[GPSCC-chat] Final Agenda Anyone? Legal Opinion About DR's Behavior: Was Registrar Of Voters S...

[John Thielking]

That's fine.  Pete would still like a chance to speak about Diane Ritchie at our meeting tonight. She was his attorney a few years ago and did a good job for him. I still don't see a final agenda being circulated. So far we have the additional items of DR and Fred and his wife's death (commemorative certificate for Fred proposed by Tian) to discuss. Thanks.

John Thielking




________________________________
 From: "WB4D23 at aol.com" <WB4D23 at aol.com>
To: spencer.graves at structuremonitoring.com; pagesincolor at yahoo.com; perrysandy at aol.com; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Legal Opinion About DR's Behavior: Was Registrar Of Voters S...
 


February 27, 2014
 
I have previously written and spoken my opinions about GPSCC 
endorsements.  I don't think we should be endorsing local candidates unless 
they request it and give us the courtesy of attending a meeting or at least 
sending someone from their campaign.
 
I don't really thing the GPSCC needs to be endorsing judicial 
candidates.  If GPSCC members want to get into evaluating candidates, I 
suggest we follow past practice of delegating 
a committee to put together an information comparison 
of  candidate positions with a comment of either reccomended, 
not recommended, or no recommendation.
 
Warner
 
In a message dated 2/27/2014 3:29:33 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
spencer.graves at structuremonitoring.com writes:

>      I would oppose the Green Party 
  of Santa Clara County taking a position on Ritchie without first consulting 
  several attorneys for their views on her and on the Merc story / stories about 
  her.  
>
>
>      We could start by 
  consulting Warner.  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20140227/3f3c7292/attachment.html>