[GPSCC-chat] FW: Risks to Internet?
Brian Good
snug.bug at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 3 11:50:42 PDT 2013
I'm very sorry for your trouble, Roy. If Berkeley.edu is not safe, what is?
Did you complain to the Berkeley.edu site administrators?
There's a questions/comment form.
http://www.berkeley.edu/misc/mainsite_feedback.shtml
Did you try uninstalling Firefox and reinstalling it?
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:30:20 -0700
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] FW: Risks to Internet?
From: palmheaven at gmail.com
To: snug.bug at hotmail.com
CC: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
Dear community, be aware that the link Brian sent that followed
Here's a picture of one of the partially "evaporated" steel girders:
did something to my wife's MacBook Pro. Virus or spyware or something, wedged Firefox dead. I feel so dirtied. Time to wipe the hard-drive and load a free linux operating system.
I suggest you all don't click on Brian's link...
Roy III
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Brian Good <snug.bug at hotmail.com> wrote:
I remember now the tenth essential mystery of Ground Zero that the government
investigation dodged by declining to analyze the towers' collapses.
I made a somewhat artificial distinction between mystery #9, presence of
molten or melted steel in the rubble pile; and mystery #10, presence of partially
"vaporized" steel samples.
Molten or melted steel (#9) was attested to by 5 PhDs--engineering professors at
Berkeley and MIT, the president of Notre Dame, a Johns Hopkins researcher, and
a NYT science writer. It was described by a FDNY Captain, Philip Ruvolo, as
"molten steel . . . like you're in a foundry . . . like lava". Leslie Robertson, one of
the primary engineers of the WTC told a Stanford audience in the spring of 2002
that he saw "like a little river of steel, flowing". (1)
#10, the "vaporized" or "evaporated" steel (the New York Times used both adjectives)
was described in Appendix C to the 2002 FEMA/ASCE report about the twin towers. (2)
The Appendix C report ascribed the phenomenon to a sulfidation attack on the steel,
and said further investigation was needed to identify the source of the sulfur. No
further official investigation was done. Lying internet propagandists claim that the
sulfur came from drywall gypsum, but this is impossible because gypsum, calcium
sulfate, is fully oxidized and thus chemically inert. That's why drywall is used for
fireproofing. A Florida engineer, Jonathan Cole, burned steel with gypsum dust for
several days and detected no corrosion at all.
Here's a picture of one of the partially "evaporated" steel girders:
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/2001/10/03_grou.html
The New York Times called this "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the
investigation", but the government has never explained it.
(1)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF4C6qtU_Fc&feature=c4-overview&list=UUCU5Ac7Vd7cqPk074nnKSTw
(2) http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm
From: snug.bug at hotmail.com
To: gerrygras at earthlink.net; sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 15:50:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [GPSCC-chat] Risks to Internet?
Since the internet started as a DARPA. project, the intel community had all this planned
out years before we even began to think about it--being able to link people through email,
website visits, and even voluntary social networking.
I have long suspected that Larry Silverstein's famous "pull it" remark about his World Trade
Center 7 skyscraper was a deliberately ambiguous remark intended to infect the internet
with a meme that would allow Isreali intrelligence to track who was spreading it and who
believed it. Stupid bigots like Dr. Kevin Barrett stepped in the poo Big Time, and then tracked
it all over the carpets of their internet friends.
The "Dancing Israelis" stunt had a similar effect. Bigots regard the fact that Mossad agents
went to the moon to get themselves arrested after demonstrating foreknowledge of the
9/11 plot as proof that the Mossad did the plot. It's ridiculous. There was a "picture van"
stopped a few blocks from the Security Command HQ on 9/11 that had on it a picture of an
airliner attacking Manhattan. Do fools like Barrett honestly believe that Mossad agents in a
burst of enthusiasm painted a mural on a van to prove that they (the Mossad) did 9/11?
Obviously the Mossad wanted to get their foreknowledge into the public record so as to
underscore the fact that they warned the US authorities before 9/11, even naming names
of alleged 9/11 ringleaders, pilots, and hijackers.
The 9/11 Truth movement has long been plagued by well-financed "friends" like Barrett who
have accomplished little but to make us look really really stupid. Most of the credible people
have dropped out of the movement.
It's a shame, because at its heart the truth movement is these undeniable facts:
1. The 9/11 widows' 300 questions got 27 answers, 73 non-answer reponses, and 300
no-reponses.
2. The scientific reports from NIST cut off their analysis at the moment the towers began to
collapse, thus failing to fulfil their number one objective of explaining "why and how" the
towers collapsed. Truncating their report they are able to dodge TEN essential mysteries of
the collapses:
a, b, c Symmetry, totality, and speed of collapse
d The arrested rotation of the top of WTC2, contrary to Newton's 1st Law
e Explosive (122 fps) ejections of pulverized building materials from isolated windows
as much as 40 stories below the collapse zone
f Multi-ton building components hurled laterally hundreds of yards
g pulverization of 180,000 tons of concrete floors, energy requirements of which should
have slowed down the collapses
h the collapse of the robust lower core structures, 40 stories tall, after the outer floors had
already collapsed, under no more stress than their own weight--though they had been
constructed to hold up the weight of 70 floors above them
i the presence of molten or melted steel in the rubble pile. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough
to melt steel, nor rubble pile materials. Long heating does not explain it. The 2d law of
thermodynamics provides that a heated material can get no hotter than the fires that heat it.
OK, that's only nine. There were ten. I'll let you know when I remember the tenth.
B
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:47:17 -0700
> From: gerrygras at earthlink.net
> To: sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> Subject: [GPSCC-chat] Risks to Internet?
>
>
> NSA reading encrypted email?
> NSA monitoring iPhones?
> Verizon blocking and censoring users?
>
> "Internet S.O.S."
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/14
>
> Gerry
> _______________________________________________
> sosfbay-discuss mailing list
> sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
> http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list
sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
_______________________________________________
sosfbay-discuss mailing list
sosfbay-discuss at cagreens.org
http://lists.cagreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sosfbay-discuss
--
Retired Greenbuilder
CA General Contractor B #756438 - inactive
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cagreens.org/pipermail/sosfbay-discuss_lists.cagreens.org/attachments/20131003/c72b7c5a/attachment.html>
More information about the sosfbay-discuss
mailing list