[GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
John Thielking
pagesincolor at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 16 07:33:44 PST 2014
The more the merrier I say. Let them both speak at our next meeting.
John Thielking
________________________________
From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>
To: perrysandy at aol.com; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
Could I hear from others? In general, I support Move to Amend, though I've been negatively impressed with their apparent reticence to working in coalition with others. Richard Hobbs' MTA group is pushing an initiative, which I find acceptable and appropriate but not exciting or inspired. Both his signature collection efforts and the work of the California Clean Money campaign are time sensitive right now. I think there is enough synergy between MTA and CA Clean that I think it would be reasonable to have them both come together. And asking Richard to share a podium with Nancy Neff might encourage him to be more open to coalitions.
If we ask only Nancy Neff, should we give her a half hour or
an hour, and should that time begin at 7 or 7:30 PM?
Thanks,
Spencer
On 2/15/2014 7:36 PM, perrysandy at aol.com wrote:
I believe we should accept Nancy Neff. I do not believe we should have Richard at the same meeting, perhaps at the following meeting.
>
>
>Sandy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>
>To: GPSCC <sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org>
>Sent: Sat, Feb 15, 2014 6:03 pm
>Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
>
>
>Hello, All:
>
>
> We have an offer of a speaker for Feb. 27; see
below.
>
>
> Shall we accept? What about also asking others like
Richard Hobbs?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
>
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
>Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:06:10 -0800
>From: Nancy Neff <nrneff at sonic.net>
>Reply-To: nancy at neffs.net
>To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org>
>CC: California Clean Money Campaign <newsletter at caclean.org>
>
>Hi Spencer,
>
>SB 27 and SB 52 work together. California Clean Money
Campaign is actively pushing both of them, and Common
Cause is a key endorser and partner with us on SB 52.
>
>In a nutshell, SB 27 contains follow-the-money language
to make non-profits have to disclose the original donors
if more than $50,000 is spent on political ads. That
information goes onto the Secretary of State website.
Then, SB 52 causes the top 3 donors to be clearly
presented on the ads themselves.
>
>I don't know of a side-by-side comparison, but you could
look at the Legislative Analyst Office summaries: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml
>
>I could attend your meeting on Feb. 27 and either give a
brief presentation of the two bills or just be available
to answer questions. A few years ago I gave your group
a presentation on the earlier version of the CA DISCLOSE
Act, AB 1648.
>
>Nancy
>
>--
>Nancy Neff
>Regional Volunteer Coordinator
>California Clean Money Campaign
>(650) 858-2436
>www.CAdisclose.org
>Support SB 52, the California DISCLOSE Act, to show who really pays for political ads!
>
>Become a regular or monthly member today to help end the dominance of Big Money in politics:
>www.CAdisclose.org/join
>
>
>
>On 2/15/2014 12:33 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
>
> What are the differences between SB 27 and 52?
>>
>
><snip>
>
>
>
>--
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph: 408-655-4567
web: www.structuremonitoring.com
>_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
--
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph: 408-655-4567
web: www.structuremonitoring.com
_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list
sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20140216/68c99e52/attachment.html>
More information about the sosfbay-discuss
mailing list