[GPSCC-chat] Why We Should Not Worry About The Latest "WMDs in Iraq" Stories

[eden]

On 14-07-10 08:18, John Thielking wrote:
> The following text would not post to the article on rt.com
> <http://rt.com> that talked about the uranium being stolen in Iraq
> because the software thought it contained "offensive language". So
> here it is uncensored:
>
> Considering that you can buy research grade uranium ore on Amazon.com,
> I wouldn't worry about this story. Since when did RT start jumping on
> the "there are WMDs in Iraq" bandwagon? I thought that path was proven
> to be bogus in 2003. The chemical weapons in Iraq story is also
> sourced from Reuters, probably USA planted propaganda used to justify
> bombing Iraq yet again. Fool me once, ok, but fool me twice? Come on
> RT, get it together.

    I agree with your conclusion, but i tried to find uranium on Amazon
and failed. Are you referring to something that i'm not aware of?

--
eden
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20140710/75e0eadf/attachment.html>