<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
<br>I had the same understanding. Looks like the Brits, along with the US, are trying to<br>rewrite the rules of diplomacy and war to fit the wishes of the global dominators.<br><br>The Esquire article about Obama's Lethal Presidency concluded by asking--if it's<br>OK for Obama to fire hellfire missiles at anyone he wants, then isn't it okay for<br>anyone to fire missiles at him?<br><br>These are interesting times. Too bad so few recognize it.<br><br><br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:34:59 -0700<br>> From: gerrygras@earthlink.net<br>> To: snug.bug@hotmail.com<br>> CC: sosfbay-discuss@cagreens.org<br>> Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Breaking--Ecaudor Says British Police Threaten to Seize Assange<br>> <br>> <br>> This is a very strange story. I thought that an embassy<br>> was considered to be part of the country it represents,<br>> so if the police were to enter the embassy and do anything<br>> not acceptable, it would be considered like an invasion,<br>> a very serious matter. I don't recall any other occasion<br>> of invasion of embassy, other than the Iranian invasion<br>> of the U.S. Embassy in 1978, which was a very serious matter.<br>> <br>> What have I misunderstood?<br>> <br>> Gerry<br>> <br>> <br>> Brian Good wrote:<br>> > http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-16/ecuador-says-u-k-threatens-embassy-assault-to-seize-assange.html<br>> ><br>> > OccupyNewsNetwork says that 10 officers went inside the embassy and have<br>> > not left yet. It's early in<br>> > the morning in London. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/occupynewsnetwork<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > sosfbay-discuss mailing list<br>> > sosfbay-discuss@cagreens.org<br>> > http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss<br>> ><br></div> </div></body>
</html>