From gerrygras at earthlink.net Tue Oct 4 00:09:37 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 00:09:37 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fossil Fuels Subsidies = $168,000 per second In-Reply-To: <57F35593.5060205@earthlink.net> References: <57F35593.5060205@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <57F355B1.6000405@earthlink.net> FYI, "Fossil fuels subsidised by $10m a minute, says IMF" https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/18/fossil-fuel-companies-getting-10m-a-minute-in-subsidies-says-imf "?Shocking? revelation finds $5.3tn subsidy estimate for 2015 is greater than the total health spending of all the world?s governments" Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Tue Oct 4 12:18:10 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:18:10 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Young People's Burden In-Reply-To: <57F4004B.20803@earthlink.net> References: <57F4004B.20803@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <57F40072.1060401@earthlink.net> FYI, A new item from Jim Hansen (climatologist). "Young People's Burden" http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2016/20161004_BurdenCommunication.pdf Some, but not all, of the conclusions: - "?Negative CO2 emissions,? i.e., extraction of CO2 from the air is now required" - "Continued high fossil fuel emissions place a burden on young people to undertake massive technological CO2 extraction." Also, his view of the ongoing lawsuit of young people (Our Children?s Trust) vs. the government (re climate change). This paper and more are available at: http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/ Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Tue Oct 4 15:09:16 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:09:16 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] "Bill Clinton Is Right, For-Profit Healthcare Is the 'Craziest Thing in the World'" In-Reply-To: <57F4285D.8050605@earthlink.net> References: <57F4285D.8050605@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <57F4288C.5030708@earthlink.net> FYI, "Bill Clinton Is Right, For-Profit Healthcare Is the 'Craziest Thing in the World'" http://commondreams.org/news/2016/10/04/bill-clinton-right-profit-healthcare-craziest-thing-world Gerry From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Wed Oct 5 12:46:53 2016 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (JAMES DOYLE) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fw: Green Party School Volunteers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1832369333.5803702.1475696813254@mail.yahoo.com> blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad Begin forwarded message: On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, 1:57 PM, Kamisha McLean wrote: Dear Mr. Doyle: My name is Kamisha McLean, and I am a Teaching Fellow for Citizen Schools, currently serving at Renaissance Academy at Mathson in San Jose.? This semester, our 7th-grade class is conducting a huge election research project, as a means of better understanding the concept of democracy. ?? To provide our students with a well-rounded perspective on the election process, we were hoping have a volunteer from your organization. We would be grateful to have the ?Green Party of Santa Clara County come and speak with the students about the Presidential Candidate, Jill Stein. Perhaps, they can also bring campaign material from the office to share. ?We would need at least two volunteers to come to our school one morning during the week of either Oct. 17 or Oct. 24?? Volunteers would also work with students who chose to advocate for Jill on their Campaign Table projects from 9am-1pm. In the following days, students will canvas at school during lunch and after school in their neighborhood, informing the community about the presidential candidates. If you have questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out. Thank you for your time and consideration! Best, Kamisha McLean National Teaching Fellow Citizen Teacher Lead- CA Region Citizen Schools California --- Renaissance Academy at Mathson 2050 Kammerer Avenue San Jose, CA 95116 646-637-7599 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net Wed Oct 5 21:58:42 2016 From: j.m.doyle at sbcglobal.net (Jim Doyle) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:58:42 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] button blanks have arrived Message-ID: <57F5DA02.3030604@sbcglobal.net> The shipment of button blanks has arrived, all 23 pounds of it. In the past they were bagged 250 to a bag. Who wants a set of 250? Blanks, pins, and mylar. Let me know and we can arrange delivery. Jim Doyle (408) 269-3299 From gerrygras at earthlink.net Fri Oct 7 13:39:39 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:39:39 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Debate Questions Poll In-Reply-To: <57F80710.6000203@earthlink.net> References: <57F80710.6000203@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <57F8080B.70402@earthlink.net> This website: https://presidentialopenquestions.com/ is polling people on questions to ask the candidates during the "town hall" debate on Sunday. According to the website, "ABC and CNN moderators agreed to consider the Top 30 questions voted up on this site!". No guarantees, I guess. Note that one can select a specific issue or all issues. And one can select different sorting methods. There a few climate change questions and a couple of health care questions among the top 25. Here is a question from my sister: "Princeton University study: Public opinion has ?near-zero? impact on U.S. law." "Gilens & Page found that the number of Americans for or against any idea has no impact on the likelihood that Congress will make it law. What is your reaction? How can the 99% ensure they are heard?" https://presidentialopenquestions.com/questions/9538/vote/ Gerry From spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org Sat Oct 8 11:38:56 2016 From: spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org (Spencer Graves) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 13:38:56 -0500 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Decentralizing process to identify Greens running for local office in non-partisan races In-Reply-To: <57f92fec7c9f9_6ceac691e1c40657@worker3.nbuild.prd.atl.3dna.io.mail> References: <57f92fec7c9f9_6ceac691e1c40657@worker3.nbuild.prd.atl.3dna.io.mail> Message-ID: Hello, All: Could someone please tell Mike Feinstein that I no longer represent the Green Party of Santa Clara County and give him contact information for my replacement (see below)? Best Wishes, Spencer Graves p.s. I'm currently with Kansas City Community Radio, KKFI, a sister station to KPFA in Berkeley. A show I recently produced is "Kansas and Missouri: Epicenter for Voter Suppression" for "RadioActive Magazine" (www.kkfi.org/program/radio-active-magazine). You won't hear my voice on this podcast, but you can hear about some of the antics of Kansas Secretary of State, Kris Kobach, who appears to be leading the Republican effort to disenfranchise as many likely Democratic voters as they can. I'm also asking US Senate candidate on their views of the 2008 RAND study on "How terrorist groups end", which found that only 20 of 268 terrorist groups (7 percent) that ended between 1968 and 206 were taken out by military force. Does that mean that the West is using the least effective approach to terrorism? -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Decentralizing process to identify Greens running for local office in non-partisan races Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:42:04 +0000 From: Green Party of California Inform List To: Spencer Graves Green Party of California Dear Spencer -- We are passing along the following message to you from CCWG member Mike Feinstein (Santa Monica), asking your county party to undertake planning for this important research for our party. Please let us know if you have any questions and/or contact Mike directly at mfeinstein at feinstein.org . Pamela Spevack, Rich Stone Co-Coordinators, GPCA Campaigns and Candidates Working Group (CCWG) ------------------------- *Decentralizing process to identify Greens running for local office in non-partisan races *As some of you know, I have tracked Greens running in non-partisan races across the state on behalf of the GPCA Campaigns & Candidates Working Group (http://www.cagreens.org/workinggroups/campaigns-candidates ) since 1994. *Starting after this November 2016 general election, I will be pulling back from almost **exclusively **performing this task for the party. **Instead I hope to help coordinate a process that involves active county parties doing most of the research within their own county boundaries. **Therefore I am writing this email to explain how the process is done, so that counties can begin to take it over for their areas. **This process is accomplished by literally: **- going to each county elections page *http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/voting-resources/county-elections-offices/ *- finding their list of ballot-qualified candidates (*often a .pdf that is difficult to work with*) and **- literally cutting and pasting each name into our Green voter registration data base in Nationbuilder, so see if any of them are listed as registered Green; then **- confirming that registration via the county registrar, by different methods depending upon the county *http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/registration-status/ Many county registrars have an on-line form in which the party registration of a registered voter can be confirmed if you have the person?s last name, street address and date of birth - information that is included in our voter registration data base in Nationbuilder. We utilize that tool for a large number of our confirmations. That makes it easy to do it at all hours and get this work done on my timeline, which often includes late nights and/or on weekends. But with other counties, the on-line confirmation tool requires either the registered voter?s Social Security number of driver?s license ? not information in the GPCA data base. In those cases - and in those counties where they have no on-line form at all, we have to actually call the Registrar of Voters office and ask them about each person who we think is registered Green. This causes a time delay because such calls have to be made during weekday business hours and sometimes we don?t hear back for a few days http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/registration-status/ . Fortunately almost all counties who we contact in this way will give us this information over the phone, after I identify myself and explain the role I play for the GPCA. Many of these offices have had experience hearing from me over the years. However in the case of two counties over the last year and a half (and very occasionally in past years), they have refused to give us the information over the phone. In one case a county started describing some elaborate process of filing out forms and mailing them in, in order to seek this info. In another county they told me I would have to come there in person, even though that particular county was 250 miles from where I live. Back in the old days before we had an up-to-date voter registration data base - and before widespread use of the internet - most candidates we learned about came from our county parties, and/or via an individual contacting the state party directly to inform us about themselves. Since 2011 when the GPCA began using Nationbuilder (to have an on-line accessible Green voter registration data base), we?ve discovered many Greens running for office that we otherwise didn?t know about. Most of them have been in counties in which we don?t have an active county party, while some have been in active counties where they simply didn?t know about these Greens running anyway. Once identified, I add these Green candidates to our candidate list on our state website (here for fall 2016 www.cagreens.org/elections/2016-fall ), and into the GPUS Elections data base (https://secure.gpus.org/secure/testdb/ ). *The process I describe above is a very time and labor intensive process and a very centralized one, where I have traditionally done 99% of the work. The GPCA would be far better off if the county parties did this work themselves and reported the results to the state party. * Why don?t the county parties take this on? Some county parties don?t have an up-to-date list of registered Greens in their county. But with a very, very few exceptions, even when they do, they don?t perform this candidate search themselves anyway. The GPCA IT Committee has consistently asked the county parties to update their county data bases and/or to work with GPCA IT to utilize the state data base information for their county. A few counties that have taken up GPCA IT on this, but most have not. That has displaced work onto my shoulders that should be undertaken locally, pushing back other party projects for which I have responsibility as well. One of the reasons that in even numbered election years (like this one) the GPCA needs to gather this information in a timely manner ? i.e. by late August after the candidate qualification person has concluded ? is that the GPCA provides campaign support funding to registered Greens running for office who have been endorsed by their county parties. To start that process, I identify the candidates themselves as discussed above. Then candidates are tagged in Nationbuilder, who are running in a contested race that live in an county where there is an active county party to endorse them. That way they can be sent an email from the Campaign Fund Support Committee (CFSC) (http://www.cagreens.org/committees/campaign-support ) email address broadcaster within Nationbuilder. There is a boilerplate CFSC email for this purpose that I created a few years ago, notifying these Greens of the process to seek such financial support from the state party. If the candidates can be appraised by late August of this opportunity, then they have a chance to seek their county party?s endorsement, fill out the necessary questionnaire and then give the CFSC time to consider their request and award them funds in time to make a difference in their campaigns. That process is described here: http://www.cagreens.org/committees/campaign-support/questionnaire http://www.cagreens.org/committees/campaign-support/criteria http://www.cagreens.org/bylaws/2016-07-02#Section_9-7_Campaign_Fund_Support_Committee It is also valuable for the GPCA to have this information as soon as possible in each election cycle in order demonstrate the party?s political viability, including by posting it to the cagreens.org site and using it in the party?s social media and media work. Since the GPCA has utilized Nationbuilder staring in 2011, we?ve discovered many Green Party members running who we otherwise would not have known about. What do we do when we find them to connect them to the party? First we contact them from the state level, send them contact information for their county party (where there is an active one), and simultaneously forward their information directly to the county party. When a candidate we?ve discovered becomes a elected Green, we add them to our state (www.cagreens.org/officeholders ) and national (www.gp.org/officeholders ) officeholders lists. In several cases we?ve also invited those same elected Greens to participate in candidate forums at our state meetings, featuring them at the Saturday night event. We also have an internal party California Green Officeholders Network email list they can join. In some cases we discover Green incumbents we didn?t know about. In many cases they were appointed to an unscheduled mid-term vacancy that we didn?t know about; or they ran previously and we didn?t have them in our data base. In these cases we add them to the GPUS elections data base and to the GPCA lists, which also increases our historical totals here in CA (http://www.cagreens.org/elections/history-by-year ). In other cases, we've discovered candidates who were formerly registered Green, who have left us for another party or registered ?decline-to-state/no party preference.? In those cases we contact them and raise the possibility of their coming back to the Green Party. Finally when we list the candidates on our GPCA website and in the GPUS data base, we list a great deal of detail that requires some searching - the name of the office sought, the city and county, how many candidates are running for how many seats, whether the Green is an incumbent, and then find their campaign website (and other social media campaign sites) where available, and enter all of this twice - once for our state party and once for the GPUS. *How much time does this take to identify and post all of this information? *For this year's November 2016 elections, I estimate I have spent 35 - to 40 unpaid staff hours on this project, and that is to do these 30 counties: Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kings, Lassen, Los Angeles, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Mendocino, Monterey, Nevada, Placer, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Shasta. Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba counties. These counties have been chosen in part because in several cases, their political leanings are likely to render more Greens running that we didn?t know about - Mendocino and Nevada counties for example, often have a handful of local Greens running in each cycle that we didn?t know about. However several major counties are missing from this list, including some of the largest counties that do have active county parties that could be doing this work themselves, meaning that is still a lot more work to do. As of October 5, we have 32 Greens listed on our state site as running in November (http://www.cagreens.org/elections/2016-fall ). Fourteen of them I knew about independently of the county-by-county search, the other eighteen we learned about through the county-by-county search. If your county party is willing to do your own search, please let GPCA IT know (it-help at cagreens.org ) and we?ll connect you to your county?s data that the GPCA currently has (your County Council needs to authorize this in an email to GPCA IT). At the same time, each county party is entitled to a free update of the registration list for all voters from their county registrar for the primary and the general election each even-numbered year. So if your county asks for that list, you can use that to double check the work for your country, or do it for the first time, depending upon whether its on the list above. People change their registration all the time and each cycle we often find out after the November election above a few Greens that had run. *Again, I need to decentralize this task starting with the spring 2017 elections, where county parties take upon the responsibility themselves to compare the registered Green list for their county with the list of all candidates running in local non-partisan election in their county. *Please let me know if you have any questions about this process and how you can help. Mike Feinstein Campaigns and Candidates Working Group ------------------------- */Stay connected with the Green Party of California /*/(and spread the message via social media)/ On Twitter: www.twitter.com/gpca ? On Instagram www.instagram.com/greenpartyofcalifornia On Facebook: www.facebook.com/cagreens and www.facebook.com/groups/8071416222 State Party email forum: lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/gpca-forum_lists.cagreens.org GPCA general contact: gpca at cagreens.org ? 916-448-3437 */Volunteer with the GPCA/* cagreens.nationbuilder.com/volunteerdetail */Donate to the GPCA /*/(we don't take corporate donations and are funded by people like you)/ cagreens.nationbuilder.com/donate /*Register Green on-line *(share this with your friends and interested others)/ registertovote.ca.gov ------------------------- -=-=- Green Party of California ? PO Box 485, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States This email was sent to spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org. To stop receiving emails, click here . -=-=- Created with NationBuilder , the essential toolkit for leaders. From gerrygras at earthlink.net Thu Oct 13 14:46:20 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:46:20 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] =?utf-8?q?=22Investors_Tell_Auto_Industry_to_Move_to?= =?utf-8?q?_Low_Carbon=E2=80=94or_Else=22?= In-Reply-To: <58000095.7080300@earthlink.net> References: <58000095.7080300@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <580000AC.7080607@earthlink.net> FYI, "Investors Tell Auto Industry to Move to Low Carbon?or Else" http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/investors_tell_auto_industry_to_move_to_low_carbon_or_else_20161013 http://www.iigcc.org/publications/publication/investor-expectations-of-automative-companies-2016 Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sat Oct 15 17:15:25 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:15:25 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] 45 years for reporting on NoDAPL Protests?!? In-Reply-To: <5802C643.5000804@earthlink.net> References: <5802C643.5000804@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <5802C69D.7070403@earthlink.net> "Filmmaker Faces 45 Years in Prison for Reporting on Dakota Access Protests" http://commondreams.org/news/2016/10/15/filmmaker-faces-45-years-prison-reporting-dakota-access-protests "NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden observed that Schlosberg faces more years in prison than he does for leaking secret documents about the NSA's mass surveillance program in 2013" ... ""Deia isn't alone," observed Fox in an op-ed in the Nation. "The arrest of journalists, filmmakers, and others witnessing and reporting on citizen protests against fossil-fuel infrastructure amid climate change is part of a worrisome and growing pattern."" https://www.thenation.com/article/the-arrest-of-journalists-and-filmmakers-covering-the-dakota-pipeline-is-a-threat-to-democracy-and-the-planet/ What are the authorities thinking? Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Wed Oct 19 16:27:11 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:27:11 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Free GP community forum in Palo Alto, 10/23 Message-ID: <5808014F.6000104@earthlink.net> "YahN? Ndgo & Local Activists on Justice & Presidential Politics" http://www.jill2016.com/mliu/yahn_ndgo_on_justice_presidential_politics https://www.facebook.com/events/544129819114033/ Gerry From perrysandy at aol.com Thu Oct 27 23:01:08 2016 From: perrysandy at aol.com (perrysandy at aol.com) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:01:08 -0400 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Green Party of Santa Clara County In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <15809e0a8cb-22b4-b193@webprd-m48.mail.aol.com> Looks like spam. Sandy -----Original Message----- From: Caroline Yacoub To: Warner Bloomberg ; Sandy Perry ; Brian Good ; Gerry Gras ; Dana St. George ; Tian Harter ; Jim Doyle ; Nassim ; sosfbay-discuss at lists cagreens. org Sent: Thu, Oct 27, 2016 10:37 pm Subject: Fwd: Green Party of Santa Clara County -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Green Party of Santa Clara County From: San Jose Business Recognition Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016, 6:52 PM To: jimd at greens.org CC: Green Party of Santa Clara County has been selected for the 2016 Best of San Jose Awards for Political Party. For details and more information please view our website: 2016 Best of San Jose Awards - Political Party If you are unable to view the link above, please copy and paste the following into your web browser: http://sanjose.bestofrecognition.com/shnl8yku_GREEN-PARTY-OF-SANTA-CLARA-COUNTY Best Regards, San Jose Business Recognition This email was sent to: jimd at greens.org. Remove - to be safely and instantly removed. Report Abuse - to safely report abuse and to stop all future email communications. If you would like to stop receiving advertisements please write to: Business Recognition, 337 Garden Oaks Blvd, Houston, TX 77018. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Oct 30 02:36:17 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:36:17 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: [gpca-forum] Green Party Registration in California on Sep 9 2016 In-Reply-To: <5815a82f.c3fe420a.d6550.dcba@mx.google.com> References: <5815a82f.c3fe420a.d6550.dcba@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5815BF11.9060905@earthlink.net> FYI, Gerry -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [gpca-forum] Green Party Registration in California on Sep 9 2016 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 00:58:03 -0700 From: shane que hee via gpca-forum Reply-To: GPCA member general discussion To: gpca-forum at cagreens.org CC: shane que hee Everyone: The total was 84,759, some 0.46% of those registered. http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ror/ror-pages/60day-gen-16/county.pdf There were 20,862 in Los Angeles County (0.42% in county);in Alameda 6,603 (0.79%); in San Diego, 6013 (0.39%); in San Francisco 4,552 (0.96%); in Orange 4,432 (0.31%); in Sacramento 3,397 (0.47%) ; in Santa Clara 3,270 (0.40%); and in Sonoma 2,997 (1.15%). We'll see what happens after the Nov 8 election. ....Shane Que Hee, Oct 230 2016 _______________________________________________ gpca-forum mailing list Reminder: Please do not "Reply All" or include other addresses in the CC line -- only use "Reply" gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/gpca-forum_lists.cagreens.org From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Oct 30 02:47:49 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:47:49 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Andrea Dorey died today In-Reply-To: <57C659D7.9080907@earthlink.net> References: <57C659D7.9080907@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <5815C1C5.5090408@earthlink.net> Andrea's memorial service will be today at 3:00 PM, somewhere on Junipero Serra, Palo Alto. I don't know the number. To get it I need to call someone, but I don't have her number. I hope to get the phone number and the address this morning. Gerry Gerry Gras wrote: > > Andrea Dorey died today in Redwood City. She had > been ill for many months. > > For those who don't know her, she used to be > active in the GPSCC and in GPCA and was on the > county council. > > There almost certainly will be a memorial > service. I'll let you know when I know. > > Gerry From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Oct 30 10:36:32 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:36:32 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Andrea Dorey died today In-Reply-To: <5815C1C5.5090408@earthlink.net> References: <57C659D7.9080907@earthlink.net> <5815C1C5.5090408@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <58162FA0.3070600@earthlink.net> 574 Junipero Serra. Gerry Gerry Gras wrote: > > Andrea's memorial service will be today at 3:00 PM, > somewhere on Junipero Serra, Palo Alto. I don't > know the number. To get it I need to call someone, > but I don't have her number. I hope to get the phone > number and the address this morning. > > Gerry > > > Gerry Gras wrote: >> >> Andrea Dorey died today in Redwood City. She had >> been ill for many months. >> >> For those who don't know her, she used to be >> active in the GPSCC and in GPCA and was on the >> county council. >> >> There almost certainly will be a memorial >> service. I'll let you know when I know. >> >> Gerry > > _______________________________________________ > sosfbay-discuss mailing list > sosfbay-discuss at lists.cagreens.org > http://lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org > From gerrygras at earthlink.net Sun Oct 30 12:56:42 2016 From: gerrygras at earthlink.net (Gerry Gras) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:56:42 -0700 Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Bill McKibben on DAPL In-Reply-To: <58165049.9000709@earthlink.net> References: <58165049.9000709@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <5816507A.8030005@earthlink.net> FYI, "Why Dakota Is the New Keystone" by Bill McKibben http://commondreams.org/views/2016/10/30/why-dakota-new-keystone Gerry