[Sosfbay-discuss] Is DEM Health Care Bill Really Worse Than Nothing?

Thu Jan 21 14:53:00 PST 2010

I supported a "first step, stepped down" health care bill with a public option that Howard Dean recommended, as well as single-payer. But Obama and the Democrats have caved in over and over again to the power of the Liebermans and the deceived voters of Massachusetts. They refuse to use all the tools available to them to pass a bill. They have been sitting on this, and climate change, and financial reform, even before they lost their working 60-vote majority. Some of us are sending petitions and making calls now to try to get the Democrats to use their majority and the reconciliation process to pass real health care reform. We are bucking the tide, of course; the ignorance of the American people and the media that influences them is so vast it is incomprehensible. 

Our nation continues as it has been, under the heel of the right-wing free market economics ideology. The "tea parties" of hoodwincked, fanatical idiots are hard to comprehend; they don't know they are the tools of big money fascism. It will take years and years of work to convince people that this ideology is false. This seems to me the only issue. Either people continue to be charmed by Ronald Reagan and his libertarian economics, and Amerika continues to decline; or we wake up and move forward after our decades-long slide. This issue is quite stark.

Most people are too stupid to actually vote for Green candidates in these times. The candidates should be there, available to vote for, just to provide an alternative, sane voice of the truth that should have been realized and acted upon decades ago. The truth that people in most other countries already know; but not Americans, because we are spellbound to Ronald Reagan and his ideology. Anything else but Reaganism they call "socialism." They are sick and diseased. They can't stand to lose any of their power and money, or to have their false ideals challenged. Someone needs to cure them; it will take decades to do it, probably, or we have to educate the younger generation and wait for the crazies to die off. Make no mistake; the American people are to blame for this state of affairs. We get the government we deserve.

But meanwhile the Green Party needs to do more than run candidates and keep its institutions going. Many Greens think that is all we should do. They are wrong. The Greens need to be activists, and not just in the streets, but as lobbyists and as pressure groups. With politicians, our lobbying and pressure would have the added power that we can run a candidate against them, and possibly spoil their election, if they don't listen to us. We Greens cannot sit on our heels, and expect to have any effect or get any support. We ought to get activist groups together, like many other groups are doing, online and elsewhere, and meanwhile join with these other groups too. We need to work at local and state levels too, if not primarily. Just staying on the sidelines, indulging in our own institutional battles and attending our own platform and by-laws committees, celebrating our alternative way of making decisions, waving signs on the street, and running candidates who can't win without the purpose of pressuring specific elected officials, is not enough.

Eric Meece, former Treasurer, Santa Clara County Greens

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: alexcathy at aol.com 
  To: gplac-forum at lists.cagreens.org ; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org 
  Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:16 AM
  Subject: [Sosfbay-discuss] Is DEM Health Care Bill Really Worse Than Nothing?

  Dear Green Friends, 

  L.A. City Greens had a lively discussion at our monthly meeting last night about efforts by liberals to "save" the Democrats' pathetic healthcare "reform" bill.  I was surprised and a bit dismayed that even some Greens are swayed by the cliché about not letting "the perfect be the enemy of the good" and how the bill "is not perfect, but a 1st step" and unfamiliar with arguments this bill is WORST THAN NOTHING.  It's important because I think healthcare is still a good issue for our 2010 California candidates. 

  TINYURL: http://tinyurl.com/yze9o9j

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

  Posted on Counterpunch, December 8, 2009. 
  YES, THIS HEALTH CARE BILL REALLY IS WORSE THAN NOTHING
  by Helen Redmond

  Already defenders and apologists for the Democrat’s health care legislation are busy at work. In the next few weeks they will be working overtime to persuade, cajole, shame and ruthlessly attack if necessary, anyone opposing health care legislation. They’ll reserve special hysteria, invective and contempt for those of us who continue to support a single-payer, national health care system.  And because it is the holiday season, we will be called heartless health care Grinches and silly, single payer, Bernie Sanders Scrooges. There will be accusations: “If you don’t support health care reform legislation, you support the status quo.” Implicit in the indictment is single-payer advocates, with their pie-in-the-sky idea that health care is a human right for all, will be responsible for the continued impoverishment and immiseration of the American people if a bill doesn’t pass. 

  Joshua Holland, an editor and senior writer for AlterNet and Uwe E. Reinhardt, an economics professor at Princeton, have begun the onslaught. In a piece posted on AlterNet November, 24th titled, “Is the House’s Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?” Holland attacks Dr. Marcia Angell, author, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and a leader of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP.) Dr. Angell opposes the House bill and believes it’s “worse than nothing.” For that she earns the disdain of Joshua who just can’t accept there isn’t something in the bill worth supporting, even though he agrees with her trenchant criticism of the bill’s gaping defects. He claims she ignores the “primary thrust of the legislation” which for Holland is “the fact that the House legislation would do quite a bit for millions of real Americans struggling through a very real health care crisis.” “Real” Americans, a “real” health care crisis? The insinuation is Angell, and by affiliation PNHP, isn’t operating in the real world of real suffering if they don’t support whatever bill Congress delivers to the Oval Office for a signature. That’s interesting. An organization of 16,000 doctors that conducts research on major aspects of the health care crisis and have been on the frontlines for real reform for decades doesn’t understand what’s real? 

  Holland argues Angell negates her original thesis when she writes, “The bill has a few good provisions (expansion of Medicaid, for example) but they are marginal.” It doesn’t. Her central contention is even with an expansion of Medicaid and a few other “good” provisions, the bill is a bomb because on balance, it entrenches the power and profits of the private insurance industry - the source of the health care crisis. 

  . . .

  According to a study published in the Annals of Family Medicine, “Medicaid programs in all 50 states implemented cost-savings strategies, including benefit reductions, cost sharing and tightened administrative rules during the recent economic downturn.” Medicaid operates within the dysfunctional, multi-payer health care system and has suffered from an expand-contract cycle since its inception. It’s a favorite target for blame-the-victim politicians who want to get poor people off welfare (and health care) and into the workforce with no health care. Under the Clinton Administration’s “welfare reform,” hundreds-of-thousands of mostly women and children lost Medicaid coverage. The Medicaid program is not an entitlement or a right. An onerous redetermination is done every year in most states. And in fact, losing Medicaid coverage for a variety of reasons is the norm. 

  . . .

  Here’s the conundrum - if you support subsidies to help people buy insurance and the expansion of Medicaid, you are forced to support the transfer of billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of the investor-owned insurance industry and a mandate that criminalizes and punishes people. You also have to accept the Stupak Amendment and the denial of health care to millions of undocumented workers.

  There are more poison pills to swallow. Holland thinks it’s fine insurance will still be linked to employment – tell that to the millions who are unemployed and being laid off by the thousands every day. In the House bill, if employers offer insurance, they must pay at least 72.5 percent of the premium for individuals and 65 percent for families. That’s too low and gives companies who pay a higher percentage an incentive to shift costs onto employees until they hit the government-mandated limit. Workers will then be dumped into the insurance exchange because it will be cheaper for employers and once there, because of the mandate, forced to buy stripped down plans with no limits on premiums.

  . . .

  Toward the end of his assault on Dr. Angell’s position, Holland writes, “…drawing the line at the House bill is privileging ideology over getting something done in the short-term, however imperfect it might be overall.” But that is precisely the problem. For decades short-term, imperfect reforms are offered that inexorably lead right back to the crisis. Then more short-term, imperfect reforms are offered and the cycle continues. Instead of attacking the privileged ideology of for-profit, corporate controlled health care, Joshua attacks single-payer ideology and argues to abandon it in order to get something, anything done.

  Single-payer supporters also reject his false choice of “trying to push for the best package possible or leaving a disastrous status quo in place…” The not so subtle message is if a bill doesn’t pass we will be responsible for the disastrous status quo that is the state of health care in this country. Sorry Joshua, but that responsibility will rest with the Obama Administration that at every turn placated the profit hungry, parasitic insurance and pharmaceutical industries.

  And if a bill does pass this year, we can hurry up and wait 4 years because that’s when it will be enacted! So, disastrous status quo for 4 more years, then in 2013 implementation of a disastrous bill that will continue to leave 20 million uninsured. I can hardly wait.  

  . . .

  Reinhardt needs to come down from his Ivy Tower and join the movement for single-payer. It’s really not so bad down here at the grassroots level, Uwe. There is PNHP with 16,000 members. The California Nurses Association (CNA) supports single-payer and has thousands of members, too. Sections of the labor movement support single-payer. There are grassroots, single-payer organizations in almost every state with committed members who got arrested in acts of civil disobedience at insurance company headquarters. And poll after poll consistently shows the majority of Americans want government-run, guaranteed and financed health care.

  . . .

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

  Helen Redmond, LCSW, is a medical social worker in Chicago. She can be reached at redmondmadrid at yahoo.com. 

  ORIGINAL URL: http://www.counterpunch.com/redmond12082009.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  sosfbay-discuss mailing list
  sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
  http://lists.cagreens.org/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2635 - Release Date: 01/20/10 11:18:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20100121/cf01fdba/attachment.html>