[Sosfbay-discuss] Fwd: Save the Grizzly Bear - Help Re-list Them as Endangered Species
Wes Rolley
wrolley at charter.net
Mon May 21 22:01:42 PDT 2007
JamBoi wrote:
Drew forwarded to us a action alert on the Grizzly Bear.(bottom of this
note). While it is a good idea to do something of this sort, it is
really helpful to understand the total picture of what went on at the
Department of the Interior, especially with those who Jack Abramoff
carefully placed in key positions. Even when ex-Secretary of the
Interior, Gail Norton, had her aide, Italia Federici, set up an
astro-turf organization called Council of Republicans for Environmental
Advocacy, it was funded by Federici.
You are still seeing the after effects of the Norton years as
Representatives George Miller and Nick Rahall are going after the
recently resigned DoI official, Julie MacDonald. MacDonald was one who
always put politics and personal gain ahead of science in the
administration of the ESA and required critical habitat. One of her very
nice touches was to lift the restrictions on the California splittail
fish. Those restrictions affected the value and use of an 80 acres farm
that she owned near Dixon in the Yolo Bypass.
According the most recent California Dept of Fish and Game, the
population of the splittail in the delta has crashed, though not quite
to the same extent as the delta smelt.
It all reeks and it won't be fixed until we start caring about the
environment and demanding that our legislators do also.
Here is the detail from Miller and Rahall.
*Congressman George Miller, California's 7th District*
*Monday, May 21, 2007
Danny Weiss, 202-225-2095
Miller and Rahall Launch Inquiry into New Conflict of Interest at
Interior Department
Senior lawmakers press Bush Administration on manipulation of science in
a California endangered species decision
*WASHINGTON, DC - Two senior House Democrats launched an inquiry today
into reports that a Bush Administration political appointee may have
improperly removed a California fish from a list of threatened species
in order to protect her own financial interests.
According to an investigative report published Sunday by the Contra
Costa Times, Julie MacDonald, who resigned this month as Interior
Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish, Wildlife and Parks, was
actively involved in removing the Sacramento Splittail fish from the
federal threatened and endangered species list at the same time that she
was profiting from her ownership of an 80-acre farm in Dixon, CA that
lies within the habitat area of the threatened fish.
MacDonald's financial disclosure statement shows that she earns as much
as $1 million per year from her ownership of the 80-acre active farm.
Federal law bars federal employees from participating in decisions on
matters in which they have a personal financial interest.
The Sacramento Splittail, a small fish found only in California's
Central Valley, depends on floodplain habitat and has been described by
the Fish and Wildlife Service as facing "potential threats from habitat
loss."
Today, Rep. George Miller (D-CA) and Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV), chairman
of the Natural Resources Committee, wrote to Interior Secretary
Kempthorne requesting a full accounting of MacDonald's role in the
Sacramento Splittail decision, an explanation of her apparent conflict
of interest, and a thorough review of the science underlying the
decision to remove the Sacramento Splittail from the threatened species
list.
"It looks like another Bush Administration official was protecting her
own bottom line instead of protecting the public interest," said Miller,
a senior member and former chairman of the Natural Resources Committee
and a long-time proponent of the Endangered Species Act and Bay-Delta
fish and wildlife issues. "We are going to fully investigate this matter
and determine whether public policy was improperly altered because of
personal conflicts of interest.
"This news raises serious questions about the integrity of the Interior
Department and its policy decisions," Miller added. "The Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta has enough problems without political appointees at
scientific agencies cooking the books. Who thought it was acceptable for
a Deputy Assistant Secretary to change a major policy decision to exempt
her own million-dollar enterprise from the Endangered Species Act even
though federal law prohibits such conflicts?"
Rahall, who has served on the Natural Resources Committee since 1976 and
became its chairman in January, called on the Department to fully
explain what happened.
"Time and again, this Administration has demonstrated a complete
disregard for scientists and their work," Rahall said. "Political
appointees at the Interior Department have been allowed to overrule
biologists and to work more closely with special interests than with
their own staff. The Interior Department must explain its deputy
assistant secretary's actions in this very troubling case, which is
apparently the latest in a long line of efforts to undercut species
recovery."
The letter from Miller and Rahall comes just two weeks after a May 9
Committee hearing at which Deputy Interior Secretary Lynn Scarlett was
questioned about recent controversies in the implementation of the
Endangered Species Act. Her prepared testimony did not mention a report
by the Department's Inspector General on an investigation into
MacDonald, nor did her testimony indicate awareness of the serious
consequences of MacDonald's actions. In the course of the hearing,
Scarlett affirmed that "where there is scientific manipulation, we want
to correct that," but no specifics were provided.
MacDonald resigned from the Interior Department just one week before
Scarlett testified.
The Endangered Species Act established a policy of protecting and
recovering species in decline and their habitats. Fish, wildlife, and
plants listed as "endangered" are in danger of extinction and the
federal government is required to take action to recover them. Species
are listed as "threatened" if it is determined that they may soon become
endangered. Other threatened species in the Bay-Delta region include the
green sturgeon and the delta smelt.
The full text of the letter to The Hon. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of
the Interior, is below.
May 21, 2007
The Honorable Dirk Kempthorne
Secretary
Department of the Interior
1849 C Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20240
Dear Secretary Kempthorne:
We are writing to reiterate the request we made at the House Natural
Resources Committee's hearing on May 9, 2007, and subsequently in
writing by Chairman Nick J. Rahall, II, for a complete accounting of how
the Department of the Interior is responding to the Inspector General's
investigation of Julie MacDonald. Yesterday's newspaper report in the
Contra Costa Times on Julie MacDonald and her role in the decision to
remove the Sacramento Splittail from the list of threatened species
demands an immediate response from the Department. This new information
adds very serious charges to her record.
The Contra Costa Times reports ("Decision on splittail raises
suspicions") that the Fish and Wildlife Service, at MacDonald's
direction, may have improperly ignored scientific evidence when deciding
to eliminate the Sacramento Splittail's threatened species designation,
and that MacDonald, a non-scientist, was heavily involved in the
decision. By statute, as you know, listing and de-listing decisions can
only be made on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data
available.
More egregious still, the article demonstrates that MacDonald was
profiting significantly from agricultural property in Sacramento
Splittail habitat. It is our understanding that this is the first and
only time that a fish species has been removed from the list of
threatened species for reasons other than extinction. It is unacceptable
that such an unprecedented policy decision may have been made because a
Deputy Assistant Secretary had a direct and substantial personal
financial interest.
In light of this highly troubling new report, please provide us with a
full accounting of former Deputy Assistant Secretary MacDonald's role
from 2002-2004 in the Sacramento Splittail decision, including but not
limited to:
1 Details of her contacts with staff in the California and Nevada
Operations Office and elsewhere within the Department regarding the
Sacramento Splittail;
1 A complete accounting of the changes made by Julie MacDonald, and
others, to the Sacramento Splittail listing documents after they were
sent to Washington; and
1 Communications regarding the Sacramento Splittail, if any, between
MacDonald and interests outside the Department, including the San Luis &
Delta-Mendota Water Authority, the State Water Contractors, or the
California Farm Bureau.
In addition, please provide us with a full account of former Deputy
Assistant Secretary MacDonald's apparent conflict of interest, including
but not limited to:
1 Details of her participation in decisions affecting the management of
fish and wildlife species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region,
especially those on or near her property;
1 A description of Interior Department decisions, if any, from which she
recused herself based on a conflict of interest, or the appearance of a
conflict;
1 A list of officials at the Department who were aware that she
continued to own and profit from agricultural property in California
while serving as Deputy Assistant Secretary; and
1 All advice or ethics opinions provided to her by the Department
regarding these matters.
In order to determine the Interior Department's role in overseeing
MacDonald's activities, please provide a description of all formal or
informal action taken by the Department in response to her 2004 decision
to leak documents to the California Farm Bureau's lobbyist in an
apparent attempt to undermine a scientific decision regarding the
threatened Delta smelt.
Finally, in order to address the significant policy implications of
MacDonald's actions, we request that you direct the Fish and Wildlife
Service to re-evaluate whether its decision to de-list the Sacramento
Splittail was based solely upon the best available scientific and
commercial data, as required by law, and to report these findings to the
Congress. In addition, please provide us with the results of each of the
three statistical methods employed by the Fish and Wildlife Service to
determine the health of the Sacramento Splittail's population.
Endangered species decisions must be based on accurate and reliable
scientific analysis, not the conflict of interest of a senior
departmental official. This is especially true for significant and
sensitive decisions such as this one, which could affect the management
of California's Bay-Delta and water operations.
We appreciate your prompt attention to our request. Please contact Ben
Miller with Rep. George Miller's staff at (202) 225-2095, or Lori Sonken
with the Natural Resources Committee staff at (202) 225-6065, with any
questions.
Sincerely,
_______________________ _______________________
GEORGE MILLER NICK J. RAHALL, II
Member of Congress Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources
>
>> Date: 21 May 2007 06:35:44 -0700
>> Subject: Save the Grizzly Bear - Help Re-list Them
>> as Endangered Species
>> From: "Michael L., Care2 Action Alerts"
>> <actionalerts at care2.com>
>>
> ---------------------------------
> :: You can make a difference TODAY, on Care2 ::
>
> Grizzly Bear numbers are declining, yet they are not
> on the endangered species list.
>
> Tell the Secretary of the Interior to re-list grizzly
> bears today!
>
--
I have been impressed with the urgency of doing.
Knowing is not enough; we must apply.
Being willing is not enough;
We must do. –Leonardo DaVinci
Wesley C. Rolley
17211 Quail Court
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
(408)778-3024 - http://cagreening.blogspot.com
More information about the sosfbay-discuss
mailing list