[GPSCC-chat] Moving Meeting to 2nd Thur? (was Re: [GPSCC] Updated Draft Ageneda For Jan GPSCC Monthly Meeting)

jamboi jamboi at greens.org
Fri Dec 24 18:25:51 PST 2010


i'm still hoping we can pick a better day *instead of* first Wed for our
General Meeting.   how about 2nd Thursday?  if not that then how about 2nd
Wed?  Those seem to be the top runners so far.

Green is Go!

Drew

> GREEN  PARTY OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
> Draft  Agenda for Monthly General Membership Meeting January 5,  2011
> San  Jose Peace and Justice Center, 48 South 7th Street, San Jose,  CA
> (Near  7th and San Fernando)
> 6:30  pm – Eat and chat
> 7:30  pm – Begin meeting
> Select  Facilitator, Notetaker, Timekeeper, and Vibeswatcher(s), Select
> Agenda Preparer  for next meeting; Affirm or modify draft agenda (5
> Minutes)
> Introductions  and Announcements (10 Minutes)
> Treasurer’s  Report and presentation of 2011 GPSCC projected budget –
> Jim
> Doyle (15 minutes)
> General  discussion of goals for 2011 – County Council Members (30
> minutes)
> Issues  include:  Role(s) of County Council  (see Bylaws excerpt below);
> General Meetings scheduling; Speakers at meetings;  Recruiting candidates
> for
> the 2012 elections (see copy of Wes Rolley email  below)
> Report  on what are current policies for use of GPSCC email list – Tian
> (5
> minutes)
> Need  to recruit new regional Coordinating Council member and alternate
> (10
>  minutes)
> Presentation  of expected 2011 tabling events; Report on status of tabling
> materials and  supplies  -- Jim Doyle (15  Minutes)
> Review  of draft banks and credit cards bookmarks – Spencer (5  minutes)
> Revisit  question of hosting 2012 GPUS Presidential Nominating Convention
> –
> Warner (10  Minutes)
> Proposal  re GPSCC campaign re banks – Spencer (15 minutes) – See text
> following draft  agenda for further details
> (2  Hours Estimated Cumulative Times.  Goal:  Adjourn by 9:30  pm)
> Tabling Events  Addenda – Needed for each item (not necessarily all at
> this
>  meeting):
> Confirm date and  location; Approval of fee payment (as applicable);
> Designation of coordinator(s)  and other volunteers
>
> No  Tabling Events Reported As Of Preparation of This Agenda
> ###
> [From  GPSCC Bylaws] ARTICLE 2 COUNTY COUNCIL
> 2.1  Purposes
> 2.1.1  The County Council will fulfill the legal requirement for a liaison
> between the  California Green Party and Santa Clara County officials. As
> used in these  Bylaws, the term "County Council" shall have the same
> meaning as
> the term  "Central Committee" as that term is used by the Office of the
> Registrar of  Voters for Santa Clara County, California.
> 2.1.2  The Council shall select a secretary and a treasurer from among its
> members, or  may ratify the selection of these officers made at a General
> County Meeting. The  Council and/or its officers will be responsible for
> complying with the financial  reporting requirements of the Fair Political
> Practices  Commission (FPPC). The Council or its officers shall be
> responsible for  obtaining an FPPC number for financial reporting. The
> Council may
> create such  committees or initiate such inquiries as it considers
> necessary
> and appropriate  to perform its collective
> responsibilities  as described in these Bylaws.
> 2.1.3  Internal to the Green Party, the Council's primary duties include
> serving as a  coordinating or steering committee to:
> a) Facilitate  communications between Green Party members within the
> county, at  county meetings, and between locals within the county.
> b) Facilitate  communications between the county Green Party and the State
> Green Party.
> c) Assist Green  Party involvement in elections in the county (including
> recruiting,  advising and assisting Green Party candidates, co-ordinating
> voter  registration efforts and tabling, and supporting ballot issues
> effecting issues  of concern to the state or county Green Party).
> d) Enhance  communications between the county Green Party and other Green
> Parties and/or  other local organizations which support the principals and
>
> objectives set  forth in the Green Party Platform.
> e) Oversee and  assist the work of committees formed by the Council, or
> outside the  Council by the Party's members, to help carry out the above
> duties, or other  duties considered necessary that are not in conflict
> with
>
> these ByLaws;  such as an electoral reform committee, an environmental
> issues  committee, etc.
> 2.1.4  The County Council shall act as the designated contact persons for
> the Green  Party of Santa Clara County, and refer interested people to
> persons who may be  designated as spokespeople for the Party at a General
> County
> Meeting.
> 2.1.5  The County Council, by agreement of eighty percent (80%) of its
> members, may  authorize the use of the name of the Green Party of Santa
> Clara
> County as an  endorser or co-sponsor of an event or public statement
> consistent with the  principals and objectives set forth in the Green
> Party Platform
> if time issues  make the decision necessary before it can be brought
> before
> the next general  meeting.  Any such County Council  authorization shall
> be
> reported to those present at the next monthly  meeting.  [Adopted July 1,
> 2003]
> --------  Original Message --------
> Subject:  [GPCA-MediaComm] Home - California Target Book
> Date:  Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:36:14 -0800
> From:  Wes Rolley
> http://www.californiatargetbook.com/ctb/default/index.cfm
> This  link to the California Target Book web site currently contains  a
> list  of all of the state legislators who will be termed out in 2010.  We
> should  currently be looking for ways to exploit this, especially as  Prop
> 14  has kicked in beginning with the special election in for the SD  28
> special  election to be held on Feb 15.
> This  is the list with interesting (to me) opportunities marked with  *
> STATE  SENATE (4 Dem; 2 Rep)
> Joe  Simitian (D-SD11)  *
> Elaine  Alquist (D-SD13)
> Alan  Lowenthal (D-SD27)
> Bob  Dutton (R-SD31)
> Tom  Harman (R-SD35)
> Christine  Kehoe (D-SD39)
> ASSEMBLY  (17 Dem; 5 Rep)
> Jared  Huffman (D-AD6)  *
> Fiona  Ma (D-AD12)
> Sandré  Swanson (D-AD16)
> Cathleen  Galgiani (D-AD17)
> Mary  Hayashi (D-AD18)
> Jim  Beall, Jr. (D-AD24)  *
> Cameron  Smyth (R-AD38)
> Felipe  Fuentes (D-AD39)
> Julia  Brownley (D-AD41)
> Mike  Feuer (D-AD42)
> Anthony  Portantino (D-AD44)
> Gil  Cedillo (D-AD45)
> Mike  Davis (D-AD48)
> Mike  Eng (D-AD49)
> Tony  Mendoza (D-AD56)
> Charles  Calderon (D-AD58)
> Wilma  Amina Carter (D-AD62)
> Paul  Cook (R-AD65)
> Kevin  Jeffries (R-AD66)
> Jim  Silva (R-AD67)
> Jose  Solorio (D-AD69)
> Martin  Garrick (R-AD74)
> ****************************************************************************
> *
> Resolved:  The Green Party of Santa Clara County  will attempt to work
> with  other organizations to build effective united action against major,
> predatory  banks.  Possible coalition members  include organizations
> involved  with people with experience with threatened or actual
> foreclosure  as well as debt counselors encouraging people to end credit
> card  debt and rank and file members of other political  organizations.
> Discussion:
> 1.  The actions of predatory banks might be  the single greatest
> "sleeping  giant" among the US electorate during the current Great
> Recession.  The commercial media are complicit in  this:  They'd lose
> advertising  if their news and world views conflicted seriously with
> those  of bank executives who control advertising budgets.  This issue
> could  be large enough to convince a critical mass of the US electorate
> that  the current structure of the US media is potentially the biggest
> threat  to peace and democracy in the world today -- possibly stronger
> regulation  of both the media and the banks -- possibly even antitrust
> action.
> 2.  Organizations involved with helping  people with financial
> difficulties  can provide substantive information as well as a source of
> people  who could be activated politically by a platform more rational
> than  that of the Tea Party.  I think they  would eagerly collaborate with
> others  who might help increase the political awareness of the issues
> they  work with every day.  An issue like  this could turn many nonvoters
> in this  group into active Green party members if we could find ways to
> help  build an effective political movement demanding enforcement of
> existing  laws regarding perjury and fraud against bank officers.
> 3.  The Peace and Freedom Party seems  farther to the left than
> the  Greens, and I think could be persuaded to join something like this.
> American  Independents might also agree that we need substantive bank
> regulation.  Most Libertarians are probably hopeless  on this issue, but
> we  could be surprised even there.
> 4.  I think the vast majority of US citizens registered as either
> Democrat  or Republican would agree with the need to increase banking
> regulation,  not decrease it as the incoming US House majority has
> promised  to do.  This could be the deciding  issue in denying reelection
> to many  incumbents in 2012.
> 5.  MoveOn so far appears to have been  thinly disguised shills
> for the  Democrats.  As the Great Recession  continues and deepens, they
> may  switch allegiance, refusing to support Democrats who vote with the
> bankers  and possibly declaring themselves a separate political party or
> even  supporting Greens in some cases.
> 6.  If this issue gets serious traction, it  will tarnish all the
> incumbents  who have supported liberalizing banking regulations in the
> past.  That will be a boon for minor parties,  especially the Greens if
> we  exercise leadership on this issue.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss





More information about the sosfbay-discuss mailing list