From jims at greens.org Wed Jul 4 15:07:58 2007 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:07:58 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Fwd: [ProChoiceOrNoChoice] Full text of the Freedom of Choice Act In-Reply-To: <3750197.1183505369157.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <3750197.1183505369157.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Mona D'Astarte" To: SVChoice , "Pro Choice or No Choice" Subject: [ProChoiceOrNoChoice] Full text of the Freedom of Choice Act Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:29:28 -0700 Following is the bill entitled the Freedom of Choice Act introduced by Sen. Boxer in the Senate and Rep. Nadler in the House of Representatives. Read it and then call or email your senators and representatives to urge them to support it. To find how to contact your senator or representative, go to: www.senate.gov or www.house.gov 110th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1173 To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other purposes. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 19, 2007 Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BAUCUS, and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A BILL To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `Freedom of Choice Act'. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) The United States was founded on core principles, such as liberty, personal privacy, and equality, which ensure that individuals are free to make their most intimate decisions without governmental interference and discrimination. (2) One of the most private and difficult decisions an individual makes is whether to begin, prevent, continue, or terminate a pregnancy. Those reproductive health decisions are best made by women, in consultation with their loved ones and health care providers. (3) In 1965, in Griswold v. Connecticut (381 U.S. 479), and in 1973, in Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113) and Doe v. Bolton (410 U.S. 179), the Supreme Court recognized that the right to privacy protected by the Constitution encompasses the right of every woman to weigh the personal, moral, and religious considerations involved in deciding whether to begin, prevent, continue, or terminate a pregnancy. (4) The Roe v. Wade decision carefully balances the rights of women to make important reproductive decisions with the State's interest in potential life. Under Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, the right to privacy protects a woman's decision to choose to terminate her pregnancy prior to fetal viability, with the State permitted to ban abortion after fetal viability except when necessary to protect a woman's life or health. (5) These decisions have protected the health and lives of women in the United States. Prior to the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, an estimated 1,200,000 women each year were forced to resort to illegal abortions, despite the risk of unsanitary conditions, incompetent treatment, infection, hemorrhage, disfiguration, and death. Before Roe, it is estimated that thousands of women died annually in the United States as a result of illegal abortions. (6) In countries in which abortion remains illegal, the risk of maternal mortality is high. According to the World Health Organization, of the approximately 600,000 pregnancy-related deaths occurring annually around the world, 80,000 are associated with unsafe abortions. (7) The Roe v. Wade decision also expanded the opportunities for women to participate equally in society. In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (505 U.S. 833), the Supreme Court observed that, `[t]he ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives.'. (8) Even though the Roe v. Wade decision has stood for more than 34 years, there are increasing threats to reproductive health and freedom emerging from all branches and levels of government. In 2006, South Dakota became the first State in more than 15 years to enact a ban on abortion in nearly all circumstances. Supporters of this ban have admitted it is an attempt to directly challenge Roe in the courts. Other States are considering similar bans. (9) Further threatening Roe, the Supreme Court recently upheld the first-ever Federal ban on an abortion procedure, which has no exception to protect a woman's health. The majority decision in Gonzales v. Carhart (05-380, slip op. April 18, 2007) and Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America fails to protect a woman's health, a core tenet of Roe v. Wade. Dissenting in that case, Justice Ginsburg called the majority's opinion `alarming', and stated that, `[f]or the first time since Roe, the Court blesses a prohibition with no exception safeguarding a woman's health'. Further, she said, the Federal ban `and the Court's defense of it cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this Court'. (10) Legal and practical barriers to the full range of reproductive services endanger women's health and lives. Incremental restrictions on the right to choose imposed by Congress and State legislatures have made access to reproductive care extremely difficult, if not impossible, for many women across the country. Currently, 87 percent of the counties in the United States have no abortion provider. (11) While abortion should remain safe and legal, women should also have more meaningful access to family planning services that prevent unintended pregnancies, thereby reducing the need for abortion. (12) To guarantee the protections of Roe v. Wade, Federal legislation is necessary. (13) Although Congress may not create constitutional rights without amending the Constitution, Congress may, where authorized by its enumerated powers and not prohibited by the Constitution, enact legislation to create and secure statutory rights in areas of legitimate national concern. (14) Congress has the affirmative power under section 8 of article I of the Constitution and section 5 of the 14th amendment to the Constitution to enact legislation to facilitate interstate commerce and to prevent State interference with interstate commerce, liberty, or equal protection of the laws. (15) Federal protection of a woman's right to choose to prevent or terminate a pregnancy falls within this affirmative power of Congress, in part, because-- (A) many women cross State lines to obtain abortions and many more would be forced to do so absent a constitutional right or Federal protection; (B) reproductive health clinics are commercial actors that regularly purchase medicine, medical equipment, and other necessary supplies from out-of-State suppliers; and (C) reproductive health clinics employ doctors, nurses, and other personnel who travel across State lines in order to provide reproductive health services to patients. SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) GOVERNMENT- The term `government' includes a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official (or other individual acting under color of law) of the United States, a State, or a subdivision of a State. (2) STATE- The term `State' means each of the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each territory or possession of the United States. (3) VIABILITY- The term `viability' means that stage of pregnancy when, in the best medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular medical facts of the case before the physician, there is a reasonable likelihood of the sustained survival of the fetus outside of the woman. SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROHIBITED. (a) Statement of Policy- It is the policy of the United States that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child, to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability, or to terminate a pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. (b) Prohibition of Interference- A government may not-- (1) deny or interfere with a woman's right to choose-- (A) to bear a child; (B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to viability; or (C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability where termination is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman; or (2) discriminate against the exercise of the rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information. (c) Civil Action- An individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may obtain appropriate relief (including relief against a government) in a civil action. SEC. 5. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which the provision is held to be unconstitutional, shall not be affected thereby. SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT. This Act applies to every Federal, State, and local statute, ordinance, regulation, administrative order, decision, policy, practice, or other action enacted, adopted, or implemented before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act. From jims at greens.org Sun Jul 15 19:12:00 2007 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:12:00 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Regional Picnic Next Weekend Message-ID: Reminder / Update Our regional picnic will be July 21 in San Mateo Central Park. A map is now available at http://cagreens.org/sclara/events/SanMateoPark.pdf (use this link to download the map since our 'events' page seems to be out of order) -- Jim From jims at greens.org Wed Jul 18 18:55:25 2007 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:55:25 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Regional Picnic This Weekend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Reminder / Update Our regional picnic will be July 21 in San Mateo Central Park. This is an opportunity to interact with Greens outside of our usual meeting environment. Festivities start at noon. A map is now available at http://cagreens.org/sclara/events/SanMateoPark.pdf (use this link to download the map since our 'events' page seems to be out of order) This looks to be a pot-luck format with everyone bringing their own. Also, if you have any appropriate games bring them along. Hope to see you all there! Jim From jims at greens.org Thu Jul 19 21:55:16 2007 From: jims at greens.org (Jim Stauffer) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:55:16 -0700 Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Fwd: [ProChoiceOrNoChoice] URGENT ALERT: Take Action - Protect Family Planning! In-Reply-To: <7308903.1184870108324.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <7308903.1184870108324.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Mona D'Astarte" To: SVChoice , "Pro Choice or No Choice" Subject: [ProChoiceOrNoChoice] URGENT ALERT: Take Action - Protect Family Planning! Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:35:07 -0700 Sometimes, Planned Parenthood is the only game in town in regards to family planning. Call your congressperson today before 5 p.m. to urge defeat of the Pence amendment. Complete information below. Thanks. Subject: URGENT ALERT: Take Action - Protect Family Planning! URGENT ALERT: Protect Reproductive Health Care for Low-Income Women First, a background: Each year, the nation's family planning program, known as "Title X" (Title Ten), helps over 5 million low-income women safely access reproductive health care such as birth control pills, sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, and cancer screenings each year. Planned Parenthood is a key provider of Title Ten services, and in many states Planned Parenthood is the only Title Ten provider - enabling millions of low-income women to access birth control at over 575 Planned Parenthood health centers. Yesterday evening, Indiana Congressman Pence introduced an amendment to the Labor-Health and Human Services spending bill, prohibiting Title Ten funds from being made available to Planned Parenthood health centers. Planned Parenthood strongly opposes the Pence Amendment because each year low-income women rely on Planned Parenthood health centers to access quality reproductive health care services including contraception, sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, and cancer screening. A vote is scheduled to happen today. Please take action by 5 p.m. Thursday, July 19th by placing a call to your congressional representative. If you do not have the opportunity to speak with office staff, please leave a voice mail with the message below. Your congressional member needs to hear that you support birth control access for low-income women. We have listed the phone numbers of selected congressional offices below, as well as a sample phone script. If you are unsure which representative is yours, find it here at vote-smart.org. PLEASE tell us you made the call by emailing publicaffairs at ppmarmonte.org with "I called" in the subject line. Phone Numbers: CALIFORNIA Congressman Dennis Cardoza 202.225.6131 Congressman Jim Costa 202.225.3341 Congresswoman Anna Eshoo 202.225.8104 Congressman Sam Farr 202.225.2861 Congressman Mike Honda 202.225.2631 Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren 202.225.3072 Congressman Jerry McNerney 202.225.1947 Congresswoman Doris Matsui 202.225.7163 NEVADA Congressman Dean Heller 202.225.6155 Sample Script: Hello! I am a constituent and I just heard about the "Pence Amendment" which is part of the "Labor HHS Bill." This amendment would discriminate against Planned Parenthood by blocking them from providing critical birth control services to millions of low-income women through the Title Ten family planning program. Please OPPOSE the Pence Amendment! The Pence Amendment would deny access to birth control for low-income women, and would lead to more unintended pregnancies. This would also deny access for breast and cervical cancer screening and testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. I know you realize the importance of preventative women's healthcare, and I wanted to alert you to this amendment to ensure that you vote against it. Thank you for supporting access to reproductive health care for low-income women, millions of women are counting on you! Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this. Tell-a-friend! If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Planned Parenthood Mar Monte. This message was sent to mdastarte at earthlink.net. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line). __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Visit Your Group SPONSORED LINKS Santa clara county Pro choice Pro-choice Yahoo! News Sexual Health Get important sex health news Yahoo! TV Staying in tonight? Check Daily Picks & see what to watch. Yoga Groups Exchange insights with members of the yoga community. . __,_._,___ From jamboi at yahoo.com Fri Jul 20 01:55:07 2007 From: jamboi at yahoo.com (JamBoi) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Our GPSCC/GPSM Regional Picnic This Saturday In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <137777.73794.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Note that the park is walking distance from the San Mateo Caltrain station. For a street map go to: http://tinyurl.com/2b288r I'm going (by train) and I hope many of the rest of us can join in. Last year's picnic was fun and I think this one will be also. :-) Green is Nurturing! Drew --- Jim Stauffer wrote: > > Reminder / Update > > Our regional picnic will be July 21 in San Mateo > Central Park. > This is an opportunity to interact with Greens > outside of our usual > meeting environment. > > Festivities start at noon. > > A map is now available at > http://cagreens.org/sclara/events/SanMateoPark.pdf > (use this link to download the map since our > 'events' page seems to be out > of order) > > This looks to be a pot-luck format with everyone > bringing their own. Also, > if you have any appropriate games bring them along. > > Hope to see you all there! > > Jim ___________________ JamBoi: Jammy, The Sacred Cow Slayer The Green Parties' #1 Blogger http://dailyJam.blogspot.com "To the brave belong all things" Celt's invading Etrusca reply to nervous Romans around 400BC "Live humbly, laugh often and love unconditionally" (anon) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 From jamboi at yahoo.com Mon Jul 23 22:35:11 2007 From: jamboi at yahoo.com (JamBoi) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Sosfbay-news] Agenda County Council Meeting Tuesday evening 7pm Sunnyvale Message-ID: <250109.158.qm@web52210.mail.re2.yahoo.com> When: 7P, Tuesday July 24th, 2007 Where: @ Palace Cafe, 139 S. Murphy St., Sunnyvale Preliminary Agenda: 1) Bylaw for Regional Rep election method 2) Tapestry in Talent tabling prep a) gather tablers well in advance as well as tabling materials. b) Ask several people to make a small number of phone calls. 3) September or October candidate training event. 4) Establish county party goals, including an outline of approach If more time is needed for #4 Jim Doyle has offered to continue that conversation at his house on next Sunday mid to late afternoon. Below is the actual version of the bylaw amendment I presented at the 7/5/07 GPSCC General County meeting. Jim Stauffer mentioned he'd like to offer some edits so I imagine we'll have his input soon. Green is Logarithmic! Drew ---------- ARTICLE 9 REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES, ALTERNATES 9.1 Representation on the statewide coordinating committee is on a regional basis. Regional representatives and alternates to the statewide coordinating committee are elected biannually for a nominal two year term that expires at the end of the term at which time the seat will remain open until the counties have agreed on new representatives. Ideally the counties' agreement will be in place before the expiration of the previous term(s). The election will be announced on email lists at least 15 days in advance and the announcement will be an agenda item. 9.2 Declaring Candidacy Candidates shall announce their availability on the email lists of the county councils of the region prior to the administrative meeting at which a vacancy or replacement is considered. "None of the Above" shall be considered an acceptable candidate. The term 'administrative meeting' in these bylaws shall be understood include but be limited only to General County, or County Council meetings. 9.3 Candidate Presentations The administrative meeting will have agenda items for the candidates to present themselves, to describe their goals, and to answer questions. 9.4 Decision Approval of a representative will be a decision item at the administrative meeting following the one at which the candidates made their presentations. 9.5 Regional Coordination A candidate must be approved by the several counties of the region. If different candidates are approved by the various counties the decision(s) shall be retaken by the counties until agreement between the counties is reached. 9.6 Regional Balance It shall be an objective to have the regional representative and the first alternate regional representative be from different counties wherever possible. 9.7 Replacement A regional representative or an alternate regional representative may be replaced using the same process for selecting a regional representative or an alternate regional representative. 9.8 Effective Date This amendment, Article 9 of the by-laws shall take effect on its date of passage, {ed. note: date of passage to be inserted here upon passage}. 9.9 Expiration of Article 9 The process for the selection of regional representatives to the statewide coordinating committee shall lapse whenever regions are redefined. ___________________ JamBoi: Jammy, The Sacred Cow Slayer The Green Parties' #1 Blogger http://dailyJam.blogspot.com "To the brave belong all things" Celt's invading Etrusca reply to nervous Romans around 400BC "Live humbly, laugh often and love unconditionally" (anon) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php