[GPSCC-chat] Fwd: BREAKING: Election fraud in Prop 37? - your help can make a difference

Fri Dec 7 16:14:46 PST 2012

Get someone with some money to fund a Freedom Of Information Act Request (printing for this costs $$). Ask the Sec of State to provide complete records of what the % yes and % no votes were during the vote count, on election night and the days following. Document that the votes that were counted later in the night and in the days following election day showed more than 0.3% change in yes/no % in the overall vote totals per million additional votes counted (at the point where about 10 million votes have been counted, or a bigger change where less than 10 million votes were counted). This will show that prop 37 had more than 50% yes votes in those sub-samples, when the no % was about 53%. On that basis, probable cause will have been established to ask for a complete recount of all the Prop 37 votes.  Good luck.

Rinse and repeat for Prop 34 too. A similar anomaly likely exists in the Prop 30 vote count, but no one is complaining as that measure won.

Sincerely,

John Thielking

--- On Fri, 12/7/12, Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote:

From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>
Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: BREAKING: Election fraud in Prop 37? - your help can make a difference
To: "GPSCC" <sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2012, 11:58 AM

-------- Original Message -------- 

Subject: 
BREAKING: Election fraud in Prop 37?

Date: 
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:29:44 +0000

From: 
Dave, Food Democracy Action! <info at fooddemocracynow.org>

Reply-To: 
Dave, Food Democracy Action! <info at fooddemocracynow.org>

To: 
Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>

#yiv1432152919 body, #yiv1432152919 td, #yiv1432152919 font {font-size:10pt;font-family:helvetica;}
#yiv1432152919 A:link {text-decoration:none;}
#yiv1432152919 A:visited {text-decoration:none;}
#yiv1432152919 A:active {text-decoration:none;}
#yiv1432152919  
#yiv1432152919 td p {margin:0em;}
#yiv1432152919 p {margin:1em 0em;}
#yiv1432152919 td div p {margin:1em 0em;}

Stand up for open and transparent elections!

Join us in standing up for open and transparent elections - join us in reporting "statistical anomalies" and 6 million votes for Prop 37 ! 

Dear Spencer,
While reports of election fraud have circulated on the Internet, at Food Democracy Now! we have been closely monitoring the results as they’ve come in and had not heard any credible reports of possible voting irregularities - until now.
Yesterday, we received some disturbing news from a voter integrity monitor, claiming that possible “statistical anomalies” had been detected in 9 counties in California.
According to Francois Choquette, a statistician closely monitoring incoming election results in California, there were significant “irregularities” in the vote totals for prop 37 to label genetically engineered foods that could not be explained by random coincidence.
Right now a team of independent statisticians are analyzing raw voter data or “preliminary data from 17 of California's 58 counties”. Potential anomalies have been detected in a number of the largest precincts in Orange, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Alameda and San Diego counties, among others.  
And while Food Democracy Now! can’t say if election fraud has taken place, we want Prop 37 supporters to be aware of the fact that the results from the election are not over and we're asking you to be vigilant in standing with us as we call for further inquiry into these questionable patterns.
Join us in standing up for open and transparent elections and to ask California Secretary of State Debra Bowen to make sure that the election results from Prop 37 are properly counted.
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/721?t=6&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
The next 24 hours are critical. Right now county election officials in the state of California are required to report their final results to the Secretary of State’s office by (today) Friday December 7th. According to state law, Secretary of State Debra Bowen has until December 14th to certify the results of the election.
And this is where we have some concern.
On election night the California Secretary of State’s office called the election for the No side, declaring that Yes on 37 to label genetically engineered foods had failed to pass by a margin of 46.9% to 53.1%, with some 4.3 million Californians having been reported voting Yes on 37 by the next morning. Since then the ballot proposition to label genetically engineered foods has slowly and steadily advanced both its vote total and percentage of the total vote.
California SOS Website Reports 6 Million Votes for Prop 37, Then Votes Disappear
As of Monday, December 3rd at 4:58 pm, the California Secretary of State’s office reported that Prop 37 had garnered 48.5% votes to the No side’s 51.5%, with 5,986,652 voting to Label GMOs and 6,365,236 Californians voting against.
The following morning, ccording to the California Secretary of State’s website the Yes on 37 campaign had received 6,004,628 votes and edged down to 48.4% of the vote total. The timestamp on the California Secretary of State’s website showed December 4, 2012, 6:04 a.m.
Six million votes is an important milestone for the election and the growing movement of millions of Americans that support labeling of genetically engineered foods across the country that were inspired by Prop 37.
I immediately shared the news via Twitter @food_democracy at 8:40 am PST.
Less than an hour later, the site was no longer showing the 6 million vote total. After capturing a screenshot, I Tweeted the image and then contacted the Secretary State’s office.
When asked about the discrepancy, the Secretary of State’s office claimed their office would no longer being updating the vote total until after December 14th, when the election is required by law to be certified.
When asked why, the Secretary of States’ office claimed that making updates to the official site were “no longer cost effective”.
After several calls to the Secretary of State’s office, their staff refused to give the number of remaining uncounted ballots and only stated that the latest vote totals were posted on the website and this information would not be updated until December 14th. This seems odd, since the Secretary of State's website had updated the vote count every day until December 4th, when the Yes side briefly appeared above 6 million votes.
Join us in standing up for open and transparent elections and to ask California Secretary of State Debra Bowen to make sure that the election results from Prop 37 are properly counted.
Please share the screenshot below showing more than 6 million votes for Prop 37 to label GMOs, this may be our only hope to make sure that open and transparent election results are reported in California.
Click on the link below to share the image of the disappearing 6 million vote total for Yes on 37 on Twitter.
 Post on Twitter
Click on the link below  to share the image of the disappearing 6 million vote total for Yes on 37 on Facebook.
 Post on Facebook
Now spread the word and share this with your friends to stand up for transparent elections and your Right to Know!

 Tweet This Share on Facebook 

No on 37 Fraudulent Behavior During Campaign

Right now we are uncertain if election fraud has taken place, but we find the reports and these developments with the California’s Secretary of State’s website and their office’s responses troubling. Currently, less than 400,000 votes separate the Yes on 37 campaign from the No side. The voters of California deserve the truth.
The No on 37 campaign ran one of the dirtiest elections in modern history with a constant stream of lies and fraudulent activity. As if spending more than $46 million on an endless stream of TV and radio ads wasn’t enough, the No on 37 campaign sent more than a half dozen fraudulent mailers from Democratic and environmentalist front groups, made demonstrably false statements in the official California Voter Guide as well as the fraudulent misuse of the official seal of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 
While none of these specific incidents can be used to bring the opposition to court or overturn the election, the current vote total irregularities taking place in California are concerning.
Right now, 48 hours before the final results vote counts from county election officials are to be handed over to the Secretary of State’s office, we need a strong showing of support for transparency and democracy.
Stand up for open and transparent elections, ask California Secretary of State Debra Bowen to make sure election results from Prop 37 are properly counted.
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/721?t=14&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
Please stand with us and share this news far and wide.
Together we have already shown that we can stand up to the most powerful corporations on the planet, it’s time to make sure our democracy is as safe as our food supply.
Thanks for participating in food democracy,
Dave, Lisa and the Food Democracy Now! Team
Background:
1. "Proposition 37: Genetically Engineered Foods Labeling", California Secretary of State, December 3, 2012, 4:58 p.m.
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/725?t=16&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
2. “Election fraud in California Prop 37? vote count hits 6 million, then CA Secretary of States site loses 18,000 votes? pic.twitter.com/hlk4VM7i” @food_democracy,  December 4, 2012
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/727?t=19&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
3. “Documented Deceptions of No on 37 Campaign”, California Right to Know Campaign, November 2, 2012
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/728?t=21&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
4. "Rigged Elections", Op-Ed News, Michael Collins, October 22, 2012
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/731?t=23&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
5. “How to Rig an Election”, Victoria Collier, Harper’s Magazine, November 5, 2012
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/729?t=25&akid=686.143688.hQZwl-
6. “None Dare Call it Stolen”, Mark Crispin Miller, Harper’s Magazine, August 2005
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/730?t=27&akid=686.143688.hQZwl- 

You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time. 

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list
sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20121207/633c4bdb/attachment.html>