<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hi, John:  <br>
    <br>
    <br>
          I don't see the same problem you do.  <br>
    <br>
    <br>
          The promoters of the current corrupt system are highly
    motivated to kill any move that will honestly limit their power. 
    I'm not an attorney, but I don't see how the current language would
    strip anyone of their powers and rights as "natural persons".  This
    amendment would not affect the rights of sole proprietors.  It's
    possible that filing a fictitious name statement could create an
    artificial entity, but I doubt it.  Would this remove the "natural
    person" rights from an actor who uses a stage name?  I doubt it: 
    They are still "natural persons", "their houses, papers, and
    effects" are still theirs and therefore should still be subject to
    protection under the Fourth Amendment -- unless the said property
    belonged to a corporation they created, registered in the Bahamas as
    a tax dodge.  Then they would be prohibited from using the extra
    money they made by tax avoidance from influencing elections unduly. 
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
          In fact, I believe it would increase the rights of "natural
    persons" by giving the government the right to regulate the
    activities of "artificial entities".  Our current system is one
    dollar, one vote.  This amendment would make it easier for citizens
    to change this.  <br>
    <br>
    <br>
          Actually, I think the "Move to Ammend" is a secondary issue: 
    For me the number one problem is the media.  For example, one study
    of found that the US public spends on average $1,645 per person more
    for health care than our counterparts in other developed countries,
    and we get less for it in terms of a lower life expectancy, higher
    infant mortality, etc.  This amounts to roughly 4% of GDP.  In other
    words, 4 cents of every dollar you get pays for denying insurance
    claims to people, medications that cost you far more than they
    should, newer, more expensive and less effective medications than
    those otherwise available, and paying doctors more than their
    counterparts elsewhere.  We could solve these problems if the media
    didn't have a conflict of interest in perpetuating all these corrupt
    practices.  This 4 percent is only the tip of the iceberg.  If you
    add corruption in the finance and defense industries, we probably
    pay on average between $4,000 and $10,000 per person per year for
    the "free" broadcasting and the substantial portion of the print
    media that is paid by advertising.  <br>
    <br>
    <br>
          Spencer <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 12/7/2011 11:14 AM, John Thielking wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1323285271.83160.YahooMailNeo@web111108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times
        new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
        <div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">No disrespect
            to those who are working hard to circulate the current paper
            form of this amendment which I also characterize below, but
            we really need to slow down the process of putting forward
            and endorsing specific amendment language, lest we end up in
            the dark ages with fewer rights for those who actually do
            something or anything involved with the functioning of a
            corporation than we originally intended. For the complete
            amendment language that I am referring to see <a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.movetoamend.org">http://www.movetoamend.org</a> 
            and look for the am<var style="RIGHT: auto"
              id="yui-ie-cursor"></var>endment link. Thanks.</span></div>
        <div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
        <div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">John
            Thielking</span></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times,
          serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
          <div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times,
            serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><font face="Arial" size="2">-----
              Forwarded Message -----<br>
              <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</span></b> John
              Thielking <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pagesincolor@yahoo.com"><pagesincolor@yahoo.com></a><br>
              <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</span></b>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.reyes@lacity.org">"councilmember.reyes@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.reyes@lacity.org"><councilmember.reyes@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.Krekorian@lacity.org">"councilmember.Krekorian@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.Krekorian@lacity.org"><councilmember.Krekorian@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.zine@lacity.org">"councilmember.zine@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.zine@lacity.org"><councilmember.zine@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:paul.koretz@lacity.org">"paul.koretz@lacity.org"</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:paul.koretz@lacity.org"><paul.koretz@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.cardenas@lacity.org">"councilmember.cardenas@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.cardenas@lacity.org"><councilmember.cardenas@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.alarcon@lacity.org">"councilmember.alarcon@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.alarcon@lacity.org"><councilmember.alarcon@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.parks@lacity.org">"councilmember.parks@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.parks@lacity.org"><councilmember.parks@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jan.Perry@lacity.org">"Jan.Perry@lacity.org"</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jan.Perry@lacity.org"><Jan.Perry@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.wesson@lacity.org">"councilmember.wesson@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.wesson@lacity.org"><councilmember.wesson@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilman.rosendahl@lacity.org">"councilman.rosendahl@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilman.rosendahl@lacity.org"><councilman.rosendahl@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.englander@lacity.org">"councilmember.englander@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.englander@lacity.org"><councilmember.englander@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.garcetti@lacity.org">"councilmember.garcetti@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.garcetti@lacity.org"><councilmember.garcetti@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.huizar@lacity.org">"councilmember.huizar@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councilmember.huizar@lacity.org"><councilmember.huizar@lacity.org></a>;
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councildistrict15@lacity.org">"councildistrict15@lacity.org"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:councildistrict15@lacity.org"><councildistrict15@lacity.org></a> <br>
              <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</span></b>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@movetoamend.org">"info@movetoamend.org"</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@movetoamend.org"><info@movetoamend.org></a> <br>
              <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</span></b>
              Tuesday, December 6, 2011 10:38 PM<br>
              <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</span></b> Fw:
              Amendment Name/Feedback<br>
            </font><br>
            <div id="yiv1830722925">
              <div>
                <div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; FONT-FAMILY: times
                  new roman, new york, times, serif; COLOR: #000;
                  FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
                  <div><span>Dear LA City Council:</span></div>
                  <div><span></span> </div>
                  <div><span>This is the message I sent to Move To Amend
                      in response to your passage of a resolution
                      supporting specific amendment language to deprive
                      corporations of personhood. See below to see why I
                      think this resolution is premature at best and a
                      bad idea at worst.  Thank you.</span></div>
                  <div><span></span> </div>
                  <div><span>Sincerely,</span></div>
                  <div><span></span> </div>
                  <div><span>John Thielking</span></div>
                  <div><span>San Jose, CA</span></div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york,
                    times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
                    <div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york,
                      times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><font face="Arial"
                        size="2">----- Forwarded Message -----<br>
                        <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</span></b>
                        John Thielking <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pagesincolor@yahoo.com"><pagesincolor@yahoo.com></a><br>
                        <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</span></b>
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@movetoamend.org">"info@movetoamend.org"</a>
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@movetoamend.org"><info@movetoamend.org></a> <br>
                        <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</span></b>
                        Tuesday, December 6, 2011 8:21 PM<br>
                        <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</span></b>
                        Amendment Name/Feedback<br>
                      </font><br>
                      <div id="yiv1830722925">
                        <div>
                          <div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff;
                            FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york,
                            times, serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
                            <div>I'm a longtime supporter and member of
                              the Green Party and the Peace and Freedom
                              Party in CA, and I support and
                              occasionally participate in the Occupy
                              movement, but I am also a small business
                              owner (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="http://www.peacemovies.com/"
                                rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.peacemovies.com</a>)
                              and I think that the first part of the
                              latest version of your amendment leaves
                              99% of business owners out in the cold
                              when it comes to their civil rights in a
                              vain attempt to attack the rights of the
                              1% which have grown to be more important
                              in our current society than the rights of
                              the 99%.</div>
                            <div> </div>
                            <div>The following statement was posted as a
                              comment on Facebook as a response to an
                              article posted about the LA City Council
                              passing a resolution supporting the
                              specific amendment language currently on
                              your web site:</div>
                            <div> </div>
                            <div>Actually, not so fast. This latest
                              amendment would possibly classify sole
                              proprietors operating under a ficticious
                              business name as "non-persons".  Also,
                              small corporations are often formed for
                              various reasons other than evading
                              liability and the operators of these
                              businesses would also be "non-persons". 
                              You want to see an Ayn Rand style of
                              revolt from the real  job creators (small
                              businesses employ most of the people in
                              the US), just try passing this amendment
                              as written.  This particular version of
                              the Move To Amend amendment was probably
                              created less than one month ago (there is
                              another, much worse version still in
                              circulation on some paper petitions).  I
                              suspect that the founding fathers had many
                              months if not years of deliberation before
                              they tried to put forth any specific form
                              of the constitution.* They were fully
                              aware of the implications of corporate
                              power even at that early date. Jefferson
                              badmouthed corporations and the banking
                              system I think, for instance. If they left
                              out an amendment that strips all people
                              involved with the functioning of a
                              corporation of their civil rights, they
                              must have had a good reason. If you think
                              this amendment won't strip PEOPLE as
                              opposed to paper entities of their rights,
                              who do you think runs the paper entities.
                              Who will have to give incriminating
                              evidence against their will and have their
                              life's work seized without a warrant? The
                              mainframe computer that issues the payroll
                              checks?  We can't start thinking of jobs
                              as handouts and SETTLE for working for
                              "the man" who may now be our slave under
                              this amendment, but who still has the
                              power to determine our financial future.
                              If you want to form co-ops and SHARE
                              responsibility and culpability when you
                              create your financial future, fine go
                              right ahead and do THAT.  But don't come
                              crying home to your sugardaddy boss and
                              ask him or her to "give you a job" while
                              you screw him or her over with an
                              amendment like this.</div>
                            <div> </div>
                            <div>That is all for now.</div>
                            <div> </div>
                            <div>Sincerely,</div>
                            <div> </div>
                            <div>John Thielking</div>
                            <div>San J<var
                                id="yiv1830722925yui-ie-cursor"></var>ose,
                              CA</div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      *Actually the founding fathers had a
                      Constitutional Convention from May 25, 1787 to
                      September 17, 1787 (116 days). The Bill Of Rights
                      was introduced 2 years later and was based on the
                      Virginia Declaration Of Rights which was adopted
                      in 1776.  So James Madison had 2 years to come up
                      with the US Bill Of Rights after the
                      Constitutional Convention.  And the ideas
                      contained in the Virginia Declaration percolated
                      for some 13 years.<br>
                      And were based in part <var
                        id="yiv1830722925yui-ie-cursor"></var>on the
                      British Bill of Rights, adopted 100 years earlier.</div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sosfbay-discuss@cagreens.org">sosfbay-discuss@cagreens.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss">http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567
web:  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.structuremonitoring.com">www.structuremonitoring.com</a>
</pre>
  </body>
</html>