[Sosfbay-discuss] Agenda Packet Follow-up
Jim Stauffer
jims at greens.org
Wed Jun 21 20:40:20 PDT 2006
> WB4D23 at aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/20/06 8:16:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> jims at greens.org writes:
>
> Only delegates, and not alternates, accredit-register. If
> a county is short a delegate, then an alternate converts to
> a delegate
> and registers.
>
> So the language referring only to delegates is appropriate.
>
> I'm fine with this explanation. It should be part of the presentation
> at the plenary. Warner
Yeah, except this proposal is on the consent calendar so there's no
presentation. What are the odds this will pass?
--
Jim
More information about the sosfbay-discuss
mailing list