[Sosfbay-discuss] Agenda Packet Follow-up

Jim Stauffer jims at greens.org
Wed Jun 21 20:40:20 PDT 2006



> WB4D23 at aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 6/20/06 8:16:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> jims at greens.org writes:
> 
>      Only delegates, and not alternates, accredit-register. If
>      a county is short a delegate, then an alternate converts to
>      a delegate
>      and registers.
> 
>      So the language referring only to delegates is appropriate.
> 
> I'm fine with this explanation.  It should be part of the presentation
> at the plenary.  Warner


Yeah, except this proposal is on the consent calendar so there's no
presentation. What are the odds this will pass?

-- 
Jim




More information about the sosfbay-discuss mailing list