[GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?

Caroline Yacoub carolineyacoub at att.net
Sun Feb 16 21:22:33 PST 2014


I think someone should talk to both of them and ask them if they want to share the time or if they would like separate dates.
Caroline
 

________________________________
 From: John Thielking <pagesincolor at yahoo.com>
To: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>; "perrysandy at aol.com" <perrysandy at aol.com>; "sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org" <sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org> 
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
  
 
The more the merrier I say. Let them both speak at our next meeting.John Thielking
 

________________________________
 From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>
To: perrysandy at aol.com; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org 
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?
  
      Could I hear from others?  In general, I support Move to Amend, though I've been negatively impressed with their apparent reticence to working in coalition with others.  Richard Hobbs' MTA group is pushing an initiative, which I find acceptable and appropriate but not exciting or inspired.  Both his signature collection efforts and the work of the California Clean Money campaign are time sensitive right now.  I think there is enough synergy between MTA and CA Clean that I think it would be reasonable to have them both come together.  And asking Richard to share a podium with Nancy Neff might encourage him to be more open to coalitions.           If we ask only Nancy Neff, should we give her a half hour or an hour, and should that time begin at 7 or 7:30 PM?           Thanks,        Spencer    On 2/15/2014 7:36 PM, perrysandy at aol.com wrote:  
I believe we should accept Nancy Neff. I do not believe we should have Richard at the same meeting, perhaps at the following meeting. 
>
>
>Sandy 
>-----Original Message----- From: Spencer Graves mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com To: GPSCC mailto:sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org Sent: Sat, Feb 15, 2014 6:03 pm Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Fwd: Re: SB 27 v. 52?  
>Hello, All:           We have an offer of a speaker for Feb. 27;  see below.           Shall we accept?  What about also asking others like Richard Hobbs?           Thanks,        Spencer  
>  -------- Original Message -------- 
>Subject: Re: SB 27 v. 52? 
>Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:06:10 -0800 
>From: Nancy Neff mailto:nrneff at sonic.net 
>Reply-To: nancy at neffs.net 
>To: Spencer Graves mailto:spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org 
>CC: California Clean Money Campaign mailto:newsletter at caclean.org    Hi Spencer,  SB 27 and SB 52 work together.  California Clean Money Campaign is actively pushing both of them, and Common Cause is a key endorser and partner with us on SB 52.  In a nutshell, SB 27 contains follow-the-money language to make non-profits have to disclose the original donors if more than $50,000 is spent on political ads.  That information goes onto the Secretary of State website.  Then, SB 52 causes the top 3 donors to be clearly presented on the ads themselves.  I don't know of a side-by-side comparison, but you could look at the Legislative Analyst Office summaries:  http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml  I could attend your meeting on Feb. 27 and either give a brief presentation of the two bills or just be available to answer questions.  A few years ago I gave your group a presentation on the earlier version of the CA DISCLOSE Act, AB
 1648.  Nancy  --  Nancy Neff Regional Volunteer Coordinator California Clean Money Campaign (650) 858-2436 http://www.caclean.org/ Support SB 52, the California DISCLOSE Act, to show who really pays for political ads!   Become a regular or monthly member today to help end the dominance of Big Money in politics:
>http://www.yesfairelections.org/join   
>On 2/15/2014 12:33 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:  
>      What are the differences between SB 27 and 52?      <snip>    
>-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567
web: http://www.structuremonitoring.com/    
>_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss       
-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567
web: http://www.structuremonitoring.com/  
_______________________________________________sosfbay-discuss mailing listsosfbay-discuss at cagreens.orghttp://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss   _______________________________________________sosfbay-discuss mailing listsosfbay-discuss at cagreens.orghttp://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20140216/b85b6d61/attachment.html>


More information about the sosfbay-discuss mailing list