[Sosfbay-discuss] Fw: Stein's Law - hitting the wall

[Caroline Yacoub]

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: shane que hee <squehee at ucla.edu>
Sent: Tue, February 2, 2010 1:00:20 PM
Subject: Stein's Law - hitting the wall


Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:24:21 -0800
>From: Don McCanne <don at mccanne.org>
>Subject: qotd: Stein's Law - hitting the wall
>
>Slate
>May 16, 1997
>Herb Stein's Unfamiliar Quotations
>By Herbert Stein
>
>If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.
>--Stein's Law, first pronounced in the 1980s
>
>This proposition, arising first in a discussion of the balance-of-payments deficit, is a response to those who think that if something cannot go on forever, steps must be taken to stop it--even to stop it at once.
>
>http://www.slate.com/id/2561/ 
>
>And...
>
>The New York Times
>February 1, 2010
>Huge Deficits May Alter U.S. Politics and Global Power
>By David E. Sanger
>
>... as Prof. James K. Galbraith of the University of Texas puts it, “Forecasts 10 years out have no credibility.”
>
>Simply projecting that health care costs will rise unabated is dangerous business.
>
>His greatest hope, Mr. Galbraith said, was Stein’s law, named for Herbert Stein, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Presidents Richard M. Nixon and Gerald R. Ford.
>
>Stein’s law has been recited in many different versions. But all have a common theme: If a trend cannot continue, it will stop.
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/us/politics/02deficit.html?hp
>
>And...
>
>Congressional Budget Office
>November 2007
>The Long-Term Outlook for Health Care Spending
>
>Projections of Health Spending
>
>Over the past 30 years, total national spending on health care has more than doubled as a share of GDP. Under the assumptions described (in this CBO report), according to CBO’s projections, that share will double again by 2035, to 31 percent of GDP. Thereafter, health care costs continue to account for a steadily growing share of GDP, reaching 41 percent by 2060 and 49 percent by the end of the 75-year projection period.
>
>http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/Intro.shtml
>Graph: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/Figure4.gif
>
>And...
>
>GOP House Issues Conference
>January 29, 2010
>
>Congressman Paul Ryan (speaking to President Obama):  ... Medicare, as you know, is a $38 trillion unfunded liability...
>
>http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-gop-house-issues-conference 
>
>
>Comment:  At over $2.5 trillion (almost 18 percent of our GDP), the level of health care spending in the United States this year is almost intolerable. Yet we hear predictions that health care will represent half of our GDP by 2082, and that Medicare will accumulate a deficit of $38 trillion.
>
>Thank goodness for Stein's Law. We will never see these numbers for the simple reason that this rate of increase cannot go on forever. It will stop once it hits the wall.
>
>Herbert Stein, being from the Chicago School of Economics (think Milton Friedman), did not believe that steps must be taken to intervene since the problem would take care of itself. Although that is true, the problem with this sterile, amoral view, common amongst those of the Chicago School, is that it ignores the consequences of a spontaneous economic process devoid of the input from the heart and soul of beneficent public stewards.
>
>To be clear, in the economics of health care, Stein's Law does not represent one point in the expansion of health care spending at which everything stops and the health care system collapses. Nor does it represent a single point at which expansion stops and spending becomes static. Rather it represents a multitude of various walls for various payers, including individuals, employers and the various levels of government, each of which has its own wall as a barrier represented by Stein's Law.
>
>In our fragmented system of financing health care, Stein's Law is already in play. Tens of millions are no longer able to afford health insurance. Tens of millions more are no longer able to afford adequate insurance products and must face the financial hardships of the underinsurance products that have been the response of competing insurers in our market economy in health care. The rate of employer-sponsored coverage has been declining because too many businesses, especially small businesses, have already hit the wall. Many states are struggling with the need to reduce Medicaid payments to providers in order to try to include more under the umbrella, while watching the safety-net of providers crumble from protracted financial losses. Even the federal government is struggling to find ways to fill the void in the face of massive budget deficits.
>
>With Stein's Law, we can predict that the rate of spending increases will very soon slow down, but under our current financing system, that will inevitably result in more financial hardship, suffering, and even death as health care access becomes ever less affordable.
>
>Suppose the Senate bill passes, along with the reconciliation tweaks, then what will happen? Since our beneficent stewards in Congress neglected their duties, failing to adopt policies that would slow the growth in health care spending, health care costs will continue to test Stein's Law.
>
>Some of the multitude of walls will move, but none of them will go away. The states will see their walls move further out with the infusion of Medicaid funds. The federal government will see its wall move closer, signaled by the shrill cacophony of the budget hawks. Employers will not see their wall move much, but they will continue to barrel forward, eventually hitting it one by one.
>
>But what about our hard-working, middle-income Americans? The wall will be moved much closer. For several reasons, mostly related to costs, there will be an attrition of employer-sponsored plans. Since the subsidies to purchase private plans will be less than the employer contributions, fewer individuals and families will be able to afford the plans. To slow the rise in premiums, more benefits will be stripped out. The Obama administration would accelerate this deterioration in benefits by imposing an excise tax on the plans as "the most effective way to control costs." The Obama/Orszag policy of controlling costs by erecting financial barriers to necessary health care is a very sick policy indeed. The legislation before Congress adds afterburners to middle-income Americans only accelerating their trip to Stein's impenetrable wall.
>
>When our economic models have immoral consequences, we should abandon the amoral models of the Chicago School, and move to normative economics. It is not a sin for an economist to have a heart.
>
>Under a single payer national health program - an improved and expanded Medicare for all - Stein's wall will still be there. But instead of letting the entire system crash into the wall, our own beneficent public stewards - if we elect ones with a heart - will be there to make sure that everyone receives the care that they need. The resources that we use may take us up to the wall, but we won't be crashing into it.
>
>Every other industrialized nation has an impenetrable Stein wall, but by using normative economics, they don't sacrifice their citizens by slamming them into that wall.
>
>_
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20100202/6408cee9/attachment.html>