[GPSCC-chat] Fw: Amendment Name/Feedback

Drew rainbeaufriend at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 8 07:51:51 PST 2011


John, that's 180 degrees off. Show me any country besides Amerikkka that even HAS "inalienable rights" for corporate "persons". The UK and the EU countries, the Commonwealth countries, Russia, Japan, China -NONE have "inalienable " rights granted to artificial entities. They are granted limited "rights" in other countries but nowhere else are they considered "inalienable rights" - that is to say above the ability of government to regulate. Why would it be important for corporations to have inherent nonnegotiable, nonlegislatable, nonstatutory rights (ie. inalienable rights)?

Inalienable rights are vital for humans and should be in place for the planet, by why praytell for corporations? Why should they be exempted from regulation and legislation in the manner in which you are advocating? If it were something needed (and I I'm not seeing it) then corporations should have their own bill of rights. And establishing the principle that micro artificial entities should be treated equally as mega corporations, does NOT require inalienable rights. Legislation will do nicely. Sorry John, just not feeling you on this one.

Inalienable human rights for humans, not corporations! 

http://JillStein.org


Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20111208/c604da4c/attachment.html>


More information about the sosfbay-discuss mailing list