[GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?

[Spencer Graves]

       Could I hear from others?  In general, I support Move to Amend, 
though I've been negatively impressed with their apparent reticence to 
working in coalition with others.  Richard Hobbs' MTA group is pushing 
an initiative, which I find acceptable and appropriate but not exciting 
or inspired.  Both his signature collection efforts and the work of the 
California Clean Money campaign are time sensitive right now. I think 
there is enough synergy between MTA and CA Clean that I think it would 
be reasonable to have them both come together.  And asking Richard to 
share a podium with Nancy Neff might encourage him to be more open to 
coalitions.


       If we ask only Nancy Neff, should we give her a half hour or an 
hour, and should that time begin at 7 or 7:30 PM?


       Thanks,
       Spencer


On 2/15/2014 7:36 PM, perrysandy at aol.com wrote:
> I believe we should accept Nancy Neff. I do not believe we should have 
> Richard at the same meeting, perhaps at the following meeting.
> Sandy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>
> To: GPSCC <sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org>
> Sent: Sat, Feb 15, 2014 6:03 pm
> Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
>
> Hello, All:
>
>
>       We have an offer of a speaker for Feb. 27;  see below.
>
>
>       Shall we accept?  What about also asking others like Richard Hobbs?
>
>
>       Thanks,
>       Spencer
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: SB 27 v. 52?
> Date: 	Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:06:10 -0800
> From: 	Nancy Neff <nrneff at sonic.net>
> Reply-To: 	nancy at neffs.net
> To: 	Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org>
> CC: 	California Clean Money Campaign <newsletter at caclean.org>
>
>
>
> Hi Spencer,
>
> SB 27 and SB 52 work together.  California Clean Money Campaign is 
> actively pushing both of them, and Common Cause is a key endorser and 
> partner with us on SB 52.
>
> In a nutshell, SB 27 contains follow-the-money language to make 
> non-profits have to disclose the original donors if more than $50,000 
> is spent on political ads.  That information goes onto the Secretary 
> of State website. Then, SB 52 causes the top 3 donors to be clearly 
> presented on the ads themselves.
>
> I don't know of a side-by-side comparison, but you could look at the 
> Legislative Analyst Office summaries: 
> http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml
>
> I could attend your meeting on Feb. 27 and either give a brief 
> presentation of the two bills or just be available to answer 
> questions.  A few years ago I gave your group a presentation on the 
> earlier version of the CA DISCLOSE Act, AB 1648.
>
> Nancy
>
> --
> Nancy Neff
> Regional Volunteer Coordinator
> California Clean Money Campaign
> (650) 858-2436
> www.CAdisclose.org <http://www.caclean.org/>
> *Support SB 52, the/California DISCLOSE Act/, to show who/really/pays 
> for political ads!*
>
> *Become a regular or monthly member today to help end the dominance of 
> Big Money in politics:
> *www.CAdisclose.org/join <http://www.yesfairelections.org/join>
>
>
> On 2/15/2014 12:33 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
>>       What are the differences between SB 27 and 52?
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
> -- 
> Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
> President and Chief Technology Officer
> Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
> 751 Emerson Ct.
> San José, CA 95126
> ph:  408-655-4567
> web:www.structuremonitoring.com
> _______________________________________________
> sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org  <mailto:sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org>
> http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss


-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567
web:  www.structuremonitoring.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20140215/348a48b9/attachment.html>