<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16484"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Cambria; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 14pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=4 face=Cambria>
<DIV><FONT size=4>May 23, 2013</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>This is the kind of sloppy, unclear, vague and overbroad
proposal for an agenda item that just drives me bonkers!!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>There is no focus whatsoever. There is no time
proposal. It is so broad it could include two years of constant chit chat
and still go nowhere...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Add that to the apparent lack of understanding about how state
meeting agendas are prepared... Argh!!! (as in frustration; not pirate
noises) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Warner</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 5/22/2013 7:30:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
spencer.graves@prodsyse.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2
face=Arial> Could we also add to the agenda a discussion of
political reform initiatives including Move to Amend and Rootstrikers?
I'd also like to see this on the agenda for the state-wide
meeting. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>