[Sosfbay-discuss] [SVIC] Re: Draft - GP RELEASE Global warming: Bush is doing to world what he did to New Orleans

JamBoi jamboi at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 5 18:11:15 PST 2007


Sorry, no these ARE serious articles of impeachment.  It is only
Warner's *opinion* that they are 'merely' polemics and on that point it
is completely evident that Warner is *entirely confused*. (Love ya
Warner but you're absolutely flat wrong on this one).

If we were to try to say that eliminating American Democracy through
coup (never elected, not once - stole 2000 AND 2004), ethnic cleansing
and the annihilation of an entire American city (Katrina) threatening
the destruction of all humankind (Global Warming) are somehow not
treasonous, high crimes and misdemeanors (not just against America, but
humanity itself) are for some reason not grounds for impeachment of
Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, and Gonzales (among others) than may God
damn America, and God damn the joke of a facade that is now
masquerading for democracy in America!!!  (That from me a progressive
evangelical Christian!!!, and that is NOT using God's name in vain!!!)
Our children, our children's children (if we survive that long) all
around the world and the very planet itself would eternally curse OUR
(American) names if we fail to act against these criminals and call a
spade a spade.

If y'all please bother to again re-read Gerry's resolution you'll see
that we have two separate lists.  One of impeachees and one of their
impeachable offenses.  Coups, city annihilation, and creating a humanly
uninhabitable planet do indeed fit into our list of impeachable
offenses.

No way I will I ever budge on this issue.  All our committee needs to
work out the precise wording.

Impeach the bastard-unpresident NOW!

Drew

--- "Cameron L. Spitzer" <cls at truffula.sj.ca.us> wrote:

> 
> Warner pointed out that these press releases and petitions
> are intended as polemics, not as actual suggestions for
> articles of impeachment.  It would be nice if we could
> be clear on that distinction.
> 
> They got Al Capone for tax evasion.  Everybody knew he'd
> done a lot of other stuff, but the case for tax evasion
> was easiest to prove and got him locked up.  That doesn't
> mean the government was absolving him of all that other stuff.
> 
> Was GWB personally involved in the conspiracy to steal
> the 2000 election?  Or was it handled for him by smarter,
> harder working people?  I don't know, and I don't see how
> it advances our case to make that particular charge.
> But it's fine in a polemic where you're just listing all
> the reasons you want him removed.  Throw in "says God
> speaks to him."  It's hardly a high crime, but it's
> a compelling reason to get him out of there.
> 
> 
> Cameron


___________________

JamBoi
Jammy The Sacred Cow Slayer

"Live humbly, laugh often and love unconditionally" (anon)
http://dailyJam.blogspot.com


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php



More information about the sosfbay-discuss mailing list