[GPSCC-chat] Agenda GPSCC Meeting - Thursday July 25 - Draft #1/Concerns

[WB4D23 at aol.com]

I think any one of these issues could involve a 20 minute  discussion or 
longer...  I suggest that Spencer choose one of these topics  for the next 
meeting and we go through them one at a time each month.  I do  not see any 
special urgency for a GPSCC "supports" statement for any of them,  since there 
is no action provision involved.  Also, again, I think  that any 
presentation of such proposals should include at least a text summary  of what is being 
requested to be endorsed and information about the current  status (if any) 
of applicable GPUS and GPCA platform items.   Warner
 
 
In a message dated 7/18/2013 9:39:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
gerrygras at earthlink.net writes:

8:20 (20  min) - Electoral Reform Proposal  (Spencer?)
"“The Green Party of  Santa Clara County supports the following 
initiatives for electoral  reform:  Overturning Citizens United, 
citizen-funded election and  news, the US and California Disclose Acts, 
the National Popular Vote  Interstate Compact (that requires 
participating states to commit all their  electoral votes to the 
candidate who wins the popular vote), and  Instant-runoff voting (as 
outlined in the Wikipedia article on "Electoral  reform in the United 
States").  The Green Party of Santa Clara County  will collaborate with 
all other organizations working to pass these issues  including getting 
supporting resolutions passed at local and state levels  as appropriate. 
This includes in particular Move to Amend and  Rootstrikers.”


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20130721/4c370bc4/attachment.html>