[GPSCC-chat] Fwd: [California Greening] California's climate is changing. Will we?

[Wes Rolley]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[California Greening] California's climate is changing. Will we?
Date: 	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:11:31 -0800 (PST)
From: 	Wes <wrolley at charter.net>
To: 	wrolley at charter.net



Since my pessimistic post 
<http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2010/12/theres-no-happy-ending.html> on 
dot earth's interview with Bill McKibben, I have been challenged by 
Gerry Gross to explain why he should listen to yet another session of 
gloom and doom Jeremiad. It made me do some additional thinking about 
what we should be doing. So this may ramble, but it hopefully provides 
energy of some kind for the work that needs to be done.

"more than anything, it's just a question of power." Another quote from 
McKibben that starts to explain why he started 350.org. If it is a 
question of power... the fossil fuel companies have it and we don't... 
then McKibben wants to build an organization <http://www.350.org/> large 
enough to have power.

I see two problems here. The first is that McKibben has chosen not to 
come forward with a firm statement of policy. What changes do we need to 
make? When do we make them? How might government provide incentives to 
change in the right way? In one way McKibben is right. There are many 
solutions and every country, state, province, group has to find the one 
that works locally. One of the reasons that Copenhagen failed, and that 
Cancun promises to just a disappointing, is that there is no solution 
that works for everyone. That is addressed in the video segment I linked.

The other problem is essentially one for Greens to deal with, but also 
seems to apply to other progressives and independents. People don't 
really trust those in power. This distrust is one of the reasons for a 
lack of cohesion within various Green organizations. The devolution of 
power to the people rarely results in a unified sense of direction.

Let me ramble back to Gerry's original question. Should we be supporting 
the Million Letter March <http://www.millionlettermarch.org/>... an 
effort to send a million letters to Congress underscoring the need to 
act on climate change now. I guess that it is like eating chicken soup 
to fight a cold... it can't hurt but I would not expect it to cure H1N1. 
As it is, even with the names of Bill McKibben, Dr. James Hansen and 
Lester "Plan B" Brown attached to the effort, they have so far generated 
less than 400 letters from US Sources.

We have to acknowledge that our Federal government is not going to act 
at least for the next 2 years, since any action will be blocked in a 
Republican controlled House of Representatives. An examination of the 
people that are being selected to head committees in a Republican House 
makes it abundantly clear. A good example is the selection of 
Oil-Industry cheerleader Ralph Hall 
<http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/gop_takeover_in_the_house_may_spell_doom_for_obamas_environmental_policies.php> 
to head the House Committee on Science and Technology. Whatever action 
takes place will have be local, or at least at the state level.

For example, we should learn more about the Panoche Valley Solar Farm 
Project in San Benito County. This is a photovoltaic installation 
designed to eventually supply 420 megawatts of power when completely 
built out. There are pros and cons for the project, and some 
environmental groups would like to stop it over the question of habitat 
loss. You can read the draft Environmental Impact Report here 
<http://www.san-benito.ca.us/departments/planning/documents/Solargen/feir/b_projdesc.pdf>. 
The scope of this project is such that we can not allow a mistake 
through ignorance or indifference.

Let me underscore the fact that most Greens acknowledge the importance 
of climate change. The draft of the 2010 version of the GPUS Platform 
clearly states that "*Climate change is the most grave environmental, 
social and economic peril that humanity has ever met.*" On it's own, 
that will have as much political effect as a Million Letter March that 
only generates 400 letters.

If we believe, as I do, that the formulation in the platform is correct, 
then we need to organize around that fact. It is time for California's 
Green Climate Hawks to get together and start having an impact.


--
Posted By Wes to California Greening 
<http://cagreening.blogspot.com/2010/12/californias-climate-is-changing-will-we.html> 
at 12/08/2010 09:11:00 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20101208/8458d8d1/attachment.html>