[GPSCC-chat] FW: Risks to Internet?

Thu Oct 3 11:30:20 PDT 2013

Dear community, be aware that the link Brian sent that followed

Here's a picture of one of the partially "evaporated" steel girders:

did something to my wife's MacBook Pro.  Virus or spyware or something,
wedged Firefox dead.   I feel so dirtied.  Time to wipe the hard-drive and
load a free linux operating system.

I suggest you all don't click on Brian's link...

Roy III

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Brian Good <snug.bug at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I remember now the tenth essential mystery of Ground Zero that the
> government
> investigation dodged by declining to analyze the towers' collapses.
>
> I made a somewhat artificial distinction between mystery #9, presence of
> molten or melted steel in the rubble pile; and mystery #10, presence of
> partially
> "vaporized" steel samples.
>
> Molten or  melted steel (#9) was attested to by 5 PhDs--engineering
> professors at
> Berkeley and MIT, the president of Notre Dame, a Johns Hopkins researcher,
> and
> a NYT science writer.  It was described by a FDNY Captain, Philip Ruvolo,
> as
> "molten steel . . . like you're in a foundry . . . like lava".  Leslie
> Robertson, one of
> the primary engineers of the WTC told a Stanford audience in the spring of
> 2002
> that he saw "like a little river of steel, flowing".  (1)
>
> #10, the "vaporized" or "evaporated" steel (the New York Times used both
> adjectives)
> was described in Appendix C to the 2002 FEMA/ASCE report about the twin
> towers. (2)
> The Appendix C report ascribed the phenomenon to a sulfidation attack on
> the steel,
> and said further investigation was needed to identify the source of the
> sulfur.  No
> further official investigation was done. Lying internet propagandists
> claim that the
> sulfur came from drywall gypsum, but this is impossible because gypsum,
> calcium
> sulfate, is fully oxidized and thus chemically inert.  That's why drywall
> is used for
> fireproofing.  A Florida engineer, Jonathan Cole, burned steel with gypsum
> dust for
> several days and detected no corrosion at all.
>
> Here's a picture of one of the partially "evaporated" steel girders:
> http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/2001/10/03_grou.html
>
> The New York Times called this "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in
> the
> investigation", but the government has never explained it.
>
> (1)
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF4C6qtU_Fc&feature=c4-overview&list=UUCU5Ac7Vd7cqPk074nnKSTw
> (2) http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: snug.bug at hotmail.com
> To: gerrygras at earthlink.net; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 15:50:29 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Risks to Internet?
>
>
> Since the internet started as a DARPA. project, the intel community had
> all this planned
> out years before we even began to think about it--being able to link
> people through email,
> website visits, and even voluntary social networking.
>
> I have long suspected that Larry Silverstein's famous "pull it" remark
> about his World Trade
> Center 7 skyscraper was a deliberately ambiguous remark intended to infect
> the internet
> with a meme that would allow Isreali intrelligence to track who was
> spreading it and who
> believed it.   Stupid bigots like Dr. Kevin Barrett stepped in the poo Big
> Time, and then tracked
> it all over the carpets of their internet friends.
>
> The "Dancing Israelis" stunt had a similar effect.  Bigots regard the fact
> that Mossad agents
> went to the moon to get themselves arrested after demonstrating
> foreknowledge of the
> 9/11 plot as proof that the Mossad did the plot.  It's ridiculous.  There
> was a "picture van"
> stopped a few blocks from the Security Command HQ on 9/11 that had on it a
> picture of an
> airliner attacking Manhattan.  Do fools like Barrett honestly believe that
> Mossad agents in a
> burst of enthusiasm painted a mural on a van to prove that they (the
> Mossad) did 9/11?
> Obviously the Mossad wanted to get their foreknowledge into the public
> record so as to
> underscore the fact that they warned the US authorities before 9/11, even
> naming names
> of alleged 9/11 ringleaders, pilots, and hijackers.
>
> The 9/11 Truth movement has long been plagued by well-financed "friends"
> like Barrett who
> have accomplished little but to make us look really really stupid.  Most
> of the credible people
> have dropped out of the movement.
>
> It's a shame, because at its heart the truth movement is these undeniable
> facts:
>
> 1.  The 9/11 widows' 300 questions got 27 answers, 73 non-answer reponses,
> and 300
> no-reponses.
>
> 2.  The scientific reports from NIST cut off their analysis at the moment
> the towers began to
> collapse, thus failing to fulfil their number one objective of explaining
> "why and how" the
> towers collapsed.   Truncating their report they are able to dodge TEN
> essential mysteries of
> the collapses:
>
> a, b, c Symmetry, totality, and speed of collapse
> d The arrested rotation of the top of WTC2, contrary to Newton's 1st Law
> e  Explosive (122 fps) ejections of pulverized  building materials from
> isolated windows
> as much as 40 stories below the collapse zone
> f  Multi-ton building components hurled laterally hundreds of yards
> g pulverization of 180,000 tons of concrete floors, energy requirements of
> which should
> have slowed down the collapses
> h  the collapse of the robust lower core structures, 40 stories tall,
> after the outer floors had
> already collapsed, under no more stress than their own weight--though they
> had been
> constructed to hold up the weight of 70 floors above them
> i the presence of molten or melted steel in the rubble pile.  Jet fuel
> does not burn hot enough
> to melt steel, nor rubble pile materials.  Long heating does not explain
> it.  The 2d law of
> thermodynamics provides that a heated material can get no hotter than the
> fires that heat it.
>
> OK, that's only nine.  There were ten.  I'll let you know when I remember
> the tenth.
>
> B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:47:17 -0700
> > From: gerrygras at earthlink.net
> > To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> > Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Risks to Internet?
> >
> >
> > NSA reading encrypted email?
> > NSA monitoring iPhones?
> > Verizon blocking and censoring users?
> >
> > "Internet S.O.S."
> > http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/14
> >
> > Gerry
> > _______________________________________________
> > sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> > sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> > http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________ sosfbay-discuss mailing
> list sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
>

-- 
Retired Greenbuilder
CA General Contractor B #756438 - inactive
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20131003/3f3ce92e/attachment.html>