in 28 states, the nominee is likely to be former US Representative of Georgia Cynthia McKinney. But beyond choosing a Presidential nominee, the Green Party will be compiling their national platform. We spoke with Convention Coordinator Ruth Weil. PART 2: The Greens say they have grown in stature over the years. As Phil Huckelberry, Co-Chair of the Green Party says, they will be celebrating and plotting how to make additional gains in the future. ***** _______________________________________________ GPCA-MediaWG mailing list GPCA-MediaWG at lists.cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/gpca-mediawg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alexcathy at aol.com Tue Jul 8 14:43:28 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] On Life in South Central Los Angeles Message-ID: <8CAAF5ACB1317B2-1140-1343@Webmail-mg16.sim.aol.com> Dear Green Friends, I have posted this entry on California Greening with Linda Piera-Avila's statement. On Life in South Central Los Angeles Think Green issues are for "elite" suburbanites? Think again. See below a brilliant statement about the quality of life in South Central Los Angeles by L.A. Green activist , Linda Piera-Avila. Ms. Piera testified before city planners in opposition to a proposed warehouse on the site of the South Central Urban Farm. According to "No Place to Play," a report by The Trust for Public Land, two-thirds of children 18 and under in Los Angeles do not live within walking distance of a public park. The study compared the number and percentage of children living within one-quarter mile of a park -- what's considered to be walking distance-in seven major metropolitan areas. With only one-third of children living near open space and 1.8 million children countywide lacking easy park access, Los Angeles fared worst among the areas evaluated. According to Los Angeles City's website, www.lacity.org, there are 250 parks in the city of Los Angeles. Not one is sited in the 90058 zip code, the same zip code as the proposed warehouse project ? Read more! URL: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2008/07/on-life-in-south-central-los-angeles.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alexcathy at aol.com Tue Jul 8 14:47:03 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] This 'Green Brotha' Going to Chicago Message-ID: <8CAAF5B4B3A5432-1140-1376@Webmail-mg16.sim.aol.com> Dear Green Friends, I have posted this blog entry on California Greening. ?? This 'Green Brotha' Going to Chicago ? The Los Angeles Times published a timely editorial this week on the disgraceful handling of the mess at Martin Luther King/Harbor Hospital in Watts. ? >From the Los Angeles Times, Monday, July 7, 2008. Editorial: Learning From a Death in Brooklyn On June 19, surveillance cameras in a Brooklyn, N.Y., mental ward captured shocking images of a woman collapsing on the floor and lying there, untended by hospital workers, for an hour. She soon died. The tape, released last week, touched a nerve in Los Angeles because the incident was reminiscent of the death of Edith Isabel Rodriguez at Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital in May 2007. Rodriguez lay on the emergency-room floor as a janitor mopped around her. The description of her suffering, and of the indifference of hospital workers, silenced all but the most recalcitrant defenders of the mismanaged medical center... I've made copies of the article (along with some others) to distribute when this "Green Brotha" goes to Chicago this weekend. On Super Tuesday, when Mayor Villaraigosa, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Laura Richardson, and my Congresswoman Diane Watson were all busy campaigning for Hillary, I was elected a Cynthia McKinney delegate to the 2008 Green Party National Convention. When I get there, if anybody shoves an Obama poster in my face babbling about "change" I'll shove this in his face speaking truth about the status-quo in One-Party Democratic Los Angeles. Alex Walker Los Angeles Greens July 8, 2008 Read more! ? URL: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2008/07/this-green-brotha-going-to-chicago.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 8 22:48:53 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [GPCA Official Notice] Volunteers Needed to Write Reports on November Ballot Measures Message-ID: <3584.38.99.84.36.1215582533.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [GPCA Official Notice] Volunteers Needed to Write Reports on November Ballot Measures From: "County Contacts" Date: Tue, July 8, 2008 21:53 To: "County Contacts" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- GREEN PARTY COUNTY CONTACTS MESSAGE This is an announcement from the GPCA Contact List. For more information, or questions related to the topic of the posting, please do not hit reply. Follow the contact directions stated in the email. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Volunteers Needed To Report On November 2008 Ballot Measures To: County Contacts, Green Party of California -- Please Distribute Widely to GPCA Members From: Warner Bloomberg, Campaigns and Candidates Working Group Co-Coordinator Date: July 7, 2008 Unless otherwise decided by a General Assembly of Delegates at a state meeting, the GPCA uses a County Polling process to determine state party positions on ballot measures. The CCWG has accepted the job of collecting reports to send to the County GP?s as part of that County Polling. Below is the Secretary of State Summary of Ballot Propositions (go to _www.ss.ca.gov/elections_ (http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections) ). Greg Jan (_gregjan4 at yahoo.com_ (mailto:gregjan4 at yahoo.com) ) has volunteered to facilitate the coordination of proposition reports (because the Alameda County Green Party has a long record of creating such reports). If you are interested in contributing to this effort about one or more of the ballot measure reports, please contact Greg as soon as possible. This is a time sensitive project. Reports need to be completed by the end of July so County Polling can be done during August and GPCA positions can be announced in early September. Reports need to be reasonably focused, but should have a clear explanation of the writer?s position and conclude with a recommendation that the GPCA either endorse, oppose or take no position on a particular initiative or bond measure. The writier?s name(s) and County will be included in the public report distributed on the County Contacts list to start the County Polling. Please Note: Because the County Polling period is expected to include the Plenary scheduled for August 23-24 in Riverside County, these same reports will be presented to the General Assembly of Delegates for consideration. If you have any questions about this message, contact Warner Bloomberg _wsb3attyca at aol.com_ (mailto:wsb3attyca at aol.com) . Propositions that are on the November 2008 General Election Ballot California Secretary of State, Debra Bowen, has assigned these Proposition Numbers for the November Election: Prop. 1: High Speed Rail -- SB 1856: Safe, Reliable, High Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century Prop. 2: Treatment of Farm Animals. Statute. Prop. 3: Children?s Hospital Bond Act. Grant Program. Statute. Prop. 4: Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor?s Pregnancy. Constitutional Amendment. Prop. 5: Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. Prop. 6: Criminal Penalties and Laws. Public Safety Funding. Statute. (Anti-Gang Penalties; Runner Initiative) Prop. 7: Renewable Energy Requirements Statute Prop. 8: Limit on Marriage. Constitutional Amendment. (Same Sex Marriage ban) Prop. 9: Criminal Justice System. Victims? Rights. Parole. Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Prop. 10: Bonds. Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Statute. Prop. 11: Redistricting. Constitutional Amendment and Statute. _http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm_ (http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm) _______________________________________________ Contacts2006 mailing list Contacts2006 at lists.cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/contacts2006 From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Wed Jul 9 07:10:16 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Congressional Approval Falls to Single Digits for First Time Ever In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <969590.73012.qm@web54302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Just 3% of those voters not affiliated with either party give Congress positive ratings, down from 6% last month. 63% believe Congress is doing a poor job, up from 57% last month The majority of voters (62%) say Congress has not passed any legislation to improve life in America. 55% of voters find it unlikely that Congress will address important problems facing our nation in the near future. For the full article, visit: http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance/congressional_performance -Edward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Wed Jul 9 08:57:47 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:57:47 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [gpca-erwg] From Krist Novoselic:Wed"July 9th in San Francisco -- Bring Ranked Choice Voting to the USA!"] Message-ID: <4874DFFB.8060307@earthlink.net> -------- Original Message -------- --- On Tue, 7/8/08, Steven Hill wrote: From: Steven Hill Subject: From Krist Novoselic: "July 9th in San Francisco -- Bring Ranked Choice Voting to the USA!" To: "Steven Hill" Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 10:37 AM Dear friends, I hope to see some of you at this event/fundraiser with Nirvana bassist Krist Novoselic in San Francisco (Wednesday evening [today] at 7:30 pm at the Foreign Cinema in the Mission district). This November, ranked choice voting/instant runoff voting is on the ballot in Memphis, TN, Glendale, AZ and St. Paul, MN. Also soon we will know if proportional representation will be on the ballot in Cincinnati. Fundraisers are being organized around the country to support these important reform efforts. Please come and join myself, Krist, Rob Richie from FairVote and others for this fundraiser in San Francisco. We have some great opportunities for big wins this fall. Every dollar raised on July 9th is going to these campaigns. See below the note from Krist about it. Here are the details about the event: WHEN: 7:30 pm to 9 pm, July 9, Wednesday evening WHERE: Foreign Cinema, 2534 Mission Street, San Francisco, http://www.foreigncinema.com/directions/ Please forward this to your own lists and help us spread the word. Thanks Steven ###################### From Krist Novoselic Greetings! I'm writing to invite you to be a part of something special. On July 9th at 7:30 pm, I will be joined by FairVote's Rob Richie, New America Foundation's Steven Hill and local leaders in the drive for one of the most compelling electoral reforms of our time: ranked choice voting. Full details are below and at http://www.fairvote.org/sfevent - but we'll gather from 7:30 to 9 pm at Foreign Cinema in downtown San Francisco. Some of you know ranked choice voting as instant runoff voting. Some of you as majority voting. I know it as the key to unlocking a new wave of democracy. This year holds every promise to open that door to ranked choice voting all across America. But we need your help. Hundreds of thousands of voters will shortly be voting on ranked choice voting. Ranked choice voting has already qualified for the ballot in: * Memphis, Tennessee: A charter commission unanimously recommended ranked choice voting in the second largest city in the southeastern United States. * St. Paul, Minnesota: A broadly and deeply supported petition campaign promises to have St. Paul join its "twin city" Minneapolis in adopting ranked choice voting, boosting efforts for statewide adoption. * Glendale, Arizona: Home of the 2008 Super Bowl, Glendale will vote on a ballot measure backed by the League of Women Voters of Arizona in a state where ranked choice voting promises to spread quickly. In addition, Los Angeles holds every promise to vote on ranked choice voting in the coming year, quite possibly as soon as March. In Ohio, Cincinnati may have a chance to bring back the "proportional voting" form of ranked choice voting. Other cities are moving to ballot measures as well. These advances are happening in the midst of a presidential campaign where every single leading candidate -- including major party nominees Barack Obama and John McCain -- support ranked choice voting. A sweep of these campaigns will create real conditions for change. We can do it. Advocates for ranked choice voting indeed have won 13 of the last 14 local ballot measures advancing this quietly powerful election reform. But we need your help. I chair FairVote and have an obligation to raise funds to keep its work moving forward. But that's not why we're holding this event. On July 9th, we have one and only one purpose: supporting campaigns for ranked choice voting. Every dollar we raise will go to action in the next six months. So please -- join us in a wonderful venue for drinks, food and a discussion on how election reform can transform democracy as we know it. I will be joined at the event by our host committee: David Wilner, Aleks Totic and Mitzi Johnson. WHEN: 7:30 pm to 9 pm, July 9 WHERE: Foreign Cinema, http://www.foreigncinema.com/directions/ WHAT: Updates on this fall's campaigns and how they fit into a national strategic vision for reform WHO: Krist Novoselic, Steven Hill, Rob Richie -- and many more, including you! For more information, please contact FairVote at rsvp at fairvote.org. If you cannot attend, I encourage you to make a contribution to help advance the way democracy will be at http://www.fairvote.org/donate/. Thank you, Krist Novoselic, Chair, FairVote -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nsmail.txt URL: From andid at cagreens.org Wed Jul 9 21:28:02 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:28:02 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Fwd: Email of the year... References: <97072.11387.qm@web54002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1DEB2497-A369-4A17-8894-19F73D1F08E8@cagreens.org> Here's what our brilliant organizers in AARP are circulating re Iraq. Just thought you might want to know what you're up against should you be planning to try to educate this outfit and other patriotic American brain trusts like them?and while you read this, think "framing, framing, framing..." Andrea > This is an email from Keith Bauer, State Volunteer Mobilizer > Subject: Email of the year... > > > > > > WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT TO TURN ON THE TV AND HEAR ANY U.S. PRESIDENT, > DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN, GIVE THE FOLLOWING SPEECH? > 'My Fellow Americans: As you all know, the defeat of the Iraq > regime has been completed. > > Since congress does not want to spend any more money on this war, > our mission in Iraq is complete. > > This morning I gave the order for a complete removal of all > American forces from Iraq . This action will be complete within 30 > days. It is now time to begin the reckoning. > > > Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of > countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict. > This list is short. The United Kingdom, Spain, Bulgaria, Australia, > and Poland are some of the countries listed there. > > The other list contains every one not on the first list. Most of > the world's nations are on that list. My press secretary will be > distributing copies of both lists later this evening. > > Let me start by saying that effective immediately, foreign aid to > those nations on List 2 ceases immediately and indefinitely. The > money saved during the first year alone will pretty much pay for > the costs of the Iraqi war. THEN EVERY YEAR THEREAFTER IT'LL GO TO > OUR SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM SO IT WON'T GO BROKE IN 20 YEARS. > > The American people are no longer going to pour money into third > world Hell holes and watch those government leaders grow fat on > corruption. > > Need help with a famine? Wrestling with an epidemic? Call France. > > In the future, together with Congress, I will work to redirect this > money toward solving the vexing social problems we still have at > home. On that note, a word to terrorist organizations. Screw with > us and we will hunt you down and eliminate you and all your friends > from the face of the earth. > > Thirsting for a gutsy country to terrorize? Try France or maybe China. > > I am ordering the immediate severing of diplomatic relations with > France, Germany, and Russia. Thanks for all your help, comrades. We > are retiring from NATO as well. Bonne chance, mez amies. > > I have instructed the Mayor of New York City to begin towing the > many UN diplomatic vehicles located in Manhattan with more than two > unpaid parking tickets to sites where those vehicles will be > stripped, shredded and crushed. I don't care about whatever treaty > pertains to this. You creeps have tens of thousands of unpaid > tickets. Pay those tickets tomorrow or watch your precious Benzes, > Beamers and limos be turned over to some of the finest chop shops > in the world. I love New York > > A special note to our neighbors. Canada is on List 2. Since we are > likely to be seeing a lot more of each other, you folks might want > to try not pissing us off for a change. > > Mexico is also on List 2. Its president and his entire corrupt > government really need an attitude adjustment. I will have a couple > extra thousand tanks and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess > where I am going to put 'em? Yep, border security. > > Oh, by the way, the United States is abrogating the NAFTA treaty - > starting now. > > We are tired of the one-way highway. Immediately, we'll be drilling > for oil in Alaska- which will take care of this country's oil needs > for decades to come. If you're an environmentalist who opposes this > decision, I refer you to List 2 above: pick a country and move there. > > It is time for America to focus on its own welfare and its own > citizens. Some will accuse us of isolationism. I answer them by > saying, 'darn tootin.' > > Nearly a century of trying to help folks live a decent life around > the world has only earned us the undying enmity of just about > everyone on the planet. It is time to eliminate hunger in America. > It is time to eliminate homelessness in America. To the nations on > List 1, a final thought : Thank you guys. We owe you and we won't > forget. > > To the nations on List 2, a final thought: You might want to learn > to speak Arabic. > > God bless America .. Thank you and good night.' > > If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in > English, thank a soldier. > > (Please forward this to at least ten friends and see what happens! > Let's get this to every USA computer!) > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 9 21:50:03 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] FW: Hip Hop Activist Accepts VP Bid for McKinney's Green Party Bid Message-ID: <43790.76.29.42.35.1215665403.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [GPCA-MediaComm] Hip Hop Activist Accepts VP Bid for McKinney's Green Party Bid From: "Hank Chapot" Date: Wed, July 9, 2008 16:11 To: "gpca forum" "GPCA Media comm comm" Cc: "Hank Chapot" ------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- http://www.thuglifearmy.com/news/?id=4427 Hip Hop Activist Accepts VP Bid for McKinney's Green Party Bid 7/9/2008 11:59:05 AM by Davey D Rosa Clemente accepting a bid to run as VP on Cynthia McKinney's Green Party ticket is big news. In fact its great news. First Rosa is no joke. This Bronx born-Puerto Rican-African sista is sharp on the issues and uncompromising on the principals she stands for. She stands tall and fights fiercely for the communities and people she has long represented. She is more than qualified. The other thing that is equally important is that Rosa gives voice to a variety of issues impacting the community that have been increasingly put on the back burner during this election season. many of us have waited eagerly for important issues like the prison industrial complex, media justice, gentrification, a just immigration policy, police brutality (i.e Sean Bell), war crimes and impeachment proceedings being levied on those in high office responsible and the Palestinian perspective in the Middle East to be addressed. With each passing day they seem to be tossed under the bus with the conventional wisdom being middle of the road white voters from small towns need to be appeased. Hence important issues like the aforementioned keep getting sacrificed. The other day, a prominent TV News commentator made a highly offensive, arrogant remark when addressing the recent shift to the right by Democratic nominee Barack Obama. He was talking about how those who see themselves as progressive and grassroots and played significant roles in the success of the Obama campaign, were feeling disenchanted and had gone so far as to stage a financial protest by withholding campaign donations until Obama reversed himself. The pundit was asked if this will hurt Obama, he said it would not. Obama can afford to sacrifice those issues because that group of people have nowhere else to go. In other words they (we) can be taken for granted. That is never a good way to go into a campaign. See the way things work is like that. We start off making the sacrifice as our candidate goes for these so called middle of the road white rural voters. The game plan is once he/she gets in office he/she will start addressing our issues. Unfortunately what usually happens is that as soon as they get into office they have to continue making sacrifices to make sure the party gets people re-elected in Congress and the Senate. We saw this with Bill Clinton. In his attempt to get folks re-elected he led the charge dismantling welfare, building up more prisons and of course shuttling in media consolidation. Wanna know how Fox News and crazed racist right wing talk show hosts came into power? Look at the media policies of Bill Clinton. All this happened when we were all being told to hush up and let him do these things to help make sure the house and senate are won by Democrats. Well this is what happened. The house and Senate were not won by democrats. All that sacrificing to appeal to white middle of the road rural voters didn't do a damn thing except lay the foundation for problems we are dealing with today. When I see Obama who I've supported cave in on FISA, give a luke warm response to Sean Bell, support faith based Initiatives, do an about face on campaign reform and 'refine' his position on the war, I start having flashbacks to Bill Clinton. When will the sacrifices stop? Hell lets look back to 2006 when the Democrats took over the house and senate. The victories was a mandate from voters to immediately end the war and start impeachment proceedings against George Bush for lying about our reasons for going to War. Well as we know that never happened. Progressives and grassroots people were told to pipe down and sacrifice because we needed to make sure the white house was taken back and hence impeachment and ending the war was not feasible if we wanted to make that happen. The sacrifices never stop. Whether McKinney and Clemente stand a snowball's chance in winning is not the issue as much as it is making sure large bodies of people go on record to say there are important issues that need to be addressed. Instead of appealing to fickle middle of the road voters who more often than not don't even support us, how about going after the 30-40% of the people who don't vote? How about really being a candidate of change and figuring out innovative ways to appeal to them. Trying to out Bush Bush and his croonies has never ever worked. So right on Rosa Clemente. we wish you luck and we can count on you to ALWAYS speak truth to power and not cave in. Lastly Clemente, reps a trend of young Hip Hop generation folks making big moves. First we have BET correspondent Jeff Johnson possibly being the next commentator on the Tom Joyner morning show. He may be the voice to replace Tavis Smiley. Next we have Dr Lamont Hill getting a permanent spot on the Fox News Team where he is frequent talking head. Hill is by no means a right winger and he always hold it down. He most recently shut down Bill O'Reilly during an on air debate. In Brooklyn's 10th congressional district, longtime Hip Hop activist Kevin Powell has a really good shot at unseating a 26 year incumbent. So good are Kevin's chances is that the democratic machine that has long backed this Congressman Ed Towns has all but abandoned him. Kev is the man with the momentum. In Atlanta Hip Hop generation head 31 year old Rev. Markel Hutchins is mounting a serious challenge to iconic civil rights figure John Lewis. In a recent debate, Lewis was ano show which did not bode well with people in his district who are beginning to wonder if he's out of touch. Most importantly, Hutchins campaign forced Lewis to stop backing Hillary Clinton and get behind Obama. Hutchins called Lewis out for being in opposition with 85% of the district. Below is a recent speech Clemente gave at the media reform conference. http://www.Youtube.com/watch?v=mmBrj1PRgkU Hip Hop Activist Accepts VP Slot to Run w/ Cynthia McKinney JULY 9th, 2008 Today Rosa A. Clemente released the following statement: "I am honored and excited to accept this invitation to run with Cynthia McKinney. Cynthia McKinney is a hero to me and many others across this country and around the world for her courage in standing up to George Bush while the Democratic Party establishment caved. "This campaign is the opportunity the Hip-Hop generation has been working for. This is our time to address the issues affecting our communities ? rising unemployment, the high cost of food and housing, a lack of quality public education and access to higher education, the prison-industrial complex, and unaccountable corporate media. These issues are not being addressed by either the Republican or Democratic nominee. "I choose to do this, not for me, but for my generation, my community and my daughter. I don't see the Green Party as an alternative; I see it as an imperative. I trust that my Vice Presidential run will inspire all people, but especially young people of color, to recognize that we have more then two choices. Together, we can build the future we've been wanting." Hip-hop artist M1 says, "I've never voted in the Presidential election; I've never felt strongly enough about a candidate to. Knowing that Rosa Clemente is down with Cynthia McKinney's run, I feel that now is the greatest opportunity for the Hip-Hop community to put our collective strength and power to the test and vote for someone who represents who we are and what we stand for." For more info visit: www.rosaclemente.com www.runcynthiarun.org # SourceDavey D Hank Chapot - Oakland CA hchapot at igc.org 510.654.5311 http://hchapot.blogspot.com/ Cogito Ergo Green _______________________________________________ GPCA-MediaWG mailing list GPCA-MediaWG at lists.cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/gpca-mediawg From wrolley at charter.net Thu Jul 10 11:07:01 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:07:01 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: Backpacks needed for homeless vets in Santa Clara County...] Message-ID: <48764FC5.6060808@charter.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mkmusic at greens.org Fri Jul 11 02:57:30 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:57:30 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's office this Friday 7/11, 3-6pm Message-ID: <48772E8A.20501@greens.org> Hi All, *IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS COULD START HAPPENING SOON!!!!! (see below a press release from the National Impeachment Network lobbying delegation)* Things are taking place in Washington D.C. that point to the beginning of impeachment hearings and we here locally will continue to do our job to help everything along. We will be out in front of Rep. Zoe Lofgren's district office showing her our support for her to DO THE RIGHT THING!! This is our 35th consecutive week. Please join us this Friday, 7/11 in front of Lofgren's office from 3:00pm - 6:00pm. We want a large presence demanding she "*DO HER JOB*." Zoe's office is at 635 N. 1st St., San Jose. (Between Taylor & Jackson St. across from the IHOP restaurant/Light Rail stop is corner of Jackson St on 1st St.) We want to be loud and proud for Impeachment hearings for Cheney and Bush. SEE YOU THERE. Thanks, Merriam Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition mkmusic03 at aol.com 408-482-6032 (Cell) svimpeach.org MEDIA ALERT July 2008 National Impeachment Network http://nationalimpeachment.org/ Aspokesperson for a National Impeachment Network (NIN) lobbying delegation, which has been meeting with Congress members in WashingtonDC this week, said "There is clear evidence that the mood of Congress has shifted. Impeachment hearings could start this month. It appears that hearings will likely focus on impeachable offenses not requiring testimony and lengthy investigations because evidence is on the public record -- the administration's refusal to honor subpoenas, the nearly800 signing statements used to alter the intent of legislation passed by Congress, and the deliberate misinformation given to Congress to get approval for going to war. We are very optimistic that Cheney and Bush are finally going to be held to account and investigated." Said another member of the NIN delegation, "The reception we've received has been positively amazing. Every Representative we've met with supports impeachment strongly. Our team is working hard and will continue lobbying efforts through the month of July. We'll be there tomorrow when Kucinich introduces his new resolution for impeaching Bush for the deliberate intelligence deceptions leading to the Iraq War. And Judiciary Committee Chair John Conyers invited the group to sit in on the Judiciary Committee hearing where Karl Rove is expected to be cited for contempt of Congress. Conyers told the group that he would like to deliver the inherent contempt citation to Rove himself. This is incredibly exciting. The majority of Americans favor impeachment and want the Democratic Party to listen to the grassroots. Congress members are going to insist on restoring their oversight authority. We should take heart that the breakthrough we've been seeking appears to finally be happening." From alexcathy at aol.com Fri Jul 11 05:55:09 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Mayor Daley Welcomes You to Chicago Message-ID: <8CAB16C7BC1B746-15D4-19B6@FWM-D41.sysops.aol.com> ?Mayor Daley Welcomes You to Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley Welcomes You to Chicago --Sign in Chicago Midway Airport Thursday, July 10th Between the plane and the Orange Line subway train into the city, on my way to the Green Party National Convention, I had to read "Mayor Richard M. Daley" a dozen times. Daley is Chicago. Chicago is "Duh Mayah" -- perfect symbol for the primitive "Old Politics" we are here to organize against. Thursday night there was a reception for international Greens. A brother from Brazil explained to us the difficulty of fighting for Greens issues there, reminding us that having a strong Green Party in the U.S. is absolutely essential since the U.S. is the 800-pound gorilla in the world, especially in the Western Hemisphere READ MORE ON CALIFORNIA GREENING AT: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2008/07/mayor-daley-welcomes-you-to-chicago.html ? ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Fri Jul 11 10:12:44 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:44 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] ACLU sues over new FISA Bill Message-ID: <4877948C.8010809@earthlink.net> The FISA bill was passed Wednesday, Bush signed it Thursday, (yesterday), and the ACLU started a lawsuit a few hours later. From the ACLU: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/35942prs20080710.html From the Nation: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/336123 http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/11/10281/ Gerry From fredd at freeshell.org Sat Jul 12 13:20:54 2008 From: fredd at freeshell.org (Fred Duperrault) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:20:54 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Chronicle Article, Today Message-ID: <48791226.5040202@freeshell.org> We'll never know whether today's Page Three, 2-3/4" X 13", SF Chronicle article about "Ex-Dem likely to lead Greens' presidential bid" (by Jeffrey Scott of the Cox News Service) was motivated by letters from us Greens, but our letters could have made the difference. I'm wondering if the SJ Mercury News featured any Green Party Convention news today. There's nothing in the PA Daily News. If we monitor those papers regularly, we can pepper them with more letters if they shut out news about third party candidates. Fred D. From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sat Jul 12 19:03:35 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:03:35 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVBC] LA Times column on "The joy of $8 gas"] Message-ID: <48796277.8000804@earthlink.net> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [SVBC] LA Times column on "The joy of $8 gas" Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:01:24 -0700 From: Kathy Durham To: bikes at lists.svbc.dreamhost.com Here's a link I think may be of interest to SVBC members interested in encouraging more people to choose bicycles for more of their everyday trips. You probably have already read serious policy arguments along these lines, but this is delivered with a Generation X edge to a wider audience, most of whom have never considered why $8 gas might be a good thing for our society: Joel Stein, "The joy of $8 gas: Why life would be better if the cost of fuel here were as high here as in Europe " Los Angeles Times, July 11, 2008 http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-stein11-2008jul11,0,258677.column ============ Whole article is worth a read but here's a quote to entice you to click on the link: ". . . With public transit use nationally at a 50-year high, traffic dropped 2.1% in the first four months of this year across the country. That mileage reduction -- along with people driving smaller cars, and more slowly, to save gas -- could mean that 12,000 fewer people will die in traffic accidents this year, according to a study by professors Michael Morrisey at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and David C. Grabowski at Harvard Medical School. Air pollution has been reduced enough, according to UC Davis economics professor J. Paul Leigh, to prevent 2,200 respiratory-related deaths over the last year. Less eating out and more walking and biking could mean a 10% reduction in obesity, according to Charles Courtemanche, an assistant economics professor at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. And, apparently, higher gas prices also keep econ professors employed." _______________________________________________ bikes at svbcbikes.org mailing list To unsubscribe from the SVBC discussion list or change your options, please visit http://lists.svbc.dreamhost.com/options.cgi/bikes-svbc.dreamhost.com/. You can also unsubscribe via e-mail by sending a message from your subscribed e-mail account to subscribe at svbcbikes.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject or body--don't include the quotation marks. You will be asked to confirm your request to unsubscribe for security reasons. List information: http://lists.svbc.dreamhost.com/listinfo.cgi/bikes-svbc.dreamhost.com From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Jul 13 09:38:22 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:38:22 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] "Gardens Save the Day .." Message-ID: <487A2F7E.5070506@earthlink.net> About the modern revival of urban and suburban gardens. http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/12/10312/ Gerry P.S. And about the movie WALL-E. From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Jul 13 10:27:52 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:27:52 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] "The War, Dems, MoveOn and The Uprising" Message-ID: <487A3B18.3030600@earthlink.net> There probably is nothing new in this to you. But I think the content is great and my be helpful to others you might want to forward to. It is an interview of David Sirota by John Stauber. http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/13/10321/ "Obama's latest flip-flops are not moves to the "center" or the "mainstream" - by the empirical public opinion data on major issues, his moves are ones away from the center and from the mainstream. That's not surprising - he has surrounded himself by Washington insiders whose definition of "the center" is radically different from where the actual center of American public opinion is. If he continues down this path, he will hurt his chances of winning the election. I would advise him to remember where mainstream public opinion is on issues like trade, the war and civil liberties is - and instead of going to the center of a corrupt Washington, go there." From JamBoi at Greens.org Sun Jul 13 18:34:01 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list Message-ID: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is not the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake in such high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I request the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my subscription to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is completely unacceptable. Green is Ethical! Drew Johnson County Council Emeritus and Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other forms of service I provide) ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew From: "Jim Stauffer" Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 To: "Regional List" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked several times to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. This list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The GPCA has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite discussion topics. If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to your discussion list. Jim _______________________________________________ SC-SM mailing list SC-SM at lists.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm From justvegan at mac.com Sun Jul 13 21:07:07 2008 From: justvegan at mac.com (justvegan at mac.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:07:07 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> Message-ID: Hello All, I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. Cheers, Randy W. Sandberg www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is > not > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake > in such > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I > request > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my > subscription > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is > completely unacceptable. > > > Green is Ethical! > > Drew Johnson > > County Council Emeritus and > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other > forms of > service I provide) > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > ---------------------------- > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > From: "Jim Stauffer" > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > To: "Regional List" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked > several times > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. > This > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The > GPCA > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite > discussion > topics. > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to > your > discussion list. > > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > SC-SM mailing list > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From fredd at freeshell.org Sun Jul 13 21:47:00 2008 From: fredd at freeshell.org (Fred Duperrault) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> Message-ID: <487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. I see no harm. Fred Duperrault Hello All, I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. Cheers, Randy W. Sandberg www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is > not > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake > in such > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I > request > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my > subscription > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is > completely unacceptable. > > > Green is Ethical! > > Drew Johnson > > County Council Emeritus and > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other > forms of > service I provide) > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > ---------------------------- > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > From: "Jim Stauffer" > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > To: "Regional List" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked > several times > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. > This > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The > GPCA > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite > discussion > topics. > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to > your > discussion list. > > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > SC-SM mailing list > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From kaisha_marie at comcast.net Mon Jul 14 02:10:27 2008 From: kaisha_marie at comcast.net (kaisha_marie at comcast.net) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:10:27 +0000 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list In-Reply-To: <487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> Message-ID: <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I don't understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What are the rules being violated specifically? Green is unification, Kaisha Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Fred Duperrault Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 To: Drew Johnson Cc: Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. I see no harm. Fred Duperrault Hello All, I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. Cheers, Randy W. Sandberg www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is > not > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake > in such > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I > request > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my > subscription > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is > completely unacceptable. > > > Green is Ethical! > > Drew Johnson > > County Council Emeritus and > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other > forms of > service I provide) > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > ---------------------------- > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > From: "Jim Stauffer" > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > To: "Regional List" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked > several times > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. > This > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The > GPCA > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite > discussion > topics. > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to > your > discussion list. > > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > SC-SM mailing list > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From snug.bug at hotmail.com Mon Jul 14 08:22:47 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:22:47 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list In-Reply-To: <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: I understand the need for rules to limit excessive off-topic posting. 9/11 rants belong in an impeachment forum only when they specifically address impeachable offenses; most impeachment news doesn't belong in a 9/11 forum. Probably I have crossed the line in this forum a couple of times. Certainly last summer Drew's email volume exceeded my ability to keep up and his high-value posts went unread along with the lower-value ones. I appreciate Drew's insights and his monitoring of a wide range of issues. A certain elasticity in the rules is justified. On a formal level, a specific number of off-topic posts per week might be permitted, with any over the limit requiring sponsorship of a county council member. Informally, someone might have confederates submit a share of her off-topic posts, or limits might be invoked only in cases involving complaints. Why would anyone complain? If you don't want to read it, don't! Why should your desire to keep your inbox free of unwanted emails prevent others from benefiting from them? Brian > To: fredd at freeshell.org; sosfbay-discuss-bounces at cagreens.org; JamBoi at Greens.org > From: kaisha_marie at comcast.net > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:10:27 +0000 > CC: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list > > I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I don't understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What are the rules being violated specifically? > > Green is unification, > Kaisha > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Duperrault > > Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 > To: Drew Johnson > Cc: > Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing > me from regional list > > > I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs > and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. > > I see no harm. > > Fred Duperrault > > Hello All, > > I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's > serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something > to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, > ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., > is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails > should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. > > Cheers, > > Randy W. Sandberg > www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com > > > On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > > > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is > > not > > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake > > in such > > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I > > request > > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my > > subscription > > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is > > completely unacceptable. > > > > > > Green is Ethical! > > > > Drew Johnson > > > > County Council Emeritus and > > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other > > forms of > > service I provide) > > > > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > > ---------------------------- > > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > > From: "Jim Stauffer" > > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > > To: "Regional List" > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked > > several times > > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. > > This > > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The > > GPCA > > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for > > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite > > discussion > > topics. > > > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to > > your > > discussion list. > > > > > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > SC-SM mailing list > > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss _________________________________________________________________ Making the world a better place one message at a time. http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source=EML_WLH_Talkathon_BetterPlace -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carolineyacoub at att.net Mon Jul 14 09:21:28 2008 From: carolineyacoub at att.net (Caroline Yacoub) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Drew's exclusion Message-ID: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on the best information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who doesn't want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is choice. Caroline -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Mon Jul 14 10:09:12 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:09:12 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] "Iran Shows Its Cards" Message-ID: <487B8838.6080004@earthlink.net> Scott Ritter on the implications of an attack on Iran: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/14/10337/ Gerry From rosasirius at yahoo.com Mon Jul 14 19:11:21 2008 From: rosasirius at yahoo.com (jodi embry) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> Message-ID: <958809.33263.qm@web55608.mail.re4.yahoo.com> I hope that no-one decides to take me off the "discuss-list" especially, if I start high-lighting events in the news. Jodi --- On Sun, 7/13/08, Fred Duperrault wrote: > From: Fred Duperrault > Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list > To: "Drew Johnson" > Cc: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 9:47 PM > I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. > I'm sure he informs > and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. > > I see no harm. > > Fred Duperrault > > Hello All, > > I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much > everyone, who's > serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has > something > to say that is important. That is, information about > impeachment, > ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, > etc., etc., > is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, > Drew's emails > should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the > GREEN party. > > Cheers, > > Randy W. Sandberg > www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com > > > On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > > > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim > Stauffer. Jim is > > not > > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the > right to partake > > in such > > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" > way to operate. I > > request > > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately > reinstate my > > subscription > > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that > this behavior is > > completely unacceptable. > > > > > > Green is Ethical! > > > > Drew Johnson > > > > County Council Emeritus and > > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among > many other > > forms of > > service I provide) > > > > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > > ---------------------------- > > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > > From: "Jim Stauffer" > > > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > > To: "Regional List" > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. > He's been asked > > several times > > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he > refuses to do so. > > This > > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green > Party issues. The > > GPCA > > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his > only purpose for > > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his > favorite > > discussion > > topics. > > > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you > can add him to > > your > > discussion list. > > > > > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > SC-SM mailing list > > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > > > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From jims at greens.org Mon Jul 14 19:20:51 2008 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:20:51 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list In-Reply-To: <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: <487C0983.1080508@greens.org> Do any of you know what you're talking about? Can any of you tell me the what list he was removed from and the purpose of that list? Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette policy (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that asks for cooperation from participants on these cost-free, advertising-free lists that the party provides for your use? And, finally, what right do any of you have to tell the small membership of closed, special-purpose list who they have to allow as members and what messages they have to read? Jim kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: > I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I don't understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What are the rules being violated specifically? > > Green is unification, > Kaisha > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Duperrault > > Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 > To: Drew Johnson > Cc: > Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing > me from regional list > > > I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs > and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. > > I see no harm. > > Fred Duperrault > > Hello All, > > I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's > serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something > to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, > ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., > is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails > should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. > > Cheers, > > Randy W. Sandberg > www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com > > > On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > >> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >> not >> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake >> in such >> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I >> request >> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my >> subscription >> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is >> completely unacceptable. >> >> >> Green is Ethical! >> >> Drew Johnson >> >> County Council Emeritus and >> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other >> forms of >> service I provide) >> >> >> ---------------------------- Original Message >> ---------------------------- >> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >> From: "Jim Stauffer" >> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >> To: "Regional List" >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked >> several times >> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. >> This >> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The >> GPCA >> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >> >> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for >> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite >> discussion >> topics. >> >> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to >> your >> discussion list. >> >> >> Jim >> _______________________________________________ >> SC-SM mailing list >> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From jims at greens.org Mon Jul 14 19:40:52 2008 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:40:52 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Drew's exclusion In-Reply-To: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> Caroline - Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation of "esclusion and censorship." Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read Drew's post can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy his messages there and no one has complained about his removal. If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make that claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are "closed" lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The membership is controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion topics are not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. Those are strong accusations. Jim Caroline Yacoub wrote: > I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on the best > information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who doesn't > want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is choice. > Caroline > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing > list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From eameece at california.com Mon Jul 14 21:02:55 2008 From: eameece at california.com (eric meece) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:02:55 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> Message-ID: I hope Drew is reinstated to that list soon. Thanks Drew for all you do. Eric Meece On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) "Drew Johnson" wrote: > I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim > Stauffer. Jim is not > the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right > to partake in such > high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to > operate. I request > the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate > my subscription > to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this > behavior is > completely unacceptable. > > > Green is Ethical! > > Drew Johnson > > County Council Emeritus and > Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many > other forms of > service I provide) > > > ---------------------------- Original Message > ---------------------------- > Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > From: "Jim Stauffer" > Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > To: "Regional List" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been > asked several times > to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses > to do so. This > list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party > issues. The GPCA > has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > > Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only > purpose for > remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his > favorite discussion > topics. > > If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can > add him to your > discussion list. > > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > SC-SM mailing list > SC-SM at lists.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From alexcathy at aol.com Mon Jul 14 21:33:53 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Greens: Mesplay, Jones, Swift; Cynthia McKinney on YouTube Message-ID: <8CAB44B1EF9BD15-1638-334C@FWM-M30.sysops.aol.com> Cynthia McKinney has been nominated by the Green Party for President of the United States. I have posted a link to a YouTube video on my blog at: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/ Friday, July 11th Candidates Forum There was a delicious irony to the garish, ostentatious "Red Lacquer" ballroom of Chicago's old Palmer House Hotel being the setting for the final Green Party presidential candidate forum. This hotel is a monument to the First Gilded Age of corrupt capitalist wheeling 'n dealing. Today, my Green Party is the leading edge progressive voice speaking in the Second Gilded Age. . . Read More At: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2008/07/great-candidates-mesplay-johnson-and.html Saturday, July 12th Cynthia McKinney Accepts Green Party Nomination Cynthia McKinney won the Green Party nomination for President of the United States at the Nominating Convention in Chicago in the 1st round of voting Saturday evening... There was, indeed, amazing energy and excitement in the nominating convention in Chicago Symphony Hall. We were witnessing history being made and everybody in the room knew it. 2008 has been an extraordinary election in these United States. Yes, it has been, though not necessarily as the story is told by the mainstream media (MSM). Both mainstream political parties have emphatically rejected the Bush-Clinton-Bush status quo. However, evidence is piling up in an avalanche that both Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama are unwilling and/or unable to turn their respective political camps from driving this nation (and the world) over a cliff. . . Read More At: http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2008/07/cynthia-mckinney-is-nominated.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mkmusic at greens.org Tue Jul 15 01:35:57 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:35:57 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] A proposal from Dave Ledesma] Message-ID: <487C616D.6010409@greens.org> Hi All, I am forwarding a plan for all progressive groups to participate in consistent demonstrations on issues that concern us. The following is an email I sent to SVIC. Merriam -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: MKmusic03 at aol.com Subject: [SVIC] A proposal from Dave Ledesma Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:46:11 EDT Size: 14875 URL: From WB4D23 at aol.com Tue Jul 15 10:09:35 2008 From: WB4D23 at aol.com (WB4D23 at aol.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:09:35 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Drew's exclusion/confusions Message-ID: Folks! There is obviously a lot of confusion about Drew Johnson being unsubscribed by Jim Stauffer (as list manager) on the email list that was created for communications between the County Council members of Santa Clara County and San Mateo County. Generally, participants on this list are limited to current County Council members (if only because who needs to be receiving email when you are not involved with the work). I have remained on this list as a former GPSCC County Council member (1998-2002), but I send a message asking if there is any concern about this after each cycle of elections (on my to do list at this time). The value of former County Council members remaining on the list is to foster institutional memory (what has been done in the past; reminding others about recurring events and activities, etc.). Additionally, some of us are resources because we are involved in state committees and working groups and can provide useful state party info to the county councils. Jim Stauffer is on this list because he has been the region's alternate to the GPCA Coordinating Committee and has been in all respects our Regional Representative since Jo Chamberlain stepped down from that position. So... Jim unsubscribing Drew from that list has NOTHING to do with this discussion list!!!! I do agree that if Drew wants to be on the County Councils list, he should take that up with GPSCC County Council. I would ask Drew to be able to clearly explain how his remaining subscribed to that list serves its purposes of facilitating communications and coordinating actions between the two County Councils. Additionally, I would ask County Council members to require that Drew promise not to use that email list as a general bulletin board... which he has done in the past and has refused to stop doing even when Jim and I have asked him to stop adding unnecessary emails to that list. It is as though Drew thinks that activists who are County Council members do not see the same messages on general discussion lists. County Council members already receive announcements from the national and state party as recipients on the GPCA County Contacts list. Jim and I have asked Drew to stop posting other matters that are readily available in other places (including this GPSCC general discussion list), and he has plain flat refused to do so. So can we get back to work???? There is a presidential campaign to support with very little time to organize. Warner **************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com! (http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Tue Jul 15 10:34:04 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:34:04 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: Impeachment Resolution: First Reading Today] Message-ID: <487CDF8C.9060509@earthlink.net> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Impeachment Resolution: First Reading Today Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:56:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Dennis Kucinich Reply-To: reply at kucinichforcongress.com To: gerrygras at earthlink.net [ ] [Dennis Kucinich - www.Kucinich.us] Impeachment Resolution: First Reading Today Dear Friends, This afternoon, at approximately 5 p.m. (EDT), the Clerk of the House of Representatives will give the first reading of the Article of Impeachment of President George Bush. Article One charges the President with deceiving Congress with fabricated threats of Iraq WMDs to fraudulently obtain support for an authorization of the use of military force against Iraq. Once the Clerk reads the bill, I will move to refer the bill to the Judiciary Committee for hearings. I believe the American people have a right to an open airing of the charges against this President. Did he or did he not lie to take us into a war? I believe the evidence is overwhelming that President Bush knew that Iraq was not an imminent threat, was not in possession of WMDs at the time, and had nothing to do with 911 or with al Queda's role in 911. And yet, despite having facts to the contrary, he took the U.S. into war with devastating consequences for our troops, our nation, and the people of Iraq. Congress must hold hearings. There can be no greater offense of a President or a Commander in Chief than to conjure a war based on lies to Congress, to the troops, and to the people of America. I love our country with all my heart and I intend to persist until America is America again. Please contact your friends and neighbors and ask them to go to our website at www.Kucinich.us and sign the impeachment petition . Thank you for your continuing support and for your love of our country and its people. [Sign the petition] Sincerely, Dennis ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Paid for by the Re-Elect Congressman Kucinich Committee] PO Box 110475 | Cleveland | OH | 44111 | 216-252-9000 Re-Elect Congressman Kucinich Committee | PO Box 110475 | Cleveland | OH | 44111 From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 15 11:23:51 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's pattern of UNGreen, tyranous offensive, high-handed behavior In-Reply-To: <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> Message-ID: <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> No No Jim. You got that entirely backwards. Caroline deserves THE RESPECT as a Couunty Council member which you just deprived her of. Though you also have not been on the Council for many years, we TRY to give you respect DESPITE your OUTRAGEOUS OUTBURSTS OF ANGER WHICH HAVE DRIVEN MANY ACTIVISTS AWAY FROM OUR PARTY. While you are currently serving as our Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee none of this gives you justification to operate as a tin plated dictator in this way. Since YOU are the one taking the completely ungreen, rageaholic, tyranous, abusive censorious, exclusionary, arbitrary, unilateral, high handed and unreasonable action YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO EXPLAIN TO EVERYONE why you think that you have the right to knock a County Council emeritus member off the list for posting about news of vital interest to Green in the region. IMO, instead of subjecting us all to these periodically terrorizing angry outbursts that Jim indulges himself in and sprays everyone around himself in, Jim Stauffer needs to get himself to anger management classes ASAP and take a timeout from party work to get his head straightened out about treating others with respect and dignity. Its a matter of taking personal responsibility for his own behavior. How many people have been driven away from this party over the years by Jim personally would be difficult to guess. While he provides much knowledge from having been at key positions over the years Jim's extremely ungreen behavior entirely detracts from the value he'd otherwise be able to provide. Let him get himself together so that he can operate as a real Green rather than a madman and THEN he will be well enough to fully contribute. Jim's archnemesis, Mike Feinstein recently took himself mostly out of the state party mix. Jim would do very well to do the same. It would do him, the GPCA AND the GPSC a WORLD OF GOOD. We should not be subjected to the factional fanaticism that the factional alphas like Jo Chamberlain, Peter Camejo, on the one side of the factional divide or Mike Feinstein on the other OR their their loyal foot soldiers like Jim Stauffer (of the Jo Chamberlain/ Peter Camejo faction) that keep that fire alive. EVERYONE GET THIS: The post that Jim knocked me off after was the one about McKinney's choice for VP running mate, Rosa Clemente!!!! The post I was about to put on was an official GP-US release describing our new nominee, Cynthia McKinney and her running mate. I was AT THE CONVENTION, TRYING TO PROVIDE CURRENT NEWS TO OUR REGION!!! HELLO!!! Jim's behavior is just out of control IMO. I'm sorry, but Jim's is the one completely confused about what constitutes items of interest and concern to Greens across the region. EVERYONE GET THIS: The volume on the list in question is a trickle!!! Its hardly used at all!!! This is a completely in Stauffer's head-only artificial situation due to Jim's amazingly cramped interpretation of what is of interest to Green in the regional I'm thinking that Jim may have altered the list's purpose statement recently because i seem to recall it was longer, broader and more inclusive previously. But whether or not this is the case, here's what it says today: http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM counties on regional issues." Notice this says NOTHING about it being County Council ONLY business or that ONLY County Council members can post. Notice it gives no restrictions (nor should it) as to how. Notice it does not say that Jim Stauffer is the definer of ANYTHING, or that he has the authority to suddenly, arbitrarily and with prejuce boot County Councilor emeritus members off the list (it doesn't even assert that he has ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE LIST WHATSOVER). Jim seems to want to treat the SC-SM list as if it were the Red Phone, connecting the White House to the Kremlin, only to be used in the direst of emergencies. Or as a fire that you have to break the glass in order to use. The SC-SM list is treated as if it were so precious it just can never be used. Rubbish!!! Our party resources NEED to be exercised in order to actually make a difference. Duh! Here's what I say: When our region needs to mobilize to run our races as we do with our presidential race, ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS. When we need to talk about how we run Carol Brouillet's race (in the 14th district which spans both San Mateo and Santa Clara county) its regional business. Heck Barry Hermanson's and Peter Myer's run to some smaller extent is regional business. When we need to organize civil rights actions (including impeachment) we need to communicate it across the whole region. When we have events we want both county member's to participate in, such as Tian's parties, its regional business. Several SM members joined us at the last, fun and wonderful election night party at Tian's. Note that Jim was not a participant. This SM-SC list is for COMMUNICATION, not to hamper, construct, censor communication. I received a number of private e-mails previously re: the posts I'd put up on the SC-SM list by people who felt intimidated by the wrathful Jim Stauffer and so didn't want to expose themselves to his abusive wrath. IF PEOPLE DO NOT WISH TO READ A POSTING THEY MAY SIMPLY IGNORE IT OR HIT THE DELETE BUTTON. THEY DO NOT NEED TO TRY TO DICTATE TO OTHERS HOW TO COMMUNICATE. Green is Connection! Drew Johnson County Council Emeritus and Delegate to the Green National Committee (among many, many other contributions) On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:40, Jim Stauffer wrote: > Caroline - > > Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation of > "esclusion and censorship." > > Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read Drew's > post > can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy his > messages there and no one has complained about his removal. > > If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make that > claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are > "closed" > lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The membership is > controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion topics > are > not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. > > As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this > organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. Those are strong accusations. > > Jim > > > > Caroline Yacoub wrote: >> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on the best >> information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who doesn't >> want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is choice. >> Caroline From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 15 12:05:00 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list In-Reply-To: <487C0983.1080508@greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org> <1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <487C0983.1080508@greens.org> Message-ID: <2786.75.17.61.205.1216148700.squirrel@www.greens.org> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:20, Jim Stauffer wrote: > Do any of you know what you're talking about? This quote is typically arrogant behavior from Jim Stauffer. It falls entirely within his typical pattern of behavior. How offensive can you get??? This puts across the entirely elitist message: "Watch out people, do not cross Jim Stauffer. He knows what's best for you. Do not speak out against his outrageous rageaholic behavior because he will slap you down. I say the party can not afford to put a rageaholic into a position of power. How many have left our party because of Jim's behavior. Its worth pointing out that Jim behaves consistently in a consistently misogynistic manner. He's a white male and he knows better than you (as in the above example). Just rollover people because Jim is the tyrant and you have no right to question any of his hurtful behavior. Like Bush, he is entirely above the shackles of any kind of check on his actions. Thank you Jim for giving us a beautiful example of exactly what we Greens are working to overcome in our world today. Green is Connection! Drew > Can any of you tell me the what list he was removed from and the purpose > of > that list? > > Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette policy > (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that asks for > cooperation from participants on these cost-free, advertising-free lists > that the party provides for your use? > > And, finally, what right do any of you have to tell the small membership > of > closed, special-purpose list who they have to allow as members and what > messages they have to read? > > Jim > > > kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: >> I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I don't >> understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What are >> the rules being violated specifically? >> >> Green is unification, >> Kaisha >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Fred Duperrault >> >> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 >> To: Drew Johnson >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >> unsubscribing >> me from regional list >> >> >> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs >> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >> >> I see no harm. >> >> Fred Duperrault >> >> Hello All, >> >> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's >> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something >> to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, >> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., >> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails >> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Randy W. Sandberg >> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >> >> >> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >> >>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >>> not >>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake >>> in such >>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I >>> request >>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my >>> subscription >>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is >>> completely unacceptable. >>> >>> >>> Green is Ethical! >>> >>> Drew Johnson >>> >>> County Council Emeritus and >>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other >>> forms of >>> service I provide) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>> ---------------------------- >>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>> To: "Regional List" >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked >>> several times >>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. >>> This >>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The >>> GPCA >>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>> >>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for >>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite >>> discussion >>> topics. >>> >>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to >>> your >>> discussion list. >>> >>> >>> Jim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SC-SM mailing list >>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > From JamBoi at Greens.org Tue Jul 15 12:13:54 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Malik Qualifies! Rosa Clemente Identifies! The R's and D's Still Lies! Message-ID: <2806.75.17.61.205.1216149234.squirrel@www.greens.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:26:42 -0500 From: "Joni LeViness" Subject: [usgp-dx] Malik Qualifies! Rosa Clemente Identifies! The R's and D's Still Lies! To: The Present looks Goooooood! Tho I was hoping Malik would be CM's choice, I resonate with her wisdom in Rosa Clemente! Peace, Joni LeViness gpok http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmBrj1PRgkU&feature=related WDSU TV New Orleans just reported that long time green Malik Rahim qualified as a Green Party candidate for the Louisiana 2nd district House of Rep. Seat currently held by William Jefferson. A film clip showed Malik at the qualifying table in Baton Rouge Six democratic Party cnadidates qualified for the primary. If no one else qulifies as a Green for this seat Malik will automaticly go into the General election in Nov. Malik Rahim is well known around the country for his work as a co-founder of Common Ground, a volunteer organization that provided much needed medical and other help to New orleans residents hurt by the post Katrina flooding. Malik is also scheduled to be a featured speaker at this weekends Green Party US Presidential Nominating Convention. Unforunately I have no information on where to send contributions for his campaign. Les Evenchick Del to the GPUS National Committee from Louisiana Les Evenchick New Orleans piratefish at yahoo.com From jims at greens.org Tue Jul 15 14:15:37 2008 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:37 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <958809.33263.qm@web55608.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <958809.33263.qm@web55608.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <487D1379.7020704@greens.org> No one has been removed from the 'discuss' list. Do you believe everything Drew tells you? Jim jodi embry wrote: > I hope that no-one decides to take me off the "discuss-list" especially, if I start high-lighting events in the news. > Jodi > > --- On Sun, 7/13/08, Fred Duperrault wrote: > >> From: Fred Duperrault >> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list >> To: "Drew Johnson" >> Cc: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 9:47 PM >> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. >> I'm sure he informs >> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >> >> I see no harm. >> >> Fred Duperrault >> >> Hello All, >> >> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much >> everyone, who's >> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has >> something >> to say that is important. That is, information about >> impeachment, >> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, >> etc., etc., >> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, >> Drew's emails >> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the >> GREEN party. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Randy W. Sandberg >> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >> >> >> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >> >>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim >> Stauffer. Jim is >>> not >>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the >> right to partake >>> in such >>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" >> way to operate. I >>> request >>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately >> reinstate my >>> subscription >>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that >> this behavior is >>> completely unacceptable. >>> >>> >>> Green is Ethical! >>> >>> Drew Johnson >>> >>> County Council Emeritus and >>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among >> many other >>> forms of >>> service I provide) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>> ---------------------------- >>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >> >>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>> To: "Regional List" >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. >> He's been asked >>> several times >>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he >> refuses to do so. >>> This >>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green >> Party issues. The >>> GPCA >>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>> >>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his >> only purpose for >>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his >> favorite >>> discussion >>> topics. >>> >>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you >> can add him to >>> your >>> discussion list. >>> >>> >>> Jim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SC-SM mailing list >>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From jims at greens.org Tue Jul 15 14:23:22 2008 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:23:22 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> Message-ID: <487D154A.1020001@greens.org> Eric - Explain why you should have a say on who is subscribed to a closed list of which you are not a member. Why should that list's membership not decide who participates? Why should a person who continuously violates the list policy be allowed to remain? Jim eric meece wrote: > I hope Drew is reinstated to that list soon. Thanks Drew > for all you do. > > Eric Meece > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) > "Drew Johnson" wrote: >> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim >> Stauffer. Jim is not >> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right >> to partake in such >> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to >> operate. I request >> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate >> my subscription >> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this >> behavior is >> completely unacceptable. >> >> >> Green is Ethical! >> >> Drew Johnson >> >> County Council Emeritus and >> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many >> other forms of >> service I provide) >> >> >> ---------------------------- Original Message >> ---------------------------- >> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >> From: "Jim Stauffer" >> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >> To: "Regional List" >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been >> asked several times >> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses >> to do so. This >> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party >> issues. The GPCA >> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >> >> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only >> purpose for >> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his >> favorite discussion >> topics. >> >> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can >> add him to your >> discussion list. >> >> >> Jim >> _______________________________________________ >> SC-SM mailing list >> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 00:01:04 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Videos of McKinney / Clemente speaking at Green Party Convention Message-ID: <1051.75.17.61.205.1216191664.squirrel@www.greens.org> From: "Sanda Everette" Subject: Re: [usgp-dx] McKinney / Clemente speak at Green Party Convention Power to the People intro after the nomination was announced. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R87J0pmaYmQ&NR=1 All 4 speeches are now available on C-span...the two intros and the two candidate speeches. http://www.c-span.org/politics/ On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Craig Seeman wrote: > Cynthia McKinney speaks at the Green Party Convention > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYbkrpgLnDU > > Rosa Clemente speaks at the Green Party Convention > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT4H-K6XNO0 > > > Viral folks Viral! > Post links on blogs and News sites. MANY news sites (MAJOR MEDIA SITES) > have comments on stories that allow links. > > > Craig Seeman > NY From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 00:19:24 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <487D1379.7020704@greens.org> References: <958809.33263.qm@web55608.mail.re4.yahoo.com> <487D1379.7020704@greens.org> Message-ID: <1082.75.17.61.205.1216192764.squirrel@www.greens.org> Let's see just how many people Jim can demean and insult in the space of just a few days. First he did elected County Councilwoman Caroline Yacoub, then a whole slew of people were sprayed down with his arrogant verbal urine in one shot and now Jodi. BTW Jim. I have never said that I was removed from this discuss list. That is yet another lie you just told. I'll keep a list your lies too. Green is Respect! Drew On Tue, July 15, 2008 14:15, Jim Stauffer wrote: > No one has been removed from the 'discuss' list. Do you believe everything > Drew tells you? > > Jim > > > > jodi embry wrote: >> I hope that no-one decides to take me off the "discuss-list" especially, >> if I start high-lighting events in the news. >> Jodi >> >> --- On Sun, 7/13/08, Fred Duperrault wrote: >> >>> From: Fred Duperrault >>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >>> unsubscribing me from regional list >>> To: "Drew Johnson" >>> Cc: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 9:47 PM >>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. >>> I'm sure he informs >>> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >>> >>> I see no harm. >>> >>> Fred Duperrault >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much >>> everyone, who's >>> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has >>> something >>> to say that is important. That is, information about >>> impeachment, >>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, >>> etc., etc., >>> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, >>> Drew's emails >>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the >>> GREEN party. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Randy W. Sandberg >>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >>> >>> >>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim >>> Stauffer. Jim is >>>> not >>>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the >>> right to partake >>>> in such >>>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" >>> way to operate. I >>>> request >>>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately >>> reinstate my >>>> subscription >>>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that >>> this behavior is >>>> completely unacceptable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Green is Ethical! >>>> >>>> Drew Johnson >>>> >>>> County Council Emeritus and >>>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among >>> many other >>>> forms of >>>> service I provide) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>> >>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>>> To: "Regional List" >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. >>> He's been asked >>>> several times >>>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he >>> refuses to do so. >>>> This >>>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green >>> Party issues. The >>>> GPCA >>>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>>> >>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his >>> only purpose for >>>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his >>> favorite >>>> discussion >>>> topics. >>>> >>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you >>> can add him to >>>> your >>>> discussion list. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jim From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 00:22:19 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribing me from regional list In-Reply-To: <487D154A.1020001@greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org> <487D154A.1020001@greens.org> Message-ID: <1084.75.17.61.205.1216192939.squirrel@www.greens.org> Yeah Eric. Don't you understand that his magnificence, Jim Stauffer, resident angry guy, rageaholic and definer of everyone else's reality has spoken? Okay I'll add Eric to the list of people Jim has demeaned and insulted. Damn, this list is getting pretty long... Green is Respect! Drew Johnson GPSC County Council Emeritus, and Green National Committee member (among many other services rendered to the Green Parties) On Tue, July 15, 2008 14:23, Jim Stauffer wrote: > Eric - > > Explain why you should have a say on who is subscribed to a closed list of > which you are not a member. Why should that list's membership not decide > who > participates? Why should a person who continuously violates the list > policy > be allowed to remain? > > Jim > > > > eric meece wrote: >> I hope Drew is reinstated to that list soon. Thanks Drew >> for all you do. >> >> Eric Meece >> >> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) >> "Drew Johnson" wrote: >>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim >>> Stauffer. Jim is not >>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right >>> to partake in such >>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to >>> operate. I request >>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate >>> my subscription >>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this >>> behavior is >>> completely unacceptable. >>> >>> >>> Green is Ethical! >>> >>> Drew Johnson >>> >>> County Council Emeritus and >>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many >>> other forms of >>> service I provide) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>> ---------------------------- >>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>> To: "Regional List" >>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been >>> asked several times >>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses >>> to do so. This >>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party >>> issues. The GPCA >>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>> >>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only >>> purpose for >>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his >>> favorite discussion >>> topics. >>> >>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can >>> add him to your >>> discussion list. >>> >>> >>> Jim From tnharter at aceweb.com Wed Jul 16 00:37:11 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:37:11 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list In-Reply-To: <2786.75.17.61.205.1216148700.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org><1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_dec ombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry><487C0983.1080508@greens.org> <2786.75.17.61.205.1216148700.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <487DA527.90505@aceweb.com> I gotta agree that general discussion belongs in the discussion forum. I've not been on that list so I don't know a "crime" was committed, but I could believe Drew would post discussion items beyond where they go. I consider the rant below this a bit over the top. Stauffer often acts grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If you allow for his personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please cut him a little slack. When we have an activist that wants to do the work Jim is doing quite well, then is the time to vote him out of office. Until then, I say "Why can't we all just get along?" Tian Drew Johnson wrote: > On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:20, Jim Stauffer wrote: >> Do any of you know what you're talking about? > > > This quote is typically arrogant behavior from Jim Stauffer. It falls > entirely within his typical pattern of behavior. How offensive can you > get??? > > This puts across the entirely elitist message: "Watch out people, do not > cross Jim Stauffer. He knows what's best for you. Do not speak out > against his outrageous rageaholic behavior because he will slap you down. > > I say the party can not afford to put a rageaholic into a position of > power. How many have left our party because of Jim's behavior. Its worth > pointing out that Jim behaves consistently in a consistently misogynistic > manner. He's a white male and he knows better than you (as in the above > example). Just rollover people because Jim is the tyrant and you have no > right to question any of his hurtful behavior. Like Bush, he is entirely > above the shackles of any kind of check on his actions. Thank you Jim for > giving us a beautiful example of exactly what we Greens are working to > overcome in our world today. > > > Green is Connection! > > Drew > > >> Can any of you tell me the what list he was removed from and the purpose >> of >> that list? >> >> Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette policy >> (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that asks for >> cooperation from participants on these cost-free, advertising-free lists >> that the party provides for your use? >> >> And, finally, what right do any of you have to tell the small membership >> of >> closed, special-purpose list who they have to allow as members and what >> messages they have to read? >> >> Jim >> >> >> kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: >>> I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I don't >>> understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What are >>> the rules being violated specifically? >>> >>> Green is unification, >>> Kaisha >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Fred Duperrault >>> >>> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 >>> To: Drew Johnson >>> Cc: >>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >>> unsubscribing >>> me from regional list >>> >>> >>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he informs >>> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >>> >>> I see no harm. >>> >>> Fred Duperrault >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's >>> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something >>> to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, >>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., >>> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails >>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Randy W. Sandberg >>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >>> >>> >>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >>>> not >>>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake >>>> in such >>>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I >>>> request >>>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my >>>> subscription >>>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is >>>> completely unacceptable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Green is Ethical! >>>> >>>> Drew Johnson >>>> >>>> County Council Emeritus and >>>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other >>>> forms of >>>> service I provide) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>>> To: "Regional List" >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked >>>> several times >>>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. >>>> This >>>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The >>>> GPCA >>>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>>> >>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for >>>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite >>>> discussion >>>> topics. >>>> >>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to >>>> your >>>> discussion list. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SC-SM mailing list >>>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >>>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -- Tian http://tian.greens.org I just got back from the Green Party Convention in Chicago. From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 00:31:22 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] I just saw it on CNN.com: McKinney running for president as Green candidate Message-ID: <1195.75.17.61.205.1216193482.squirrel@www.greens.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT) From: attorneyabel at riseup.net Subject: [usgp-dx] I just saw it on CNN.com: McKinney running for president as Green candidate This is the link to the story about GPUS' nomination of Cynthia McKinney for President and Rosa Clemente for Vice President on Saturday. If everybody clicks on the link, maybe it will rise in the Google ratings so somebody hears this story. NY Times doesn't cover the news, apparently. Title: McKinney running for president as Green candidate - CNN.com http://tinyurl.com/5o6qnu From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 00:37:15 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Recall Jim Stauffer from GPCA Coordinating Committee Message-ID: <1208.75.17.61.205.1216193835.squirrel@www.greens.org> Jim Stauffer has a very long history of rageaholist behavior in Green Party gathering. He has hurt many, many people and driven many people from our party. I request that the County Council of Santa Clara County and all the Greens of Santa Clara County Green Party immediately remove Jim Stauffer from his position of trust as Regional Representative to the GPCA's Coordinating Committee because he is clearly demonstrating daily in our midst that he is unfit for that position. I add this request to my previous request that the Council reinstate me to the SC-SM list and make it very clear to Jim Stauffer that this behavior was completely unacceptable. Green is Core! Drew Johnson GPSC County Council Emeritus and GNC delegate (among so many contributions that its hard for me to track them all). :-) From wechslertoo at earthlink.net Wed Jul 16 01:16:42 2008 From: wechslertoo at earthlink.net (Curt Wechsler) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:16:42 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list Message-ID: <410-22008731681642218@earthlink.net> Look, people are dying, others being tortured, an attack on Iran pending, and you persist in your petty squabbles. Be ashamed. Grow up. Make yourselves useful. > [Original Message] > From: Drew Johnson > To: > Date: 7/16/2008 12:19:28 AM > Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingme from regional list > > Let's see just how many people Jim can demean and insult in the space of > just a few days. First he did elected County Councilwoman Caroline > Yacoub, then a whole slew of people were sprayed down with his arrogant > verbal urine in one shot and now Jodi. > > BTW Jim. I have never said that I was removed from this discuss list. > That is yet another lie you just told. I'll keep a list your lies too. > > > > Green is Respect! > > Drew > > > On Tue, July 15, 2008 14:15, Jim Stauffer wrote: > > No one has been removed from the 'discuss' list. Do you believe everything > > Drew tells you? > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > jodi embry wrote: > >> I hope that no-one decides to take me off the "discuss-list" especially, > >> if I start high-lighting events in the news. > >> Jodi > >> > >> --- On Sun, 7/13/08, Fred Duperrault wrote: > >> > >>> From: Fred Duperrault > >>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly > >>> unsubscribing me from regional list > >>> To: "Drew Johnson" > >>> Cc: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > >>> Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 9:47 PM > >>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. > >>> I'm sure he informs > >>> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. > >>> > >>> I see no harm. > >>> > >>> Fred Duperrault > >>> > >>> Hello All, > >>> > >>> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much > >>> everyone, who's > >>> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has > >>> something > >>> to say that is important. That is, information about > >>> impeachment, > >>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, > >>> etc., etc., > >>> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, > >>> Drew's emails > >>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the > >>> GREEN party. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Randy W. Sandberg > >>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: > >>> > >>>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim > >>> Stauffer. Jim is > >>>> not > >>>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the > >>> right to partake > >>>> in such > >>>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" > >>> way to operate. I > >>>> request > >>>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately > >>> reinstate my > >>>> subscription > >>>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that > >>> this behavior is > >>>> completely unacceptable. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Green is Ethical! > >>>> > >>>> Drew Johnson > >>>> > >>>> County Council Emeritus and > >>>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among > >>> many other > >>>> forms of > >>>> service I provide) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ---------------------------- Original Message > >>>> ---------------------------- > >>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew > >>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" > >>> > >>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 > >>>> To: "Regional List" > >>> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. > >>> He's been asked > >>>> several times > >>>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he > >>> refuses to do so. > >>>> This > >>>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green > >>> Party issues. The > >>>> GPCA > >>>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. > >>>> > >>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his > >>> only purpose for > >>>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his > >>> favorite > >>>> discussion > >>>> topics. > >>>> > >>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you > >>> can add him to > >>>> your > >>>> discussion list. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From JGSHURT69 at aol.com Wed Jul 16 06:16:42 2008 From: JGSHURT69 at aol.com (JGSHURT69 at aol.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:16:42 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Re Jim and Drew Message-ID: Petty squabbles. Typically personal attacks. Get over it, and get on with our work. Build the Green Perspective, Green Values, direct action projects......not this distraction BS. Jeffrey in San Bruno **************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com! (http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alexcathy at aol.com Wed Jul 16 06:48:07 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Recall Jim Stauffer? Let's Not Get Carried Away In-Reply-To: <1208.75.17.61.205.1216193835.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <1208.75.17.61.205.1216193835.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <8CAB561B61BE805-165C-3914@webmail-nf04.sim.aol.com> My Dear Green Friends, Let's not get carried away!? This incident is unfortunate, but not a big deal.? With one of the most important elections in the history of the United States coming up, now is not the time to fool around with recalling Greens.? Now that things are mercifully settling down in Los Angeles, we don't need the brothers and sisters of Santa Clara bumping up the California?Green dysfunction index.??I've known and worked with Jim for years.? Jim is a hero of the Green Revolution.? I have?also been a great admirer of Drew's work promoting?Green values.? I agree 100% with Tian: "Why can't we all just get along?" Alex Walker -----Original Message----- From: Tian Harter To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Sent: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:37 am Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list . . .Stauffer often acts grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If you allow for his personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please cut him a little slack. When we have an activist that wants to do the work Jim is doing quite well, then is the time to vote him out of office. Until then, I say "Why can't we all just get along?" Tian ? -----Original Message----- From: Tian Harter To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Sent: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:37 am Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list . . .Stauffer often acts grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If you allow for his personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please cut him a little slack. When we have an activist that wants to do the work Jim is doing quite well, then is the time to vote him out of office. Until then, I say "Why can't we all just get along?" Tian ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 07:54:30 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list In-Reply-To: <487DA527.90505@aceweb.com> References: <2964.99.164.175.193.1215999241.squirrel@greens.org><487ADA44.2060707@freeshell.org><1653572900-1216026609-cardhu_dec ombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-722019690-@bxe162.bisx.prod.on.blackberry><487C0983.1080508@greens.org> <2786.75.17.61.205.1216148700.squirrel@www.greens.org> <487DA527.90505@aceweb.com> Message-ID: <2399.75.17.61.205.1216220070.squirrel@greens.org> Jim's mischaracterization that this was about 'general discussion' is misleading and innacurate and therefore is irrelevant. Hitting a person is far from the only form of violence. Month by month we have been subjected to Jim's violent attitude towards any that disagree with him. I know for a fact that numerous people (especially women because of his misogynistic attitudes) have been turned off of our county's party and have not returned based on what you call Tian his 'personality'. Its not his personality. Its that he is an unrecovered rageaholic. He needs help but apparently doesn't take steps to get Anger Management or whatever it is that would address his issues. Just in the past few days a number of Santa Clara Greens have been abused by Jim on the e-mail list. This arrogant and tyrannous behavior is completely unacceptable of someone who we have entrusted with being our Regional Representative to the GPCA Coordinating Committee. Further it is not Jim's perview to arbitrarily and unilaterally take a GPSC County Councilor emeritus off any GPCA e-mail list. He is not the king of anything. He did not have the right to act in such an emperious way. We can not afford to continue to turn a blind eye to Jim's ongoing egregious toxic behavior, so we need to protect our membership by removing the power investing in Jim's that he is injuring other people and our party with. No I will not drop my requests to the County Council. Absolutely not. Green is Safe! Drew On Wed, July 16, 2008 00:37, Tian Harter wrote: > I gotta agree that general discussion belongs in the discussion forum. > I've not been on that list so I don't know a "crime" was committed, > but I could believe Drew would post discussion items beyond where they go. > > I consider the rant below this a bit over the top. Stauffer often acts > grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If you allow for his > personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please cut him a little slack. > > When we have an activist that wants to do the work Jim is doing quite > well, then is the time to vote him out of office. Until then, I say > "Why can't we all just get along?" > > Tian > > Drew Johnson wrote: >> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:20, Jim Stauffer wrote: >>> Do any of you know what you're talking about? >> >> >> This quote is typically arrogant behavior from Jim Stauffer. It falls >> entirely within his typical pattern of behavior. How offensive can you >> get??? >> >> This puts across the entirely elitist message: "Watch out people, do not >> cross Jim Stauffer. He knows what's best for you. Do not speak out >> against his outrageous rageaholic behavior because he will slap you >> down. >> >> I say the party can not afford to put a rageaholic into a position of >> power. How many have left our party because of Jim's behavior. Its >> worth >> pointing out that Jim behaves consistently in a consistently >> misogynistic >> manner. He's a white male and he knows better than you (as in the above >> example). Just rollover people because Jim is the tyrant and you have >> no >> right to question any of his hurtful behavior. Like Bush, he is >> entirely >> above the shackles of any kind of check on his actions. Thank you Jim >> for >> giving us a beautiful example of exactly what we Greens are working to >> overcome in our world today. >> >> >> Green is Connection! >> >> Drew >> >> >>> Can any of you tell me the what list he was removed from and the >>> purpose >>> of >>> that list? >>> >>> Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette policy >>> (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that asks for >>> cooperation from participants on these cost-free, advertising-free >>> lists >>> that the party provides for your use? >>> >>> And, finally, what right do any of you have to tell the small >>> membership >>> of >>> closed, special-purpose list who they have to allow as members and what >>> messages they have to read? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: >>>> I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I >>>> don't >>>> understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What >>>> are >>>> the rules being violated specifically? >>>> >>>> Green is unification, >>>> Kaisha >>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Fred Duperrault >>>> >>>> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 >>>> To: Drew Johnson >>>> Cc: >>>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >>>> unsubscribing >>>> me from regional list >>>> >>>> >>>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he >>>> informs >>>> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >>>> >>>> I see no harm. >>>> >>>> Fred Duperrault >>>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's >>>> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something >>>> to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, >>>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., >>>> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails >>>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Randy W. Sandberg >>>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >>>>> not >>>>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake >>>>> in such >>>>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I >>>>> request >>>>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my >>>>> subscription >>>>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is >>>>> completely unacceptable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Green is Ethical! >>>>> >>>>> Drew Johnson >>>>> >>>>> County Council Emeritus and >>>>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other >>>>> forms of >>>>> service I provide) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>>>> To: "Regional List" >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked >>>>> several times >>>>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. >>>>> This >>>>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The >>>>> GPCA >>>>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>>>> >>>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for >>>>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite >>>>> discussion >>>>> topics. >>>>> >>>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to >>>>> your >>>>> discussion list. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jim >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> SC-SM mailing list >>>>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >>>>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>>>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > > -- > Tian > http://tian.greens.org > I just got back from the Green Party Convention in Chicago. > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From cls at truffula.sj.ca.us Wed Jul 16 07:59:08 2008 From: cls at truffula.sj.ca.us (cls at truffula.sj.ca.us) Date: 16 Jul 2008 14:59:08 -0000 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Recall Jim Stauffer from GPCA Coordinating Committee Message-ID: <20080716145908.12979.qmail@truffula.sj.ca.us> The owner of an Internet mailing list is captain of his ship. If you don't like the way he runs it, you start a competing list. If you're right, his list dies. That's the only way it's ever worked. Cameron From cls at truffula.sj.ca.us Wed Jul 16 08:11:15 2008 From: cls at truffula.sj.ca.us (cls at truffula.sj.ca.us) Date: 16 Jul 2008 15:11:15 -0000 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Recall Jim Stauffer? Let's Not Get Carried Away Message-ID: <20080716151115.13186.qmail@truffula.sj.ca.us> Hey, maybe Jim is wrong and Drew really knows better than Jim and his subscribers what they subscribed to that list for. Maybe it really is the "anything Drew thinks is interesting" list. Maybe all lists are. Cameron From JamBoi at Greens.org Wed Jul 16 08:37:30 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Recall Jim Stauffer? Yes! In-Reply-To: <20080716151115.13186.qmail@truffula.sj.ca.us> References: <20080716151115.13186.qmail@truffula.sj.ca.us> Message-ID: <2433.75.17.61.205.1216222650.squirrel@greens.org> Hey, maybe Jim is always right about everything and its perfectly okay for him to abuse and turn away scores of people in the party. After all he is the almighty Jim Stauffer. Or maybe we might just want to democratically discuss and work out how we want our e-mail lists (which belong to the party, not to the e-mail list administrator) run? Maybe we might want a transparent, open procedure of greviences instead of one white male intimidator, dominator tyrant , judge, jury and executioner, unilaterally and arbitrarily pronouncing the sentence of doom and carrying it out. Let's see, Grassroots Democracy or elitism, Grassroots Democracy or Elitsism. Hmmm... which one best fits our values... Green is Principled! Drew On Wed, July 16, 2008 08:11, cls at truffula.sj.ca.us wrote: > > Hey, maybe Jim is wrong and Drew really knows better than Jim and his > subscribers what they subscribed to that list for. Maybe it really is > the "anything Drew thinks is interesting" list. Maybe all lists are. > > Cameron > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From jims at greens.org Wed Jul 16 19:24:44 2008 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:24:44 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] To Drew and his Friends In-Reply-To: <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <487EAD6C.7080709@greens.org> Drew, you seriously need to see a therapist. You're embarrassing yourself with these lies, as you have so often embarrassed the Green Party. Get some help! To those of you who appear to believe any lie that Drew spits out, why don't you find something meaningful to do with your lives instead of attacking people on email lists. I'm not interested in hearing anything more from any of you. I'm unsubscribing from this list. Jim Drew Johnson wrote: > No No Jim. You got that entirely backwards. Caroline deserves THE RESPECT > as a Couunty Council member which you just deprived her of. Though you > also have not been on the Council for many years, we TRY to give you > respect DESPITE your OUTRAGEOUS OUTBURSTS OF ANGER WHICH HAVE DRIVEN MANY > ACTIVISTS AWAY FROM OUR PARTY. While you are currently serving as our > Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee none of this gives you > justification to operate as a tin plated dictator in this way. > > Since YOU are the one taking the completely ungreen, rageaholic, tyranous, > abusive censorious, exclusionary, arbitrary, unilateral, high handed and > unreasonable action YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO EXPLAIN TO EVERYONE why > you think that you have the right to knock a County Council emeritus > member off the list for posting about news of vital interest to Green in > the region. > > IMO, instead of subjecting us all to these periodically terrorizing angry > outbursts that Jim indulges himself in and sprays everyone around himself > in, Jim Stauffer needs to get himself to anger management classes ASAP and > take a timeout from party work to get his head straightened out about > treating others with respect and dignity. Its a matter of taking personal > responsibility for his own behavior. How many people have been driven > away from this party over the years by Jim personally would be difficult > to guess. While he provides much knowledge from having been at key > positions over the years Jim's extremely ungreen behavior entirely > detracts from the value he'd otherwise be able to provide. Let him get > himself together so that he can operate as a real Green rather than a > madman and THEN he will be well enough to fully contribute. > > Jim's archnemesis, Mike Feinstein recently took himself mostly out of the > state party mix. Jim would do very well to do the same. It would do him, > the GPCA AND the GPSC a WORLD OF GOOD. We should not be subjected to the > factional fanaticism that the factional alphas like Jo Chamberlain, Peter > Camejo, on the one side of the factional divide or Mike Feinstein on the > other OR their their loyal foot soldiers like Jim Stauffer (of the Jo > Chamberlain/ Peter Camejo faction) that keep that fire alive. > > EVERYONE GET THIS: The post that Jim knocked me off after was the one > about McKinney's choice for VP running mate, Rosa Clemente!!!! The post I > was about to put on was an official GP-US release describing our new > nominee, Cynthia McKinney and her running mate. I was AT THE CONVENTION, > TRYING TO PROVIDE CURRENT NEWS TO OUR REGION!!! HELLO!!! Jim's behavior > is just out of control IMO. > > I'm sorry, but Jim's is the one completely confused about what constitutes > items of interest and concern to Greens across the region. > > EVERYONE GET THIS: The volume on the list in question is a trickle!!! Its > hardly used at all!!! This is a completely in Stauffer's head-only > artificial situation due to Jim's amazingly cramped interpretation of what > is of interest to Green in the regional > > I'm thinking that Jim may have altered the list's purpose statement > recently because i seem to recall it was longer, broader and more > inclusive previously. But whether or not this is the case, here's what it > says today: > > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm > > "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM counties on > regional issues." > > Notice this says NOTHING about it being County Council ONLY business or > that ONLY County Council members can post. Notice it gives no > restrictions (nor should it) as to how. Notice it does not say that Jim > Stauffer is the definer of ANYTHING, or that he has the authority to > suddenly, arbitrarily and with prejuce boot County Councilor emeritus > members off the list (it doesn't even assert that he has ANYTHING TO DO > WITH THE LIST WHATSOVER). > > Jim seems to want to treat the SC-SM list as if it were the Red Phone, > connecting the White House to the Kremlin, only to be used in the direst > of emergencies. Or as a fire that you have to break the glass in order to > use. The SC-SM list is treated as if it were so precious it just can > never be used. Rubbish!!! Our party resources NEED to be exercised in > order to actually make a difference. Duh! > > Here's what I say: > > When our region needs to mobilize to run our races as we do with our > presidential race, ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS. When we need to talk about how > we run Carol Brouillet's race (in the 14th district which spans both San > Mateo and Santa Clara county) its regional business. Heck Barry > Hermanson's and Peter Myer's run to some smaller extent is regional > business. > > When we need to organize civil rights actions (including impeachment) we > need to communicate it across the whole region. > > When we have events we want both county member's to participate in, such > as Tian's parties, its regional business. Several SM members joined us at > the last, fun and wonderful election night party at Tian's. Note that Jim > was not a participant. > > This SM-SC list is for COMMUNICATION, not to hamper, construct, censor > communication. I received a number of private e-mails previously re: the > posts I'd put up on the SC-SM list by people who felt intimidated by the > wrathful Jim Stauffer and so didn't want to expose themselves to his > abusive wrath. IF PEOPLE DO NOT WISH TO READ A POSTING THEY MAY SIMPLY > IGNORE IT OR HIT THE DELETE BUTTON. THEY DO NOT NEED TO TRY TO DICTATE TO > OTHERS HOW TO COMMUNICATE. > > > Green is Connection! > > Drew Johnson > County Council Emeritus and Delegate to the Green National Committee > (among many, many other contributions) > > > On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:40, Jim Stauffer wrote: >> Caroline - >> >> Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation of >> "esclusion and censorship." >> >> Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read Drew's >> post >> can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy his >> messages there and no one has complained about his removal. >> >> If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make that >> claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are >> "closed" >> lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The membership is >> controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion topics >> are >> not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. >> >> As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this >> organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. Those > are strong accusations. >> Jim >> >> >> >> Caroline Yacoub wrote: >>> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on the best >>> information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who doesn't >>> want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is choice. >>> Caroline > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From justvegan at mac.com Wed Jul 16 20:43:20 2008 From: justvegan at mac.com (justvegan at mac.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:43:20 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] To Drew and his Friends In-Reply-To: <487EAD6C.7080709@greens.org> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> <487EAD6C.7080709@greens.org> Message-ID: <1824F498-6552-45A3-B363-C4ABA10ADF8A@mac.com> Dear Jim, What's up? Scientists say there will be no ice at the North Pole come *this* Summertime. And, if we continue doing things the non-Green way, there will be no ice at all anywhere in five years from now. Corporations own the governments, the police forces, and the armies. We're f**ked in so many ways right now I cannot even begin to express my angst towards these evil doers who are bringing Earth to its demise. On the flip-side the only hope us awoken folks have at not seeing an end to everything we know is through the masses. The masses who need to be woken up. And it's going to take Drew, yourself, me, and a whole bunch of other folks to get the message out working night and day. Sadly, thus far, for at least the last few days, it seems that you have spent a goodly amount of your valuable time trying to be right. Why? Like I said in my first email regarding your angst towards Drew, with all that's going on right now, everything really does matter and everything is truly connected. For instance, folks who educate others about 9/11 and who really did the deed have everything in common with folks who are calling for impeachment. Yep, folks who are calling for impeachment ultimately want to uncover EVERYTHING Bush and His cohorts have done which will most certainly unravel the whole 9/11 mess. Moreover, impeachment will also get to the bottom of how Bush has shut down warnings about Global Climate Change and how we really are to blame for it. Thus, please turn your energies towards what all of of are trying to accomplish -- saving Mother Earth and all of its inhabitants from the ravages of the Corporations. Sincerely, Randy W. Sandberg www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jim Stauffer wrote: > Drew, you seriously need to see a therapist. You're embarrassing > yourself > with these lies, as you have so often embarrassed the Green Party. > Get some > help! > > To those of you who appear to believe any lie that Drew spits out, > why don't > you find something meaningful to do with your lives instead of > attacking > people on email lists. > > I'm not interested in hearing anything more from any of you. I'm > unsubscribing from this list. > > Jim > > > > > Drew Johnson wrote: >> No No Jim. You got that entirely backwards. Caroline deserves THE >> RESPECT >> as a Couunty Council member which you just deprived her of. Though >> you >> also have not been on the Council for many years, we TRY to give you >> respect DESPITE your OUTRAGEOUS OUTBURSTS OF ANGER WHICH HAVE >> DRIVEN MANY >> ACTIVISTS AWAY FROM OUR PARTY. While you are currently serving as >> our >> Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee none of this gives you >> justification to operate as a tin plated dictator in this way. >> >> Since YOU are the one taking the completely ungreen, rageaholic, >> tyranous, >> abusive censorious, exclusionary, arbitrary, unilateral, high >> handed and >> unreasonable action YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO EXPLAIN TO >> EVERYONE why >> you think that you have the right to knock a County Council emeritus >> member off the list for posting about news of vital interest to >> Green in >> the region. >> >> IMO, instead of subjecting us all to these periodically terrorizing >> angry >> outbursts that Jim indulges himself in and sprays everyone around >> himself >> in, Jim Stauffer needs to get himself to anger management classes >> ASAP and >> take a timeout from party work to get his head straightened out about >> treating others with respect and dignity. Its a matter of taking >> personal >> responsibility for his own behavior. How many people have been >> driven >> away from this party over the years by Jim personally would be >> difficult >> to guess. While he provides much knowledge from having been at key >> positions over the years Jim's extremely ungreen behavior entirely >> detracts from the value he'd otherwise be able to provide. Let him >> get >> himself together so that he can operate as a real Green rather than a >> madman and THEN he will be well enough to fully contribute. >> >> Jim's archnemesis, Mike Feinstein recently took himself mostly out >> of the >> state party mix. Jim would do very well to do the same. It would >> do him, >> the GPCA AND the GPSC a WORLD OF GOOD. We should not be subjected >> to the >> factional fanaticism that the factional alphas like Jo Chamberlain, >> Peter >> Camejo, on the one side of the factional divide or Mike Feinstein >> on the >> other OR their their loyal foot soldiers like Jim Stauffer (of the Jo >> Chamberlain/ Peter Camejo faction) that keep that fire alive. >> >> EVERYONE GET THIS: The post that Jim knocked me off after was the >> one >> about McKinney's choice for VP running mate, Rosa Clemente!!!! The >> post I >> was about to put on was an official GP-US release describing our new >> nominee, Cynthia McKinney and her running mate. I was AT THE >> CONVENTION, >> TRYING TO PROVIDE CURRENT NEWS TO OUR REGION!!! HELLO!!! Jim's >> behavior >> is just out of control IMO. >> >> I'm sorry, but Jim's is the one completely confused about what >> constitutes >> items of interest and concern to Greens across the region. >> >> EVERYONE GET THIS: The volume on the list in question is a >> trickle!!! Its >> hardly used at all!!! This is a completely in Stauffer's head-only >> artificial situation due to Jim's amazingly cramped interpretation >> of what >> is of interest to Green in the regional >> >> I'm thinking that Jim may have altered the list's purpose statement >> recently because i seem to recall it was longer, broader and more >> inclusive previously. But whether or not this is the case, here's >> what it >> says today: >> >> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >> >> "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM >> counties on >> regional issues." >> >> Notice this says NOTHING about it being County Council ONLY >> business or >> that ONLY County Council members can post. Notice it gives no >> restrictions (nor should it) as to how. Notice it does not say >> that Jim >> Stauffer is the definer of ANYTHING, or that he has the authority to >> suddenly, arbitrarily and with prejuce boot County Councilor emeritus >> members off the list (it doesn't even assert that he has ANYTHING >> TO DO >> WITH THE LIST WHATSOVER). >> >> Jim seems to want to treat the SC-SM list as if it were the Red >> Phone, >> connecting the White House to the Kremlin, only to be used in the >> direst >> of emergencies. Or as a fire that you have to break the glass in >> order to >> use. The SC-SM list is treated as if it were so precious it just can >> never be used. Rubbish!!! Our party resources NEED to be >> exercised in >> order to actually make a difference. Duh! >> >> Here's what I say: >> >> When our region needs to mobilize to run our races as we do with our >> presidential race, ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS. When we need to talk >> about how >> we run Carol Brouillet's race (in the 14th district which spans >> both San >> Mateo and Santa Clara county) its regional business. Heck Barry >> Hermanson's and Peter Myer's run to some smaller extent is regional >> business. >> >> When we need to organize civil rights actions (including >> impeachment) we >> need to communicate it across the whole region. >> >> When we have events we want both county member's to participate in, >> such >> as Tian's parties, its regional business. Several SM members >> joined us at >> the last, fun and wonderful election night party at Tian's. Note >> that Jim >> was not a participant. >> >> This SM-SC list is for COMMUNICATION, not to hamper, construct, >> censor >> communication. I received a number of private e-mails previously >> re: the >> posts I'd put up on the SC-SM list by people who felt intimidated >> by the >> wrathful Jim Stauffer and so didn't want to expose themselves to his >> abusive wrath. IF PEOPLE DO NOT WISH TO READ A POSTING THEY MAY >> SIMPLY >> IGNORE IT OR HIT THE DELETE BUTTON. THEY DO NOT NEED TO TRY TO >> DICTATE TO >> OTHERS HOW TO COMMUNICATE. >> >> >> Green is Connection! >> >> Drew Johnson >> County Council Emeritus and Delegate to the Green National Committee >> (among many, many other contributions) >> >> >> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:40, Jim Stauffer wrote: >>> Caroline - >>> >>> Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation >>> of >>> "esclusion and censorship." >>> >>> Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read >>> Drew's >>> post >>> can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy >>> his >>> messages there and no one has complained about his removal. >>> >>> If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make >>> that >>> claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are >>> "closed" >>> lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The >>> membership is >>> controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion >>> topics >>> are >>> not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. >>> >>> As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this >>> organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. >>> Those >> are strong accusations. >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> >>> Caroline Yacoub wrote: >>>> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on >>>> the best >>>> information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who >>>> doesn't >>>> want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is >>>> choice. >>>> Caroline >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From mkmusic at greens.org Thu Jul 17 00:41:00 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:41:00 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: ACTION ALERT] Message-ID: <487EF78C.6050602@greens.org> Hi All, What do you think? Do we get excited about this development, did the Republicans really brake rank or is it just another ploy by them like the House voting game was when Kucinich presented his 35 Articles for Impeachment? Any discussion on this is greatly appreciated. Maybe I'm a bit too skeptical today. Merriam Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Tobi Dragert, Coordinator" Subject: ACTION ALERT Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Size: 18189 URL: From justvegan at mac.com Thu Jul 17 01:12:56 2008 From: justvegan at mac.com (justvegan at mac.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:12:56 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: ACTION ALERT] In-Reply-To: <487EF78C.6050602@greens.org> References: <487EF78C.6050602@greens.org> Message-ID: <5B5B8E93-8E87-4178-B8F0-993C6F83BA2E@mac.com> This is a BIG deal!!! On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:41 AM, Merriam Kathaleen wrote: > Hi All, > > What do you think? Do we get excited about this development, did > the Republicans really brake rank or is it just another ploy by them > like the House voting game was when Kucinich presented his 35 > Articles for Impeachment? > > Any discussion on this is greatly appreciated. Maybe I'm a bit too > skeptical today. > > Merriam > Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition > > From: "Tobi Dragert, Coordinator" > Date: July 16, 2008 2:44:43 PM PDT > To: mkmusic at greens.org > Subject: ACTION ALERT > Reply-To: tdragert at gmail.com > > > NATIONAL IMPEACHMENT NETWORK > ACTION ALERT: THEY'RE BREAKING RANKS! > July 16, 2008 > Sorry - this is longer than an action alert should be, but it's all > such good stuff! Tobi > > 9 Republicans Vote for Impeachment Hearings, 10 Abstain > by Ralph Lopez > Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 01:10:01 PM PDT > > On Daily Kos, Ralph Lopez reports: In a stunning development which > fell with the silence of a feather yesterday, 9 Republicans broke > with their iron-fisted party to put country first, and voted to send > Rep. Dennis Kucinich's article of impeachment HR 1345 to the > Judiciary, where Chairman John Conyers will hold a hearings on > abuses of power by the Bush administration, according to the > Congressional Quaterly's CQToday. (Ten Republicans abstained in > this critical moment.) > > Those 9 Republicans are: > > Congressman Kevin Brady (TX) > Phone: (202)225-4901 > Fax: (202)225-5524 > Email: rep.brady at mail.house.gov > > Congressman Wayne Gilchrest (MD) > Phone 202-225-5311 > Fax 202-225-0254 > > Congressman Walter B. Jones (NC) > Phone: 252-931-1003 > Fax: 252-931-1002 > > Congressman Don Manzullo (IL) > Phone - (202) 225-5676 > Fax - (202)225-5284 > > Congressman Tim Murphy(PA) > Phone: (202) 225-2301 > Fax: (202) 225-1844 322 > > Congressman Ron Paul (TX) > Phone: (202) 225-2831 > > Congressman Dave Reichert (WA) > Phone: (202) 225-7761 > Fax: (202) 225-4282 > > Congressman Christopher Shays (CT) > Phone: 202/225-5541 > Fax: 202/225-9629 > > Congressman Mike Turner (OH) > Phone: (202) 225-6465 > Fax: (202) 225-6754 > > One of the Republicans, Walter Jones, represents Camp LeJeune in > North Carolina, one of the largest Marine bases in the country, and > one which has borne heavily the sacrifice of the Iraq War. > > CQ said of Conyers' hearings: > The anticipated hearing would review more than a year of committee > inquiry into such matters as the firing of U.S. attorneys, the leak > of the identity of former CIA operative Valerie Plame and the > information provided to Congress in the run-up to the Iraq War. > Kucinich has promised a surprise foreign official as a witness in > the hearing. His article focuses on administration claims that > Saddam possessed WMD in the run-up to the Iraq war, and that there > was a connection between Hussein and 9/11. > > Hit the media outlets: (PLEASE REPORT ON THE KUCINICH ARTICLE AND > ON THE 9 REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS!) > letters at jackson.gannett.com, > theforum at usatoday.com, > oped at nytimes.com, > op-ed at latimes.com, > oped at phillynews.com, > ctc-COMMENT at tribune.com, > opinion at startribune.com, > letters at RockyMountainNews.com, > viewpoints at chron.com, > oped at newsday.com, > viewpoints at dallasnews.com, > shuntley at suntimes.com, > forum at sfchronicle.com, > my.turns at pni.com, > m_Pritchard at globe.com, > HeraldEd at herald.com, > oped at herald.com, > oped at starledger.com, > forum at plaind.com, > oped at news.oregonian.com, > editpg at freepress.com, > gailey at sptimes.com, > openforum at denverpost.com, > netaudr at abc.com, > nightline at abcnews.com, > 2020 at abc.com, > nightly at msnbc.com, > today at nbc.com, > dateline at nbc.com, > evening at cbsnews.com, > earlyshow at cbs.com, > hardball at msnbc.com, > msnbcreports at msnbc.com, > newshour at pbs.org, > ombudsman at npr.or > > Keep hitting Congress (below) -- DO NOT LET UP -- RIGHT NOW IS > CRUCIAL! > > If you know any Republicans, ask them to call the 9 (above) in > support! > > CALL NOW: > > House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers, Jr.: > (202) 225-5126 (PLEASE SCHEDULE IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS RIGHT AWAY) > > House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: (202) 225-4965 (THANK YOU FOR LETTING > IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS BEGIN) > > Call Toll Free 800-828-0498 & ask for your Rep. > > (I AM VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS, AND AM VERY > CONCERNED THAT THIS PRESIDENT WILL NOT BE MADE TO ANSWER FOR HIS > ACTIONS, WHICH WERE LAID OUT IN DETAIL IN DENNIS KUCINICH'S ARTICLE > ON TUESDAY, THE 15TH) > > Or see http://www.house.gov/house > > If we fail to motivate our Congressmen to call for Impeachment > Hearings before the Election, we will lose all of our power to > change America for four years. > > LET'S MAKE IMPEACHMENT HAPPEN!! > Tobi Dragert > > This email was sent to mkmusic at greens.org by tdragert at gmail.com. > Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe? > | Privacy Policy. > Email Marketing by > > NIN | LA | www.lockupbush.com | Los Angeles | CA | 90012 > > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From mkmusic at greens.org Thu Jul 17 01:14:20 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:14:20 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] To Drew and his Friends In-Reply-To: <1824F498-6552-45A3-B363-C4ABA10ADF8A@mac.com> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> <487EAD6C.7080709@greens.org> <1824F498-6552-45A3-B363-C4ABA10ADF8A@mac.com> Message-ID: <487EFF5C.7080508@greens.org> Ok, everybody enough is enough. Drew, it may be entirely true that you overstepped your bounds by making the Regional list into a discuss list. If the Regional list is only for regional business then maybe you need to do your posting of discussions items to the sosfbay-discuss list instead. I would really like to see you and Jim Stauffer come to an amiable conclusion to this issue. Drew, you are who your are and Jim is who he is and you both care about our Green Party. So, both of you please find a common ground to agree on and stop this "spitting" at one another, it is not accomplishing anything. Drew, if it is that important to you to be on the Regional list then please find a better way to influence our opinions then by creating all this drama. When someone is taken off a list isn't there some form of recourse to follow, such as calling for a vote among the Regional group instead of getting all of us, who are not in the Regional group, nvolved? Drew, please find a "Green" way to get reinstated on the Regional list. Merriam justvegan at mac.com wrote: > Dear Jim, > > What's up? Scientists say there will be no ice at the North Pole come > *this* Summertime. And, if we continue doing things the non-Green way, > there will be no ice at all anywhere in five years from now. > Corporations own the governments, the police forces, and the armies. > We're f**ked in so many ways right now I cannot even begin to express > my angst towards these evil doers who are bringing Earth to its demise. > > On the flip-side the only hope us awoken folks have at not seeing an > end to everything we know is through the masses. The masses who need > to be woken up. And it's going to take Drew, yourself, me, and a whole > bunch of other folks to get the message out working night and day. > Sadly, thus far, for at least the last few days, it seems that you > have spent a goodly amount of your valuable time trying to be right. > Why? > > Like I said in my first email regarding your angst towards Drew, with > all that's going on right now, everything really does matter and > everything is truly connected. For instance, folks who educate others > about 9/11 and who really did the deed have everything in common with > folks who are calling for impeachment. Yep, folks who are calling for > impeachment ultimately want to uncover EVERYTHING Bush and His cohorts > have done which will most certainly unravel the whole 9/11 mess. > Moreover, impeachment will also get to the bottom of how Bush has shut > down warnings about Global Climate Change and how we really are to > blame for it. > > Thus, please turn your energies towards what all of of are trying to > accomplish -- saving Mother Earth and all of its inhabitants from the > ravages of the Corporations. > > Sincerely, > > Randy W. Sandberg > www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com > > > On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jim Stauffer wrote: > > >> Drew, you seriously need to see a therapist. You're embarrassing >> yourself >> with these lies, as you have so often embarrassed the Green Party. >> Get some >> help! >> >> To those of you who appear to believe any lie that Drew spits out, >> why don't >> you find something meaningful to do with your lives instead of >> attacking >> people on email lists. >> >> I'm not interested in hearing anything more from any of you. I'm >> unsubscribing from this list. >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> >> Drew Johnson wrote: >> >>> No No Jim. You got that entirely backwards. Caroline deserves THE >>> RESPECT >>> as a Couunty Council member which you just deprived her of. Though >>> you >>> also have not been on the Council for many years, we TRY to give you >>> respect DESPITE your OUTRAGEOUS OUTBURSTS OF ANGER WHICH HAVE >>> DRIVEN MANY >>> ACTIVISTS AWAY FROM OUR PARTY. While you are currently serving as >>> our >>> Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee none of this gives you >>> justification to operate as a tin plated dictator in this way. >>> >>> Since YOU are the one taking the completely ungreen, rageaholic, >>> tyranous, >>> abusive censorious, exclusionary, arbitrary, unilateral, high >>> handed and >>> unreasonable action YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO EXPLAIN TO >>> EVERYONE why >>> you think that you have the right to knock a County Council emeritus >>> member off the list for posting about news of vital interest to >>> Green in >>> the region. >>> >>> IMO, instead of subjecting us all to these periodically terrorizing >>> angry >>> outbursts that Jim indulges himself in and sprays everyone around >>> himself >>> in, Jim Stauffer needs to get himself to anger management classes >>> ASAP and >>> take a timeout from party work to get his head straightened out about >>> treating others with respect and dignity. Its a matter of taking >>> personal >>> responsibility for his own behavior. How many people have been >>> driven >>> away from this party over the years by Jim personally would be >>> difficult >>> to guess. While he provides much knowledge from having been at key >>> positions over the years Jim's extremely ungreen behavior entirely >>> detracts from the value he'd otherwise be able to provide. Let him >>> get >>> himself together so that he can operate as a real Green rather than a >>> madman and THEN he will be well enough to fully contribute. >>> >>> Jim's archnemesis, Mike Feinstein recently took himself mostly out >>> of the >>> state party mix. Jim would do very well to do the same. It would >>> do him, >>> the GPCA AND the GPSC a WORLD OF GOOD. We should not be subjected >>> to the >>> factional fanaticism that the factional alphas like Jo Chamberlain, >>> Peter >>> Camejo, on the one side of the factional divide or Mike Feinstein >>> on the >>> other OR their their loyal foot soldiers like Jim Stauffer (of the Jo >>> Chamberlain/ Peter Camejo faction) that keep that fire alive. >>> >>> EVERYONE GET THIS: The post that Jim knocked me off after was the >>> one >>> about McKinney's choice for VP running mate, Rosa Clemente!!!! The >>> post I >>> was about to put on was an official GP-US release describing our new >>> nominee, Cynthia McKinney and her running mate. I was AT THE >>> CONVENTION, >>> TRYING TO PROVIDE CURRENT NEWS TO OUR REGION!!! HELLO!!! Jim's >>> behavior >>> is just out of control IMO. >>> >>> I'm sorry, but Jim's is the one completely confused about what >>> constitutes >>> items of interest and concern to Greens across the region. >>> >>> EVERYONE GET THIS: The volume on the list in question is a >>> trickle!!! Its >>> hardly used at all!!! This is a completely in Stauffer's head-only >>> artificial situation due to Jim's amazingly cramped interpretation >>> of what >>> is of interest to Green in the regional >>> >>> I'm thinking that Jim may have altered the list's purpose statement >>> recently because i seem to recall it was longer, broader and more >>> inclusive previously. But whether or not this is the case, here's >>> what it >>> says today: >>> >>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>> >>> "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM >>> counties on >>> regional issues." >>> >>> Notice this says NOTHING about it being County Council ONLY >>> business or >>> that ONLY County Council members can post. Notice it gives no >>> restrictions (nor should it) as to how. Notice it does not say >>> that Jim >>> Stauffer is the definer of ANYTHING, or that he has the authority to >>> suddenly, arbitrarily and with prejuce boot County Councilor emeritus >>> members off the list (it doesn't even assert that he has ANYTHING >>> TO DO >>> WITH THE LIST WHATSOVER). >>> >>> Jim seems to want to treat the SC-SM list as if it were the Red >>> Phone, >>> connecting the White House to the Kremlin, only to be used in the >>> direst >>> of emergencies. Or as a fire that you have to break the glass in >>> order to >>> use. The SC-SM list is treated as if it were so precious it just can >>> never be used. Rubbish!!! Our party resources NEED to be >>> exercised in >>> order to actually make a difference. Duh! >>> >>> Here's what I say: >>> >>> When our region needs to mobilize to run our races as we do with our >>> presidential race, ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS. When we need to talk >>> about how >>> we run Carol Brouillet's race (in the 14th district which spans >>> both San >>> Mateo and Santa Clara county) its regional business. Heck Barry >>> Hermanson's and Peter Myer's run to some smaller extent is regional >>> business. >>> >>> When we need to organize civil rights actions (including >>> impeachment) we >>> need to communicate it across the whole region. >>> >>> When we have events we want both county member's to participate in, >>> such >>> as Tian's parties, its regional business. Several SM members >>> joined us at >>> the last, fun and wonderful election night party at Tian's. Note >>> that Jim >>> was not a participant. >>> >>> This SM-SC list is for COMMUNICATION, not to hamper, construct, >>> censor >>> communication. I received a number of private e-mails previously >>> re: the >>> posts I'd put up on the SC-SM list by people who felt intimidated >>> by the >>> wrathful Jim Stauffer and so didn't want to expose themselves to his >>> abusive wrath. IF PEOPLE DO NOT WISH TO READ A POSTING THEY MAY >>> SIMPLY >>> IGNORE IT OR HIT THE DELETE BUTTON. THEY DO NOT NEED TO TRY TO >>> DICTATE TO >>> OTHERS HOW TO COMMUNICATE. >>> >>> >>> Green is Connection! >>> >>> Drew Johnson >>> County Council Emeritus and Delegate to the Green National Committee >>> (among many, many other contributions) >>> >>> >>> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:40, Jim Stauffer wrote: >>> >>>> Caroline - >>>> >>>> Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation >>>> of >>>> "esclusion and censorship." >>>> >>>> Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read >>>> Drew's >>>> post >>>> can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy >>>> his >>>> messages there and no one has complained about his removal. >>>> >>>> If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make >>>> that >>>> claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are >>>> "closed" >>>> lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The >>>> membership is >>>> controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion >>>> topics >>>> are >>>> not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. >>>> >>>> As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this >>>> organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. >>>> Those >>>> >>> are strong accusations. >>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Caroline Yacoub wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on >>>>> the best >>>>> information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who >>>>> doesn't >>>>> want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is >>>>> choice. >>>>> Caroline >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > From JamBoi at Greens.org Thu Jul 17 01:56:59 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] To Drew and his Friends In-Reply-To: <487EFF5C.7080508@greens.org> References: <278344.21223.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <487C0E34.3020204@greens.org> <2738.75.17.61.205.1216146231.squirrel@www.greens.org> <487EAD6C.7080709@greens.org> <1824F498-6552-45A3-B363-C4ABA10ADF8A@mac.com> <487EFF5C.7080508@greens.org> Message-ID: <3109.75.17.61.205.1216285019.squirrel@greens.org> Oh I am working this through in a Green way. I took it straight to the County Council who has purview over this. Even though there is no formal procedure for working these things through, the County Councils are more than capable of figuring out how to deal with them. Jim has operated as if he were the definer of what that list is for and I hate to break the news to him, but its a Green Party asset, not his private list. So its something for the Grassroots Democracy of our membership (including the folks on THIS list and the folks in the other part of the region, San Mateo) and for the respective County Councils of the two counties to figure out. Also these two county parties are in control of recalling Jim from his trusted position as a Regional Rep. To my mind anyone who would write so disrespectfully as Jim has right here on this list to anyone who disagrees with him is patently unfit to represent our region to the GPCA Coordinating Committee (CC). His behavior has been part of the dynamic that has kept the CC in turmoil lo these many months. As one of the Factional Fanatics (in his case he fights for the Jo Chamberlain/Peter Camejo Faction this sectarian division has been absolutely devastating to the GPCA. When people bitterly complain and roll their eyes about how bad its been on the CC, just remember that Jim was a key contributor to that whole fiasco. Unfortunately he projects so much (as he did below) that when someone challenges him on his out of control behavior as I have he just dismisses it (as he did below) instead of HIM GETTING THE ANGER MANAGEMENT HELP THAT HE SO OBVIOUSLY NEEDS. HE CAN NOT BE BOTHERED TO BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE MEMBERS OF THE GPSC AND HIS ARROGANCE IS DISPLAYED HERE IN SPADES. Green is Connection! Drew On Thu, July 17, 2008 01:14, Merriam Kathaleen wrote: > Ok, everybody enough is enough. Drew, it may be entirely true that you > overstepped your bounds by making the Regional list into a discuss > list. If the Regional list is only for regional business then maybe you > need to do your posting of discussions items to the sosfbay-discuss list > instead. I would really like to see you and Jim Stauffer come to an > amiable conclusion to this issue. Drew, you are who your are and Jim is > who he is and you both care about our Green Party. So, both of you > please find a common ground to agree on and stop this "spitting" at one > another, it is not accomplishing anything. Drew, if it is that > important to you to be on the Regional list then please > find a better way to influence our opinions then by creating all this > drama. When someone is taken off a list isn't there some form of > recourse to follow, such as calling for a vote among the Regional group > instead of getting all of us, who are not in the Regional group, > nvolved? Drew, please find a "Green" way to get reinstated on the > Regional list. > > Merriam > > > justvegan at mac.com wrote: >> Dear Jim, >> >> What's up? Scientists say there will be no ice at the North Pole come >> *this* Summertime. And, if we continue doing things the non-Green way, >> there will be no ice at all anywhere in five years from now. >> Corporations own the governments, the police forces, and the armies. >> We're f**ked in so many ways right now I cannot even begin to express >> my angst towards these evil doers who are bringing Earth to its demise. >> >> On the flip-side the only hope us awoken folks have at not seeing an >> end to everything we know is through the masses. The masses who need >> to be woken up. And it's going to take Drew, yourself, me, and a whole >> bunch of other folks to get the message out working night and day. >> Sadly, thus far, for at least the last few days, it seems that you >> have spent a goodly amount of your valuable time trying to be right. >> Why? >> >> Like I said in my first email regarding your angst towards Drew, with >> all that's going on right now, everything really does matter and >> everything is truly connected. For instance, folks who educate others >> about 9/11 and who really did the deed have everything in common with >> folks who are calling for impeachment. Yep, folks who are calling for >> impeachment ultimately want to uncover EVERYTHING Bush and His cohorts >> have done which will most certainly unravel the whole 9/11 mess. >> Moreover, impeachment will also get to the bottom of how Bush has shut >> down warnings about Global Climate Change and how we really are to >> blame for it. >> >> Thus, please turn your energies towards what all of of are trying to >> accomplish -- saving Mother Earth and all of its inhabitants from the >> ravages of the Corporations. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Randy W. Sandberg >> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >> >> >> On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jim Stauffer wrote: >> >> >>> Drew, you seriously need to see a therapist. You're embarrassing >>> yourself >>> with these lies, as you have so often embarrassed the Green Party. >>> Get some >>> help! >>> >>> To those of you who appear to believe any lie that Drew spits out, >>> why don't >>> you find something meaningful to do with your lives instead of >>> attacking >>> people on email lists. >>> >>> I'm not interested in hearing anything more from any of you. I'm >>> unsubscribing from this list. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Drew Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> No No Jim. You got that entirely backwards. Caroline deserves THE >>>> RESPECT >>>> as a Couunty Council member which you just deprived her of. Though >>>> you >>>> also have not been on the Council for many years, we TRY to give you >>>> respect DESPITE your OUTRAGEOUS OUTBURSTS OF ANGER WHICH HAVE >>>> DRIVEN MANY >>>> ACTIVISTS AWAY FROM OUR PARTY. While you are currently serving as >>>> our >>>> Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee none of this gives you >>>> justification to operate as a tin plated dictator in this way. >>>> >>>> Since YOU are the one taking the completely ungreen, rageaholic, >>>> tyranous, >>>> abusive censorious, exclusionary, arbitrary, unilateral, high >>>> handed and >>>> unreasonable action YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO EXPLAIN TO >>>> EVERYONE why >>>> you think that you have the right to knock a County Council emeritus >>>> member off the list for posting about news of vital interest to >>>> Green in >>>> the region. >>>> >>>> IMO, instead of subjecting us all to these periodically terrorizing >>>> angry >>>> outbursts that Jim indulges himself in and sprays everyone around >>>> himself >>>> in, Jim Stauffer needs to get himself to anger management classes >>>> ASAP and >>>> take a timeout from party work to get his head straightened out about >>>> treating others with respect and dignity. Its a matter of taking >>>> personal >>>> responsibility for his own behavior. How many people have been >>>> driven >>>> away from this party over the years by Jim personally would be >>>> difficult >>>> to guess. While he provides much knowledge from having been at key >>>> positions over the years Jim's extremely ungreen behavior entirely >>>> detracts from the value he'd otherwise be able to provide. Let him >>>> get >>>> himself together so that he can operate as a real Green rather than a >>>> madman and THEN he will be well enough to fully contribute. >>>> >>>> Jim's archnemesis, Mike Feinstein recently took himself mostly out >>>> of the >>>> state party mix. Jim would do very well to do the same. It would >>>> do him, >>>> the GPCA AND the GPSC a WORLD OF GOOD. We should not be subjected >>>> to the >>>> factional fanaticism that the factional alphas like Jo Chamberlain, >>>> Peter >>>> Camejo, on the one side of the factional divide or Mike Feinstein >>>> on the >>>> other OR their their loyal foot soldiers like Jim Stauffer (of the Jo >>>> Chamberlain/ Peter Camejo faction) that keep that fire alive. >>>> >>>> EVERYONE GET THIS: The post that Jim knocked me off after was the >>>> one >>>> about McKinney's choice for VP running mate, Rosa Clemente!!!! The >>>> post I >>>> was about to put on was an official GP-US release describing our new >>>> nominee, Cynthia McKinney and her running mate. I was AT THE >>>> CONVENTION, >>>> TRYING TO PROVIDE CURRENT NEWS TO OUR REGION!!! HELLO!!! Jim's >>>> behavior >>>> is just out of control IMO. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry, but Jim's is the one completely confused about what >>>> constitutes >>>> items of interest and concern to Greens across the region. >>>> >>>> EVERYONE GET THIS: The volume on the list in question is a >>>> trickle!!! Its >>>> hardly used at all!!! This is a completely in Stauffer's head-only >>>> artificial situation due to Jim's amazingly cramped interpretation >>>> of what >>>> is of interest to Green in the regional >>>> >>>> I'm thinking that Jim may have altered the list's purpose statement >>>> recently because i seem to recall it was longer, broader and more >>>> inclusive previously. But whether or not this is the case, here's >>>> what it >>>> says today: >>>> >>>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm >>>> >>>> "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM >>>> counties on >>>> regional issues." >>>> >>>> Notice this says NOTHING about it being County Council ONLY >>>> business or >>>> that ONLY County Council members can post. Notice it gives no >>>> restrictions (nor should it) as to how. Notice it does not say >>>> that Jim >>>> Stauffer is the definer of ANYTHING, or that he has the authority to >>>> suddenly, arbitrarily and with prejuce boot County Councilor emeritus >>>> members off the list (it doesn't even assert that he has ANYTHING >>>> TO DO >>>> WITH THE LIST WHATSOVER). >>>> >>>> Jim seems to want to treat the SC-SM list as if it were the Red >>>> Phone, >>>> connecting the White House to the Kremlin, only to be used in the >>>> direst >>>> of emergencies. Or as a fire that you have to break the glass in >>>> order to >>>> use. The SC-SM list is treated as if it were so precious it just can >>>> never be used. Rubbish!!! Our party resources NEED to be >>>> exercised in >>>> order to actually make a difference. Duh! >>>> >>>> Here's what I say: >>>> >>>> When our region needs to mobilize to run our races as we do with our >>>> presidential race, ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS. When we need to talk >>>> about how >>>> we run Carol Brouillet's race (in the 14th district which spans >>>> both San >>>> Mateo and Santa Clara county) its regional business. Heck Barry >>>> Hermanson's and Peter Myer's run to some smaller extent is regional >>>> business. >>>> >>>> When we need to organize civil rights actions (including >>>> impeachment) we >>>> need to communicate it across the whole region. >>>> >>>> When we have events we want both county member's to participate in, >>>> such >>>> as Tian's parties, its regional business. Several SM members >>>> joined us at >>>> the last, fun and wonderful election night party at Tian's. Note >>>> that Jim >>>> was not a participant. >>>> >>>> This SM-SC list is for COMMUNICATION, not to hamper, construct, >>>> censor >>>> communication. I received a number of private e-mails previously >>>> re: the >>>> posts I'd put up on the SC-SM list by people who felt intimidated >>>> by the >>>> wrathful Jim Stauffer and so didn't want to expose themselves to his >>>> abusive wrath. IF PEOPLE DO NOT WISH TO READ A POSTING THEY MAY >>>> SIMPLY >>>> IGNORE IT OR HIT THE DELETE BUTTON. THEY DO NOT NEED TO TRY TO >>>> DICTATE TO >>>> OTHERS HOW TO COMMUNICATE. >>>> >>>> >>>> Green is Connection! >>>> >>>> Drew Johnson >>>> County Council Emeritus and Delegate to the Green National Committee >>>> (among many, many other contributions) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:40, Jim Stauffer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Caroline - >>>>> >>>>> Since you are County Councilor you need to explain your accusation >>>>> of >>>>> "esclusion and censorship." >>>>> >>>>> Specifically, how is it censorship when anyone who wants to read >>>>> Drew's >>>>> post >>>>> can do so on this list? No one on the other list asked him to copy >>>>> his >>>>> messages there and no one has complained about his removal. >>>>> >>>>> If you want to make a claim of exclusion, then you'll have to make >>>>> that >>>>> claim against most of the lists in the state party. Most lists are >>>>> "closed" >>>>> lists for committees or some other specialized purpose. The >>>>> membership is >>>>> controlled by the list members themselves, and general discussion >>>>> topics >>>>> are >>>>> not allowed. Such is the list from which Drew was removed. >>>>> >>>>> As a person who now holds a position of responsibility in this >>>>> organization, please explain how this is exclusion and censorship. >>>>> Those >>>>> >>>> are strong accusations. >>>> >>>>> Jim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Caroline Yacoub wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I thought the Green Party was about inclusion and operating on >>>>>> the best >>>>>> information available, not esclusion and censorship. Anyone who >>>>>> doesn't >>>>>> want to read Drew's e-mails has only to delete them. Green is >>>>>> choice. >>>>>> Caroline From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Thu Jul 17 06:45:23 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Rapid Bus, BART, High-Speed Rail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <426511.25481.qm@web54307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9906067 That is an article about a proposed tax for extending BART down to San Jose. It will generate $42 million per year, which will almost cover the $50 million it takes to operate the extension annually but will only kick in once the federal and state governments fulfill their promise of $1 billion to the BART extension project (so far they've only given half the amount). Proponents are afraid the proposition will not pass this November due to a $10 billion bond for high speed rail and a bad economy. What I fail to see is the problem with the $10 billion for high speed rail. Compared to other industrialized countries, the United States is about half a century behind when it comes to rail transport. $10 billion breaks down to $10 per person per year. It is also much less than the $20+ billion we will need to spend on road and airport expansions in the next 25 years without high speed rail. If people can spend over $10 to watch a movie, I am sure they can afford to see one less movie every year to fund reducing global warming. I may be preaching to the choir, but what are your thoughts about BART and high speed rail? -Edward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Thu Jul 17 07:28:33 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list In-Reply-To: <787861.75376.qm@web81205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <787861.75376.qm@web81205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3361.75.17.61.205.1216304913.squirrel@greens.org> On Wed, July 16, 2008 07:58, Caroline Yacoub wrote: > Okay, so Tian's not on that list, and I'm not on that list. My question > is: exactly what is this list, and why are Tian and I not on it? > Caroline Hey Caroline and all, Okay this is a valuable question. The list in question is called the SC-SM (Santa Clara - San Mateo) list. Our two county parties form what is called a 'region' (The 'Silicon Valley' Region) for the purposes of Green Party of California (GPCA) self governance. It is the Silicon Valley Region which is about to get together for the picnic you have put together. Theoretically a region could also provide more support, structure and resources for candidates and campaigns as well, but mostly its just a way to select a representative -- Regional Representative or RR. And note that the 14th Congression District crosses into both counties of the 'Silicon Valley Region', so for the race that Carol Brouillet is running, both counties need to provide support. Currently Jim Stauffer serves as the Alternate RR but since there is no RR other than him he basically serves as the RR. The Regional Representatives participate in the GPCA's Coordinating Committee (CC). The CC runs the day to day affairs of the GPCA in between General Assemblies (GA). GAs are actually the highest authority within the GPCA, but since they are only occasional (2 or 3 times per year -- one is coming up in August in Orange County), there needs to be a way to get business done the rest of the time and the CC provides that service. Unfortunately over the past number of years the CC has been ground to a halt by what I call the Factional Fanatics. There are basically two Factions that hate each other's guts and are apparently more interested in gaining their own power and defeating the other faction than in the good of the party. One faction is lead by Mike Feinstein who's highest claim to fame so far is being the former Mayor of in the LA area. The other faction claims that Mike Feinstein financial improprieties more than 10 years ago and they persist in crusading against MF and his followers in the LA Region and all over the state. The other faction was previously led by Jo Chamberlain who is from San Mateo ie. in our own Silicon Valley Region and who was the RR from our region until she resigned recently which put Jim Stauffer in the role. Jo had previously been active in the national party as well and served as a CoChair to the Green National Committee (sorta like Howard Dean but with 7 Howard Deans instead of just one). From what I could see (admittedly from a distance) Jo provided the tactical genius for her faction. The rhetorical and strategic genius of that faction was Peter Camejo (several times Green gubnatorial candidate and who ran as an independent in 2004 as Ralph Nader's VP candidate. Confoundingly enough I've found that all of the members of these two factions deny being in a faction themselves and can only identify their opponents as being part of a faction. This includes top members of the faction. Mike Feinstein himself denies being a part of a faction!!! And denies being a leader of said faction!!! Jim Stauffer is a fairly loyal footsoldier of the JC/PC faction. when I've pointed this out to him he exploded in anger and totally denied it. I suppose that might be one of the items he would call a 'lie' by me. I suppose facing truths that Jim is in denial about like that he's a rageaholic and that he's a key member of the JC/PC Faction are uncomfortable I'm guessing. There's another structure called GDI (Greens for Democratic Indepence) that overlaps with the Jo Chamberlain/Peter Camejo faction. GDI is nationwide and essentially could be called Greens for Nader and Camejo because that is pretty much their function. They are constantly harping on this ideological concept they have called 'One Green One Vote'. I won't get into it here, but I will say that while it sounds good, they place far too much emphasis on this ideological construct and what it boils down to is that they think the GPCA should dominate the GP-US and deliver the GPCA ballot line to Nader. Jim Stauffer is pretty uninterested in national politics so I don't think he's really a part of that national faction. Jim has been a long term member of the CC and indeed I think at one point served as one of the CoChairs of the CC as well as serving as the Liaison to the Secretary of State. So he has provided a LOT of service and has been with the party almost since its start. While its absolutely true that Jim is hard working and super knowledgable, he also has these problems with his behavior as you got a sample of the other day when he insulted you and a number of others on this list. These unaddressed behavioral problems make him scarey to be around and many people report unwillingness to even put themselves in He seems to experience temper tantrums like you wouldn't believe. It makes our General Meetings very unpleasant and contentious at times. He is what some people call a Mood Transmitter. When he walks in the room the whole emotional atmosphere of the room is effected (this is a phenomenon that not everyone experiences, but I and some others certainly do and have talked about it). I would also characterize him as a 'control freak'. As we've been able to see in these past few postings by Jim, even though he hasn't been on the County Council literally in years he treats the Council contemptuously and as though he were not only more powerful than a Councilor. He's not -- the RR is put into position BY The Council. The Council is directly elected by the Green Party members and so is in a sense the most direct representatives of Grassroots Democracy and everything else in the party including the delegates to the General Assembly (GA) are determined by The Councils. He also seems to hold the opinion that whatever HE defines the purpose of the SC-SM list as should automatically and absolutely be treated as law without reference back to the (actually more powerful and that which he's supposed to be accountable to) Councils. He doesn't see a need apparently to check back with The Councils who essentially put him into his position in the first place and who has the right to recall, remove or replace him. Jim has regularly demeaned Carol Brouillet (new member of The Council and highest vote getter). He doesn't care for her radical politics and especially her emphasis on getting down to the truth of what happened on 9-11. But Carol is not the only woman that Jim treats contempuously and I would not be the only one to point out that he seems to have some kind of issue going on with women generally. Although he might not say it right now Tian has also been a regular target of Jim's wrath. Jim doesn't like that Tian can be so dominating of meeting time since Tian expresses himself so slowly during meetings and also that Tian sometimes reports unconfirmed rumours as fact. Jim Stauffer's behavior is one of the primary reasons I refuse to invite any newcomers to the General Meeting. Why should newbies be subjected to this unpleasantness? It is quite possible that they will be so turned off they will leave and never return. It was great that he was absent at this last meeting and frankly that might be a contributing reason it went so well. Green is Connection! Drew > > Drew Johnson wrote: > Jim's mischaracterization that this was about 'general discussion' is > misleading and innacurate and therefore is irrelevant. > > Hitting a person is far from the only form of violence. Month by month we > have been subjected to Jim's violent attitude towards any that disagree > with him. I know for a fact that numerous people (especially women > because of his misogynistic attitudes) have been turned off of our > county's party and have not returned based on what you call Tian his > 'personality'. Its not his personality. Its that he is an unrecovered > rageaholic. He needs help but apparently doesn't take steps to get Anger > Management or whatever it is that would address his issues. Just in the > past few days a number of Santa Clara Greens have been abused by Jim on > the e-mail list. This arrogant and tyrannous behavior is completely > unacceptable of someone who we have entrusted with being our Regional > Representative to the GPCA Coordinating Committee. > > Further it is not Jim's perview to arbitrarily and unilaterally take a > GPSC County Councilor emeritus > off any GPCA e-mail list. He is not the king of anything. He did not > have the right to act in such an emperious way. > > We can not afford to continue to turn a blind eye to Jim's ongoing > egregious toxic behavior, so we need to protect our membership by removing > the power investing in Jim's that he is injuring other people and our > party with. > > No I will not drop my requests to the County Council. Absolutely not. > > > Green is Safe! > > Drew > > > On Wed, July 16, 2008 00:37, Tian Harter wrote: >> I gotta agree that general discussion belongs in the discussion forum. >> I've not been on that list so I don't know a "crime" was committed, >> but I could believe Drew would post discussion items beyond where they >> go. >> >> I consider the rant below this a bit over the top. Stauffer often acts >> grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If you allow for his >> personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please cut him a little >> slack. >> >> When we have an activist that wants to do the work Jim is doing quite >> well, then is the time to vote him out of office. Until then, I say >> "Why can't we all just get along?" >> >> Tian >> >> Drew Johnson wrote: >>> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:20, Jim Stauffer wrote: >>>> Do any of you know what you're talking about? >>> >>> >>> This quote is typically arrogant behavior from Jim Stauffer. It falls >>> entirely within his typical pattern of behavior. How offensive can you >>> get??? >>> >>> This puts across the entirely elitist message: "Watch out people, do >>> not >>> cross Jim Stauffer. He knows what's best for you. Do not speak out >>> against his outrageous rageaholic behavior because he will slap you >>> down. >>> >>> I say the party can not afford to put a rageaholic into a position of >>> power. How many have left our party because of Jim's behavior. Its >>> worth >>> pointing out that Jim behaves consistently in a consistently >>> misogynistic >>> manner. He's a white male and he knows better than you (as in the above >>> example). Just rollover people because Jim is the tyrant and you have >>> no >>> right to question any of his hurtful behavior. Like Bush, he is >>> entirely >>> above the shackles of any kind of check on his actions. Thank you Jim >>> for >>> giving us a beautiful example of exactly what we Greens are working to >>> overcome in our world today. >>> >>> >>> Green is Connection! >>> >>> Drew >>> >>> >>>> Can any of you tell me the what list he was removed from and the >>>> purpose >>>> of >>>> that list? >>>> >>>> Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette policy >>>> (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that asks for >>>> cooperation from participants on these cost-free, advertising-free >>>> lists >>>> that the party provides for your use? >>>> >>>> And, finally, what right do any of you have to tell the small >>>> membership >>>> of >>>> closed, special-purpose list who they have to allow as members and >>>> what >>>> messages they have to read? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: >>>>> I appreciate Drew's posts and he is the reason I'm green at all. I >>>>> don't >>>>> understand why his speech would be limited in any green forum. What >>>>> are >>>>> the rules being violated specifically? >>>>> >>>>> Green is unification, >>>>> Kaisha >>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Fred Duperrault >>>>> >>>>> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 >>>>> To: Drew Johnson >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >>>>> unsubscribing >>>>> me from regional list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads and his comments. I'm sure he >>>>> informs >>>>> and energizes many Greens who rely on the discussion list. >>>>> >>>>> I see no harm. >>>>> >>>>> Fred Duperrault >>>>> >>>>> Hello All, >>>>> >>>>> I agree with Drew. In these trying times pretty much everyone, who's >>>>> serious about this planet and it turning GREEN someday, has something >>>>> to say that is important. That is, information about impeachment, >>>>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass transit, bicycling, etc., etc., >>>>> is all good and points towards a GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails >>>>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing that will help the GREEN party. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Randy W. Sandberg >>>>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew Johnson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I vehemently protest this unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >>>>>> not >>>>>> the king of the e-mail list and does not have the right to partake >>>>>> in such >>>>>> high handed behavior. This is not a "green" way to operate. I >>>>>> request >>>>>> the County Council instruct Jim to immediately reinstate my >>>>>> subscription >>>>>> to the regional list and make it clear to Jim that this behavior is >>>>>> completely unacceptable. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Green is Ethical! >>>>>> >>>>>> Drew Johnson >>>>>> >>>>>> County Council Emeritus and >>>>>> Elected Delegate the Green National Committee (among many other >>>>>> forms of >>>>>> service I provide) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message >>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew >>>>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >>>>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >>>>>> To: "Regional List" >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson from this list. He's been asked >>>>>> several times >>>>>> to stop posting general discussion issues, and he refuses to do so. >>>>>> This >>>>>> list is defined for a discussion of regional Green Party issues. The >>>>>> GPCA >>>>>> has a list-use policy and his actions violate it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County Council, so his only purpose for >>>>>> remaining on this list is to use it to distribute his favorite >>>>>> discussion >>>>>> topics. >>>>>> >>>>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want get his posts, you can add him to >>>>>> your >>>>>> discussion list. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jim >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> SC-SM mailing list >>>>>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >>>>>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm From carolineyacoub at att.net Thu Jul 17 08:54:06 2008 From: carolineyacoub at att.net (Caroline Yacoub) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] picnic Message-ID: <251783.90111.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> This is really to Carol, but I don't have a separate address for her, and it may concern others of you. I live 1 1/2 blocks from the picnic site. I will be going over there at 9:00 to reserve our table and hopefully grab others, After other people come, I will go back to my house and get my food. If any of you have scheduling conflicts on that day but would like to contribute things to the picnic, I will be happy to store them at my house (323 N. Murphy Ave. ) and haul them over to the picnic later. Caroline -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Thu Jul 17 10:04:13 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Rapid Bus, BART, High-Speed Rail In-Reply-To: <426511.25481.qm@web54307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <426511.25481.qm@web54307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3489.75.17.61.205.1216314253.squirrel@greens.org> In a nutshell my opinion is that High Speed Rail is long overdue and that BART is a Halliburton-like boondoggle for Bechtel that funnels 10X the amount that a conventional rail or even elevated rail kinda solution would cost us and that BART should therefore be dismantled and replaced ASAP. Further I like the stuff that I've learned about PRT, Personal Rapid Transit. Rob Means can speak to this option. Jus in general rail is inherently much, much more energy efficient than auto/trucks/buses (anything with rubber tires on road is much less efficient than steel wheels on tracks) could ever be, so wherever possible I favor rail solutions. Hovercraft would be more efficient yet -- extremely low resistance of air against air. ;-) As far as connecting the current BART in Fremont to the rest of Santa Clara Co. I'd favor the already extant rail line. It'd be great if in addition to the ACE and Amtrak trains there were some additional commuter trains used to get us back and forth. The buses between the two are marginally okay. They take too long and are not as frequent as I'd like. Some of the express buses don't go both directions which means they are only useful for commuters who are going in one particular direction. Cameron has rightfully pointed out that the VTA Lightrail and buses are set up largely to serve the largest employers in the valley -- Lockheed Martin, IBM, Cisco and a few others -- and not to move common people where they need to get to. The 'New VTA' reorg that VTA went through in the past year is mostly an improvement IMO, but they have a long way to go for us to obtain a fully functioning mass transit system for Santa Clara valley (AKA Silicon Valley). I recommend that people join the "VTA Rider's Union" and the Silicon Valley Bic Green is Core! Drew On Thu, July 17, 2008 06:45, Edward wrote: > http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9906067 > > > > That is an article about a proposed tax for extending BART down to San > Jose. It will generate $42 million per year, which will almost cover > the $50 million it takes to operate the extension annually but will > only kick in once the federal and state governments fulfill their > promise of $1 billion to the BART extension project (so far they've > only given half the amount). > > > > Proponents are afraid the proposition will not pass this November due > to a $10 billion bond for high speed rail and a bad economy. > > > > What I fail to see is the problem with the $10 billion for high speed > rail. Compared to other industrialized countries, the United States is > about half a century behind when it comes to rail transport. $10 > billion breaks down to $10 per person per year. It is also much less > than the $20+ billion we will need to spend on road and airport > expansions in the next 25 years without high speed rail. If people can > spend over $10 to watch a movie, I am sure they can afford to see one > less movie every year to fund reducing global warming. > > > > I may be preaching to the choir, but what are your thoughts about BART and > high speed rail? > > > > -Edward > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From gerrygras at earthlink.net Thu Jul 17 11:17:27 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:17:27 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Gore on NPR NOW Message-ID: <487F8CB7.2020706@earthlink.net> Gore is on "Talk of the Nation".. pushing for complete switch of the electric gird to non fossil fules in 10 years. Gerry From tnharter at aceweb.com Thu Jul 17 12:02:13 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:02:13 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Gore on NPR NOW In-Reply-To: <487F8CB7.2020706@earthlink.net> References: <487F8CB7.2020706@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <487F9735.4020504@aceweb.com> My AOL service crashed about the time Gore finished speaking. The conspiracy theorist in me wants to make something of it, but it was probably just a fluke... Gerry Gras wrote: > Gore is on "Talk of the Nation".. > > pushing for complete switch of the electric gird to > non fossil fules in 10 years. > > Gerry > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Latest change: still adding pictures and commentary from the Green Party Convention in Chicago. From JamBoi at Greens.org Thu Jul 17 12:02:21 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente: Building a Movement for REAL Change (reprinted from Black Commentator, July 17, 2008) Message-ID: <1161.75.17.61.205.1216321341.squirrel@greens.org> http://blackcommentator.com/286/286_kir_mckinney_clemente_movement_change.html Cynthia McKinney & Rosa Clemente: Building a Movement For Real Change Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente: Building a Movement for REAL Change By LARRY PINKNEY (Black Commentator Editorial Board Member) Something magnificent and truly extraordinary happened at the 2008, Green Party Presidential Convention a few days ago in Chicago, Illinois. Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente; two dynamic, highly intelligent, experienced, and politically committed women of color were chosen by the Green Party of this nation to be its nominees for President and Vice President respectively, of the United States of America. Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who demonstrated the guts and integrity to leave the politically opportunist and bankrupt Democratic Party has, for quite some time now been yet again demonstrating her guts and integrity by crisscrossing this nation and informing people in every nook and cranny about the "Power To The People" Campaign. Now Sister McKinney has been joined by Puerto Rican people's grass root activist / journalist / and intellectual hip hop artist Sister Rosa Clemente in this ever growing campaign and people's movement and struggle. Indeed, something extraordinary has happened and there is yet more to come. While CNN, ABC, C-SPAN, etc. did give some limited coverage of and to this incredibly momentous event; none of the pundits of these so-called "main stream news" media outlets dared elucidate to the "American" people the enormous present-day and historical significance and opportunities of what just happened in Chicago. None of these pundits dared explain and emphasize the revolutionary aspect of what had just happened in Chicago: That the Green Party and the Reconstruction Movement this past weekend, in selecting Cynthia McKinney as their primary standard bearer, is a stinging rejection and rebuke of the Democratic and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] with their putrid, hypocritical, corporate / military apparatus-fueled politics of dishonesty, subterfuge, smoke & mirrors, and unending wars abroad and increasing economic disparity and social misery at home. The sleeping dragon, consisting of the rank and file, everyday woman, man, and child in this nation, has finally begun to awaken once again. The Empire, including its Democratic and Republican Party surrogates, has been put on notice by politically conscious Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation of who are sick and tired of being hoodwinked, manipulated, and politically blood sucked. What happened this past week end in Chicago is a wake up call to all persons of good will: Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow! By supporting the candidacies of Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente we are supporting a people's movement -- our movement for real, fundamental, "systemic" change, not mealy-mouth meaningless / feel good rhetoric. We are self-actualizing our hopes and dreams, not allowing others to pimp and manipulate us by playing on those hopes and dreams. We are supporting the very best in ourselves. We are laying the foundation in 21st Century "America" for a genuine and ongoing people's movement that says NO to the corporate / military / prison apparatus of the U.S. Empire at home and abroad. We are supporting so much more than only candidates for political office -- we are supporting our commitment to the building of an uncompromising, unswerving, people's movement that is unhindered by this system's Democratic and Republican [i.e. Republicratic] Party election time lines and political machine. We are refusing to collaborate with this Empire's system of oppression. Rather, we are working to dismantle it and build a fundamentally and systemically different system that addresses human needs, not human greed. We are emphatically stating that we will not sit back and allow principled, intelligent, revolutionary / politically progressive, honest, and for-real women to be by-passed and ignored any longer by this system in "America." By supporting the Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente "Power To The People" Campaign we are making it crystal clear that we will intensify the struggle the dignity and human rights of all people: women, men, and children -- Black, Brown, Red, White, and Yellow -- all peoples. To be sure, the U.S. Empire's corrupt and biased news media disinformation machine can be expected to go into high gear in an effort to discredit and neutralize the McKinney / Clemente ticket and the "Power To The People" Campaign. Indeed, these slimy tactics have already begun. However, such tactics merely confirm the absolute importance of what we are committed to and what this movement is all about. For those who may not have seen and heard Cynthia McKinney's acceptance speech on C-SPAN at the Green Party Convention this past July 13, 2008; it is urged that you turn on your computer's speakers, view her presentation, and hear her remarks and those of Rosa Clemente on the internet at C-SPAN.org under the heading Green Party Presidential Convention (July 13, 2008). The "Power To The People" Campaign is the only one to boldly and seriously address not only the issues of militarism, economic disparity, social and environmental inequities, single payer health care, government malfeasance and neglect, corporate greed, equal opportunity and education, racism, reparations, gender parity, and homelessness, etc; but just as importantly, this campaign is about building an ongoing movement to fundamentally address the root causes of these pressing concerns. The twin demons of the Empire, i.e. the Democratic and Republican Parties [increasingly known as the Republicrats] and their accomplices, are in opposition to any real systemic change. Thus, every conceivable means will be utilized to deter this campaign, its ultimate movement, and objectives. We must get out into our towns, cities, and municipalities of all kinds with one fundamental objective: Getting and putting the "Power To The People" Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente Green Party ticket on the ballot in high numbers in every viable state of this nation, while simultaneously building and nurturing this people's movement. Let us start voting right now by organizing to support Cynthia and Rosa in the streets, the back woods, the schools, on the reservations, in the barrios, ghettos, and every possible nook and cranny and community of this nation. WE ARE NOT COLLABORATORS AND WE WILL NOT COLLABORATE WITH THE EMPIRE IN OUR OWN OPPRESSION OR THAT OF OTHERS. Organize, organize, and organize some more! We are the people and it is WE ourselves who are the essence of, and motivation for, real change. Let us call out to our sisters and brothers in Haiti, in Venezuela, in Bolivia, in Cuba, in Palestine, in Myanmar, in the Congo and throughout the entire world. Let us send them a message of comradely greetings and let them know that we are reawakening from slumber here in the belly of the Empire. We have seen their examples and are emulating them for the mutual betterment of all our peoples. We must build coalitions that serve the interests of the people. We must pry open the systemic, strangling, amoral death grip that the Democrats and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] have around our proverbial necks and minds. We must work together with the Reconstruction Movement which began around the despicable U.S. Government criminality of both the Republicans and Democratic Parties re hurricane Katrina (and subsequently hurricane Rita). Being Green is just the beginning. We must keep in mind that there are also other progressive peoples out there in parties such as the Peace & Freedom Party, and we must work together with them to the mutual advantage of the people's movement. We must remember that "no one of us is as smart or as strong as all of us." We must remember our sister and brother political prisoners, liberation fighters, and exiles such as Leonard Peltier, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Reverend Edward Pinkney [no relation], the San Francisco 8, Assata Shakur and so very, very many more. We must remember why we are waging this struggle. This is about more than votes. This is about our very survival and that of Mother Earth - this planet. This is about saying NO to the Empire and its collaborators, and YES to a NEW DAY a NEW SOCIETY, a NEW WORLD. This is about struggling to be that NEW PERSON who self-actualizes and addresses human needs, not human greed, lies, and hypocrisy. Viva Cynthia McKinney! Viva Rosa Clememte! Long live "The Power To The People' Campaign! Let's get busy brothers and sisters. "Each one reach one". There is much work to be done! Onward then? ---------- BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board Member, Larry Pinkney, is a veteran of the Black Panther Party, the former Minister of Interior of the Republic of New Africa, a former political prisoner and the only American to have successfully self-authored his civil/political rights case to the United Nations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In connection with his political organizing activities in opposition to voter suppression, etc., Pinkney was interviewed in 1988 on the nationally televised PBS NewsHour, formerly known as The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. For more about Larry Pinkney see the book, Saying No to Power: Autobiography of a 20th Century Activist and Thinker , by William Mandel [Introduction by Howard Zinn]. (Click here to read excerpts from the book). Click here to contact Mr. Pinkney. -- Starlene Rankin Green Party Media Coordinator 916-995-3805 starlene at gp.org From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Thu Jul 17 14:35:28 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Progressive Unity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <127991.64524.qm@web54304.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Since Nader received the most votes from California and we are also the state that launched the McKinney campaign, I thought it would be a great place to ask the following question: What are we going to do in 2008 to get both candidates in the debates? The Nader campaign seems to be very organized while the McKinney campaign has a lot of resources from the Green Party. -Edward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rob.means at electric-bikes.com Thu Jul 17 15:29:29 2008 From: rob.means at electric-bikes.com (Rob Means) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:29:29 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Rapid Bus, BART, High-Speed Rail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <005801c8e85c$9562e220$6401a8c0@INTERBIKE06> I agree with Drew that the BART extension is a boondoggle. It's a black hole for money that is threatening many worthy Measure A transit projects. In addition to being 1960's technology that uses non-standard gauge rails, BART is a corridor system in an area that sprawls. Beefing up a networked system like the buses makes more sense. As an alternative, one PRT option offered by a local supporter would blanket our area with 24/7 automated transportation for half the price of a BART extension: http://www.electric-bikes.com/prt/bart-prt.html Recently, the Board of the San Jose Airport requested that VTA re-visit plans for connecting airport terminals with BART and LRT. VTA had presented their $450M plan for an underground Automated People Mover (APM) with 3 stations. Then, a PRT guy presented a plan that included 18 stations and above-ground guideways for one-half the price. Let's see how VTA responds. Rob Means, Electro Ride Bikes and Scooters 408-262-8975 rob.means at electric-bikes.com 1421 Yellowstone Ave., Milpitas, CA 95035-6913 Discover cycling that's Easy, Safe, Fast - and FUN! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- -----Original Message----- Message: 4 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Drew Johnson" Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Rapid Bus, BART, High-Speed Rail To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Message-ID: <3489.75.17.61.205.1216314253.squirrel at greens.org> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 In a nutshell my opinion is that High Speed Rail is long overdue and that BART is a Halliburton-like boondoggle for Bechtel that funnels 10X the amount that a conventional rail or even elevated rail kinda solution would cost us and that BART should therefore be dismantled and replaced ASAP. Further I like the stuff that I've learned about PRT, Personal Rapid Transit. Rob Means can speak to this option. Jus in general rail is inherently much, much more energy efficient than auto/trucks/buses (anything with rubber tires on road is much less efficient than steel wheels on tracks) could ever be, so wherever possible I favor rail solutions. Hovercraft would be more efficient yet -- extremely low resistance of air against air. ;-) As far as connecting the current BART in Fremont to the rest of Santa Clara Co. I'd favor the already extant rail line. It'd be great if in addition to the ACE and Amtrak trains there were some additional commuter trains used to get us back and forth. The buses between the two are marginally okay. They take too long and are not as frequent as I'd like. Some of the express buses don't go both directions which means they are only useful for commuters who are going in one particular direction. Cameron has rightfully pointed out that the VTA Lightrail and buses are set up largely to serve the largest employers in the valley -- Lockheed Martin, IBM, Cisco and a few others -- and not to move common people where they need to get to. The 'New VTA' reorg that VTA went through in the past year is mostly an improvement IMO, but they have a long way to go for us to obtain a fully functioning mass transit system for Santa Clara valley (AKA Silicon Valley). I recommend that people join the "VTA Rider's Union" and the Silicon Valley Bic Green is Core! Drew On Thu, July 17, 2008 06:45, Edward wrote: > http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9906067 > > That is an article about a proposed tax for extending BART down to San > Jose. It will generate $42 million per year, which will almost cover > the $50 million it takes to operate the extension annually but will > only kick in once the federal and state governments fulfill their > promise of $1 billion to the BART extension project (so far they've > only given half the amount). > > Proponents are afraid the proposition will not pass this November due > to a $10 billion bond for high speed rail and a bad economy. > > What I fail to see is the problem with the $10 billion for high speed > rail. Compared to other industrialized countries, the United States is > about half a century behind when it comes to rail transport. $10 > billion breaks down to $10 per person per year. It is also much less > than the $20+ billion we will need to spend on road and airport > expansions in the next 25 years without high speed rail. If people can > spend over $10 to watch a movie, I am sure they can afford to see one > less movie every year to fund reducing global warming. > > I may be preaching to the choir, but what are your thoughts about BART and > high speed rail? > > -Edward ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:17:27 -0700 From: Gerry Gras Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Gore on NPR NOW To: GPSCC Message-ID: <487F8CB7.2020706 at earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Gore is on "Talk of the Nation".. pushing for complete switch of the electric gird to non fossil fules in 10 years. Gerry ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss End of sosfbay-discuss Digest, Vol 35, Issue 25 *********************************************** From mkmusic at greens.org Fri Jul 18 01:57:42 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:57:42 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's office this Friday 7/18, 3-6pm Message-ID: <48805B06.1010002@greens.org> Hi All, *REP. DENNIS KUCINICH IS MEETING WITH THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE NEXT FRIDAY, 7/25, TO DISCUSS THE CASE FOR STARTING IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS. *We will be out in front of Rep. Zoe Lofgren's district office showing her our support for her to DO THE RIGHT THING!!* * *ON 6/30/08 SILICON VALLEY IMPEACHMENT COALITON MEMBERS MET WITH ZOE LOFGREN TO DISCUSS WITH HER THE GRAVE IMPORTANCE OF HER SUPPORTING IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. AT THE END OF OUR MEETING SHE TOLD US TO CONTINUE DEMONSTRATING AND TO CONTINUE LOUDLY DEMONSTRATING. (SHE COULD HEAR THE CARS DURING OUR MEETING DRIVING BY HONKING FOR IMPEACHMENT)* *HELP US TO LOUDLY DEMONSTRATE!!!!* This is our 36th consecutive week. Please join us this Friday, 7/18 in front of Lofgren's office from 3:00pm - 6:00pm. We want a large presence demanding she "*DO HER JOB*." Zoe's office is at 635 N. 1st St., San Jose. (Between Taylor & Jackson St. across from the IHOP restaurant/Light Rail stop is corner of Jackson St on 1st St.) We want to be loud and proud for Impeachment hearings for Cheney and Bush. SEE YOU THERE. IF YOU CAN'T BE THERE PLEASE CALL ZOE'S OFFICE (408-271-8700) TO TELL THEM THAT YOU WANT ZOE TO SUPPORT IMPEAHCMENT HEARINGS Thanks, Merriam Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition mkmusic03 at aol.com 408-482-6032 (Cell) svimpeach.org From JamBoi at Greens.org Fri Jul 18 07:12:34 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly unsubscribingmefrom regional list In-Reply-To: <728702.38687.qm@web55607.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <728702.38687.qm@web55607.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2739.75.17.61.205.1216390354.squirrel@greens.org> Jodi, Sounds good re: female vibes watcher. Well, there's another list that most people are unaware of and that's the one we are discussing Jim having kicked me off of with no process and no discussion with The Council. The list is called the SC-SM list and as I'd previously posted its a list for both the Santa Clara and San Mateo parties to communicate. Jim holds an (IMO) extremely, extremely, extremely narrow, cramped concept of what our two parties should be communicating about on that list. In his view it should only be info between the two Councils re: regional info. This is like treating it as if it were the red phone between D.C. and Moscow or a fire alarm -- break the glass to use. As I'd said before, it was just hardly used at all before I joined and apparently that's exactly the way Jim thinks it should be used -- hardly at all. But interestingly enough I was ON THE COUNCIL for Santa Clara when he was trying to dictate to me how the list was to be used -- no matter that his position as Regional Rep is essentially a position under the accountability of the County Councils of the region (in this case Santa Clara and San Mateo) and that therefore HE SHOULD BE LISTENING TO THE COUNTY COUNCILORS as to how WE CHOOSE TO USE THE LIST. And since we have a party resource (not a Jim Stauffer resource) to help us communicate between our two parties IMO we ought to actually use it and NOT to treat is like something so precious we can never use it. IMO thats just plain silly. So what if one of the Councilors chooses to communicate more than Jim Stauffer enjoys. Jim Stauffer's position as Regional Rep is subject to the elected/appointed Council Councils and not the other way around. Just as Jim got it totally backwards and tried to harangue Caroline Yacoub for holding him accountable, he seems to have the backwards idea that everyone else is accountable to him and he is accountable to no one. Well sorry Jim, but we've got some news for you. The Regional Rep is supposed to serve the county parties and the County Councils, not the other way around. Green is True! Drew On Thu, July 17, 2008 12:56, jodi embry wrote: > Dear All: >>From the understanding that I have as a member of the Green P., I know of >> two lists. One for discussion of topics and news, the other of of Party >> actions. Someone might clarify this and also from being at meetings until >> the last year, I think that a woman Vibes Watcher is a good idea. > > > --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Drew Johnson wrote: > >> From: Drew Johnson >> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's high handedly >> unsubscribingmefrom regional list >> To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 7:28 AM >> On Wed, July 16, 2008 07:58, Caroline Yacoub wrote: >> > Okay, so Tian's not on that list, and I'm not >> on that list. My question >> > is: exactly what is this list, and why are Tian and I >> not on it? >> > Caroline >> >> Hey Caroline and all, >> >> Okay this is a valuable question. The list in question is >> called the >> SC-SM (Santa Clara - San Mateo) list. Our two county >> parties form what is >> called a 'region' (The 'Silicon Valley' >> Region) for the purposes of Green >> Party of California (GPCA) self governance. It is the >> Silicon Valley >> Region which is about to get together for the picnic you >> have put >> together. Theoretically a region could also provide more >> support, >> structure and resources for candidates and campaigns as >> well, but mostly >> its just a way to select a representative -- Regional >> Representative or >> RR. And note that the 14th Congression District crosses >> into both >> counties of the 'Silicon Valley Region', so for the >> race that Carol >> Brouillet is running, both counties need to provide >> support. Currently >> Jim Stauffer serves as the Alternate RR but since there is >> no RR other >> than him he basically serves as the RR. >> >> The Regional Representatives participate in the GPCA's >> Coordinating >> Committee (CC). The CC runs the day to day affairs of the >> GPCA in >> between General Assemblies (GA). GAs are actually the >> highest authority >> within the GPCA, but since they are only occasional (2 or 3 >> times per year >> -- one is coming up in August in Orange County), there >> needs to be a way >> to get business done the rest of the time and the CC >> provides that >> service. >> >> Unfortunately over the past number of years the CC has been >> ground to a >> halt by what I call the Factional Fanatics. There are >> basically two >> Factions that hate each other's guts and are apparently >> more interested in >> gaining their own power and defeating the other faction >> than in the good >> of the party. >> >> One faction is lead by Mike Feinstein who's highest >> claim to fame so far >> is being the former Mayor of in the LA area. The other >> faction claims >> that Mike Feinstein financial improprieties more than 10 >> years ago and >> they persist in crusading against MF and his followers in >> the LA Region >> and all over the state. The other faction was previously >> led by Jo >> Chamberlain who is from San Mateo ie. in our own Silicon >> Valley Region and >> who was the RR from our region until she resigned recently >> which put Jim >> Stauffer in the role. Jo had previously been active in the >> national party >> as well and served as a CoChair to the Green National >> Committee (sorta >> like Howard Dean but with 7 Howard Deans instead of just >> one). From what >> I could see (admittedly from a distance) Jo provided the >> tactical genius >> for her faction. The rhetorical and strategic genius of >> that faction was >> Peter Camejo (several times Green gubnatorial candidate and >> who ran as an >> independent in 2004 as Ralph Nader's VP candidate. >> >> Confoundingly enough I've found that all of the members >> of these two >> factions deny being in a faction themselves and can only >> identify their >> opponents as being part of a faction. This includes top >> members of the >> faction. Mike Feinstein himself denies being a part of a >> faction!!! And >> denies being a leader of said faction!!! Jim Stauffer is a >> fairly loyal >> footsoldier of the JC/PC faction. when I've pointed >> this out to him he >> exploded in anger and totally denied it. I suppose that >> might be one of >> the items he would call a 'lie' by me. I suppose >> facing truths that Jim >> is in denial about like that he's a rageaholic and that >> he's a key member >> of the JC/PC Faction are uncomfortable I'm guessing. >> >> There's another structure called GDI (Greens for >> Democratic Indepence) >> that overlaps with the Jo Chamberlain/Peter Camejo faction. >> GDI is >> nationwide and essentially could be called Greens for Nader >> and Camejo >> because that is pretty much their function. They are >> constantly harping >> on this ideological concept they have called 'One Green >> One Vote'. I >> won't get into it here, but I will say that while it >> sounds good, they >> place far too much emphasis on this ideological construct >> and what it >> boils down to is that they think the GPCA should dominate >> the GP-US and >> deliver the GPCA ballot line to Nader. Jim Stauffer is >> pretty >> uninterested in national politics so I don't think >> he's really a part of >> that national faction. >> >> Jim has been a long term member of the CC and indeed I >> think at one point >> served as one of the CoChairs of the CC as well as serving >> as the Liaison >> to the Secretary of State. So he has provided a LOT of >> service and has >> been with the party almost since its start. >> >> While its absolutely true that Jim is hard working and >> super knowledgable, >> he also has these problems with his behavior as you got a >> sample of the >> other day when he insulted you and a number of others on >> this list. These >> unaddressed behavioral problems make him scarey to be >> around and many >> people report unwillingness to even put themselves in He >> seems to >> experience temper tantrums like you wouldn't believe. >> It makes our >> General Meetings very unpleasant and contentious at times. >> He is what >> some people call a Mood Transmitter. When he walks in the >> room the whole >> emotional atmosphere of the room is effected (this is a >> phenomenon that >> not everyone experiences, but I and some others certainly >> do and have >> talked about it). >> >> I would also characterize him as a 'control >> freak'. As we've been able >> to see in these past few postings by Jim, even though he >> hasn't been on >> the County Council literally in years he treats the Council >> contemptuously and as though he were not only more powerful >> than a >> Councilor. He's not -- the RR is put into position BY >> The Council. The >> Council is directly elected by the Green Party members and >> so is in a >> sense the most direct representatives of Grassroots >> Democracy and >> everything else in the party including the delegates to the >> General >> Assembly (GA) are determined by The Councils. He also >> seems to hold the >> opinion that whatever HE defines the purpose of the SC-SM >> list as should >> automatically and absolutely be treated as law without >> reference back to >> the (actually more powerful and that which he's >> supposed to be >> accountable to) Councils. He doesn't see a need >> apparently to check back >> with The Councils who essentially put him into his position >> in the first >> place and who has the right to recall, remove or replace >> him. >> >> Jim has regularly demeaned Carol Brouillet (new member of >> The Council and >> highest vote getter). He doesn't care for her radical >> politics and >> especially her emphasis on getting down to the truth of >> what happened on >> 9-11. But Carol is not the only woman that Jim treats >> contempuously and I >> would not be the only one to point out that he seems to >> have some kind of >> issue going on with women generally. >> >> Although he might not say it right now Tian has also been a >> regular target >> of Jim's wrath. Jim doesn't like that Tian can be >> so dominating of >> meeting time since Tian expresses himself so slowly during >> meetings and >> also that Tian sometimes reports unconfirmed rumours as >> fact. >> >> Jim Stauffer's behavior is one of the primary reasons I >> refuse to invite >> any newcomers to the General Meeting. Why should newbies >> be subjected to >> this unpleasantness? It is quite possible that they will >> be so turned off >> they will leave and never return. It was great that he was >> absent at this >> last meeting and frankly that might be a contributing >> reason it went so >> well. >> >> >> Green is Connection! >> >> Drew >> >> > >> > Drew Johnson wrote: >> > Jim's mischaracterization that this was about >> 'general discussion' is >> > misleading and innacurate and therefore is irrelevant. >> > >> > Hitting a person is far from the only form of >> violence. Month by month we >> > have been subjected to Jim's violent attitude >> towards any that disagree >> > with him. I know for a fact that numerous people >> (especially women >> > because of his misogynistic attitudes) have been >> turned off of our >> > county's party and have not returned based on what >> you call Tian his >> > 'personality'. Its not his personality. Its >> that he is an unrecovered >> > rageaholic. He needs help but apparently doesn't >> take steps to get Anger >> > Management or whatever it is that would address his >> issues. Just in the >> > past few days a number of Santa Clara Greens have been >> abused by Jim on >> > the e-mail list. This arrogant and tyrannous behavior >> is completely >> > unacceptable of someone who we have entrusted with >> being our Regional >> > Representative to the GPCA Coordinating Committee. >> > >> > Further it is not Jim's perview to arbitrarily and >> unilaterally take a >> > GPSC County Councilor emeritus >> > off any GPCA e-mail list. He is not the king of >> anything. He did not >> > have the right to act in such an emperious way. >> > >> > We can not afford to continue to turn a blind eye to >> Jim's ongoing >> > egregious toxic behavior, so we need to protect our >> membership by removing >> > the power investing in Jim's that he is injuring >> other people and our >> > party with. >> > >> > No I will not drop my requests to the County Council. >> Absolutely not. >> > >> > >> > Green is Safe! >> > >> > Drew >> > >> > >> > On Wed, July 16, 2008 00:37, Tian Harter wrote: >> >> I gotta agree that general discussion belongs in >> the discussion forum. >> >> I've not been on that list so I don't know >> a "crime" was committed, >> >> but I could believe Drew would post discussion >> items beyond where they >> >> go. >> >> >> >> I consider the rant below this a bit over the top. >> Stauffer often acts >> >> grumpy, but I have never seen him hit anyone. If >> you allow for his >> >> personality, he is a fine fellow traveler. Please >> cut him a little >> >> slack. >> >> >> >> When we have an activist that wants to do the work >> Jim is doing quite >> >> well, then is the time to vote him out of office. >> Until then, I say >> >> "Why can't we all just get along?" >> >> >> >> Tian >> >> >> >> Drew Johnson wrote: >> >>> On Mon, July 14, 2008 19:20, Jim Stauffer >> wrote: >> >>>> Do any of you know what you're talking >> about? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> This quote is typically arrogant behavior from >> Jim Stauffer. It falls >> >>> entirely within his typical pattern of >> behavior. How offensive can you >> >>> get??? >> >>> >> >>> This puts across the entirely elitist message: >> "Watch out people, do >> >>> not >> >>> cross Jim Stauffer. He knows what's best >> for you. Do not speak out >> >>> against his outrageous rageaholic behavior >> because he will slap you >> >>> down. >> >>> >> >>> I say the party can not afford to put a >> rageaholic into a position of >> >>> power. How many have left our party because of >> Jim's behavior. Its >> >>> worth >> >>> pointing out that Jim behaves consistently in >> a consistently >> >>> misogynistic >> >>> manner. He's a white male and he knows >> better than you (as in the above >> >>> example). Just rollover people because Jim is >> the tyrant and you have >> >>> no >> >>> right to question any of his hurtful behavior. >> Like Bush, he is >> >>> entirely >> >>> above the shackles of any kind of check on his >> actions. Thank you Jim >> >>> for >> >>> giving us a beautiful example of exactly what >> we Greens are working to >> >>> overcome in our world today. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Green is Connection! >> >>> >> >>> Drew >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Can any of you tell me the what list he >> was removed from and the >> >>>> purpose >> >>>> of >> >>>> that list? >> >>>> >> >>>> Have any of you read GPCA net etiquette >> policy >> >>>> >> (http://cagreens.org/structure/email_etiquette.shtml) that >> asks for >> >>>> cooperation from participants on these >> cost-free, advertising-free >> >>>> lists >> >>>> that the party provides for your use? >> >>>> >> >>>> And, finally, what right do any of you >> have to tell the small >> >>>> membership >> >>>> of >> >>>> closed, special-purpose list who they have >> to allow as members and >> >>>> what >> >>>> messages they have to read? >> >>>> >> >>>> Jim >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> kaisha_marie at comcast.net wrote: >> >>>>> I appreciate Drew's posts and he >> is the reason I'm green at all. I >> >>>>> don't >> >>>>> understand why his speech would be >> limited in any green forum. What >> >>>>> are >> >>>>> the rules being violated specifically? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Green is unification, >> >>>>> Kaisha >> >>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless >> BlackBerry >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>>> From: Fred Duperrault >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:47:00 >> >>>>> To: Drew Johnson >> >>>>> Cc: >> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim >> Stauffer's high handedly >> >>>>> unsubscribing >> >>>>> me from regional list >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I appreciate Drew's alerts, leads >> and his comments. I'm sure he >> >>>>> informs >> >>>>> and energizes many Greens who rely on >> the discussion list. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I see no harm. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Fred Duperrault >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hello All, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I agree with Drew. In these trying >> times pretty much everyone, who's >> >>>>> serious about this planet and it >> turning GREEN someday, has something >> >>>>> to say that is important. That is, >> information about impeachment, >> >>>>> ending war, healthcare for all, mass >> transit, bicycling, etc., etc., >> >>>>> is all good and points towards a >> GREENer planet. Thus, Drew's emails >> >>>>> should be looked upon as a GOOD thing >> that will help the GREEN party. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Cheers, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Randy W. Sandberg >> >>>>> www.ENDinjusticeNOW.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Jul 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Drew >> Johnson wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> I vehemently protest this >> unilateral action by Jim Stauffer. Jim is >> >>>>>> not >> >>>>>> the king of the e-mail list and >> does not have the right to partake >> >>>>>> in such >> >>>>>> high handed behavior. This is not >> a "green" way to operate. I >> >>>>>> request >> >>>>>> the County Council instruct Jim to >> immediately reinstate my >> >>>>>> subscription >> >>>>>> to the regional list and make it >> clear to Jim that this behavior is >> >>>>>> completely unacceptable. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Green is Ethical! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Drew Johnson >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> County Council Emeritus and >> >>>>>> Elected Delegate the Green >> National Committee (among many other >> >>>>>> forms of >> >>>>>> service I provide) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ---------------------------- >> Original Message >> >>>>>> ---------------------------- >> >>>>>> Subject: [SC-SM] Unsubscribing >> Drew >> >>>>>> From: "Jim Stauffer" >> >>>>>> Date: Fri, July 11, 2008 18:12 >> >>>>>> To: "Regional List" >> >>>>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I'm unsubscribing Drew Johnson >> from this list. He's been asked >> >>>>>> several times >> >>>>>> to stop posting general discussion >> issues, and he refuses to do so. >> >>>>>> This >> >>>>>> list is defined for a discussion >> of regional Green Party issues. The >> >>>>>> GPCA >> >>>>>> has a list-use policy and his >> actions violate it. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Drew is no longer on the SC County >> Council, so his only purpose for >> >>>>>> remaining on this list is to use >> it to distribute his favorite >> >>>>>> discussion >> >>>>>> topics. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> If any of you San Mateo folks want >> get his posts, you can add him to >> >>>>>> your >> >>>>>> discussion list. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Jim >> >>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>> SC-SM mailing list >> >>>>>> SC-SM at lists.sonic.net >> >>>>>> >> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Fri Jul 18 10:18:37 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] PA Republican Supporting Ballot Access Reform... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <932439.76730.qm@web54307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> ...and WI & NY Democrats supporting weekend election days! >From Ballot Access News: On July 17, Pennsylvania State Senator Mike Folmer (R-Lancaster and Lebanon Counties) contacted the Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition, and requested a copy of the Coalition?s original 2007 ballot access proposal. The Senator said he is not interested in Representative Kerry Benninghoff?s idea for replacing mandatory petitions with filing fees. Senator Folmer wants ideas for a bill specifically to help minor parties. The Coalition?s original proposal, submitted to all legislators last year, was a ballot access system similar to Delaware?s system. In Delaware, minor parties that attain a certain number of registered voters are considered qualified parties, and nominate by convention, and are automatically on the November ballot. --- The weekend voting bills are HR 6240 and S 2638. I don't understand why it has to be the first weekend after the first Friday of November and why it is not just the first weekend of November. I have already emailed the Pennsylvanian state senator thanking him for his initial actions and hopefully if more people from outside his district email him, he will see that his advocacy is actually something that can indirectly impact millions of Americans who live in states with restrictive ballot access laws like Pennsylvania. Also, neither of the Congressional bills has any co-sponsors (except Hillary for S 2638). Let's get the GPCA to ask all on their lists to email Boxer, Feinstein, and our local reps to ask that they not only co-sponsor these bills, but to advocate for them once they reach the floors of their respective chambers. These three pieces of legislation may not be the end-all-be-all of the problem, but they sure help. -Edward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andid at cagreens.org Fri Jul 18 13:30:49 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:30:49 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] =?windows-1252?q?KPFA_=22Friend_Raising=22=97Te?= =?windows-1252?q?ll_Them_Thanks!!!?= Message-ID: Now is a moment we Greens can take advantage of! KPFA (94.1 FM) is searching for funds to continue running their progressive radio programs. Yes, they are laced with yellow-dog Democrats, but they also have Amy Goodman's Democracy Now, Dennis Bernstein's Flashpoints, Free Speech News, Guns and Butter, Seventh Generation, Against the Grain...all programs that have true left and, some, far left subject matter and positions. We have added a KPFA link to our Green website?a move of brilliance IMHO?now let's donate to KPFA and be sure that they know that the money is coming from a member of the Green Party. YOU CAN DONATE AS LITTLE AS $25 AND BE A VOTING MEMBER OF KPFA! You can influence the elections. When you donate large amounts ($100 or more) they will ask if it's OK to thank you on the air?ask them to thank Green Party member (name) or if you prefer privacy, ask them to thank a Green Party member from (your city). Remember to thank them for the live coverage of the GP in Chicago and/ or the interviews in Chicago by Davy Dee! If you are an inclusive person in the Greens, you might want to thank them for interviewing third (or minor) party candidates (Nader of Independent Party and Bob? of Libertarian Party), showing that the idea is to OPEN VENUES TO OTHER PARTIES besides the two majors. All this exerts gentle pressure on them to report on the Green Party and its candidates if they want to keep this money pipeline open! This is a chance for grassroots partnering that we should NOT miss! Best regards to ALL Greens, whatever your position on voting in November, Andrea -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wrolley at charter.net Fri Jul 18 13:56:11 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:56:11 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Open Space Message-ID: <4881036B.1090005@charter.net> We have two issues going on that involve open space and how it might be used. The first is the situation with BAREC. Kathryn Mathewson sent out a report this week which begins with: > Currently SaveBAREC has a CEQA lawsuit. The hearing for this CEQA > lawsuit will be tomorrow morning, July 18th at 9 a.m. The location is > 191 North First Street, San Jose, Courtroom 21. Judge Nicols will be > presiding. The public can listen but not speak. Our San Francisco > environmental attorney, Mark Wolfe, is doing an excellent job. and it ends with and appeal for volunteer time and/or money. I would guess that they need money more than anything else. The second issue involves the entire county. According to a story today in the Morgan Hill Times: > The California Supreme Court threw a wrench into the Santa Clara > County Open Space Authority's plans when it ruled unanimously that $56 > million in taxes were illegally collected. http://morganhilltimes.com/news/246774-open-space-tax-ruled-illegal It was one of the first cases of "vote by mail" in the County. > Proposition 218 limited the ability of local governments to impose > real property assessments. Five years later, the Open Space Authority > imposed the county-wide tax through a vote by mail. Of the > approximately 314,000 official ballots mailed, 48,100 were returned, a > 15 percent response rate. > > Immediately, the taxpayer's association filed a lawsuit charging that > the tax was illegal because it did not meet Prop 218's "special > benefit" distinction. According to Supervisor Don Gage (Dist. 1)... > The Supreme Court ruling is bad news," he said Thursday. "We don't > lose the whole tax, the first part was legal and they say the second > part wasn't, but with the revenue, the county had been purchasing a > lot of open space land to keep in perpetuity. Now they don't have the > dollars to do that, there will be fewer and fewer open spaces and more > land used for development." I frequently disagree with Gage, and I am a bit surprised by the direct nature of his statement as he is well connected with and mostly funded by developers. This specific ruling may have ramifications beyond our local question... one that could affect how other communities proceed with special parcel assessments. The question of Open Space, it's preservation and non-use, is all connected to the concept of bio-diversity. I will be writing more on that, and the Delta, in my next MH Times article to be submitted today for running next week. Wes -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 From wrolley at charter.net Fri Jul 18 14:31:16 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:31:16 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Restore the Delta takes on the PPIC Message-ID: <48810BA4.6020502@charter.net> I posted a new notice on California Greening today concerning this weeks release of a new report by the Public Policy Institute of California supporting the idea of a peripheral canal. I believe that study to be biased. It is suspect as it was funded in part by Bechtel. The entire thing is too long to post here, so please read it at cagreening . -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Fri Jul 18 16:13:41 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:13:41 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Fw: [GPCA Official Notice] Plenary Agenda Packet Message-ID: <001b01c8e92b$eba1e3a0$4101a8c0@JIMSDESKTOP> ----- Original Message ----- From: "County Contacts" To: "County Contacts" Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:04 PM Subject: [GPCA Official Notice] Plenary Agenda Packet > GREEN PARTY COUNTY CONTACTS MESSAGE > > This is an announcement from the GPCA Contact List. For more information, > or questions related to the topic of the posting, please do not hit reply. > Follow the contact directions > stated in the email. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > From: Chris Malan and Larry Mullen, CC Cocos > > -------------------------- > The agenda packet for the August 23-24 General Assembly in Orange County > is > now available for downloading from the plenary web site: > > http://www.cagreens.org/plenary/ > > The logistics packet will be available in about a week. > > You will need the common password for access to the agenda packet. Please > contact your County Council or Regional Representative if you don't have > it. > > This agenda packet contains proposals, the schedule and county delegate > allocation. Please read it ASAP. If you have concerns about any proposal, > please send them to the people listed as the contact persons and/or > sponsors > *before* the meeting begins. > > The logistics packet contains information on the meeting site, housing, > registration and host contacts. > > Online registration will open on Sunday, July 20. > > NOTE: Counties are also required to submit their list of General Assembly > delegates online. Use the Delegates link on the plenary page cited above. > > Online registration and delegate submission closes on Wednesday August 20. > > > > You may participate in this important event in a number of ways: > > At the General Assembly > - as a delegate or a observer in the decision-making plenary sessions > and/or > - as participant in working group, standing committee and/or caucus > meetings > > Before the General Assembly > - with a working group or standing committee that is generating a proposal > - discussing the agenda proposals in your county and on-line > > We hope to see you in Dana Point! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Contacts2006 mailing list > Contacts2006 at lists.cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/contacts2006 From WB4D23 at aol.com Fri Jul 18 16:50:01 2008 From: WB4D23 at aol.com (WB4D23 at aol.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:50:01 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Silicon Valley Region CC Member Needed Message-ID: Folks! Just as a reminder -- Both Santa Clara and San Mateo County GPs revised their bylaws so we could appoint our member and alternate to the GPCA Coordinating Committee more democratically from our local organizations. Jim Stauffer has been our alternate since (and interim alternate before) the September 2006 South Lake Tahoe Plenary. Jim has sent messages that his term is ending and that replacements are needed, but no one (as far as I have heard) has volunteered for either of these positions. In the past, we have tried to have the Regional Rep from one County and the alternate for the other. The CC responsibilities are summarized in the GPCA Bylaws. They include monthly teleconferences, participation on an email list, and working in at least one GPCA committee or working group. Any volunteers??? Warner **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From WB4D23 at aol.com Fri Jul 18 17:00:04 2008 From: WB4D23 at aol.com (WB4D23 at aol.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:00:04 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Old CC Newz : [was Jim Stauffer's high handedly etc.] Message-ID: IMO Drew's descriptions of the GPCA Coordinating are at worst inaccurate and at best out of date. Never mind the character attacks on specific individuals (this is Green???). Drew does not have the benefit of being a member of the Coordinating Committee or getting reports about its current work and atmosphere as a state party committee or working group coordinator. Drew's comments are pretty insulting to the group of current volunteer CC members who are trying to move the GPCA forward... including their work towards organizing the next state meeting, and, particularly, Larry Mullen's work in organizing a pre-plenary strategy meeting in Fresno, August 2nd. Warner **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Mon Jul 14 12:39:54 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:39:54 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] SC-SM regional list Message-ID: <487BAB8A.3070809@sbcglobal.net> My concept of the SC-SM list is that it is for regional business. If it truly is for regional business I do not find it inappropriate to remove Drew from the list for his postings because, although they affect the region, let's say in the sense of global warming, etc., they are not about regional "business." Furthermore, an alternative was offered - join the San Mateo county discussion list. Also, a warning had been issued. Now, it is an irritation for me to receive the same posting more than once and I fall into the trap of opening the second version of the posting because it might contain different information or be relevant to regional "business.". And I have a further question - what shall I do with the information Drew provides? Jim Doyle From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Jul 20 10:24:31 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:24:31 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] A Nation of Sheep? Message-ID: <488374CF.7060707@earthlink.net> "Netroots Nation or Nation of Sheep: Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore Address the Netroots Nation Conference" http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/19/10478/ I found this very interesting. - It seems most participants were quite unhappy with the Democratic leadership, including Pelosi, but not Al Gore. - There was a threat to arrest anyone who was too passionate in expressing frustration. - Final paragraph: "Whether or not you decide to vote for Democrat Barack Obama, Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney, or Independent Ralph Nader in November, please go to http://www.GrassrootsNetroots.org and join a growing radical populist army who believe we need an alternative to MoveOn and Democratic Party centrists. The doomsday clock is ticking. Let's fight like hell to make sure that 2008 is not the year where we tried to change drivers, but still went over the cliff." NOTE: I know nothing about the author (Ronnie Cummins) or the Grassroots Netroots Alliance. Can anyone clarify? Gerry From JamBoi at Greens.org Sun Jul 20 15:44:31 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] SC-SM regional list In-Reply-To: <487BAB8A.3070809@sbcglobal.net> References: <487BAB8A.3070809@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <59617.76.126.222.234.1216593871.squirrel@greens.org> The first problem with this analysis is that it is completely inaccurate re: what I actually posted on that list. I did NOT post general info on it, but only party info that was relevant or red hot info that everyone and I do mean everyone in the party needs to be up on. If people looked on the e-mail archives you could see what I posted and its not just general info (unlike what I post here). So that post is wrong. Secondly joining another county's list should not be encouraged IMO. I don't want people from other counties on our list (especially not posting) and I don't want people from our county butting into other county's list. The regional list is for info of regional import, yes but that is not nearly as narrow and cramped a criteria as Jim Stauffer would make it. Jim treats it as some kind of precious little list that can never be used. I don't agree. Perhaps the most important point is that I WAS ON THE COUNTY COUNCIL WHEN ALL THIS WAS TAKING PLACE. HELLO!!! I WAS ONE OF THE POLICY MAKERS, WHEREAS JIM WAS NOT ON THE COUNTY COUNCIL, BUT DID THAT CAUSE HIM TO PAUSE AND ASK ME AND THE COUNCIL ABOUT WHAT THE POLICY SHOULD BE??? No. He just arrogantly tried to dictate to the Council how things would be. Sorry I'm a NO to this kind behavior and I'm taking a firm stand against it. Green is Clarity! Drew On Mon, July 14, 2008 12:39, Jim Doyle wrote: > My concept of the SC-SM list is that it is for regional business. > If it truly is for regional business I do not find it inappropriate to > remove > Drew from the list for his postings because, although they affect the > region, > let's say in the sense of global warming, etc., they are not about > regional "business." > > Furthermore, an alternative was offered - join the San Mateo county > discussion list. > > Also, a warning had been issued. > > Now, it is an irritation for me to receive the same posting more than > once and I fall > into the trap of opening the second version of the posting because it > might contain > different information or be relevant to regional "business.". > > And I have a further question - what shall I do with the information > Drew provides? > > Jim Doyle > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From gerrygras at earthlink.net Mon Jul 21 11:46:48 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:46:48 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] What do you see in Obama? Message-ID: <4884D998.1040807@earthlink.net> "People See in Obama What They Want to See - That's a Blessing and a Curse" "As the US Democratic candidate heads towards Europe, liberals refer to him as if he represents a second coming" http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/21/10495/ reminds me of the Obama button I saw on July 4th. Gerry From mkmusic at greens.org Wed Jul 23 02:27:45 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:27:45 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] This Thursday 7/24 is our first Impeachment Demonstration at the Metro Newspaper] Message-ID: <4886F991.1030009@greens.org> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: MKmusic03 at aol.com Subject: [SVIC] This Thursday 7/24 is our first Impeachment Demonstration at the Metro Newspaper Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:17:22 EDT Size: 6708 URL: From tnharter at aceweb.com Wed Jul 23 14:23:37 2008 From: tnharter at aceweb.com (Tian Harter) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:23:37 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] My take on the Green Party Nominating Convention in Chicago. Message-ID: <4887A159.6070209@aceweb.com> http://tian.greens.org/GreenParty/Chicago2008/index.html -- Tian http://tian.greens.org Tax dollars at work: The US Navy used about $5 million to remove 67 million gallons of groundwater from Moffett Field, from which almost 23.7 pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were cleaned. It is estimated that there are still about five pounds of VOCs in the plume. From wrolley at charter.net Wed Jul 23 15:13:48 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:13:48 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Water Wars Continue Message-ID: <4887AD1C.6080806@charter.net> Op Ed submitted to the Morgan Hill Times yesterday for publication (Hopefully on Friday). __ Some of us have been writing about water for years. Get used to reading it because you are going to be inundated with ever more stories, opinion pieces, etc. between now and early next year. The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) published a report on the California Delta that supplies water for more that 60% of California's residents and a great deal of the Central Valley agriculture. This report has, during the past week, been covered to some extent on every major news outlet in the State The PPIC places all of our hopes for a reliable water supply on the construction of a peripheral canal routing water around the delta, changing the nature of that resource forever and doing it in a manner from which it can not recover. In the same week, we had Gov. Schwarzenegger and Sen.Feinstein calling for the state legislature to deal with a $9.3 billion bond proposal to build new reservoirs and other water conservation projects. This, even though the PPIC has a negative opinion on the usefulness of new dams. The PPIC's report seems incomplete. The data backing up their conclusions was in appendices which will not be made public until later in the summer. I am told, that the Schwarzenegger pushed to have the report out before it was ready. The story is being scripted. Every political publication has a back story that makes you want to doubt the motives of the authors. Besides Schwarzenegger's meddling, the PPIC Report was funded, in part, by Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr., co-owner of Bechtel Corp., one of the largest players in the businesses of water system construction and water privatization. The fact that one of the funders has a vested interest in the outcome of this study is enough to make me begin to question how it was constructed. It is always possible to control the answer to problem by the way you structure it's definition. It would be refreshing to hear Bechtel say that they will refrain from bidding on any water project, but I am not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen. Bechtel's history in water projects is one where they use political power and then seek to overturn common sense in their pursuit of profits. For example, with one World Bank project in Bolivia, Bechtel claimed that they had the right to charge farmers for the water that fell as rain on their property since that was water that Bechtel could have sold to the cities. This is going to be much more complicated than just being an attempt to grab new water supplies for Southern California, even though the Metropolitan Water District has said that they are willing to pay. The same could be said for the farmers of the Central Valley, except that they are never willing to pay and get by now on heavily subsidized water. The fact is that the world is running out of fresh water and the fight to control it has begun. Major corporations, like Bechtel, are in the middle of it all. There is a history of major water vendors to take over the operation of a system, for example as Bechtel did in Guayaquil, Ecuador. They then protect their profits by not investing in needed upgrades or even maintenance. In the case of the Bechtel contract in Guayaquil the system broke down, the water was contaminated and the citizens finally threw them out. We have similar water privatization problems in California.. OMI-Thames is a major European water corporation who took over the operation on the Stockton Municipal Water system in 2003. The contract with the City of Stockton was later judged to have been illegal. Even so, the same patterns of non-performance were in evidence in Stockton, just not on the scale of Bechtel's Ecuadorian fiasco. As for ourselves, a $6.8 billion bond issue effort was sponsored by State Senator Don Perata. It failed to make the ballot in Nov. There are now five separate, but similar, bond issue proposals listed on the Secretary of State's web site, all of which would spend 30% of the money for new dams but asking for $11.6 billion. The PPIC was right in that we don't know what we are doing but, in the rush to fix the problem and get re-elected, our politicians are going to fall back on simplistic solutions for complicated problems. A common view is that water needs to be stored behind dams for use later. . Well, California has hundreds of dams and they are not full this year, or most years. So, I am not sure what we gain by building new ones. We are told that we have to rebuild the delta's levees. The PPIC report indicated that there are some islands in the delta that are not sustainable and should be abandoned. This may mean that State will have to buy up as much as 100,000 acres of farm land, allowing the levees to fail and the land to return to its original state. Of course, these costs were not included in any of the bond measures nor, as far as I can tell, in the cost projections furnished by the PPIC.. We will end up with multiple solutions. It will involve conservation, recycling, desalinization and levee maintenance not only for now, but for sea levels pushed higher as the result of global warming. One way or another, as taxpayers or as rate payers, we will end up footing a very large bill. I only hope that common sense will prevail because the prospect of continued political stalemate on this issue means financial disaster for California. I don't trust those whose current governance of California's water to come up with the right answers. -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 From WB4D23 at aol.com Wed Jul 23 20:49:15 2008 From: WB4D23 at aol.com (WB4D23 at aol.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:49:15 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Preparing for the Orange County Plenary August 23-24/August 6th Agenda Items Message-ID: The next GPCA state meeting will be held Saturday-Sunday August 23-24 at Dana Point (southern coastal Orange County). The draft agenda includes a number of items, including proposed GPCA Platform additions. The Plenary will also consider November 2008 ballot measures. Under our monthly general meeting schedule, our only meeting before the Plenary will be August 6th (first Wednesday). At that meeting we will need to affirm delegates and alternates to the Plenary and decide how to deal with instructions to those delegates. We also have outstanding issues regarding recruiting and affirming a new GPCA Coordinating Committee member and alternate (in coordination with the San Mateo County GP). Warner **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mkmusic at greens.org Thu Jul 24 02:46:11 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:46:11 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's district office this Fri. 7/25] Message-ID: <48884F63.5060206@greens.org> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: MKmusic03 at aol.com Subject: [SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's district office this Fri. 7/25 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:49:53 EDT Size: 6814 URL: From andid at cagreens.org Thu Jul 24 17:04:02 2008 From: andid at cagreens.org (Andrea Dorey) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:04:02 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's district office this Fri. 7/25] In-Reply-To: <48884F63.5060206@greens.org> References: <48884F63.5060206@greens.org> Message-ID: <01FD9179-4C89-4E2E-BFBC-293900AFEDF1@cagreens.org> KPFA will carry it LIVE!! Call in to let them know you appreciate their dogged following of this and other Progressive events!! Andi On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Merriam Kathaleen wrote: > > > From: MKmusic03 at aol.com > Date: July 24, 2008 12:49:53 AM PDT > To: svic at lists.riseup.net > Cc: MKmusic03 at aol.com > Subject: [SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's district > office this Fri. 7/25 > Reply-To: svic at lists.riseup.net,MKmusic03 at aol.com > > > Hi All, > > This is the week we have all been waiting for and putting out all > our efforts for the past years! !!!! > > This Friday 7/25 there will be a House Judiciary Committee hearing > and Dennis Kucinich is definitely one of the speakers. Though the > hearing is not primarily about impeachment we can be certain the > topic will be brought up. The hearing begins 10:00 am Washington > DC time. > > We will then celebrate our standing up for the Constitution by > demonstrating in front of Zoe Lofgren's office. Come out and be a > part of this historical moment. Make no Mistake, it is the power > of "WE THE PEOPLE" that has brought about the Judiciary Committee > hearing!!!! We The People have spoken and WE have been heard!!!!! > > This Friday will be our 37th consecutive week of demonstrating > LOUDLY for IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS!!!! Join us in front of Zoe's > office at 635 N. 1st St., San Jose. (Between Taylor & Jackson St. > across from the IHOP restaurant/Light Rail stop is corner of > Jackson St on 1st St.) > We will be there from 3:00pm - 6:00pm. We want to be loud and proud > for Impeachment hearings for Cheney and Bush. > > SEE YOU THERE. IF YOU CAN'T BE THERE PLEASE CALL ZOE'S OFFICE > (408-271-8700) TO TELL THEM THAT YOU WANT ZOE TO SUPPORT > IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS. > > Thanks, > > Merriam > Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition > mkmusic03 at aol.com > 408-482-6032 (Cell) > svimpeach.org > > > > > > > > ************** > Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse > Fantasy Football today. > (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Thu Jul 24 22:41:33 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:41:33 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] WATCH Dennis and others speaking in front of the Judiciary Committee tomorrow] Message-ID: <4889678D.6070808@earthlink.net> On KPFA, C-SPAN, and who knows where else. Gerry -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [SVIC] WATCH Dennis and others speaking in front of the Judiciary Committee tomorrow Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:30:18 -0700 From: justvegan at mac.com Reply-To: svic at lists.riseup.net,justvegan at mac.com To: svic at lists.riseup.net, Peninsula Peace and Justice Center , AndJusticeForAll-discuss at yahoogroups.com, impeach meetup , sbm at lists.riseup.net http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html From JamBoi at Greens.org Fri Jul 25 16:43:11 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Come join me on National Lavender Greens Caucus... Message-ID: <2608.75.19.86.251.1217029391.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [gpus-del] Fwd: [usgp-dx] Come join me on National Lavender Greens Caucus... From: "Sanda Everette" Date: Fri, July 18, 2008 20:04 To: "Delegates from GPCA to GPUS" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There was a request to forward this to state lists. Will someone on CalForum forward it there. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Strand Date: Jul 18, 2008 2:08 PM Subject: [usgp-dx] Come join me on National Lavender Greens Caucus... To: "natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org" National Lavender Greens Caucus: Voice of the Lavender Community within the Green Party of the United States David Strand has invited you to join National Lavender Greens Caucus -------------------- Please pass this invitation on to state party lists. The Lavender Green networking site offers more social and informal ways of interacting with the Lavender Greens. David Strand- Del. LG Caucus Check out National Lavender Greens Caucus: http://lavendergreens.ning.com/?xgi=1IJuD7u If your email program doesn't recognize the web address above as an active link, please copy and paste it into your web browser -------------------- Members already on National Lavender Greens Caucus -------------------- About National Lavender Greens Caucus... Welcome to the Lavender Green Caucus of the Green Party of the United States! We are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Queer Greens organized as a Caucus with the purpose of promoting LGBTIQ issues within the Green Party. 14 members -------------------- To control which emails you receive on the corner, or to opt-out, go to: http://lavendergreens.ning.com/profiles/profile/emailSettings _______________________________________________ Natlcomaffairs mailing list To send a message to the list, write to: Natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org To unsubscribe or change your list options, go to: http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/natlcomaffairs You must know your password to do this. If you can't figure out how to unsubscribe, as a last resort only, send a message OFF LIST to steveh at olypen.com If your state delegation changes, please see: http://gp.org/committees/nc/documents/delegate_change.html To report violations of listserv protocol, write to forummanagers at lists.gp-us.org For other information about the National Committee, see: http://gp.org/committees/nc/ _______________________________________________ gpus-del mailing list gpus-del at lists.cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/gpus-del http://cagreens.org/delegates/ Have You Hugged Your Delegate Today? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Fri Jul 25 22:51:35 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] County Council Meeting Sat. 25th 3pm @ Jim Doyle's Message-ID: <2827.75.19.86.251.1217051495.squirrel@www.greens.org> Dear All, Caroline told me she had company and would be unlikely to make it, and Merriam said she was improbable due to her work on Impeachment @ the SJ Peace & Justice Center. I'm planning to come. I'm thinking that since Jim Stauffer's term is up and hence replacing him is just as good as recalling him, that it would be more constructive for me to not bother with a recall effort, but just to focus on his unjustified actions of removing me from the regional list -- so as I'd said originally I'll look for my reinstatement on the list and the council making it clear to Jim that such behavior is out of bounds. BTW, I'm volunteering to serve as our next Regional Rep. Green is Core! Drew ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: try again (2) From: "Jim Doyle" Date: Tue, July 22, 2008 19:25 To: "andrea dorey" "Carol Brouillet" carolineyacoub at att.net "dana St George" "tian harter" "Wesley Rolley" Cc: "Drew" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I wish to correct any misunderstandings I might have caused by my more recent lists of agenda items for the county council meeting we will try to hold this coming Saturday July 26-th tentatively set for 3 pm at 1683 Nightingale. So far Carol has anounced she can come. Caroline and Tian will not be available. By implication Andrea and Jim will be there. We still need a fourth to establish a quorum. Agenda clarification: After incorporating Drew's email reply to a call for agenda items verbatim I subsequently shortened it and cut one part of it down to three words - Recall Jim Stauffer. I did not mean we would initiate a recall. I meant that that would be a topic in the expectation that Drew would present a written complaint as described in by-laws Article 3.3. Possible agenda items are - and I do welcome your suggestions - elect treasurer picnic tabling (regular schedule) agenda preparation (rotating duty, both cc and general meeting) prepare an agenda for the august monthly meeting - there are ten or twelve ballot initiatives to establish a position on for county polling and a newsletter discuss SC-SM email list ownership re (reinstatement request) presentation of written complaint newsletter fundraising letter receipts schedule next meeting From snug.bug at hotmail.com Sat Jul 26 00:45:03 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:45:03 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Questions for my Congressional Rep. Message-ID: 1. What in your busy legislative agenda could possibly be more important than honoring your oath of office, defending the Constitution, and preserving the rights of future generations by impeaching this rogue administration? 2. How can you claim that the 9/11 Commission investigations were thorough when the Jersey Widows are still waiting for answers to 273 of their 300 questions? _________________________________________________________________ Time for vacation? WIN what you need- enter now! http://www.gowindowslive.com/summergiveaway/?ocid=tag_jlyhm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbrouillet at igc.org Sat Jul 26 08:42:30 2008 From: cbrouillet at igc.org (Carol Brouillet) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:42:30 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] County Council Meeting Sat. 25th 3pm @ Jim Doyle's In-Reply-To: <2827.75.19.86.251.1217051495.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <2827.75.19.86.251.1217051495.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: Eshoo is holding a Town Hall Meeting in Meno Park from 1 to 2:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park I thought I should go and I guess I'll go directly from there to the meeting at Andrea's. Carol At 10:51 PM 7/25/2008, Drew Johnson wrote: >Dear All, > >Caroline told me she had company and would be unlikely to make it, and >Merriam said she was improbable due to her work on Impeachment @ the SJ >Peace & Justice Center. I'm planning to come. > >I'm thinking that since Jim Stauffer's term is up and hence replacing him >is just as good as recalling him, that it would be more constructive for >me to not bother with a recall effort, but just to focus on his >unjustified actions of removing me from the regional list -- so as I'd >said originally I'll look for my reinstatement on the list and the council >making it clear to Jim that such behavior is out of bounds. > >BTW, I'm volunteering to serve as our next Regional Rep. > > >Green is Core! > >Drew > > >---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- >Subject: try again (2) >From: "Jim Doyle" >Date: Tue, July 22, 2008 19:25 >To: "andrea dorey" > "Carol Brouillet" > carolineyacoub at att.net > "dana St George" > "tian harter" > "Wesley Rolley" >Cc: "Drew" >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >I wish to correct any misunderstandings I might have caused >by my more recent lists of agenda items for the county council meeting >we will try to hold this coming Saturday July 26-th tentatively set for >3 pm at 1683 Nightingale. > >So far Carol has anounced she can come. >Caroline and Tian will not be available. >By implication Andrea and Jim will be there. >We still need a fourth to establish a quorum. > >Agenda clarification: >After incorporating Drew's email reply to a call for agenda items verbatim >I subsequently shortened it and cut one part of it down to three words - >Recall Jim Stauffer. > >I did not mean we would initiate a recall. I meant that that would be a >topic >in the expectation that Drew would present a written complaint as described >in by-laws Article 3.3. > >Possible agenda items are - and I do welcome your suggestions - > >elect treasurer >picnic >tabling (regular schedule) >agenda preparation (rotating duty, both cc and general meeting) >prepare an agenda for the august monthly meeting - > there are ten or twelve ballot initiatives to establish a position on > for county polling and a newsletter >discuss SC-SM email list ownership re (reinstatement request) >presentation of written complaint >newsletter >fundraising letter receipts >schedule next meeting > > > >_______________________________________________ >sosfbay-discuss mailing list >sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 10:27:17 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] County Council Meeting Sat. 25th 3pm @ Andrea's In-Reply-To: References: <2827.75.19.86.251.1217051495.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <3016.75.19.86.251.1217093237.squirrel@www.greens.org> Oh Carol, thank you for pointing out that its at Andrea's not Jim Doyle's as I'd mistakenly titled the post. Ooops! Green is Care! Drew On Sat, July 26, 2008 08:42, Carol Brouillet wrote: > > Eshoo is holding a Town Hall Meeting in Meno Park from > 1 to 2:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park > > I thought I should go and I guess I'll go directly from there to the > meeting at Andrea's. > > Carol > > At 10:51 PM 7/25/2008, Drew Johnson wrote: >>Dear All, >> >>Caroline told me she had company and would be unlikely to make it, and >>Merriam said she was improbable due to her work on Impeachment @ the SJ >>Peace & Justice Center. I'm planning to come. >> >>I'm thinking that since Jim Stauffer's term is up and hence replacing him >>is just as good as recalling him, that it would be more constructive for >>me to not bother with a recall effort, but just to focus on his >>unjustified actions of removing me from the regional list -- so as I'd >>said originally I'll look for my reinstatement on the list and the >> council >>making it clear to Jim that such behavior is out of bounds. >> >>BTW, I'm volunteering to serve as our next Regional Rep. >> >> >>Green is Core! >> >>Drew >> >> >>---------------------------- Original Message >> ---------------------------- >>Subject: try again (2) >>From: "Jim Doyle" >>Date: Tue, July 22, 2008 19:25 >>To: "andrea dorey" >> "Carol Brouillet" >> carolineyacoub at att.net >> "dana St George" >> "tian harter" >> "Wesley Rolley" >>Cc: "Drew" >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>I wish to correct any misunderstandings I might have caused >>by my more recent lists of agenda items for the county council meeting >>we will try to hold this coming Saturday July 26-th tentatively set for >>3 pm at 1683 Nightingale. >> >>So far Carol has anounced she can come. >>Caroline and Tian will not be available. >>By implication Andrea and Jim will be there. >>We still need a fourth to establish a quorum. >> >>Agenda clarification: >>After incorporating Drew's email reply to a call for agenda items >> verbatim >>I subsequently shortened it and cut one part of it down to three words - >>Recall Jim Stauffer. >> >>I did not mean we would initiate a recall. I meant that that would be a >>topic >>in the expectation that Drew would present a written complaint as >> described >>in by-laws Article 3.3. >> >>Possible agenda items are - and I do welcome your suggestions - >> >>elect treasurer >>picnic >>tabling (regular schedule) >>agenda preparation (rotating duty, both cc and general meeting) >>prepare an agenda for the august monthly meeting - >> there are ten or twelve ballot initiatives to establish a position on >> for county polling and a newsletter >>discuss SC-SM email list ownership re (reinstatement request) >>presentation of written complaint >>newsletter >>fundraising letter receipts >>schedule next meeting >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>sosfbay-discuss mailing list >>sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >>http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > > From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 10:28:38 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Silicon Valley Region CC Member Needed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3021.75.19.86.251.1217093318.squirrel@www.greens.org> I'm volunteering. Green is Core! Drew On Fri, July 18, 2008 16:50, WB4D23 at aol.com wrote: > Folks! Just as a reminder -- Both Santa Clara and San Mateo County GPs > revised their bylaws so we could appoint our member and alternate to the > GPCA > Coordinating Committee more democratically from our local organizations. > Jim > Stauffer has been our alternate since (and interim alternate before) the > September 2006 South Lake Tahoe Plenary. Jim has sent messages that his > term is > ending and that replacements are needed, but no one (as far as I have > heard) > has volunteered for either of these positions. In the past, we have > tried to > have the Regional Rep from one County and the alternate for the other. > The CC > responsibilities are summarized in the GPCA Bylaws. They include monthly > teleconferences, participation on an email list, and working in at least > one > GPCA committee or working group. Any volunteers??? Warner > > > > > > **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for > FanHouse Fantasy Football today. > (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 10:34:12 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Networking for McKinney/Clemente Message-ID: <3031.75.19.86.251.1217093652.squirrel@www.greens.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:05:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Midge Potts Subject: [usgp-dx] Networking for McKinney/Clemente To: Natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org Whether or not you are into the social networking sites, I hope everyone is aware that sites such as MySpace and Facebook are heavily used by the X and Y generations... we need to utilize these sites, and others like them as much as possible. When we make up fliers and other campaign materials, besides listing gp.org or official campaign websites, we should also add the url's for one or more of these social networking sites. Especially when it comes to college students, they will me much more likely to check out Cynthia McKinney on Facebook/MySpace than they will go to a traditional .com campaign website. Also, these social networking sites enable you to become "friends", and then you can send out post one single "bulletin" or "note" that all your "friends" can see when they log in to their user interface. You can also create groups on these sites as well. ? So, I have compiled the profiles of McKinney/Clemente that I could find and am listing them in this email below my signature. If you are already a member of one of the sites, please go and add our candidates as your friend. ? Midge Potts Progressive Party of Missouri PPMO state-co-chair Missouri GPNC delegate ? ================================= ? MYSPACE: ? Rosa Clemente http://www.myspace.com/rosaclemente Cynthia McKinney http://www.myspace.com/runcynthiarun ? ? FACEBOOK: ? Cynthia McKinney http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cynthia-McKinney/6713987105?ref=s ? Power to the People group http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19016342426 ? YOUTUBE: ? http://www.youtube.com/runcynthiarun ? Other networking sites: ? http://www.eventful.com/cynthiamckinney http://cynthiamckinney.meetup.com From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 11:14:15 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Convention Coverage Compilation, McKinney networking and BAR endorsement Message-ID: <3049.75.19.86.251.1217096055.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Natlcomaffairs Digest, Vol 57, Issue 79 From: natlcomaffairs-request at green.gpus.org Date: Sun, July 20, 2008 15:33 To: natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today's Topics: 1. Networking for McKinney/Clemente (Marnie Glickman) 2. Columns on the McKinney-Clemente nomination (Black Agenda Report; Black Commentator) (Scott McLarty) 4. compilation of convention coverage (Ann Link) Message: 4 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:33:12 +0000 From: Ann Link Subject: [usgp-dx] compilation of convention coverage To: ABC http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/green-party-tap.html Green Party Taps McKinney Atlanta-Journal Constitution http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/07/12/mckinney_green_nomination.html McKinney wins Green Party nomination http://www.ajc.com/pbccentral/content/metro/dekalb/stories/2008/07/09/mckinney_green_party.html McKinney expected to get Green Party nomination this week CBS http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/07/14/politics/horserace/entry4261275.shtml McKinney Joins The (Third) Party As Barr, Nader Fight On Chicago Public Radio (has a nice picture) http://www.wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=26531 McKinney Chosen To Lead Greens (for complete Chicago Public Radio Coverage go to http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/ and type ?Green Party? in the search area for a series of articles) The Chicago Sun-Times http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1048670,CST-NWS-green10web.article Green Party to hold convention, nominate presidential candidate Chicago tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-green-party-chicagojul13,0,869646.story McKinney to represent Greens on ballot CNN http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/12/mckinney.green.party/?iref=mpstoryview McKinney running for president as Green candidate Democracy Now http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/14/headlines Green Party Nominates Cynthia McKinney to be President Fox http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/07/12/mckinney-wins-green-party-nomination/ McKinney Wins Green Party Nomination The Herald News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1050706,4_1_JO11_GREEN_S1.article Two local candidates going Green (Party) Indypendent http://www.indypendent.org/2008/07/10/2004-indy-interview-w-rosa-clemente-likely-green-party-vice-presidential-nominee/ 2004 Indy Interview w/ Rosa Clemente, Likely Green Party Vice-Presidential Nominee The LA Times http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-greenparty11-2008jul11,0,1807623.story Cynthia McKinney outlines Green Party goals Michigan Daily (University of Michigan) http://www.michigandaily.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=72360e73-7dac-499e-b5ea-61dafc202e06 The third chair (see also accompanying blog http://apps.michigandaily.com/blogs/thepodium/) Ms. Magazine (Feminist Wire News Briefs) http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=11140 Cynthia McKinney will be Green Party Presidential Candidate NBC http://www.nbc5.com/news/16848228/detail.html Green Party Holds Convention In Chicago; Party Expected To Nominate Presidential Candidate Newsweek http://www.newsweek.com/id/146263 McKinney Goes Green; Will a third-party candidate be a ?spoiler?? NPR (story starts halfway through) http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92499294 Former Rep. McKinney Heads Green Party Ticket Pacifica (3-hour broadcast) http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour1.mp3 http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour2.mp3 http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour3.mp3 The Southern http://www.thesouthern.com/articles/2008/07/11/breaking_news/doc4877d8ff45448999054888.txt Don't blame me, I voted Whitney," bumper sticker proclaims UPI http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/12/McKinney_named_Green_Party_candidate/UPI-91001215909285/ McKinney named Green Party candidate USA Today (headlines) http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/07/looking-ahead-6.html The U.S. Green Party continues its presidential nominating convention in Chicago ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:04:35 -0700 From: Marnie Glickman Subject: [usgp-dx] Networking for McKinney/Clemente To: natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org Hi. Networking for the campaign also is happening on the Green Change Network: http://network.greenchange.org/groups/mckinney08 The Green Change Network is not run by a nasty corporation like Facebook or MySpace. We are run by people with Green values. We are ad-free and designed to help you organize. If you have never used a networking site, Green Change is a good place to start. We will train you. Just send me an email and we can set up a time to start. Peace, Marnie Glickman Executive director Green Change www.greenchange.org 503.313.7919 w 707.313.7919 f skype: marnieglickman Green Change is a community of people with Green values: justice, grassroots democracy, sustainability and non-violence. We work together to share Green art, politics and culture. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:05:26 +0000 From: Scott McLarty Subject: [usgp-dx] Columns on the McKinney-Clemente nomination (Black Agenda Report; Black Commentator) To: McKinney & Clemente: Black, Brown, Green & True (Glen Ford, Black Agenda Report) McKinney & Clemente: Black, Brown, Green and True Presidential Politics 2008 - Green Party By BAR executive editor Glen Ford Black Agenda Report, 16 July 2008 http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=698&Itemid=1 The Green Party's brand new Cynthia McKinney-Rosa Clemente ticket is off and running, having captured an overwhelming proportion of delegates at the national convention, in Chicago. Two Black women, one a Latina, are challenged to garner five percent of the national vote while transforming the Greens "into a vehicle for 24-7 movement politics." Former Georgia congresswoman McKinney vowed, "A vote for the Green Party is a vote for the movement that will turn this country right-side-up again." Said Clemente, a Hip Hop political organizer: "I don't see the Green Party as an alternative. I see it as an imperative." "The Green Party was against the war when it started, is against the war now, and is against any military action against Iran that might take place tomorrow," declared former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, accepting the Green Party's presidential nomination, in Chicago, this weekend. "The Green Party is a peace party. A Green vote is a peace vote." McKinney's statement is unequivocally true, a verity beyond question, as is her own deep commitment to social justice, tested and manifested during her 12-year sojourn in Congress. The 53-year-old activist and educator, whose last act as a U.S. Representative was to submit Articles of Impeachment against George Bush, not only speaks "truth to power" (or, as she puts it, "truth to empower), but demands that truth be the essential element of all American political discourse. There is nothing quaint or convenient about The Truth. In a nation ruled by the raw power of money, the Lords of Capital market their own versions of truth designed to make wrongs seem right, and criminality appear normal. The corporate casting couch supplies political actors to mouth attractive untruths as required by the imperatives of Capital. Some of these actors are extremely talented, compounding the dangers they present to society. At every opportunity, they stomp on truth as if it were vermin - and for each vanquished truth they are paid a bounty in parceled power and prestige. U.S. presidents are manufactured in this way. Truth thus becomes a precious commodity in 21st Century America. At the Green Party podium, Cynthia McKinney reached back to the year 1851, when Black abolitionist Sojourner Truth asked a white crowd a rhetorical question for which only one answer was conceivable: "Ain't I a woman?" Having focused her audience on a simple truth, Sojourner proceeded to explicate the burning issues of the day: "Well children, where there is so much racket, there must be something out of kilter." Truth is compelling, in any epoch. "In 2008, after two stolen Presidential elections and eight years of George W. Bush, and at least two years of Democratic Party complicity, the racket is about war crimes, torture, crimes against the peace; the racket is about crimes against the Constitution, crimes against the American people, and crimes against the global community," said Cynthia McKinney, relating well-known but relentlessly suppressed truths. "The racket is even about values that we thought were long settled as reasonable to pursue, like liberty and justice, and economic opportunity, for all. Yes, Sojourner, there's a lot out of kilter now, but these two women, Rosa and me, joined by all the men and women in this room, are going to do our best to turn this country right side up again." The truth alone cannot set you free, but it will at least tell you what time it is. "The only way I can even begin to accept this nomination is that I must understand that I am just a vessel, a representative of the work of an entire generation, and the Hip-Hop radical activist movement," said vice-presidential nominee Rosa Clemente, a South Bronx native of Puerto Rican parentage. The 36-year-old journalist was a key organizer of the 3,000-strong, 2004 Hip Hop Political Convention, in Newark, New Jersey. The delegates, all of whom paid their own way, drew up a Hip Hop Political Agenda that remains eminently compatible with the Green Party and "Power to the People" platforms under which Clemente and McKinney are currently campaigning. (A second Hip Hop Political Convention took place in Chicago in the summer of 2006.) "I stand on the shoulders of a generation of young people of color that are united, that clearly understand that we are suffering form structural racism, institutional racism and capitalism," said Clemente. These are truths that Barack Obama, the corporate Democrat, would rather end 20-year friendships than accept. Obama allows the celebration of his candidacy to serve as a vindication of historical and contemporary racist rule. In fact, his ascension is fully endorsed (and financed) by the overwhelmingly white Lords of Capitol. No recess of reality is safe from corporate sanitization. In this election cycle, conducted amid overlapping, terminal crises of late-stage capitalism, the heroes are those who challenge the corporate media's endlessly looped lies - key elements in the structural supports that keep the evil edifice from crumbling outright. Heroines like McKinney and Clemente. "I don't see the Green Party as an alternative," said Clemente. "I see it as an imperative." A True Choice "We are in this to build a movement," McKinney told her jubilant Chicago crowd. "A vote for the Green Party is a vote for the movement that will turn this country right-side-up again." Had she chosen to do so, McKinney could have remained in the Democratic Party and attempted to recapture her House seat, outside Atlanta, as she did in 2004 after a two year absence. But the overarching necessity for Black America - and therefore, for the entire nation - is the rebirth of a Black-led mass movement for peace and fundamental social change. Without a movement, the corporate version of reality triumphs by default - not just through the two-business-party electoral racket, but in all aspects of life in which human beings must somehow locate themselves in the real world. Much more is at stake than the Green Party's goal of garnering five percent of the presidential vote, which would make the Greens eligible for federal election funds next time around. Corporate hegemony is the enemy of the self-determination of peoples and individuals. It seeks to subdue every relationship except those of corporate ownership and control, and capriciously alters the terms of even those shrunken arrangements, at will. The current multiple crises afflicting humanity are all rooted in the commodification of the Earth's resources - including human beings. There is no choice but to resist the crushing grip, at every level of human activity. In Black America, which is the vital epicenter of any progressive national politics, the Obama phenomenon - a species of seductive invading organism that feeds on centuries of pent-up Black aspirations - has already dangerously disrupted the African American political consensus on peace, social justice and the validity of the Black historical narrative, itself (the Obama-Rev. Wright clash). Obama has caused Blacks to suspend the disbelief (healthy distrust) that has been at least a partial defense against white snake oil salesmen over the years. National Black politics has effectively disintegrated, stripped of all issues other than Obama's own fortunes. It is as if an entire people were reduced to the property of one, thoroughly dishonest man - in the service of another Man. Obama's cynicism, his deliberate ambiguity and outright manipulation of ALL people - but especially African Americans - debases the morals of his desperate followers. In a remarkably short period of time they have come to accept half-lies as clever, and well-crafted untruths as things to be admired. To justify Obama's behavior, Blacks accept that all "politicians" say whatever they must in order to win office, and attach no moral onus to that, even when it is Blacks who are the ones being lied to and defamed. Obama has sanctioned - sanctified! - opportunism of the most base kind. He has brought corporate and anti-Black values into the African American house, in ways that no combination of previous scoundrels could have dreamed. The McKinney-Clemente message is one of struggle, not blind hope and amorphous change. In the presidential candidate's words: "Today's reality is harsh. But what's even harder for many to accept and admit is that our quality of life today is the making of the Democratic and Republican Parties. What our country has become through their public policy is reflective of their values. We will never get a United States that is reflective of different values if we continue to do the same thing. Those who delivered us into this mess cannot be trusted to get us out of it. That's why I signed up to do something I've never done before so I can have something I've never had before: My country, made in the likeness of the values of the Green Party." That party is now headed by two Black women, one a Latina, who consciously seek to transform it into a vehicle for 24-7 movement politics PLUS effective electoral activity. That is the historic opportunity. The Democrats would have you waste your vote on an actor employed by corporations. As Rosa Clemente reminded the Greens in Chicago: "We must remember the words of the great abolitionist Frederick Douglass: 'I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false.'" BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford at BlackAgendaReport.com * * * * * Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente: Building a Movement for REAL Change By LARRY PINKNEY Editorial Board Member Black Commentator, July 17, 2008, Issue 286 http://www.blackcommentator.com/286/286_kir_mckinney_clemente_movement_change.html Something magnificent and truly extraordinary happened at the 2008, Green Party Presidential Convention a few days ago in Chicago, Illinois. Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente; two dynamic, highly intelligent, experienced, and politically committed women of color were chosen by the Green Party of this nation to be its nominees for President and Vice President respectively, of the United States of America. Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who demonstrated the guts and integrity to leave the politically opportunist and bankrupt Democratic Party has, for quite some time now been yet again demonstrating her guts and integrity by crisscrossing this nation and informing people in every nook and cranny about the ?Power To The People? Campaign. Now Sister McKinney has been joined by Puerto Rican people?s grass root activist / journalist / and intellectual hip hop artist Sister Rosa Clemente in this ever growing campaign and people?s movement and struggle. Indeed, something extraordinary has happened and there is yet more to come. While CNN, ABC, C-SPAN, etc. did give some limited coverage of and to this incredibly momentous event; none of the pundits of these so-called ?main stream news? media outlets dared elucidate to the ?American? people the enormous present-day and historical significance and opportunities of what just happened in Chicago. None of these pundits dared explain and emphasize the revolutionary aspect of what had just happened in Chicago: That the Green Party and the Reconstruction Movement this past weekend, in selecting Cynthia McKinney as their primary standard bearer, is a stinging rejection and rebuke of the Democratic and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] with their putrid, hypocritical, corporate / military apparatus-fueled politics of dishonesty, subterfuge, smoke & mirrors, and unending wars abroad and increasing economic disparity and social misery at home. The sleeping dragon, consisting of the rank and file, everyday woman, man, and child in this nation, has final ly begun to awaken once again. The Empire, including its Democratic and Republican Party surrogates, has been put on notice by politically conscious Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation of who are sick and tired of being hoodwinked, manipulated, and politically blood sucked. What happened this past week end in Chicago is a wake up call to all persons of good will: Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow! By supporting the candidacies of Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente we are supporting a people?s movement ? our movement for real, fundamental, ?systemic? change, not mealy-mouth meaningless / feel good rhetoric. We are self-actualizing our hopes and dreams, not allowing others to pimp and manipulate us by playing on those hopes and dreams. We are supporting the very best in ourselves. We are laying the foundation in 21st Century ?America? for a genuine and ongoing people?s movement that says NO to the corporate / military / prison apparatus of the U.S. Empire at home and abroad. We are supporting so much more than only candidates for political office - we are supporting our commitment to the building of an uncompromising, unswerving, people?s movement that is unhindered by this system?s Democratic and Republican [i.e. Republicratic] Party election time lines and political machine. We are refusing to collaborate with this Empire?s system of oppression. Rather, we are working to dismantle it and build a fundamentally and systemically different system that addresses human needs, not human greed. We are emphatically stating that we will not sit back and allow principled, intelligent, revolutionary / politically progressive, honest, and for-real women to be by-passed and ignored any longer by this system in ?America.? By supporting the Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente ?Power To The People? Campaign we are making it crystal clear that we will intensify the struggle the dignity and human rights of all people: women, men, and children - Black, Brown, Red, White, and Yellow - all peoples. To be sure, the U.S. Empire?s corrupt and biased news media disinformation machine can be expected to go into high gear in an effort to discredit and neutralize the McKinney / Clemente ticket and the ?Power To The People? Campaign. Indeed, these slimy tactics have already begun. However, such tactics merely confirm the absolute importance of what we are committed to and what this movement is all about. For those who may not have seen and heard Cynthia McKinney?s acceptance speech on C-SPAN at the Green Party Convention this past July 13, 2008; it is urged that you turn on your computer?s speakers, view her presentation, and hear her remarks and those of Rosa Clemente on the internet at C-SPAN.org under the heading Green Party Presidential Convention (July 13, 2008) (http://cspan.org/search.aspx?For=Green%20Party%20Presidential%20Convent). The ?Power To The People? Campaign is the only one to boldly and seriously address not only the issues of militarism, economic disparity, social and environmental inequities, single payer health care, government malfeasance and neglect, corporate greed, equal opportunity and education, racism, reparations, gender parity, and homelessness, etc; but just as importantly, this campaign is about building an ongoing movement to fundamentally address the root causes of these pressing concerns. The twin demons of the Empire, i.e. the Democratic and Republican Parties [increasingly known as the Republicrats] and their accomplices, are in opposition to any real systemic change. Thus, every conceivable means will be utilized to deter this campaign, its ultimate movement, and objectives. We must get out into our towns, cities, and municipalities of all kinds with one fundamental objective: Getting and putting the ?Power To The People? Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente Green Party ticket on the ballot in high numbers in every viable state of this nation, while simultaneously building and nurturing this people?s movement. Let us start voting right now by organizing to support Cynthia and Rosa in the streets, the back woods, the schools, on the reservations, in the barrios, ghettos, and every possible nook and cranny and community of this nation. WE ARE NOT COLLABORATORS AND WE WILL NOT COLLABORATE WITH THE EMPIRE IN OUR OWN OPPRESSION OR THAT OF OTHERS. Organize, organize, and organize some more! We are the people and it is WE ourselves who are the essence of, and motivation for, real change. Let us call out to our sisters and brothers in Haiti, in Venezuela, in Bolivia, in Cuba, in Palestine, in Myanmar, in the Congo and throughout the entire world. Let us send them a message of comradely greetings and let them know that we are reawakening from slumber here in the belly of the Empire. We have seen their examples and are emulating them for the mutual betterment of all our peoples. We must build coalitions that serve the interests of the people. We must pry open the systemic, strangling, amoral death grip that the Democrats and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] have around our proverbial necks and minds. We must work together with the Reconstruction Movement which began around the despicable U.S. Government criminality of both the Republicans and Democratic Parties re hurricane Katrina (and subsequently hurricane Rita). Being Green is just the beginning. We must keep in mind that there are also other progressive peoples out there in parties such as the Peace & Freedom Party, and we must work together with them to the mutual advantage of the people?s movement. We must remember that ?no one of us is as smart or as strong as all of us.? We must remember our sister and brother political prisoners, liberation fighters, and exiles such as Leonard Peltier, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Reverend Edward Pinkney [no relation], the San Francisco 8, Assata Shakur and s o very, very many more. We must remember why we are waging this struggle. This is about more than votes. This is about our very survival and that of Mother Earth - this planet. This is about saying NO to the Empire and its collaborators, and YES to a NEW DAY a NEW SOCIETY, a NEW WORLD. This is about struggling to be that NEW PERSON who self-actualizes and addresses human needs, not human greed, lies, and hypocrisy. Viva Cynthia McKinney! Viva Rosa Clememte! Long live ?The Power To The People? Campaign! Let?s get busy brothers and sisters. ?Each one reach one?. There is much work to be done! Onward then? BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board Member, Larry Pinkney, is a veteran of the Black Panther Party, the former Minister of Interior of the Republic of New Africa, a former political prisoner and the only American to have successfully self-authored his civil/political rights case to the United Nations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In connection with his political organizing activities in opposition to voter suppression, etc., Pinkney was interviewed in 1988 on the nationally televised PBS NewsHour, formerly known as The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. For more about Larry Pinkney see the book, Saying No to Power: Autobiography of a 20th Century Activist and Thinker, by William Mandel [Introduction by Howard Zinn]. ------------------------------ From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 11:19:09 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Convention Coverage Compilation, McKinney networking and BAR endorsement Message-ID: <3054.75.19.86.251.1217096349.squirrel@www.greens.org> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Natlcomaffairs Digest, Vol 57, Issue 79 From: natlcomaffairs-request at green.gpus.org Date: Sun, July 20, 2008 15:33 To: natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today's Topics: 1. Networking for McKinney/Clemente (Marnie Glickman) 2. Columns on the McKinney-Clemente nomination (Black Agenda Report; Black Commentator) (Scott McLarty) 4. compilation of convention coverage (Ann Link) ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:33:12 +0000 From: Ann Link Subject: [usgp-dx] compilation of convention coverage To: ABC http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/green-party-tap.html Green Party Taps McKinney Atlanta-Journal Constitution http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/07/12/mckinney_green_nomination.html McKinney wins Green Party nomination http://www.ajc.com/pbccentral/content/metro/dekalb/stories/2008/07/09/mckinney_green_party.html McKinney expected to get Green Party nomination this week CBS http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/07/14/politics/horserace/entry4261275.shtml McKinney Joins The (Third) Party As Barr, Nader Fight On Chicago Public Radio (has a nice picture) http://www.wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=26531 McKinney Chosen To Lead Greens (for complete Chicago Public Radio Coverage go to http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/ and type ?Green Party? in the search area for a series of articles) The Chicago Sun-Times http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1048670,CST-NWS-green10web.article Green Party to hold convention, nominate presidential candidate Chicago tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-green-party-chicagojul13,0,869646.story McKinney to represent Greens on ballot CNN http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/12/mckinney.green.party/?iref=mpstoryview McKinney running for president as Green candidate Democracy Now http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/14/headlines Green Party Nominates Cynthia McKinney to be President Fox http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/07/12/mckinney-wins-green-party-nomination/ McKinney Wins Green Party Nomination The Herald News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1050706,4_1_JO11_GREEN_S1.article Two local candidates going Green (Party) Indypendent http://www.indypendent.org/2008/07/10/2004-indy-interview-w-rosa-clemente-likely-green-party-vice-presidential-nominee/ 2004 Indy Interview w/ Rosa Clemente, Likely Green Party Vice-Presidential Nominee The LA Times http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-greenparty11-2008jul11,0,1807623.story Cynthia McKinney outlines Green Party goals Michigan Daily (University of Michigan) http://www.michigandaily.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=72360e73-7dac-499e-b5ea-61dafc202e06 The third chair (see also accompanying blog http://apps.michigandaily.com/blogs/thepodium/) Ms. Magazine (Feminist Wire News Briefs) http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=11140 Cynthia McKinney will be Green Party Presidential Candidate NBC http://www.nbc5.com/news/16848228/detail.html Green Party Holds Convention In Chicago; Party Expected To Nominate Presidential Candidate Newsweek http://www.newsweek.com/id/146263 McKinney Goes Green; Will a third-party candidate be a ?spoiler?? NPR (story starts halfway through) http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92499294 Former Rep. McKinney Heads Green Party Ticket Pacifica (3-hour broadcast) http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour1.mp3 http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour2.mp3 http://www.audioport.org/audioport_files/nathan at pacifica.org/7621-20080713-GreenConvention_PacificaSpecial_July13_Hour3.mp3 The Southern http://www.thesouthern.com/articles/2008/07/11/breaking_news/doc4877d8ff45448999054888.txt Don't blame me, I voted Whitney," bumper sticker proclaims UPI http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/12/McKinney_named_Green_Party_candidate/UPI-91001215909285/ McKinney named Green Party candidate USA Today (headlines) http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/07/looking-ahead-6.html The U.S. Green Party continues its presidential nominating convention in Chicago ------------------------------ Message: 1 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:04:35 -0700 From: Marnie Glickman Subject: [usgp-dx] Networking for McKinney/Clemente To: natlcomaffairs at green.gpus.org Hi. Networking for the campaign also is happening on the Green Change Network: http://network.greenchange.org/groups/mckinney08 The Green Change Network is not run by a nasty corporation like Facebook or MySpace. We are run by people with Green values. We are ad-free and designed to help you organize. If you have never used a networking site, Green Change is a good place to start. We will train you. Just send me an email and we can set up a time to start. Peace, Marnie Glickman Executive director Green Change www.greenchange.org 503.313.7919 w 707.313.7919 f skype: marnieglickman Green Change is a community of people with Green values: justice, grassroots democracy, sustainability and non-violence. We work together to share Green art, politics and culture. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:05:26 +0000 From: Scott McLarty Subject: [usgp-dx] Columns on the McKinney-Clemente nomination (Black Agenda Report; Black Commentator) To: McKinney & Clemente: Black, Brown, Green & True (Glen Ford, Black Agenda Report) McKinney & Clemente: Black, Brown, Green and True Presidential Politics 2008 - Green Party By BAR executive editor Glen Ford Black Agenda Report, 16 July 2008 http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=698&Itemid=1 The Green Party's brand new Cynthia McKinney-Rosa Clemente ticket is off and running, having captured an overwhelming proportion of delegates at the national convention, in Chicago. Two Black women, one a Latina, are challenged to garner five percent of the national vote while transforming the Greens "into a vehicle for 24-7 movement politics." Former Georgia congresswoman McKinney vowed, "A vote for the Green Party is a vote for the movement that will turn this country right-side-up again." Said Clemente, a Hip Hop political organizer: "I don't see the Green Party as an alternative. I see it as an imperative." "The Green Party was against the war when it started, is against the war now, and is against any military action against Iran that might take place tomorrow," declared former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, accepting the Green Party's presidential nomination, in Chicago, this weekend. "The Green Party is a peace party. A Green vote is a peace vote." McKinney's statement is unequivocally true, a verity beyond question, as is her own deep commitment to social justice, tested and manifested during her 12-year sojourn in Congress. The 53-year-old activist and educator, whose last act as a U.S. Representative was to submit Articles of Impeachment against George Bush, not only speaks "truth to power" (or, as she puts it, "truth to empower), but demands that truth be the essential element of all American political discourse. There is nothing quaint or convenient about The Truth. In a nation ruled by the raw power of money, the Lords of Capital market their own versions of truth designed to make wrongs seem right, and criminality appear normal. The corporate casting couch supplies political actors to mouth attractive untruths as required by the imperatives of Capital. Some of these actors are extremely talented, compounding the dangers they present to society. At every opportunity, they stomp on truth as if it were vermin - and for each vanquished truth they are paid a bounty in parceled power and prestige. U.S. presidents are manufactured in this way. Truth thus becomes a precious commodity in 21st Century America. At the Green Party podium, Cynthia McKinney reached back to the year 1851, when Black abolitionist Sojourner Truth asked a white crowd a rhetorical question for which only one answer was conceivable: "Ain't I a woman?" Having focused her audience on a simple truth, Sojourner proceeded to explicate the burning issues of the day: "Well children, where there is so much racket, there must be something out of kilter." Truth is compelling, in any epoch. "In 2008, after two stolen Presidential elections and eight years of George W. Bush, and at least two years of Democratic Party complicity, the racket is about war crimes, torture, crimes against the peace; the racket is about crimes against the Constitution, crimes against the American people, and crimes against the global community," said Cynthia McKinney, relating well-known but relentlessly suppressed truths. "The racket is even about values that we thought were long settled as reasonable to pursue, like liberty and justice, and economic opportunity, for all. Yes, Sojourner, there's a lot out of kilter now, but these two women, Rosa and me, joined by all the men and women in this room, are going to do our best to turn this country right side up again." The truth alone cannot set you free, but it will at least tell you what time it is. "The only way I can even begin to accept this nomination is that I must understand that I am just a vessel, a representative of the work of an entire generation, and the Hip-Hop radical activist movement," said vice-presidential nominee Rosa Clemente, a South Bronx native of Puerto Rican parentage. The 36-year-old journalist was a key organizer of the 3,000-strong, 2004 Hip Hop Political Convention, in Newark, New Jersey. The delegates, all of whom paid their own way, drew up a Hip Hop Political Agenda that remains eminently compatible with the Green Party and "Power to the People" platforms under which Clemente and McKinney are currently campaigning. (A second Hip Hop Political Convention took place in Chicago in the summer of 2006.) "I stand on the shoulders of a generation of young people of color that are united, that clearly understand that we are suffering form structural racism, institutional racism and capitalism," said Clemente. These are truths that Barack Obama, the corporate Democrat, would rather end 20-year friendships than accept. Obama allows the celebration of his candidacy to serve as a vindication of historical and contemporary racist rule. In fact, his ascension is fully endorsed (and financed) by the overwhelmingly white Lords of Capitol. No recess of reality is safe from corporate sanitization. In this election cycle, conducted amid overlapping, terminal crises of late-stage capitalism, the heroes are those who challenge the corporate media's endlessly looped lies - key elements in the structural supports that keep the evil edifice from crumbling outright. Heroines like McKinney and Clemente. "I don't see the Green Party as an alternative," said Clemente. "I see it as an imperative." A True Choice "We are in this to build a movement," McKinney told her jubilant Chicago crowd. "A vote for the Green Party is a vote for the movement that will turn this country right-side-up again." Had she chosen to do so, McKinney could have remained in the Democratic Party and attempted to recapture her House seat, outside Atlanta, as she did in 2004 after a two year absence. But the overarching necessity for Black America - and therefore, for the entire nation - is the rebirth of a Black-led mass movement for peace and fundamental social change. Without a movement, the corporate version of reality triumphs by default - not just through the two-business-party electoral racket, but in all aspects of life in which human beings must somehow locate themselves in the real world. Much more is at stake than the Green Party's goal of garnering five percent of the presidential vote, which would make the Greens eligible for federal election funds next time around. Corporate hegemony is the enemy of the self-determination of peoples and individuals. It seeks to subdue every relationship except those of corporate ownership and control, and capriciously alters the terms of even those shrunken arrangements, at will. The current multiple crises afflicting humanity are all rooted in the commodification of the Earth's resources - including human beings. There is no choice but to resist the crushing grip, at every level of human activity. In Black America, which is the vital epicenter of any progressive national politics, the Obama phenomenon - a species of seductive invading organism that feeds on centuries of pent-up Black aspirations - has already dangerously disrupted the African American political consensus on peace, social justice and the validity of the Black historical narrative, itself (the Obama-Rev. Wright clash). Obama has caused Blacks to suspend the disbelief (healthy distrust) that has been at least a partial defense against white snake oil salesmen over the years. National Black politics has effectively disintegrated, stripped of all issues other than Obama's own fortunes. It is as if an entire people were reduced to the property of one, thoroughly dishonest man - in the service of another Man. Obama's cynicism, his deliberate ambiguity and outright manipulation of ALL people - but especially African Americans - debases the morals of his desperate followers. In a remarkably short period of time they have come to accept half-lies as clever, and well-crafted untruths as things to be admired. To justify Obama's behavior, Blacks accept that all "politicians" say whatever they must in order to win office, and attach no moral onus to that, even when it is Blacks who are the ones being lied to and defamed. Obama has sanctioned - sanctified! - opportunism of the most base kind. He has brought corporate and anti-Black values into the African American house, in ways that no combination of previous scoundrels could have dreamed. The McKinney-Clemente message is one of struggle, not blind hope and amorphous change. In the presidential candidate's words: "Today's reality is harsh. But what's even harder for many to accept and admit is that our quality of life today is the making of the Democratic and Republican Parties. What our country has become through their public policy is reflective of their values. We will never get a United States that is reflective of different values if we continue to do the same thing. Those who delivered us into this mess cannot be trusted to get us out of it. That's why I signed up to do something I've never done before so I can have something I've never had before: My country, made in the likeness of the values of the Green Party." That party is now headed by two Black women, one a Latina, who consciously seek to transform it into a vehicle for 24-7 movement politics PLUS effective electoral activity. That is the historic opportunity. The Democrats would have you waste your vote on an actor employed by corporations. As Rosa Clemente reminded the Greens in Chicago: "We must remember the words of the great abolitionist Frederick Douglass: 'I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false.'" BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford at BlackAgendaReport.com * * * * * Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente: Building a Movement for REAL Change By LARRY PINKNEY Editorial Board Member Black Commentator, July 17, 2008, Issue 286 http://www.blackcommentator.com/286/286_kir_mckinney_clemente_movement_change.html Something magnificent and truly extraordinary happened at the 2008, Green Party Presidential Convention a few days ago in Chicago, Illinois. Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente; two dynamic, highly intelligent, experienced, and politically committed women of color were chosen by the Green Party of this nation to be its nominees for President and Vice President respectively, of the United States of America. Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who demonstrated the guts and integrity to leave the politically opportunist and bankrupt Democratic Party has, for quite some time now been yet again demonstrating her guts and integrity by crisscrossing this nation and informing people in every nook and cranny about the ?Power To The People? Campaign. Now Sister McKinney has been joined by Puerto Rican people?s grass root activist / journalist / and intellectual hip hop artist Sister Rosa Clemente in this ever growing campaign and people?s movement and struggle. Indeed, something extraordinary has happened and there is yet more to come. While CNN, ABC, C-SPAN, etc. did give some limited coverage of and to this incredibly momentous event; none of the pundits of these so-called ?main stream news? media outlets dared elucidate to the ?American? people the enormous present-day and historical significance and opportunities of what just happened in Chicago. None of these pundits dared explain and emphasize the revolutionary aspect of what had just happened in Chicago: That the Green Party and the Reconstruction Movement this past weekend, in selecting Cynthia McKinney as their primary standard bearer, is a stinging rejection and rebuke of the Democratic and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] with their putrid, hypocritical, corporate / military apparatus-fueled politics of dishonesty, subterfuge, smoke & mirrors, and unending wars abroad and increasing economic disparity and social misery at home. The sleeping dragon, consisting of the rank and file, everyday woman, man, and child in this nation, has final ly begun to awaken once again. The Empire, including its Democratic and Republican Party surrogates, has been put on notice by politically conscious Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation of who are sick and tired of being hoodwinked, manipulated, and politically blood sucked. What happened this past week end in Chicago is a wake up call to all persons of good will: Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow! By supporting the candidacies of Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente we are supporting a people?s movement ? our movement for real, fundamental, ?systemic? change, not mealy-mouth meaningless / feel good rhetoric. We are self-actualizing our hopes and dreams, not allowing others to pimp and manipulate us by playing on those hopes and dreams. We are supporting the very best in ourselves. We are laying the foundation in 21st Century ?America? for a genuine and ongoing people?s movement that says NO to the corporate / military / prison apparatus of the U.S. Empire at home and abroad. We are supporting so much more than only candidates for political office - we are supporting our commitment to the building of an uncompromising, unswerving, people?s movement that is unhindered by this system?s Democratic and Republican [i.e. Republicratic] Party election time lines and political machine. We are refusing to collaborate with this Empire?s system of oppression. Rather, we are working to dismantle it and build a fundamentally and systemically different system that addresses human needs, not human greed. We are emphatically stating that we will not sit back and allow principled, intelligent, revolutionary / politically progressive, honest, and for-real women to be by-passed and ignored any longer by this system in ?America.? By supporting the Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente ?Power To The People? Campaign we are making it crystal clear that we will intensify the struggle the dignity and human rights of all people: women, men, and children - Black, Brown, Red, White, and Yellow - all peoples. To be sure, the U.S. Empire?s corrupt and biased news media disinformation machine can be expected to go into high gear in an effort to discredit and neutralize the McKinney / Clemente ticket and the ?Power To The People? Campaign. Indeed, these slimy tactics have already begun. However, such tactics merely confirm the absolute importance of what we are committed to and what this movement is all about. For those who may not have seen and heard Cynthia McKinney?s acceptance speech on C-SPAN at the Green Party Convention this past July 13, 2008; it is urged that you turn on your computer?s speakers, view her presentation, and hear her remarks and those of Rosa Clemente on the internet at C-SPAN.org under the heading Green Party Presidential Convention (July 13, 2008) (http://cspan.org/search.aspx?For=Green%20Party%20Presidential%20Convent). The ?Power To The People? Campaign is the only one to boldly and seriously address not only the issues of militarism, economic disparity, social and environmental inequities, single payer health care, government malfeasance and neglect, corporate greed, equal opportunity and education, racism, reparations, gender parity, and homelessness, etc; but just as importantly, this campaign is about building an ongoing movement to fundamentally address the root causes of these pressing concerns. The twin demons of the Empire, i.e. the Democratic and Republican Parties [increasingly known as the Republicrats] and their accomplices, are in opposition to any real systemic change. Thus, every conceivable means will be utilized to deter this campaign, its ultimate movement, and objectives. We must get out into our towns, cities, and municipalities of all kinds with one fundamental objective: Getting and putting the ?Power To The People? Cynthia McKinney / Rosa Clemente Green Party ticket on the ballot in high numbers in every viable state of this nation, while simultaneously building and nurturing this people?s movement. Let us start voting right now by organizing to support Cynthia and Rosa in the streets, the back woods, the schools, on the reservations, in the barrios, ghettos, and every possible nook and cranny and community of this nation. WE ARE NOT COLLABORATORS AND WE WILL NOT COLLABORATE WITH THE EMPIRE IN OUR OWN OPPRESSION OR THAT OF OTHERS. Organize, organize, and organize some more! We are the people and it is WE ourselves who are the essence of, and motivation for, real change. Let us call out to our sisters and brothers in Haiti, in Venezuela, in Bolivia, in Cuba, in Palestine, in Myanmar, in the Congo and throughout the entire world. Let us send them a message of comradely greetings and let them know that we are reawakening from slumber here in the belly of the Empire. We have seen their examples and are emulating them for the mutual betterment of all our peoples. We must build coalitions that serve the interests of the people. We must pry open the systemic, strangling, amoral death grip that the Democrats and Republican Parties [i.e. the Republicrats] have around our proverbial necks and minds. We must work together with the Reconstruction Movement which began around the despicable U.S. Government criminality of both the Republicans and Democratic Parties re hurricane Katrina (and subsequently hurricane Rita). Being Green is just the beginning. We must keep in mind that there are also other progressive peoples out there in parties such as the Peace & Freedom Party, and we must work together with them to the mutual advantage of the people?s movement. We must remember that ?no one of us is as smart or as strong as all of us.? We must remember our sister and brother political prisoners, liberation fighters, and exiles such as Leonard Peltier, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Reverend Edward Pinkney [no relation], the San Francisco 8, Assata Shakur and s o very, very many more. We must remember why we are waging this struggle. This is about more than votes. This is about our very survival and that of Mother Earth - this planet. This is about saying NO to the Empire and its collaborators, and YES to a NEW DAY a NEW SOCIETY, a NEW WORLD. This is about struggling to be that NEW PERSON who self-actualizes and addresses human needs, not human greed, lies, and hypocrisy. Viva Cynthia McKinney! Viva Rosa Clememte! Long live ?The Power To The People? Campaign! Let?s get busy brothers and sisters. ?Each one reach one?. There is much work to be done! Onward then? BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board Member, Larry Pinkney, is a veteran of the Black Panther Party, the former Minister of Interior of the Republic of New Africa, a former political prisoner and the only American to have successfully self-authored his civil/political rights case to the United Nations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In connection with his political organizing activities in opposition to voter suppression, etc., Pinkney was interviewed in 1988 on the nationally televised PBS NewsHour, formerly known as The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. For more about Larry Pinkney see the book, Saying No to Power: Autobiography of a 20th Century Activist and Thinker, by William Mandel [Introduction by Howard Zinn]. ------------------------------ From JamBoi at Greens.org Sat Jul 26 13:30:06 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's Counter Factual Claims vs the Reality of the SC-SM List and His Unacceptable Behavior. Message-ID: <3193.75.19.86.251.1217104206.squirrel@www.greens.org> To review: Earlier this month Jim Stauffer without County Council consultation or authorization, arbitrarily, tyrannously forcibly removed my e-mail address from the Regional E-mail List. Jim Stauffer struck just as soon as he thought he could get away with it (ie. as soon as I was an Emeritus Councilor). He had previously sereptitiously removed a second account of mine JamBoi at yahoo.com (again entirely without my permission) so its not much of a stretch to guess that he planned this illicit strike with malice of forethought. Jim Doyle (without ever asking me for my point of view on this subject) posted a note which read exactly like Jim Stauffer's 'talking points' regarding his skewed perspective on this discussion list Note also that the only people to plead on this list for me not to press home the point with Stauffer are not even from this county (and therefore in my strongly held opinion should not even be allowed to post on our county party's list), Curt Wechsler and The archive is open for anyone to examine and verify these facts. See: http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/sc-sm/ Currently the list info says (although I'm not certain if Jim hasn't recently changed it to narrow the statement) "This list is to facilitate communications between SC and SM counties on regional issues." I painstakingly went through the archive and assembled a list of the posting titles by month so people can determine for themselves what the facts are. Its quite evident to the observer of this material that Jim never objected on this list to what he now tries to claim are off-topic posts (his pathetic excuse for removing me from the list) when his cohort and the Alpha of the Anti-Mike Feinstein Faction, Jo Chamberlain posted very similar posts. Nor did Jim ever post any objections when similar supposedly 'off-topic' posts were made by Sanda Everette, Andrea Dorey, or any other person. Just me. Nor were the number of posts ever objected to when they were made by Jo Chamberlain or others. So much for his other pathetic excuse. There is also no evidence here that he's ever removed anyone else from the list. No objective observer could conclude anything other than Jim Stauffer has an axe to grind against me and has carried it out by (temporarily I assure all) removing me from the list. Let's take special note of the extremely salient fact that his attempts to intimidate me via off list e-mail "warnings" took place WHILE I WAS ON THE COUNCIL AND THEREFORE HE WOULD LOGICALLY BE THE ONE SUBJECTED TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL AND OUT POSTING POLICY ON OUR OWN LIST AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. IF HE WAS SERVING THE TWO COUNTY COUNCILS AS ALTERNATE REGIONAL REP AND E-MAIL LIST MANAGER THEN WHY IS IT THAT HE CONTINUOUSLY ATTEMPTS TO INTIMIDATE COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBERS. NOT JUST ME, BUT NOW CAROLINE YACOUBS AS WELL. Others who have had to deal with the angry, tempestuous apparently untreated rageaholic Jim Stauffer have written me off list calling his behavior "toxic" and saying that "My observation is that he is utterly toxic to everything he touches. Only complete isolation will offer any hope that he will find the motivation necessary to seek the anger management counseling he needs." Anyone who has experienced his outrageous temper tantrum outbursts or his attempts to rush us through our business at our county General Meetings and in particular his prejudiced rants against Tian and Carol Brouillet in particular could agree with this assessment. He has misused his position on the Coordinating Committee to pursue a blind Factional Fanaticism towards Mike Feinstein. While Feinstein's and his Factional Fanatic's behavior has certainly been equally grievous, Jim Stauffer is our responsibility as he represents us on the GPCA Coordinating Committee and between the two factions they've brought the GPCA to its knees. This sectarian brawl must end and we must act within our own purview to remove those that are perpetuating this brawl. Jim Stauffer and Jo Chamberlain actually used this very regional list to pursue their Anti-Mike Feinstein sectarian agenda and spread their propaganda. All the postings that have the label "Green Idea Pac" regard a Political Action Committee formed with the express purpose of finding a way to purge the opposing Mike Fienstein faction from all state County Councils. They actually provided money and resources to further this agenda. Disgusting! The Green Party is not a plaything for the rich and powerful (like Peter Camejo, Jo Chamberlain or Mike Feinstein) to have their way with. It is the people's party and its all about Grassroots Democracy and Decentralization, not pulling the marionette's strings from afar. In a phrase Jim Stauffer currently and for long in the past behaves what I'll unabashedly label an "apparently untreated rageahaolic abusive controlling bully". Always in the past I tried to see past his outrageous behavior and receive the virtues of his long experience and hard work for the party. Problem is while we've collectively tolerated his intolerable behavior many people (especially women) have been driven from our party, particularly from the Santa Clara co. Green Party. I have heard from many people who do not wish to be mistreated further that his behavior is the reason they do not continue to participate in the party. I refuse to remain silent any longer. Jim once said to me that if one was going to participate in politics, one would have to learn to deal with the tough nature of politics. That appears to be his blanket excuse for abusing fellow Greens. Well there's acting tough and then there's abuse. Jim's abusive behavior is not conducive of any recognizable Green party and will only continue to drive good Greens away from the party if we do not challenge it and call for Jim to get the help he needs in order to behave in a civilized and Green manner within the party. After he gets help and reforms his behavior then I'd welcome him back to be a key member of our party. Until then I believe we must firmly reject any application he makes to represent or lead our party including turning him out of the Regional Representative position ASAP. Green is Accountable! Drew County Councilor Emeritus, Green National Committee Member (among many other Green Party posts served) Items of note re: archives: The first 50+ message month occurred long before I ever joined. Note as you read through the message titles (and remember you can go to the archives to read the messages themselves) the many supposedly 'off topic' postings by others long before I ever joined the list. Archives: http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/sc-sm ___ August 2005 Messages: 4 September 2005 Messages: 0 October 2005 Messages: 1 November 2005 Messages: 6 December 2005 Messages: 1 January 2006 Messages: 30 February 2006 Messages: 28 April 2006 Messages: 19 May 2006 Messages: 20 June 2006 Messages: 54 July 2006 Messages: 7 August 2006 Messages: 10 September 2006 Messages: 13 October 2006 Messages: 23 November 2006 Messages: 15 December 2006 Messages: 9 January 2007 Messages: 8 February 2007 Messages: 7 March 2007 Messages: 6 April 2007 Messages: 27 May 2007 Messages: 11 June 2007 Messages: 23 July 2007 Messages: 7 August 2007 Messages: 3 September 2007 Messages: 1 October 2007 Messages: 11 November 2007 Messages: 50 December 2007 Messages: 20 January 2008 Messages: 2 February 2008 Messages: 11 March 2008 Messages: 2 April 2008 Messages: 9 May 2008 Messages: 30 June 2008 Messages: 19 July 2008 Messages: 7 ___ August 2005 Archives by thread Messages: 4 * [SC-SM] test Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] test Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] regional list Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Regional List Jim Stauffer ___ September 2005 NO MESSAGES Messages: 0 ___ October 2005 Archives by thread Messages: 1 * [SC-SM] Invite: GPSMC Event w/Peter Camejo ++ Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Mon Oct 31 09:10:23 PDT 2005 ___ November 2005 Archives by thread Messages: 6 * [SC-SM] Nov 9th Green Talk - Don't Miss It Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Nov 9th Green Talk - Don't Miss It Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Invite: GPSMC Event w/Peter Camejo ++ Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Nov 9th Green Talk "Tonight" - Don't Miss It Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Regional Rep Selection; Previous Draft Bylaw Proposal WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Tomorrow Night: GPSMC Event w/Peter Camejo ++ Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Mon Nov 14 16:34:22 PDT 2005 ___ December 2005 Archives by thread Messages: 1 * [SC-SM] Green women Sanda Everette Archived on: Fri Dec 9 17:13:40 PDT 2005 ___ January 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 30 * [SC-SM] Fwd: full time political job for environmental initiative Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] elist communication request Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] elist communication request Gerry Gras * [SC-SM] Testing the list Gerry Gras o [SC-SM] Testing the list Don Havis o [SC-SM] [Sclara-cc] Testing the list--use ONE email address? Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Testing the list greenjellyfish at redjellyfish.net o [SC-SM] Testing the list Gerry Gras + [SC-SM] Testing the list Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Testing the list Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] Testing the list Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Testing the list James Shannon # [SC-SM] Testing the list Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] Testing the list Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] SC-SM Elist Current Participants Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] SC-SM Elist Current Participants Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] SC-SM Elist Current Participants Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Testing the list greenjellyfish at redjellyfish.net o [SC-SM] Testing the list Gerry Gras + [SC-SM] Testing the list Margaret Pye * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] To all CC members: Question about Bylaws Com appointments Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] My Participation on This List (from Warner) WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] My Participation on This List (from Warner) Sanda Everette o [SC-SM] My Participation on This List (from Warner) Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] My Participation on This List (from Warner) Sanda Everette + [SC-SM] My Participation on This List (from Warner) Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Information About Minimum Wage Initiative Campaign; Possible Event Date Feb 11th WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] First Gen. Assembly of 2006 is now in May Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] First Gen. Assembly of 2006 is now in May Mjsmith55 at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd Msg: Reminder to Treasurers re end of year statement due WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com Archived on: Mon Jan 23 20:35:42 PDT 2006 ___ February 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 11 * [SC-SM] Has Each GP County Endorsed The March 18th Peace Rally In Palo Alto? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Has Each GP County Endorsed The March 18th Peace Rally In Palo Alto? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Has Each GP County Endorsed The March 18th Peace Rally In Palo Alto? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Draft Revised Proposal re Write-In Votes Threshold -- For Questions and Concerns James Shannon o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Draft Revised Proposal re Write-In Votes Threshold Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Draft Revised Proposal re Write-In Votes Threshold -- For Questions and Concerns James Shannon o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Draft Revised Proposal re Write-In VotesThreshold -- For Questions and Concerns Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Comments re Mike Feinstein Draft for Endorsement Procedures James Shannon * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CCWG] Comments re Michael Feinstein Proposals for CCWG Candidate Support Commitee James Shannon * [SC-SM] Pat Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Pat Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Mon Feb 20 14:52:34 PDT 2006 ___ March 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 28 * [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state Coordinating Council Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state Coordinating Council WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state Coordinating Council Sanda Everette + [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state Coordinating Council Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the stateCoordinating Council Pat Gray o [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state CoordinatingCouncil Pat Gray + [SC-SM] Election of our Regional rep to the state CoordinatingCouncil Gerry Gras * [SC-SM] Invite: CCRA EVENT ON MARCH 26TH Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] PLAN - Santa Clara County Initiative Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] PLAN - Santa Clara County Initiative Jim Doyle + [SC-SM] PLAN - Santa Clara County Initiative Gerry Gras o [SC-SM] PLAN - Santa Clara County Initiative Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray o [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray + [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Gerry Gras * [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray + [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Andrea Dorey # [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] regional meeting to elect Regional Rep and alternate? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Open Letter from Peter Camejo to the GPCA CC Mjsmith55 at aol.com Archived on: Wed Mar 29 09:53:40 PDT 2006 ___ April 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 19 * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Andrea Dorey o [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Pat Gray + [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Andrea Dorey # [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Pat Gray # [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [Fwd: [Sosfbay-discuss] Regional Rep Election]] WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Pat Gray o [SC-SM] Regional Meeting Request? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] APRIL GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE MEETIN1 Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Fwd: NEWS ADVISORY: May 1 immigrant rights march in San Francisco could be largest ever Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Thu Apr 13 15:49:55 PDT 2006 ___ May 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 20 * [SC-SM] regional meeting? Pat Gray o [SC-SM] regional meeting? Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] regional meeting? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] regional meeting? WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] regional meeting? Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Regional meeting Pat Gray * [SC-SM] FW: possible Senate candidates forum Pat Gray * [SC-SM] regional meeting Pat Gray o [SC-SM] regional meeting Gerry Gras + [SC-SM] regional meeting Pat Gray # [SC-SM] regional meeting Andrea Dorey # [SC-SM] regional meeting Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] regional meeting Pat Gray # [SC-SM] regional meeting Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] regional meeting Pat Gray o [SC-SM] regional meeting Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] regional meeting Pat Gray o [SC-SM] regional meeting Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] June 10th Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Silicon Valley Regional Meeting - Saturday June 10th Pat Gray Archived on: Wed May 31 10:52:30 PDT 2006 ___ June 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 54 * [SC-SM] directions to Regional Meeting location Jean Comfort * [SC-SM] Silicon Valley Regional meeting Saturday June 10th Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse Gerry Gras + [SC-SM] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure --Clearinghouse Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure-- Clearinghouse Pat Gray # [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: SpecialExpenditure-- Clearinghouse Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Fwd: Your message to Sclara-cc awaits moderator approval Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: Your message to Sclara-cc awaits moderator approval Gerry Gras * [SC-SM] Fwd: Your message to Sclara-cc awaits moderator approval Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] [Fwd: Re: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse] Gerry Gras o [SC-SM] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse] Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] [Sclara-cc] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse TNHarter at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure -- Clearinghouse WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Special Expenditure --Clearinghouse Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE -- Specific Expenditure -- Clearinghouse Materials] Gerry Gras * [SC-SM] CC Proposal #4 Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] LA Account Pat Gray * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: SpecialExpenditure-- C... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] Regional Green Registration Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Regional Green Registration James Shannon # [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Cameron L. Spitzer # [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Clarification Regarding Bylaws Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] [Sclara-cc] [gpsmc-admin] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: SpecialExpenditure-- C... Dana St. George o [SC-SM] Open Discussion Was: VOTE RESULTS.... Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: Your message to Sclara-cc awaits moderator approval Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Notes from Regional Meeting Mjsmith55 at aol.com * [SC-SM] Eric's GPSCC Bylaw Proposal July 1, 2003 (revised earlier proposals) WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Eric's GPSCC Bylaw Proposal July 1, 2003 (revised earlier proposals) Pat Gray * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] Letter from Bill Pietz to GPLAC council Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] Letter from Bill Pietz to GPLAC council WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Re: PROPOSAL for executive session re: LA filing Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Re: PROPOSAL for executive session re: LA filing WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension of Impeachment Resolu... Mjsmith55 at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension of Impeachment Resolu... Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension of Impeachment Resolu... Andrea Dorey o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension ofImpeachment Resolu... Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension ofImpeachment Resolu... Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension ofImpeachment Resolu... Pat Gray # [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- ExtensionofImpeachment Resolu... Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 48-Hour Vote -- Extension of Impeac... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Platform Summaries Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Platform Summaries Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Platform Summaries Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Extension of Impeachment Resolution Poll Mjsmith55 at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: Extension of ImpeachmentResolution Poll Don Havis * [SC-SM] Regional + 1 Picnic Date? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] San Benito's Registered Voters Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Thu Jun 29 14:43:12 PDT 2006 ___ July 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 7 * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic Scheduled For Sunday August 13th WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Regional Picnic Scheduled For Sunday August 13th Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Platforms Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Green Tribute - July 18th Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [gpsmc-d] San Mateo County Fair!!! Who can't help with the Green Party booth? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Your CO2 Production Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Fri Jul 21 14:05:27 PDT 2006 ___ August 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 10 * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic Sanda Everette * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic/Info re County Parks Page WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Regional Picnic/Info re County Parks Page Sanda Everette * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: Re: [Agenda] Clarifying Question Re: Agenda Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic/Parking Fees $6 WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC Tonight's call Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Regrets and Apology Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Regrets and Apology Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Regrets and Apology greenjellyfish at redjellyfish.net Archived on: Tue Aug 15 17:20:35 PDT 2006 ___ September 2006 Archives by thread Starting: Thu Sep 14 10:31:58 PDT 2006 Ending: Fri Sep 22 14:52:29 PDT 2006 Messages: 13 * [SC-SM] Invite: GPSMC Administration Meeting, Sunday Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC On-Line Vote Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Statement of Candidacy for GPCA CC Co-Coordinator Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Candidate Statement for GPCA-CC - Bruce Wolfe, SF Regional Representative Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Statement of intent Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] my Co-co candidate statement is coming Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Statement of Candidacy to Serve as CC Co-Co Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] GPCA-CC CoCo Election A Problem James Shannon Archived on: Fri Sep 22 14:52:38 PDT 2006 ___ October 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 23 * [SC-SM] GPLAC RR History from Joe Crompton Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] GPLAC Chronology by Donna Jo Warren Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC TELECONFERENCE: Monday, 10/02/06 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC TELECONFERENCE: Monday, 10/02/06 Jim Shannon o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC TELECONFERENCE: Monday, 10/02/06 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Meeting minutes Oct. 2, 2006 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] HEADS UP: 5-day vote coming--Schedule General Asembly for January 27-28 in San Francisco Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] HEADS UP: 5-day vote coming--Schedule General Asembly for January 27-28 in San Francisco Pat Gray o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] HEADS UP: 5-day vote coming--Schedule General Asembly for January 27-28 in San Francisco Andrea Dorey o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] HEADS UP: 5-day vote coming--ScheduleGeneral Asembly for January 27-28 in San Francisco Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] HEADS UP: 5-day vote coming--Schedule General Asem... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Bylaws Committee Appointment Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Schedule CC Retreat for December 9-10 in Santa Cruz Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Schedule CCRetreat for December 9-10 in Santa Cruz Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Bylaws Committee Appointment Jim Shannon * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Bylaws Committee Appoin... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--Bylaws Committee Appoin... Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--BylawsCommittee Appoin... Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--BylawsCommittee Appoin... Pat Gray # [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE--BylawsCommittee Appoin... Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAYVOTE--BylawsCommittee Appoin... Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: THURSDAY HEALTH CARE RALLY SAN JOSE Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] NOMINATION PERIOD: Budget Committee Appointment (10/22/06-10/27/06) Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Thu Oct 26 19:02:27 PDT 2006 ___ November 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 15 * [SC-SM] Fwd: Community Open Forum, Friday 11/3 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC TELECONFERENCE AGENDA: Monday, November 13th, 2006 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] LA Regional Representative Election Results -- 11/11/06 Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] LA Regional Representative Election Results-- 11/11/06 Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC TELECONFERENCE AGENDA: Monday, November 13th, ... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC TELECONFERENCE AGENDA: Monday, November 13th, ... Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GreenIDEA PAC] November 11 summary. Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] [GPCA-CC] Fwd: [Fwd: Notice of Election of 3 Regional Reps] Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GreenIDEA PAC] November 11 summary. WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GreenIDEA PAC] November 11 summary. Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC TELECONFERENCE AGENDA: Monday, November 13th, ... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC TELECONFERENCE AGENDA: Monday, November 13th, ... Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] GPCA-CC telemeeting report Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Invite: Admin Meeting & Agenda, Nov 19th Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] List Membership Jim Stauffer Archived on: Thu Nov 30 21:17:16 PST 2006 ___ December 2006 Archives by thread Messages: 9 * [SC-SM] Next Plenary Date Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Next Plenary Date Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Administration Meeting Dec 17th - Draft Agenda Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] adding to the list Sanda Everette o [SC-SM] adding to the list Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] adding to the list Sanda # [SC-SM] adding to the list Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] adding to the list Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Invite: Annual Planning Meeting Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Wed Dec 27 22:36:59 PST 2006 ___ January 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 8 * [SC-SM] Welcome a New Member Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] We are moving!! Sanda Everette * [SC-SM] Bylaw Amendment Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] GPUS Delegation Survey Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] GPUS Delegation Survey Jim Doyle + [SC-SM] GPUS Delegation Survey Pat Gray o [SC-SM] GPUS Delegation Survey Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] GPUS Delegation Survey Jonathan Lundell Archived on: Sun Jan 28 08:25:44 PST 2007 ___ February 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 7 * [SC-SM] Fwd: Feb 27 Sacramento SB 840 hearing in the Assembly health committee Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: Feb 27 Sacramento SB 840 hearing in the Assembly health committee Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] Request from Paul George PPJC to Endorse March 17th Peace Rally WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Request from Paul George PPJC to Endorse March 17th Peace Rally Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Request from Paul George PPJC to Endorse March 17th Peace Rally Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Bylaw Amendment Proposal Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Bylaw Amendment Proposal Andrea Dorey Archived on: Wed Feb 21 09:03:41 PST 2007 ___ March 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 6 * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC Teleconference, Monday, March 5th Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Agenda Admin Meeting, Mar 11, 2007 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: (fwd) Call For News, Feature and OP/ED articles - GREEN FOCUS Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: (fwd) Call For News, Feature and OP/ED articles - GREEN FOCUS cmarcopulos + [SC-SM] Fwd: (fwd) Call For News, Feature and OP/ED articles - GREEN FOCUS Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Please change my email address Margaret Pye Archived on: Sat Mar 24 11:41:54 PDT 2007 ___ April 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 27 * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Three votes coming Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE -- (#1) SB 840 Healthcare Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE -- (#2) Nat'l Corp. Shopping Boycott Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE -- (#3) Unity Blueprint for Immigration Reform Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] 3 votes - Your Input? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] 3 votes - Your Input? Jim Doyle + [SC-SM] 3 votes - Your Input? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] 3 votes - Your Input? Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] 3 votes - Your Input? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC Retreat Notes, Mar31/Apr01 2007 (quorum not met, so informal retreat) Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [SGARC-l] GA agenda being controlled? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Removed from Agenda Elist? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Removed from Agenda Elist? Gerry Gras + [SC-SM] Removed from Agenda Elist? Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] Removed from Agenda Elist? Gerry Gras # [SC-SM] Removed from Agenda Elist? Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC Teleconference -- Monday, 4/9/07 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [Agenda] General Assembly draft agenda Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE RESULTS: SB840 / Shopping Boycott / Unity Blueprint Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC Teleconference -- Monday, 4/9/07 WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC Teleconference -- Monday, 4/9/07 Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] AGENDA: CC Teleconference -- Monday, 4/9/07 Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Agenda Admin Meeting - April 15, 9 am to 12:30 pm Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Returned mail: Data format error bhawal at bom7.vsnl.net.in * [SC-SM] Fwd: [Agenda] Delegate count for 5/07 Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [usgp-nc] Anouncement from the Treasurer 2nd Quarter state sharing to be paid Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] Unathorized Access Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Sun Apr 29 19:38:11 PDT 2007 ___ May 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 11 * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] VOTE REQUIRED: 5-DAY VOTE -- Emergency Funding -- Extension of 2006-07 Budget & Work Plans Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: Re: [GPCA-CC] votes still not required Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] error jonwhite011 at mail.com * [SC-SM] (no subject) Mail Delivery Subsystem * [SC-SM] Invite: May 20, 2007 Gen'l Admin Mtg Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [GPCA-CC] CC minutes, 5/21/2007 mtg re 5/25-27 GA Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Fwd: [G-C-F] The Alameda Recall Resolution and the Provisional Voting Proposal Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] DELIVERY REPORTS ABOUT YOUR E-MAIL designer at bluebonnet.net * [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Jonathan Lundell Archived on: Wed May 30 16:31:37 PDT 2007 ___ June 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 23 * [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Jonathan Lundell o [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Andrea Dorey + [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Jonathan Lundell # [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Andrea Dorey * [SC-SM] A Bylaws Amendment Proposal For Both Counties -- Re CC Rep Selection Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Report Post Office * [SC-SM] MESSAGE COULD NOT BE DELIVERED anwarj at kfupm.edu.sa * [SC-SM] [Fwd: Seeking Regional Rep to the Coordinating Committee] Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Bylaws Regarding RR Jo Chamberlain + [SC-SM] Bylaws Regarding RR j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net * [SC-SM] Returned mail: Data format error Bounced mail * [SC-SM] Delivery reports about your e-mail Mail Administrator * [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Andrea Dorey o [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Pat Gray + [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Jonathan Lundell + [SC-SM] Invitation to Regional Meeting and More Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] delivery failed The Post Office * [SC-SM] July 21st Picnic Information Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] by-laws amendment Jim Doyle o [SC-SM] by-laws amendment Jonathan Lundell Archived on: Fri Jun 29 14:18:56 PDT 2007 ___ July 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 7 * [SC-SM] RR by-laws amendment - gpsmc action Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] RR by-laws amendment - gpsmc action JamBoi * [SC-SM] Thank you GPSCC & invite? Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] Thank you GPSCC & invite? Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] Thank you GPSCC & invite? JamBoi * [SC-SM] RECLAIMING RICHMOND: The city's Green Party Mayor Gayle McLaughlin and a cadre of residents fight to take back the shoreline for public use JamBoi * [SC-SM] GPSCC Bylaw Amendment re: Regional Representatives JamBoi Archived on: Sun Jul 22 23:00:13 PDT 2007 ___ August 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 3 * [SC-SM] Carol Brouillet: Truth & Courage v America's Fear-based Global Police State JamBoi * [SC-SM] Proposal: green fest steering committee planning date - Sept 18th @ SJ Peace Center JamBoi at Greens.org o [SC-SM] Proposal: green fest steering committee planning date - Sept 18th @ SJ Peace Center Andrea Dorey Archived on: Sun Aug 12 09:36:27 PDT 2007 ___ September 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 1 * [SC-SM] Ride to the Plenary Jim Stauffer Archived on: Tue Sep 4 21:11:53 PDT 2007 ___ October 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 11 * [SC-SM] Fwd: Fw: 40 beagles need homes ASAP Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Status of the CC Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Status of the CC Pat Gray * [SC-SM] Reminder about amending our counties' bylaws re CC member WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] Status of the CC cmarcopulos at comcast.net * [SC-SM] Fwd: Sustainable San Mateo Indicators Report volunteer opporutnity Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Fwd: Presidential Candidate Jared Ball's Calif. Tour Dec. 12-22 Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Single Payer Healthcare Rally next Mon Oct. 22, noon, State Building in downtown San Jose Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] How about we host an event with Presidential candidate Jared Ball Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Dutch Green lawmakers offended by Rep. Lantos Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] SF Green Festival Nov 9-11 Drew Johnson Archived on: Wed Oct 31 22:39:43 PDT 2007 ___ November 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 50 * [SC-SM] SF Green Festival Nov 9-11 Andrea Dorey o [SC-SM] SF Green Festival Nov 9-11 Drew Johnson + [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] SF Green Festival Nov 9-11 Kaisha Torres * [SC-SM] Zipcar, Flexcar to merge car sharing businesses Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] GP RELEASE Greens to watch on Election Day, Nov. 6; Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Nat'l Lawyers Guild Passes Impeach Resolution; Launches Campaign Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Fwd: Tue & Wed: Bay Area Showings of "An Unreasonable Man" (about Ralph Nader) with special guests! Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Green Pages Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Planning for Jared Ball SF Bay Appearances December 14th-16th Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Cheney Impeach Monday 3:30 Townhall's, call-in by Kucinich Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Reminder about amending our counties' bylaws re CC member Pat Gray o [SC-SM] Reminder about amending our counties' bylaws re CC member Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Green candidate Jared Ball wins West Ill. U's mock primary Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Stanford students protest Rumsfeld appointment Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Bay cleanup efforts expanding Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty democracy Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty democracy Scott McLarty + [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty democracy Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty demo... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty demo... Drew Johnson + [SC-SM] New progressive 3rd party and the Greens place in multiparty demo... Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] 70%: Cheney abused powers, 52% committed impeachable; 64% Bush abused Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] 70%: Cheney abused powers, 52% committed impeachable; 64% Bush abused Jim Shannon * [SC-SM] Truth Rising: The American People are Beginning To Get It Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] 70%: Cheney abused powers, 52% committed impeachable; 64% Bu... WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] e-mail list purpose Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FWD: 10,000 letter to Nancy IMPEACH CHENEY Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FWD: 10,000 letter to Nancy IMPEACH CHENEY FTPrairiedog at aol.com * [SC-SM] Truth Rising: The American People are Beginning To Get It/Crossposts WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com o [SC-SM] Truth Rising: The American People are Beginning To Get It/Crossposts Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball for Prez gathering Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball for Prez gathering Wes Rolley + [SC-SM] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball 4 Prez gathering Drew Johnson # [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball4 Prez gathering Kaisha Torres # [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball4 Prez gathering Kaisha Torres # [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball4 Prez gathering Sanda Everette # [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] Idea for holiday social: Dec 15th Jared Ball4 Prez gathering Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Local Green was on NPR's all things considered re oil spill... Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] Local Green was on NPR's all things considered re oil spill... Jim Shannon * [SC-SM] Lantos could get Dem primary challenge Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] Lantos could get Dem primary challenge Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] Lantos could get Dem primary challenge Pat Gray # [SC-SM] Lantos could get Dem primary challenge Jim Shannon # [SC-SM] Regional discussion is not limited to "County Council" business Drew Johnson # [SC-SM] Regional discussion is not limited to "County Council" business Jim Shannon # [SC-SM] Regional discussion is not limited to "County Council" business Drew Johnson # [SC-SM] Regional discussion is not limited to "County Council" business cls at truffula.sj.ca.us # [SC-SM] Lantos could get Dem primary challenge Pat Gray * [SC-SM] First Green Congressional Campaign Committee election coming soon Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Regional discussion is not limited to "County Council" business WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com Archived on: Sat Nov 24 16:35:20 PST 2007 ___ December 2007 Archives by thread Messages: 20 * [SC-SM] report on support for presidential candidates & Dr. Jared Ball press release Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Su 16th Holiday Social/Dr. Jared Ball 4 Prez Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] open letter to members from the Jared Ball campaign Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Green running for 15th Congressional seat! Peter Myers Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] GP Holiday Social w/ Presidential Candidate special guest Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Presidential Candidate special guest @ GP Holiday Social Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jim Doyle o [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jonathan Lundell + [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jonathan Lundell # [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] draft of bylaw re regional rep election Sanda Everette * [SC-SM] Come Sunday for Holiday Social and meet Jared Ball, presidential candidate Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Report on a Jared Ball campaign event in NorCal Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] bylaws replace vs recall Jim Doyle o [SC-SM] bylaws replace vs recall Pat Gray o [SC-SM] bylaws replace vs recall Jonathan Lundell + [SC-SM] bylaws replace vs recall Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] draft of bylaw re regional rep election WB4D23 at aol.com Archived on: Tue Dec 18 19:24:23 PST 2007 ___ January 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 2 * [SC-SM] bylaws re regional rep election Jim Doyle * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Wed Jan 9 12:37:33 PST 2008 ___ February 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 11 * [SC-SM] Bylaws Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] SAN MATEO??? [Fwd: Bylaws] Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] SAN MATEO??? [Fwd: Bylaws] Jo Chamberlain * [SC-SM] Subscription Request Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] Subscription Request Jonathan Lundell o [SC-SM] Subscription Request Pat Gray * [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jo Chamberlain o [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jo Chamberlain # [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] [gpsmc-admin] RR bylaws language draft v1 Jo Chamberlain Archived on: Wed Feb 27 07:57:24 PST 2008 ___ March 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 2 * [SC-SM] Alameda Co restructuring proposal for the GPCA Coordinating Committee Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FWD: Renewal of the GPCA Drew Johnson Archived on: Sun Mar 30 00:14:49 PDT 2008 ___ April 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 9 * [SC-SM] IS THIS REBOOT/RESTRUCTURING NECESSARY? Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] FWD: Green Voter Registration - age group 20s tops Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] GP RELEASE Greens: Impeachment of Bush is last chance to assert rule of US law Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: Sunday Evening 10k Club Cynthia McKinney for President Weekly Update Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Video of Carol Brouillet & other GPCA '08 Candidates Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: We need someone from CA on the GP-US Finance Committee Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Fw: Re: Merriam Calling For Yard Sale Donators and Helpers - Fundraiser May 17th-18th Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Cynthia McKinney, Danny Glover and Cindy Sheehan among featured speakers at "No Peace, No Work" mobilization in San Francisco on May 1st Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: San Francisco Teleconference for McKinney May 4th Drew Johnson Archived on: Sat Apr 26 23:12:31 PDT 2008 ___ May 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 30 * [SC-SM] GP RELEASE Green Party election advances in Ariz., Conn., Maine, Mich. Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Carol's campaign is highlighted on GP.org Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Calif. Green congressional candidates back ILWU's antiwar protest Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] In Oakland & SF On May Day, many marchers for many causes Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] [Fwd: [GPCA-CC] FW: [GreenIDEA PAC] Statewide County Council Elections -- Status] Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] [Fwd: [GPCA-CC] FW: [GreenIDEA PAC] Statewide County Council Elections -- Status] Jim Shannon + [SC-SM] [Fwd: [GPCA-CC] FW: [GreenIDEA PAC] Statewide County Council Elections -- Status] Jim Stauffer o [SC-SM] [Fwd: [GPCA-CC] FW: [GreenIDEA PAC] Statewide County Council Elections -- Status] Jonathan Lundell * [SC-SM] Interview with Kat Swift on her presidential campaign Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] Interview with Kat Swift on her presidential campaign Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] FW: Register now for the National Convention July 10-13th. Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: Free Website for County Council Candidates Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: Technical Assistance for candidates Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Write in campaigns for County Council in San Mateo??? Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] Write in campaigns for County Council in San Mateo??? Jim Stauffer + [SC-SM] Write in campaigns for County Council in San Mateo??? Sanda Everette # [SC-SM] Write in campaigns for County Council in San Mateo??? Sanda Everette # [SC-SM] Write in camp ___ June 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 19 * [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's VoterRegistration Report of 5/19/08 Tian Harter * [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's Voter Registration Report of 5/19/08 Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's Voter Registration Report of 5/19/08 Fred Duperrault o [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's Voter Registration Report of 5/19/08 Pat Gray o [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's VoterRegistration Report of 5/19/08 Tian Harter * [SC-SM] [Sosfbay-discuss] We're #5: Anaylzing Santa Clara's Voter Registration Report of 5/19/08 Fred Duperrault * [SC-SM] Greenfair Silicon Valley: June 7-8th in San Jos? Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Is San Mateo's County Council problem addressed yet? Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Vote today! Tonight: Election night party at Tian's! Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] [Fwd: Silicon Valley Region Report] Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] FW: URGENT! We need to know ASAP if you're going to the Green National Convention in Chicago Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] FW: URGENT! We need to know ASAP if you're going to the Green National Convention in Chicago Pye, Margaret (Perkins Coie) + [SC-SM] FW: URGENT! We need to know ASAP if you're going to the Green National Convention in Chicago Jim Stauffer # [SC-SM] FW: URGENT! We need to know ASAP if you're going to the Green National Convention in Chicago Margaret Pye * [SC-SM] Fw:[GPCA Official Notice] Apply for GPCA Member of GPUS National Committee Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Cynthia McKinney Urges Mass Mobilization for Impeachment Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] GP Presidential Candidates Debate THIS SAT ON WEB 8p ET Drew Johnson o [SC-SM] GP Presidential Candidates Debate THIS SAT ON WEB 8p ET Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Telecom Donations Tied to FISA Vote (Washington Independent) Drew Johnson Archived on: Wed Jun 25 08:32:41 PDT 2008 ___ July 2008 Archives by thread Messages: 7 * [SC-SM] Regional Picnic, Sat Aug 9th, Sunnyvale Murphy Park Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: GP ADVISORY New update: Green Nat'l Convention (Chicago, July 10-13) schedule, other info] Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] [GPCA Official Notice] Volunteers Needed to Write Reports on November Ballot Measures Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] FW: Hip Hop Activist Accepts VP Bid for McKinney's Green Party Bid Drew Johnson * [SC-SM] Unsubscribing Drew Jim Stauffer * [SC-SM] Warner's Bi-annual Notice to This Email Group WSB3ATTYCA at aol.com * [SC-SM] picnic! picnic! Jim Doyle Archived on: Sun Jul 20 11:12:03 PDT 2008 -- JamBoi http://www.greencommons.org/blog/63 "Peaceable: the ability to interact peacefully. A skill set similar to social or emotional intelligence that is unfortunately rare in today's American culture, but can be developed by all. The Green Parties need to lead the way in Peaceableness." From wrolley at charter.net Sat Jul 26 14:00:10 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:00:10 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's Counter Factual Claims vs the Reality of the SC-SM List and His Unacceptable Behavior. In-Reply-To: <3193.75.19.86.251.1217104206.squirrel@www.greens.org> References: <3193.75.19.86.251.1217104206.squirrel@www.greens.org> Message-ID: <488B905A.9040102@charter.net> Drew Johnson wrote: > To review: Earlier this month Jim Stauffer without County Council consultation or authorization, arbitrarily, tyrannously forcibly removed my e-mail address from the Regional E-mail List. > ( I dropped the rest of this.) I think that Jim and Drew ought to buy a case of Rolling Rock (comes in green bottles) and go somewhere to solve this. The results will be that they either kill each other (a very un-green thing to do) or decide that is is not worth wasting everyone's time over. The bylaw for GP SCC state: > > 2.1.3 Internal to the Green Party, the Council's primary duties > include serving as a coordinating or steering committee to: > ... > d) Enhance communications between the county Green Party and other > Green Parties and/or other local organizations which support the > principals and objectives set forth in the Green Party Platform. This has all of the characteristics of the Graham - Tewksbury feud without the use of physical weapons. When it was all over, no one won. I would like to see Jim and Drew take this to some mediation rather than to have Drew force the Council into attempting a judicial action for which there may not be documented authority. Somewhat in jest, I suggested the use of alcohol as a mediator. They might decide to use someone or something else. -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 From alexcathy at aol.com Sat Jul 26 18:41:48 2008 From: alexcathy at aol.com (alexcathy at aol.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's Counter Factual . . . [Blah! Blah! Blah!] In-Reply-To: <488B905A.9040102@charter.net> References: <3193.75.19.86.251.1217104206.squirrel@www.greens.org> <488B905A.9040102@charter.net> Message-ID: <8CABDA111441683-15D0-FCC@webmail-nc21.sysops.aol.com> Amen! I concur with Wes Rolley 100%. Alex Walker -----Original Message----- From: Wes Rolley To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Sent: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 2:00 pm . . I think that Jim and Drew ought to buy a case of Rolling Rock (comes in green bottles) and go somewhere to solve this. The results will be that they either kill each other (a very un-green thing to do) or decide that is is not worth wasting everyone's time over. . . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fredd at freeshell.org Sat Jul 26 19:16:53 2008 From: fredd at freeshell.org (Fred Duperrault) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:16:53 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Jim Stauffer's Counter Factual . . . [Blah! Blah! Blah!] In-Reply-To: <488B905A.9040102@charter.net> References: <3193.75.19.86.251.1217104206.squirrel@www.greens.org> <488B905A.9040102@charter.net> Message-ID: <488BDA95.2090408@freeshell.org> Maybe rubbing alcohol would be the better wash. Fred Amen! I concur with Wes Rolley 100%. Alex Walker -----Original Message----- From: Wes Rolley To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Sent: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 2:00 pm . . I think that Jim and Drew ought to buy a case of Rolling Rock (comes in green bottles) and go somewhere to solve this. The results will be that they either kill each other (a very un-green thing to do) or decide that is is not worth wasting everyone's time over. . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Famous, the Infamous, the Lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar Now ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: file:///tmp/nsmail-1.asc URL: From JamBoi at Greens.org Sun Jul 27 06:07:48 2008 From: JamBoi at Greens.org (Drew Johnson) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] For Green tracking info on McCain/Obama's sameness/grayness Message-ID: <1435.75.19.86.251.1217164068.squirrel@www.greens.org> Check out the "Obameter" group on GreenChange.org http://network.greenchange.org/groups/obameter Also the e-mail updates: http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/1488/t/338/signUp.jsp?key=1877 Green is REAL CHANGE! Drew On Sat, July 26, 2008 10:41, floresmagon at yahoo.com wrote: > Maybe I am wrong, maybe we should launch a full scale campaign detailing > how much backtracking or in fact identical political positions that Barack > and MCCAIN have in common. From cbrouillet at igc.org Sun Jul 27 07:25:53 2008 From: cbrouillet at igc.org (Carol Brouillet) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:25:53 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Upcoming Schedule of 9/11 Truth/Impeachment events Message-ID: This is somewhat belated. I will be bringing a ound system to the San Mateo/SantaClara County Picnic/Potluck, and music and am looking for speakers for our annual rally/march to the 10th Annual Power to the Peaceful Festival (which draws 50,000 people). Here are the Upcoming Events/Meetings/Rallies/Marches (please help spread the word- and do come! Send your events to cbrouillet at igc.org to add them to the calendar) Announcements- Good News! Dennis Kucinich's Impeachment Resolution was addressed in the House Judiciary Committee Hearing Friday. More Good News! My doctor called yesterday, and the cysts in my pancreas are benign. (Carol Brouillet) #1) Impeachment Actions, Rally, Friday, July 25th, 3pm - 6pm, Zoe Lofgren's Office, 635 N. 1st St., San Jose #2) Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance Retreat/Celebration/Organizing for September, Sunday, July 27, 2008, Noon- 8pm, Palo Alto #3) Film Premiere- The Reflecting Pool, Monday, August 4, 2008, 7 PM, Pacific Film Archive, 2575 Bancroft Way, Berkeley #4) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, August 7, 2008, 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., 522 Valencia St., San Francisco #5) Green Party of San Mateo/Santa Clara County Annual Potluck/Picnic, Saturday, August 9, 2008, 11am - 4 pm, Murphy Park, Sunnyvale #6) Listening for a Change- On the Eleventh of Every Month, Monday, August 11, 2008, 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m., Lytton Plaza, Palo Alto #7) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, August 21, 2008, 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., The Grand Lake Neighborhood Center, Oakland #8) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, September 4, 2008, 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., 522 Valencia St.,San Francisco #9) 9th Annual 911 Power to the Peaceful Festival, Sat., Sept. 6, Annual 9/11 Truth Rally/March begins at 10am @ the Panhandle (between Oak & Fell @ Ashbury) #10) 9/11 Truth Film Festival, Thursday, September 11th, 2008, 1 pm- 10 pm, Grand Lake Theater, Oakland More Details (Check http://www.communitycurrency.org/events.html for the latest updates- we are still on the planning stage for a few of these events.) #1) Impeachment Actions, Rally, Friday, July 25th, 3pm - 6pm, Zoe Lofgren's Office, 635 N. 1st St., San Jose Here's the latest Impeachment News- which includes what we can do to further this process. http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=5538 Amongst the articles of Impeachment that Kucinich introduced in June 3 included 9/11 issues. Hearings will hopefully force the media to begin to cover the important suppressed facts and information, and begin some process of accountability, at least slow them down on their present course. #2) Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance Retreat/Celebration/Organizing for September, Sunday, July 27, 2008 Noon- 8pm (Serious Discussion/Decision making 3pm - 6 pm) Last year we held a Retreat to plan our August/September events at my home (in Palo Alto). It was a fun/productive gathering and our subsequent events were a success. We are still trying to figure out what to do precisely for this August/September 11th at the Grand Lake Theater. If you would like to come to the retreat and help with the upcoming events & newsletter... I hope you can join us next Sunday, July 27th at my house. I plan on making food (but some people want me to spend more time facilitating and participating in the discussion- so if we turn it into a potluck, I might have more time to be part of the circle). This will also be a chance for me to celebrate with friends the good news that the biopsy results show the cysts in my pancreas are benign. Call, or email to RSVP and get directions to my house. 650-857-0927, cbrouillet at igc.org Carol AND, If you want to help, but can't come next Sunday- please let us know what you can do, and any of your ideas/suggestions. Main Goals- Newsletter- getting it done/mailed Annie Machon event? 911 Power to the Peaceful Rally? March? Tabling/Flyering/Speaking September 11th at the Grand Lake Theater #3) Film Premiere- The Reflecting Pool August 4, 2008, 7 PM Pacific Film Archive 2575 Bancroft Way Berkeley, CA (510) 642-1412 The Reflecting Pool follows an investigation by a skeptical Russian-American journalist who teams up with the father of a 9/11 victim to fact check the official version of the tragedy as documented in the 9/11 Commission Report. As they examine evidence and interview key eyewitnesses, the official story begins to crumble. The Reflecting Pool is the first investigative drama to present this issue in the spirit of such films as All the President's Men and JFK. The film illustrates that, as so often is the case, the truth does not set you free; it ties your stomach and conscience into knots. It will remind you of All the President's Men and JFK, films that also used drama to pursue political truths. Writer/Director Jarek Kupsc plays Alex Prokop, a successful journalist who receives a mysterious 9/11 videotape revealing new information on the attack. Joseph Culp appears as Paul Cooper, the man who sent the tape and a driven researcher whose daughter died on 9/11. Though skeptical of conspiracy theorists and fearful that it will jeopardize his career, Prokop agrees to take on the story. We follow Prokop and Cooper as they investigate the destruction of evidence from Ground Zero, the collapse of the 47-story WTC Building Seven, and the airliner attack on the Pentagon. The results of their investigation suggest the official version as presented in the 9/11 Commission Report purposely ignored or omitted evidence and testimonies to protect people in political positions, including the present administration. Prokop, plagued by the ghosts of his Communist childhood and trying to uphold the independence of American journalism, struggles to come to grips with this awful truth. The Reflecting Pool is an intense, sobering analysis of the most controversial tragedy of our time -- a thought-provoking study of a search for truth and the profound consequences of not looking for it any further than the nightly news. Selected reviews "The Reflecting Pool presents a story that I have not taken the time or courage to touch." --Barbara Trent, Academy Award Winner, The Panama Deception "The film illustrates that, as so often is the case, the truth does not set you free; it ties your stomach and conscience into knots. It will remind you of All the President's Men and JFK, films that also used drama to pursue political truths." --Joel Hirschhorn, Op-ed news "The script is top-notch, the characterizations moving. If the film has a flaw, it's in trying to document so much evidence in a narrative thriller. Yet by and large, it pulls it off to deliver a chilling and effective message -- maybe it can happen here." --Jim Cirile, Screenwriters Magazine About The Reflecting Pool: The Reflecting Pool premiered theatrically through American Cinematheque to a standing-room only audience on January 31, 2008, at the Aero Theatre in Santa Monica, CA. The film screened in limited runs in February and March in Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, and continues with other selected screenings. The film is an official selection this summer at the Maine International Film Festival in July and the Moondance International Film Festival in August. The film was recently picked up by Rialto Theaters in New Zealand for this September. About the filmmakers: The Reflecting Pool was independently produced and financed by Baltazar Works with Jodie Baltazar and Joseph Culp serving as producers. The Reflecting Pool is director Jarek Kupsc's third feature film. He won multiple awards for his debut feature Recoil and won Best Picture for Slumberland in his native Poland. Kupsc gives his view: "Most of all we wanted to tell a human story about what happens to people when the truth is kept from them and show the struggle one must go through for their own sense of integrity." He continues, "September 11th, 2001, was a defining moment in modern history--an event that propelled America toward preemptive wars under false pretenses resulting in the deaths of over a million civilians in the Middle East, thousands of American troops, and a complete disregard for the Geneva Conventions not to mention the Bill of Rights." Culp says, The Reflecting Pool is a way of taking stock of what has happened to our country after 9/11 and to do the most American thing of all--ask questions and demand honest answers." www.reflectingpoolfilm.com #4) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, August 7, 2008 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. 522 Valencia St., just up from the 16th St. Bart Station,San Francisco #5) Green Party of San Mateo/Santa Clara County Annual Potluck/Picnic 11am - 4 pm 130 E California Ave. Martin Murphy Junior Park, Sunnyvale Everyone welcome! Green Party Congressional Candidate- Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance Founder- Carol Brouillet will be there (and could use some logistical help..) #6) Listening for a Change- On the Eleventh of Every Month 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m., Lytton Plaza, Palo Alto (University x Emerson) Since October 2001, every Wednesday, except when it is raining; I have set up tables, banners, chairs, food, educational material, and created a space for public dialogue on key issues. Beginning in November 2007, I am doing this on a monthly basis, on the 11th of every month. We ask the public three questions and write down their responses- What do you think/feel about the events of September 11th and the U.S. government's response? How could we defuse terrorism?" How could we create a safer/better world for our children and all children? Sponsored by Women's International League for Peace and Freedom and Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance All welcome. For more information call Carol Brouillet 650-857-0927. #7) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, August 21, 2008 at The Grand Lake Neighborhood Center 530 Lake Park Avenue, (between Lakeshore Avenue and Grand Avenue) in Oakland 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Directions- From Hwy. 580 East (coming from the Bay Bridge or Berkeley), take the Grand Ave./Lakeshore exit (start getting over to the on your way past the Broadway-Webster exit - it's tricky - and move right again when approaching the next exit, Harrison/Oakland, but don't get in that exit lane). The exit ramp merges into MacArthur which intersects with Grand at the light. Make a left at the light onto Grand, make a right onto Lake Park Ave. (the Grand Lake Theater will be on the corner on your far right before you turn). Go about a block, past the BofA, which will be on your left, and the GLNC will also be on your left. Park on the street or turn right into free public parking under the freeway. From Hwy. 580 West (coming from Hayward), take the Lakeshore Ave. exit. When you exit at Lakshore Ave., you will be on Lake Park. Go straight at the light (you'll see a Busy Body Home Fitness store in front of you to the right), crossing Lakeshore Ave. The GLNC will be a few storefronts down on your right. Park on the street or turn left into free public parking under the freeway across from GLNC. If you cross Grand Ave. (and the theater) you've gone too far. Buses (check schedules): The 57 Macarthur, to Kaiser hospital, 40th and the Emeryville shopping district. The NL, via Grand to downtown Oakland and San Francisco #8) Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance Meeting, Thursday, September 4, 2008, 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. 522 Valencia St., just up from the 16th St. Bart Station, San Francisco #9) 9th Annual 911 Power to the Peaceful Festival Annual Rally/March from the Panhandle through Golden Gate Park to the 911 Power to the Peaceful Festival Saturday, September 6, 2008 Speedway Meadows Golden Gate Park Following the attacks of September 11th, the first "9/11 Truth Rally and March" took place in the Panhandle, marching up Haight Street and through Golden Gate Park to the 911 Power to the Peaceful Concert- Our rally begins at 10:00 am @ the Panhandle (between Oak and Fell at Ashbury) 11:00 am we begin our march up Ashbury to Haight, through Golden Gate Park to Speedway Meadows and to the Concert which lasts until 5:00 pm. To endorse, speak, volunteer- Contact Carol Brouillet @ 650-857-0927. We welcome all who are for 9/11 Truth, Impeachment, Peace, an End to War, Repeal of the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act. Bring banners, signs, costumes, musical instruments, your humor, energy, messages. The Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance will have a booth at the Concert and pass out literature to the thousands who come to the concert and support peace. http://www.powertothepeaceful.org/ #10) 9/11 Truth Film Festival Thursday, September 11th, 2008 1 pm- 10 pm Grand Lake Theater Oakland California Final Program TBA- We will have great films, music, speakers... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbrouillet at igc.org Sun Jul 27 11:27:16 2008 From: cbrouillet at igc.org (Carol Brouillet) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:27:16 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] TODAY LABORFEST is in San Jose!!!!!2PM SJSU MKL Jr. Library Message-ID: THIS EVENT IS HAPPENING TODAY!!!! PLEASE COME!!! San Jose and New Orleans have seen the closing of hospitals and have community groups working to restore them. On Sunday July 27th Brian Ott, chair of the Committee to Reopen Charity Hospital will discuss post-Katrina efforts to restore the largest public health care facility in Louisiana. Also featured is the film "Spirit of 1929-Streetcar Stories" which depicts the turbulent general strike in New Orleans at the dawn of the Depression. Charity hospital in New Orleans was the second largest hospital in the country before Katrina closed it in 2005. This 550 bed state funded facility was designed in 1930's and has been part of New Orleans architectural, cultural and medical heritage since its founding in 1735 to serve the indigent. Brian Ott of the Committee to Reopen Charity Hospital , along with speakers from the Coalition for a Downtown Hospital in San Jose will share efforts to preserve health care facilities. Like New Orleans, San Jose has lost its Downtown hospital. Here local citizens have been mobilizing support to preserve and protect public healthcare. A fall bond measure may provide funds for restoring county medical facilities which include a Down Town medical unit. We will enjoin a panel to talk about how both cities can foster efforts to save public health care services in CA. and LA. Date: July 27, Sunday Where: San Jose State University Library Room 255 150 E.Fernando St. in San Jose Time: 2:00 p.m. Film and Discussion Information: Call Michael Hejazi UAW 2350 CSEA (4080-420-5760 Jim Kelly San Jose City College Labor Studies (408)298-2181 x2575 Full LaborFest schedule at http://www.laborfest.net/2008schedule.htm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Sun Jul 27 12:16:34 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:16:34 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] drew - jim stauffer solutions Message-ID: <488CC992.8030003@sbcglobal.net> Hats off to Fred Dupperault for his gentle and compassionate "non-alcoholic" suggestion! He had me rolling in the aisle. From MARKETPOIN at aol.com Sun Jul 27 13:00:42 2008 From: MARKETPOIN at aol.com (MARKETPOIN at aol.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:42 EDT Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] drew - jim stauffer solutions Message-ID: How would this be handled and negotiated in a non violent manner if it was an argument between the leaders of two countries? If we can't figure how to handle this type of argument between ourselves how can we be leaders handling huge life threatening arguments out there in the world? Just trading insults and sarcasm's doesn't seem like it is going to solve the situation. Judy B. In a message dated 7/27/2008 12:16:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net writes: > Hats off to Fred Dupperault for his gentle and compassionate > "non-alcoholic" suggestion! > > He had me rolling in the aisle. > > ************** Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wrolley at charter.net Sun Jul 27 16:58:04 2008 From: wrolley at charter.net (Wes Rolley) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:58:04 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Energy Policies: Red, Blue, Green Message-ID: <488D0B8C.9040203@charter.net> Just wrote a fairly long post at California Greening that I hope illustrates why the way out of the energy mess is to vote Green. Comments on Spier, Eshoo and Honda. All three are far from providing solutions for our real problems. -- "Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth" Roberto Clemente Wes Rolley 17211 Quail Court, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 http://www.refpub.com/ -- Tel: 408.778.3024 From eameece at california.com Fri Jul 25 12:07:07 2008 From: eameece at california.com (E. Alan Meece) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:07:07 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] drew - jim stauffer solutions References: Message-ID: <488A245B.3AE5@california.com> I respect Jim and his contributions to the Green Party, and have nothing personal against him. It seems to me though that Drew is a pretty cool-headed guy and that Jim is the problem. This is not a one-time situation, as Drew has said. I think the Party needs to take into account Jim's behavior and his unwillingness to face up to it. Perhaps the issue of his cancelling Drew from a list is not so important; it's the larger pattern that concerns me. Eric Meece By the way, when we hit the reply button, the message should go to the list. duh?? MARKETPOIN at aol.com wrote: > > How would this be handled and negotiated in a non violent manner if it > was an argument between the leaders of two countries? If we can't > figure how to handle this type of argument between ourselves how can > we be leaders handling huge life threatening arguments out there in > the world? Just trading insults and sarcasm's doesn't seem like it is > going to solve the situation. > > Judy B. > > In a message dated 7/27/2008 12:16:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net writes: > > Hats off to Fred Dupperault for his gentle and compassionate > "non-alcoholic" suggestion! > > He had me rolling in the aisle. > > ************** > Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse > Fantasy Football today. > (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss From mkmusic at greens.org Mon Jul 28 01:28:17 2008 From: mkmusic at greens.org (Merriam Kathaleen) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:28:17 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: [SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's district office this Fri. 7/25] In-Reply-To: <01FD9179-4C89-4E2E-BFBC-293900AFEDF1@cagreens.org> References: <48884F63.5060206@greens.org> <01FD9179-4C89-4E2E-BFBC-293900AFEDF1@cagreens.org> Message-ID: <488D8321.7020003@greens.org> Andi, Our SVIC members lobbied for KPFA to cover the hearing. We blitzed them with multiple press releases. I don't know if our press releases did the trick, but one of our SVIC members who sent out the press releases received an email and phone call from KPFA telling her that they will be covering the hearing. Merriam SVIC Andrea Dorey wrote: > KPFA will carry it LIVE!! > Call in to let them know you appreciate their dogged following of > this and other Progressive events!! > Andi > > On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Merriam Kathaleen wrote: >> >> >> *From: *MKmusic03 at aol.com >> *Date: *July 24, 2008 12:49:53 AM PDT >> *To: *svic at lists.riseup.net >> *Cc: *MKmusic03 at aol.com >> *Subject: **[SVIC] Impeachment Demonstration at Zoe Lofgren's >> district office this Fri. 7/25* >> *Reply-To: *svic at lists.riseup.net >> ,MKmusic03 at aol.com >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> *This is the week we have all been waiting for and putting out all >> our efforts for the past years!* !!!! >> >> This Friday 7/25 there will be a House Judiciary Committee hearing >> and Dennis Kucinich is definitely one of the speakers. Though the >> hearing is not primarily about impeachment we can be certain the >> topic will be brought up. The hearing begins 10:00 am Washington DC >> time. >> >> We will then celebrate our standing up for the Constitution by >> demonstrating in front of Zoe Lofgren's office. Come out and be a >> part of this historical moment. Make no Mistake, it is the power of >> "WE THE PEOPLE" that has brought about the Judiciary Committee >> hearing!!!! We The People have spoken and WE have been heard!!!!! >> >> This Friday will be our 37th consecutive week of demonstrating LOUDLY >> for IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS!!!! Join us in front of Zoe's office at 635 >> N. 1st St., San Jose. (Between Taylor & Jackson St. across from the >> IHOP restaurant/Light Rail stop is corner of Jackson St on 1st St.) >> We will be there from 3:00pm - 6:00pm. We want to be loud and proud >> for Impeachment hearings for Cheney and Bush. >> >> SEE YOU THERE. IF YOU CAN'T BE THERE PLEASE CALL ZOE'S OFFICE >> (408-271-8700) TO TELL THEM THAT YOU WANT ZOE TO SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT >> HEARINGS. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Merriam >> Silicon Valley Impeachment Coalition >> mkmusic03 at aol.com >> 408-482-6032 (Cell) >> svimpeach.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************** >> Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse >> Fantasy Football today. >> (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) >> _______________________________________________ >> sosfbay-discuss mailing list >> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org >> http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss > From snug.bug at hotmail.com Mon Jul 28 10:04:43 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:04:43 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] NZ Students Offer Reward for Citizens' Arrest of Condi Message-ID: Fri Jul 25, 1:15 AM ET WELLINGTON, New Zealand - New Zealand students protesting the Iraq war offered a reward to anyone who carries out a citizen's arrest of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during her visit to the country Friday. The Auckland University Students' Association is seeking Rice's arrest for her role in "overseeing the illegal invasion and continued occupation" of Iraq, Association President David Do said. The group is offering a $3,700 reward. Rice is making her first trip to New Zealand after attending a Southeast Asian security forum in Singapore. She is scheduled to arrive from Australia late Friday and fly out early Sunday. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080725/ap_on_re_au_an/rice_student_arrest _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you. http://www.windowslive.com/mobile/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_mobile_072008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From peter at myersforcalifornia.com Sun Jul 27 22:12:35 2008 From: peter at myersforcalifornia.com (Peter Myers) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:12:35 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Peter Myers for Congress: 100 Days Left Message-ID: <651D0D29-3321-4CEA-9330-F3E273FC70F1@myersforcalifornia.com> Dear Fellow Greens, With 100 days left before the election, I'd like to reintroduce myself and my campaign, and ask for your help down the home stretch. My name is Peter Myers, and I am running for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 15th District, a seat currently held by Democrat Mike Honda. I was raised in Los Gatos, earned a degree in journalism and international relations from Boston University, and served my country as a Peace Corps volunteer in the former Soviet republic of Moldova. I now live in Campbell and work as a computer teacher at the Apple Store in Los Gatos. In my two years of Peace Corps service, I saw the tremendous possibility for American leadership in international development and diplomacy. I lived and worked with hundreds of men, women and children who would have considered America their worst enemy 20 years ago, and created ties of friendship that will last more than another 20 years. While I was building a positive image of the United States through my Peace Corps work, my government was creating an image of the United States as a military occupier, a leading source of pollution, and a nation that couldn't provide for its own citizens after a natural disaster. The Iraq War, which I had vehemently opposed as a student newspaper columnist in 2003, now caused my eighth-grade Moldovan students to distrust America's motives. I returned home to the U.S. in August 2007, and traveled around the country for three months by car. While driving, I talked with ordinary folks in over 30 states, and found that they, like myself, had started to question whether anyone in Washington represented them. I met veterans who couldn't understand their country's actions in Iraq, and I met dozens of New Orleanians who either were struggling to make ends meet in their hometown or had moved to Mississippi or Texas because they had given up hope. In "red" and "blue" states alike, I met American after American who felt that something was going terribly wrong in our country, and that we needed a change. I used to think Democrats could deliver that change; their actions since taking control of Congress in 2006 have changed my mind. Democrats have failed the American people on improving fuel efficiency, in fixing our moribund health care system, and in getting our troops out of Iraq. Constitutionally, the Democrats could have stood up to the Bush administration as early as January 2007 and refused to further fund the Iraq War without a withdrawal date; they didn't. The Democrats in Congress have spinelessly allowed this failed imperialist occupation to continue, either because they have no political courage or, worse, because they stand to profit from American militarism just as much as Republicans. I am running because Americans need to reclaim our country from the two-party system that has brought us nothing but war and recession for the last eight years. We need new elected officials who can bring peace, social justice and ecological wisdom to Washington. In the next 100 days, I need your help. There are many ways to help, whether it's by inviting your friends to a candidate meet-and-greet at your home, by forwarding my e-mails to your friends, by contributing to my campaign via myersforcalifornia.com, by joining a phone bank party, by handing out flyers door-to-door, or by finding your own way to help. This campaign will succeed with your help. To volunteer, please e-mail me at peter at myersforcalifornia.com or call me at 408-242-4212. Together, we can bring a message of peace and Green living to the 15th District and the entire country. Thank you, Peter Peter Myers Green Party Candidate U.S. House of Representatives California's 15th District peter at myersforcalifornia.com http://www.myersforcalifornia.com 408-242-4212 From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Mon Jul 28 16:46:30 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:46:30 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] full list of names of 12 ballot measures Message-ID: <488E5A56.8090605@sbcglobal.net> There are a dozen ballot measures/initiatives that have qualified for the November ballot and there are 5 more going through signature verification. The Secretary of State has two web pages that provide information on these measures. http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/vig_11042008_public_display.htm The first is merely a list and is the source of the list presented below. It will however get you started as to the question "What are the ballot measures?" The second is a draft copy of the voter pamphlet separated in sedctions for each ballot proposition and uses only proposition x as the haeder of a section. I will send a sample of the second type in another email. The legislative analyst's analyses for these ballot measures are at http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/ballot_source/propositions.aspx Here are the 12 propositions that have qualified for and will be on the November 4, 2008 General Election Ballot* Bond Measure Proposition 1 SB 1856 (Chapter 697, 2002). Costa. Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century. Initiative Statute Proposition 2 1274. Treatment of Farm Animals. Statute. Initiative Statute Proposition 3 1271. Children?s Hospital Bond Act. Grant Program. Statute. Initiative Constitutional Amendment Proposition 4 1287. Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor?s Pregnancy. Statute Proposition 5 1310. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Initiative Statute Proposition 6 1326. Criminal Penalties and Laws. Public Safety Funding. Statute. Initiative Statute Proposition 7 1304. Renewable Energy. Statute. Initiative Constitutional Amendment Proposition 8 1298. Limit on Marriage. Constitutional Amendment. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute Proposition 9 1325. Criminal Justice System. Victims? Rights. Parole. Initiative Statute Proposition 10 1332. Bonds. Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Statute. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute Proposition 11 1307. Redistricting. Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Bond Measure Proposition 12 SB 1572 (Chapter 122, 2008). Wyland. Veterans' Bond Act of 2008. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Mon Jul 28 16:53:03 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:53:03 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] public display copy of voter pamphlet Message-ID: <488E5BDF.2040501@sbcglobal.net> The public display - draft - copy of the voter pamphlet for November is online at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/vig_11042008_public_display.htm Here is a sample of the format it uses - just one for the pattern is the same for each one of the others. November 4, 2008, General Election Official Voter Information Guide - Public Display The following documents are PDF files for viewing online: Proposition 1 # Ballot Label and Ballot Title and Summary # Legislative Analysis # Argument in Favor # Rebuttal to Argument in Favor # Argument Against # Rebuttal to Argument Against # Text of Proposed Law Access the web site listed above, scroll to the proposition of interest, and read on. From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Mon Jul 28 16:54:51 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:54:51 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] preparing for next meeting Message-ID: <488E5C4B.60207@sbcglobal.net> The links and references I sent re ballot measures are intended to help you prepare for our next general meeting at which these measures will be on the agenda. From snug.bug at hotmail.com Tue Jul 29 09:01:15 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:01:15 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] =?windows-1256?q?Pelosi_Needs_a_Reminder_on_Bus?= =?windows-1256?q?h_Crimes=FE?= Message-ID: Pelosi told "The View" yesterday "I thought that impeachment would be divisive for the country.... If somebody had a crime that the president had committed, that would be a different story." She said you can't accomplish Congress's legislative goals "if you?re trying to impeach the president at the same time, unless you have the goods that this president committed these crimes." http://www.democrats.com/pelosi-would-impeach-bush-if-she-had-the-goods David Swanson asks us to fax and email her Conyers's list and Kucinich's 35 articles. http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35102 Swanson also links to video of the December 19, 2005, press conference in which Bush admits to violating FISA (thereby committing numerous felonies). This press conference was cited by abc channel 7 news Legal Analyst Dean Johnson as evidence for the "strongest legal case against Mr. Bush." He said "Section 1809 of the FISA Act provides that any public official who engages in a wiretap, without authorization, is guilty of a felony - I think it's beyond a reasonable dispute that President Bush violated that statute." http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4911758 Bush has already confessed to an impeachable offense! He could be impeached in a couple of days, but Congress pretends they don't have time, need investigations, and haven't got the evidence. We need to send these links to our reps. Brian _________________________________________________________________ Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger2_072008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Wed Jul 30 16:53:35 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:53:35 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] voter registration vs homeland security Message-ID: <4890FEFF.9060501@sbcglobal.net> 1) up to 10,000 new citizens to be sworn in in August in Santa Clara County at two large ceremonies at the county fairgrounds If I understood correctly that will be on Thursday August 7-th and Thursday August 14-th (personal communication from Soccoro McCord) 2) Homeland Security has changed a regulation affecting procedures at swearing ceremonies claiming congestion resulting in a drop in registrations. reported in the Mercury News of July 19-th http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9931998?IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com *http://tinyurl.com/5zjf2v *reported in the Mercury News of July 19-th 3) thus we have an opportunity to distribute voter registration forms to those being sworn in as they arrive From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Wed Jul 30 21:34:35 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:34:35 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] meeting agenda topics Message-ID: <489140DB.7090102@sbcglobal.net> Here a reminder about agenda topics for our next monthly meeting: (the original came from Warner) The next GPCA state meeting will be held Saturday-Sunday August 23-24 at Dana Point (southern coastal Orange County). The draft agenda includes a number of items, including proposed GPCA Platform additions. The Plenary will also consider November 2008 ballot measures. Our position on these ballot measures needs to be established. Under our monthly general meeting schedule, our only meeting before the Plenary will be August 6th (first Wednesday). At that meeting we will need to affirm delegates and alternates to the Plenary and decide how to deal with instructions to those delegates. We also have outstanding issues regarding recruiting and affirming a new GPCA Coordinating Committee member and alternate (in coordination with the San Mateo County GP). Warner From gerrygras at earthlink.net Thu Jul 31 00:54:05 2008 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:54:05 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] [Fwd: I'm Going to Court - We Need Your Support!] Message-ID: <48916F9D.2000802@earthlink.net> Please read, Gerry -------- Original Message -------- Subject: I'm Going to Court - We Need Your Support! Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:00:45 -0400 (EDT) From: SF Bay Area WORLD CAN'T WAIT - DRIVE OUT THE BUSH REGIME! Reply-To: sf at worldcantwait.org [ ] August 4th, in Oakland is My Pretrial Hearing for Protesting at the Recruiting Station See below for details A Letter to the WCW Community and Friends >From Stephanie Tang Dear Friends, Next week I go to court for a pretrial hearing in a case stemming from World Can't Wait's ongoing Berkeley protests at the Marine Recruiting Station (MRS). I write to ask for the support of our whole community to fight for this politically-charged and motivated case to get dropped, right now. There is no way I should be threatened with a year in jail for organizing protest and resistance against the military recruiters, this endless and murderous war/occupation, torture, and the whole Bush regime program. As readers of this e-list know, during WCW's persistent and spirited protests at the MRS, the Berkeley police have repeatedly attacked us with harsh and often violent tactics (that by the way, totally belie Berkeley being a city officially opposed to the war!). Both WCW and Code Pink have received much repressive harassment. And WCW's rallies and actions (which have all been nonviolent, and usually have permits) have been repeatedly assaulted by the police. In lovely downtown Berkeley, cops in full riot gear charge the crowd, destroy sound equipment, and generally create a whole scenario meant to intimidate both the protestors and our public support. It was in one of these WCW protests on February 22 that I was injured by a Berkeley police officer, who hit me so hard I flew head first into a brick wall. Some days later, I received notification by mail that I was being charged with obstruction of an officer. The charge carries a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. My pretrial hearing is set for Monday, August 4, at the Alameda County Superior Court. World Can't Wait fully supports me in fighting to get this totally trumped-up charge dropped. It is important to note that although several protestors have been arrested at the MRS (either for civil resistance/civil disobedience or other nonviolent actions), everyone else's charges have either been dropped or never even filed. So I am the only protestor actually facing any charges. I am known as a leader of the local World Can't Wait movement by the community - and by the police - which may factor into the authorities' approach to my case. I know all of you on this e-list (if not personally, yet) because together we have been working tirelessly: to stop this intolerable war and occupation - to prevent the next U.S. escalation in the Middle East; the threatened war against Iran - to refuse the complicity of silence in the face of state-sanctioned torture - to say the whole Bush Regime program must be repudiated, resisted, and reversed. And although Bush himself may be nearing the end of his White House residency, our determination and our demands will have to grow even stronger, more than ever, whoever the next president of the empire may be. So, friends, I'm asking you to join me to take my court case and make it yet another way all of us can stand up to resist this intolerable war and occupation, and the whole Bush trajectory along with it. What can you do to help? * PACK THE COURTROOM -- be there with me for the pretrial hearing. When anyone faces criminal charges for political activism, it is so important to show that this is not a lone individual, but that we are a large, united community. Your presence makes visible that our protest and resistance will not be silenced, because it's absolutely right to oppose these recruiters and this war. MONDAY, AUG. 4, 2008 9:00 AM Dept. #104, Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Criminal Div. 661 Washington St. Oakland, CA 94607 * CONTRIBUTE TO THE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND today. Several thousand dollars in legal fees and expenses must be covered very soon. We ask you to DONATE WHAT YOU CAN and forward this email ASKING OTHERS to join you. Write checks to "World Can't Wait" - write "legal fund" in the memo line Mail to World Can't Wait, 2940-16th St., Rm. 200-6, San Francisco CA 94103 * EMAIL ME at: sf at worldcantwait.org if you can help in other ways - WCW wants to get this case widely known through the press and through outreach to many communities. Let me know how we can work together to do this. The World Can't Wait! Stephanie Tang Organizer, SF Bay Area WCW 415-864-5153 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enough! The World Can't Wait! Drive Out the Bush Regime! Impeach Bush & Cheney for War Crimes! Donate generously . . . - An East Bay homeowner just donated $250 toward the "Fire John Yoo" billboard. - Another woman who can't afford to miss work for the protest sent a check for $100. - Two local business owners continue to generously donate their space for WCW events. WCW is an all volunteer organization. It is a vehicle for the change we need NOW. Funds from you are the fuel this vehicle needs. Give all you can. NOTE: Tax deductible contributions are not available with this PayPal "Donate Button" Make checks payable to: "SF World Can't Wait" Mail to: 2940 16th Street, Room 200-6, San Francisco, CA 94103, or donate on-line at worldcantwait.org. TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION INFO: To make a tax deductible donation of $100 or more in support of WCW's educational activities, checks should be made out to: "The Alliance for Global Justice," a 501(3)(c) organization, and designate "for WCW" in the check memo line. The Alliance for Global Justice latest financial report is available at their offices: 1247 E St. SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 MAIL ALL CHECKS TO: SF World Can't Wait 2940 16th St., Rm 200-6 San Francisco, CA 94103 www.sfbaycantwait.org 415-864-5153 sf at worldcantwait.org SF Bay World Can't Wait sf at worldcantwait.org 415-864-5153 2940 16th Street, Room 200-6 San Francisco, CA 94103 www.sfbaycantwait.org IMPORTANT!!! Your help is always needed for publicity and outreach. We have posters and flyers to get out everywhere, as well as programs, media, decorations, and literature tables. Call the WCW office (415) 864-5153 to volunteer! World Can't Wait! Drive Out the Bush Regime! | 2940 16th Street, Room 200-6 | San Francisco | CA | 94103 From the_alliance47 at yahoo.com Thu Jul 31 06:16:08 2008 From: the_alliance47 at yahoo.com (Edward) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] eCFL not as green as we thought Message-ID: <795456.21609.qm@web54301.mail.re2.yahoo.com> CNN article: http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/27/eco.flourescent/index.html Save energy -- two words that have rapidly become a modern day mantra. But some are now asking, at what cost? One person asking that question is City University of Hong Kong's professor Ron Hui, chairman of the electronic engineering department, and co-author of a recent paper published in a peer-reviewed journal on the environmental impact of fluorescent lighting. Hui has a problem with compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), specifically electronic ones. He wants them out of people's homes as much as an increasing number of governments around the world want incandescent light bulbs out of our homes. Hui wants them replaced by magnetic CFLs instead. Why? CNN spoke recently with Professor Hui. -Edward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From snug.bug at hotmail.com Thu Jul 31 10:34:02 2008 From: snug.bug at hotmail.com (Brian Good) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:34:02 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Meiers and Bolton Must Testify, Court Rules Message-ID: But Rep. Lamar Smith, a member of the Judiciary Committee warns that ?today?s victory may be short-lived.? He added: ?If the administration appeals the ruling, our congressional prerogatives will once again be put at risk.? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25949309/ _________________________________________________________________ Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety. http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_family_safety_072008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Thu Jul 31 12:42:04 2008 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:42:04 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] meeting agenda for August 6-th Message-ID: <4892158C.6070409@sbcglobal.net> My first reading of the agenda for the plenary at the end of August reveals a need for discussion on three platform planks (agenda item) California Tax Reform Green Science Water because our delegates will be asked to vote on these items. The details are in the agenda packet which requires a password to access. Contact a county council member for info on the password. The complete agenda packet is a 34 page document in pdf format. 3 pages for the tax reform plank 2 1/2 pages for the green science plank 14 pages for the water plank And of course, positions will be taken on the ballot measures and initiatives. So here too, instructions for the delegates are needed. (agenda item) As well as selection of the delegates. (agenda item) There is a lot to do at the next monthly meeting.